Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 299 references

For a spectrally regularized Dean–Kawasaki equation, weak accuracy is superpolynomial when the initial density is bounded away from zero, and only polynomial when the density can vanish.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-05 00:11 UTC pith:PLHXSQKY

load-bearing objection A well-executed analysis of a spectral Dean-Kawasaki regularization: superpolynomial weak error when the density is bounded away from zero, and a lower bound showing that positivity loss genuinely caps the rate. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.00838 v1 pith:PLHXSQKY submitted 2026-08-01 math.PR cs.NAmath.NA

On the role of positivity preservation for high order approximations of the Dean--Kawasaki equation

Ana Damnjanovi\'c , Ana Djurdjevac , Nicolas Perkowski This is my paper
classification math.PR cs.NAmath.NA MSC 60H1560J6060H3565C3060K35
keywords Dean-Kawasaki equationpositivity preservationspectral regularizationweak errorLaplace transformsuperpolynomial convergenceBrownian particlesHamilton-Jacobi-Bellman duality
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a spectrally mollified version of the Dean–Kawasaki equation, the exact SPDE for the empirical density of N independent Brownian particles, and asks how much accuracy is lost when the approximation does not preserve positivity. Its main positive result is that if the initial density has a positive lower bound, the Laplace-transform weak error decays faster than any power of N, uniformly in time, at the optimal mollification scale. Its main negative result is that when the initial density touches zero, this superpolynomial behavior disappears; in a one-dimensional example a lower bound blocks any faster-than-polynomial convergence. The paper thus identifies positivity preservation as the mechanism that decides the achievable convergence order, and it suggests hybrid schemes that use the spectral approximation where density is high and switch to positivity-preserving or particle methods where it is low.

Core claim

The paper's central claim is a dichotomy governed by the minimum of the initial density. Decomposing the regularized solution as u_t = p_t*u_0 + v_t, the negative part u^- is exponentially small when rho_min>0: its L1 moments are at most delta * rho_max^{1/2} exp(-c rho_min^2/(kappa^2 rho_max)). With epsilon=N^{-1/d}(log N)^{3/d} and f(x)=sqrt(x_+), the Laplace-transform weak error becomes O(N^{-1-alpha/d}(log N)^{3 alpha/d}) for every alpha>0 and phi in C^alpha, uniformly in t. When rho_min=0 the exponential factor disappears; optimizing epsilon gives O(N^{-(3alpha+d)/(2alpha+d)}), and in a one-dimensional example with rho_0=2*1_{[1/2,1]} and phi(x)=sin(2pi x) the paper proves a lower bound

What carries the argument

The argument runs on the split u_t = p_t*u_0 + v_t with fluctuation parameters delta=epsilon^{-d/2}N^{-1/2} and kappa=delta*sqrt(1 or d log(1/epsilon)). The inequality u^-_t <= v^-_t * 1_{||v_t||_inf > u_min} turns all positivity loss into a large-deviation estimate for ||v_t||_inf, giving exponential suppression of u^- when rho_min>0. On the deterministic side, duality of the empirical measure with the complex Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation and its explicit Cole-Hopf solution phi_s = N log(p_{t-s} * exp(phi/N)) split the Laplace-transform error into initial, cutoff, and negative-part terms; the spectral gap of the Laplacian makes these uniform in time.

Load-bearing premise

The estimates assume the fluctuation scaling N >= epsilon^{-d}(1 or d log(1/epsilon)), meaning many particles per resolved spatial cell, so noise fluctuations stay small compared with the deterministic density; without this, high-probability positivity of u_t and the exponential suppression of its negative part collapse.

What would settle it

Run the spectral scheme on the one-dimensional example rho_0=2*1_{[1/2,1]} with phi(x)=sin(2pi x), take epsilon=N^{-a} for small a>0, and measure the variance error at t=epsilon^2/log(1/epsilon) for increasing N. If the error decays faster than N^{-3/2}epsilon^{5/2}|log epsilon|^{-3}, for instance superpolynomially, the lower bound (24) is false.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

If this is right

  • With strictly positive initial density and smooth test functions, the spectral scheme reaches a weak error of order N^{-1-alpha/d}(log N)^{3 alpha/d} for every alpha>0, faster than any fixed polynomial order.
  • All moments of <u_t, phi> are controlled by the Laplace-transform error through Cauchy's integral formula, so the superpolynomial rate transfers from generating functions to moments.
  • When rho_min=0, even the best choice of epsilon gives a polynomial bound O(N^{-(3alpha+d)/(2alpha+d)}), and the one-dimensional lower bound shows the polynomial obstruction is genuine, not an artifact of the proof.
  • The error estimates are uniform in time, the first such uniformity for approximating Dean-Kawasaki dynamics, so the rates hold for arbitrarily long simulation horizons.
  • In low densities, positivity-preserving approximations can be more accurate than this spectral regularization, suggesting hybrid schemes combine both.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same lower-bound mechanism, nonlocal convolution feeding mass into regions the heat flow has not yet reached, should apply to any non-positivity-preserving spatial discretization with a high-order nonlocal stencil, so the polynomial barrier likely extends beyond this spectral scheme.
  • For interacting particle systems whose mean-field equation can create low-density regions, the maximum-principle reasoning implies the strictly positive condition is fragile: even if it holds initially, dynamics may destroy it, so accuracy guarantees should be based on the low-density regime or on positivity-preserving methods.
  • The Monte Carlo estimate of the probability of loss of positivity could serve as a practical diagnostic: run a few short trajectories, measure how often min_x rho_L^n(x) < 0, and use that to decide when to trust the superpolynomial regime.
  • A sharper matching of upper and lower bounds in the rho_min=0 case (N^{-3/2}epsilon^{-d/2} versus N^{-3/2}epsilon^{5/2}|log epsilon|^{-3}) would pin down the exact polynomial exponent; the present bounds leave a gap in d and epsilon powers.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper analyzes a spectrally regularized Dean--Kawasaki SPDE, u_t = (1/2)Δu_t + N^{-1/2}∇·(K_ε*(f(u_t^+) dW_t)), with f(x) ≈ √x, as an approximation to the empirical measure of N independent Brownian particles. The main upper-bound result, Theorem 1.3, gives a uniform-in-time Laplace-transform weak error decomposed into an initial approximation error, a Fourier-cutoff error, and a negative-part error. For initial densities bounded away from zero, choosing ε = N^{-1/d}(log N)^{3/d} makes the dynamic part of the error superpolynomially small for smooth test functions. When the initial density may vanish, the upper bound worsens, and in a one-dimensional example with ρ_min = 0, Theorem 2.1 proves a lower bound of order N^{-3/2} ε^{5/2} |log ε|^{-3} for the difference of the dynamic variances, which is claimed to rule out superpolynomial convergence. The paper also contains well-posedness results, detailed Besov and heat-kernel estimates, a Cole--Hopf treatment of the complex Hamilton--Jacobi--Bellman equation, and numerical experiments.

Significance. If the claims hold, this is a significant contribution: it is, to my knowledge, the first quantitative analysis of a non-positivity-preserving spectral approximation of the Dean--Kawasaki equation in the low-density regime, and it identifies positivity preservation as the key mechanism separating superpolynomial from polynomial accuracy. The proof strategy is substantial and mostly self-contained: error decompositions based on Itô calculus, the KLvR19 duality, explicit Cole--Hopf regularity estimates, and the spectral gap of the Laplacian are all used in a coherent way. A particular strength is that the rates are derived from the model equations, not fitted; the constants are explicit and the assumptions are stated. The numerical experiments are illustrative and not load-bearing for the mathematical results. However, two issues -- the precise quantity estimated by the lower bound and a false inequality in the proof of Corollary 1.7 -- need to be corrected before the claims as stated are fully supported.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Theorem 2.1 and Remark 2.2] The lower bound (24) is proved for E[(<u_t,φ>-<p_t*u_0,φ>)^2] - E[(<μ_t,φ>-<p_t*μ_0,φ>)^2], i.e. for the 'dynamic' variance around the random mean p_t*μ_0. But the weak error studied in Theorem 1.3 is |E[e^{<u_t,φ>}]-E[e^{<μ_t,φ>}]|, whose second-moment analogue is the raw difference E[<u_t,φ>^2] - E[<μ_t,φ>^2]. These quantities differ by B_N = E[<μ_0-ρ_0, p_t*φ>^2], which is of order N^{-1} for the test function φ = sin(2πx). Because the displayed lower bound L_N is much smaller than N^{-1} for the assumed scaling ε ≳ N^{-a}, the lower bound on the dynamic part does not by itself imply a lower bound on the raw weak error: cancellation with B_N is not excluded. The statements in Remark 2.2 and the introduction that the example 'rules out superpolynomial convergence' therefore either need a separate argument bounding the raw weak error from below (e.g. by showing B_N does not cancel the d
  2. [Section 1, Eq. (3) and Remark 1.5] The superpolynomial statement is made for the 'dynamic part of the weak error', not for the full Laplace weak error. The full error in Theorem 1.3 contains the initial approximation term N^{-1/2} ε^α ||φ||_{C^α}. For any fixed α this term decays only polynomially in N when ε = N^{-1/d}(log N)^{3/d}. To conclude superpolynomial convergence for the full Laplace error on C^∞ test functions one must let α grow with the desired polynomial degree and control the growth of ||φ||_{C^α}. This is likely true and easily made precise, but it is not stated. The abstract's phrase 'superpolynomial convergence rate for smooth test functions' should be qualified or the argument supplied.
  3. [Corollary 1.7, proof around Eq. (22)] The inequality κ√ρmax m ≤ κ^2ρmax + κ^2m is false in general (e.g. κ=0.1, ρmax=2, m=3 gives 0.424 on the left and 0.05 on the right). The subsequent bound m!/R^{m-2} ≲_m ||φ||_∞^{m-2} can nevertheless be recovered: one has R^2 κ^2ρmax ||φ||_∞^2 = m^2κ^2ρmax/(1+κ√ρmax m)^2 ≤ 1, and the factor (1+κ√ρmax m)^{m-2} can be absorbed into an m-dependent constant because κ ≤ 1 and m is fixed in this corollary. So the result is likely correct, but the proof as written contains an incorrect step that should be replaced.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Notation, Theorem 1.3] The notation ||id - f^2||_∞ should be defined explicitly, e.g. sup_{x ≥ 0} |x - f(x)^2|, since f is only defined on R_+ and 'id' is otherwise ambiguous.
  2. [Section 2, Lemma 2.4] The identity E[v_t(x)^-] = (1/2)E|v_t(x)| follows from E[v_t(x)] = 0, but this is stated very quickly. A one-line reminder would improve readability.
  3. [Section 6] The numerical experiments do not include code, random seeds, or a precise description of the Monte Carlo error bars. This is acceptable since the experiments are not load-bearing, but the captions and text should make that status explicit.
  4. [Figures] Several figure captions contain stray 'L' or 'LLL' text ('L L L LLL'), which appears to be a formatting artifact and should be corrected.
  5. [Section 4, Proposition 4.1] In the bound (45), the p ∈ {2,∞} minimization is clear, but the case p = ∞ is used in the main text without commenting that ρ_max^{1/∞} := 1. This is already noted in the proposition statement, but a short reminder in Theorem 1.3 would help.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: the claimed rates follow from the SPDE/particle dynamics via Itô calculus and analytic estimates, with no fitted parameter renamed as a prediction.

full rationale

The central derivation is self-contained. The upper bound (Theorem 1.3 and Remark 1.5) is obtained by comparing Laplace transforms of u and the empirical measure via the martingale/duality identity from [KLvR19] (an external result), and then bounding three explicit error contributions: initial approximation (Proposition 4.1), Fourier cutoff error, and negative-part error (Corollary 3.5). The negative-part control is derived from moment and tail bounds for the fluctuation v_t, which are proven from the SPDE itself under the explicit Assumption 1; no constant is fitted to data, and the parameter choice ε = N^{-1/d}(log N)^{3/d} is an analytic optimization, not an empirical calibration. The lower bound (Theorem 2.1) is built separately from a martingale identity and heat-kernel estimates; its polynomial rate is not used as an input anywhere in the upper-bound argument. Self-citations such as [DKP24], [DJP26], and [BDP26] appear only as background or comparison benchmarks, not as load-bearing inputs; the key duality result [KLvR19] is not authored by the present authors. The only caveat is expository: the abstract's phrase 'superpolynomial convergence rate' refers to the dynamic part of the weak error, with the initial-condition contribution O(N^{-1/2}ε^α) excluded. This is a precision concern, not circularity, since the paper explicitly labels the dynamic part in the introduction and in Remark 1.5.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on external duality theory, standard Besov and heat-kernel machinery, and the explicit fluctuation-scaling assumption. No parameters are fitted to data and no new physical entities are postulated.

axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Duality for the empirical measure: E[e^{<mu_t,phi>}] = E[e^{<mu_0,phi_0>}] with phi solving the Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman equation; extended to complex phi with ||phi/N||_infinity <= pi/4.
    Taken from KLvR19 and extended in Section 5 (Lemmas 5.1-5.3); used as the backbone of the Laplace-transform weak error analysis.
  • standard math Besov composition estimate (52) from RS96 and Bernstein inequalities from BCD11 on the torus.
    Used throughout for estimates involving frequency-localized functions, e.g., Lemmas B.2, 3.2, and Corollary 3.3.
  • standard math Spectral gap of the Laplacian on the torus and heat kernel bounds (uniform-in-time decay).
    Crucial for the uniform-in-time estimates; used in Lemma 5.3 and Theorem 1.3.
  • domain assumption Assumption 1: fluctuation scaling delta <= kappa <= 1, i.e., N >= epsilon^{-d}(1 or d log(1/epsilon)).
    Standing assumption guaranteeing fluctuations do not dominate the deterministic density; essential for negative-part control and the whole analysis.
  • domain assumption Test functions satisfy kappa^2 ||phi||_infinity <= gamma for gamma in (0, pi/4], and for Theorem 1.8 phi in B^alpha_{2,infty} with grad phi in L^infinity.
    Required for the complex HJB duality and for the exponential moment bounds to be finite; stated before Theorem 1.3.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33166 in / 17910 out tokens · 169676 ms · 2026-08-05T00:11:41.077052+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the role of positivity preservation for high order approximations of the Dean--Kawasaki equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PLHXSQKY

@misc{pith2026260800838,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the role of positivity preservation for high order approximations of the Dean--Kawasaki equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PLHXSQKY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.00838}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

We study a spectral regularization of the Dean--Kawasaki equation and quantify how the failure of positivity preservation affects its weak approximation of the empirical measure of independent Brownian particles. For initial densities bounded away from zero, we prove a uniform-in-time weak error measured through the Laplace transform and prove a superpolynomial convergence rate for smooth test functions. When the initial density is allowed to vanish, the negative part of the regularized solution leads to weaker upper bounds, and a one-dimensional example gives a lower error bound ruling out superpolynomial convergence. We also present numerical experiments that confirm the theoretical results and illustrate main observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.00838 by Ana Damnjanovi\'c, Ana Djurdjevac, Nicolas Perkowski.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sample trajectories at time T = 1 for particle numbers N = 3,000, 10,000, and 30,000 from left to right. The upper row uses spectral cutoff L = 30 and nonlinear grid size M = 128, while the lower row uses L = 70 and M = 512. Each panel shows the initial histogram, the deterministic finite-volume mean field, and single realizations of the finite-volume linearized-Gaussian, finite-volume Dean–Kawasaki, spect… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Dependence of the estimated probability of detected loss of positivity on the minimum and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Third-moment weak errors for N = 25,000, spectral cutoff L = 70, auxiliary spectral grid size M = 256, timestep ∆t = 10−3 , terminal time T = 1, and 106 Monte Carlo realizations for each stochastic solver. The left column uses the exact finite-particle mean as a common center, while the middle column uses the deterministic mean computed by evolving the heat equation with the respective numerical solver. Th… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Common-centered spectral weak-error convergence for the periodic band-limited Gaussian test [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Per-solver-centered second-moment spectral weak errors for the exact-Hölder test functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_5.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

299 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Djurdjevac, Ana and Almgren, Ann and Bell, John , TITLE =. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/camcos.2025.20.147 , URL =

    work page doi:10.2140/camcos.2025.20.147 2025

  2. [2]

    and Winkelmann, Stefanie , TITLE =

    Wehlitz, Nathalie and Sadeghi, Mohsen and Montefusco, Alberto and Sch\"utte, Christof and Pavliotis, Grigorios A. and Winkelmann, Stefanie , TITLE =. SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1137/24M1676661 , URL =

    doi:10.1137/24m1676661 2025

  3. [3]

    Donev, Aleksandar and Vanden-Eijnden, Eric and Garcia, Alejandro and Bell, John , TITLE =. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 2010 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/camcos.2010.5.149 , URL =

    doi:10.2140/camcos.2010.5.149 2010

  4. [4]

    Ji, Xiaohao and Sun, Yue and Wu, Zhengyan , journal=. Dean-

  5. [5]

    Wu, Zhengyan and Zhang, Rangrang , journal=. McKean-

  6. [6]

    Djurdjevac, Ana and Ji, Xiaohao and Perkowski, Nicolas , TITLE =. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) , FJOURNAL =. 2026 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.matpur.2026.103937 , URL =

    arXiv 2026

  7. [7]

    Illien, Pierre , TITLE =. Rep. Progr. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1088/1361-6633/adee2e , URL =

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6633/adee2e 2025

  8. [8]

    Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=

    Stochastic model of slow dynamics in supercooled liquids and dense colloidal suspensions , author=. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications , volume=. 1994 , publisher=

    1994

  9. [9]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.06863 , year=

    Surface Dean--Kawasaki equations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.06863 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  10. [10]

    Ehrnstr\"om, Mats and Pei, Long , TITLE =. J. Evol. Equ. , FJOURNAL =. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00028-018-0435-5 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00028-018-0435-5 2018

  11. [11]

    1996 , PAGES =

    Runst, Thomas and Sickel, Winfried , TITLE =. 1996 , PAGES =. doi:10.1515/9783110812411 , URL =

    doi:10.1515/9783110812411 1996

  12. [12]

    Bernoulli , FJOURNAL =

    Djurdjevac, Ana and Rosati, Tommaso , TITLE =. Bernoulli , FJOURNAL =. 2025 , NUMBER =. doi:10.3150/24-bej1739 , URL =

    work page doi:10.3150/24-bej1739 2025

  13. [13]

    Lower bounds on the top

    Hairer, Martin and Punshon-Smith, Sam and Rosati, Tommaso and Yi, Jaeyun , journal=. Lower bounds on the top

  14. [14]

    Hairer, Martin and Rosati, Tommaso , TITLE =. Ann. PDE , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s40818-023-00165-6 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/s40818-023-00165-6 2024

  15. [15]

    Gess, Benjamin and Heydecker, Daniel and Wu, Zhengyan , journal=. Landau-

  16. [16]

    From interacting agents to density-based modeling with stochastic

    Helfmann, Luzie and Djurdjevac Conrad, Nata. From interacting agents to density-based modeling with stochastic. Commun. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.2140/camcos.2021.16.1 , URL =

    doi:10.2140/camcos.2021.16.1 2021

  17. [17]

    Fehrman, Benjamin and Gess, Benjamin , TITLE =. Invent. Math. , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00222-023-01207-3 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/s00222-023-01207-3 2023

  18. [18]

    Fehrman, Benjamin and Gess, Benjamin , TITLE =. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00205-024-01963-3 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/s00205-024-01963-3 2024

  19. [19]

    Density fluctuations in weakly interacting particle systems via the

    Cornalba, Federico and Fischer, Julian and Ingmanns, Jonas and Raithel, Claudia , journal=. Density fluctuations in weakly interacting particle systems via the. 2026 , publisher=

    2026

  20. [20]

    Djurdjevac, Ana and Kremp, Helena and Perkowski, Nicolas , TITLE =. Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s40072-024-00324-1 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/s40072-024-00324-1 2024

  21. [21]

    Fornasier, Massimo and Huang, Hui and Pareschi, Lorenzo and S\"unnen, Philippe , TITLE =. J. Mach. Learn. Res. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , PAGES =

    2021

  22. [22]

    Crauel, Hans and Flandoli, Franco , TITLE =. J. Dynam. Differential Equations , FJOURNAL =. 1998 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1023/A:1022665916629 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1023/a:1022665916629 1998

  23. [23]

    Dunlap, Alexander and Graham, Cole and Ryzhik, Lenya , TITLE =. Comm. Math. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04025-x , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00220-021-04025-x 2021

  24. [24]

    Sinai, Ya. G. , TITLE =. J. Statist. Phys. , FJOURNAL =. 1991 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/BF01057866 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01057866 1991

  25. [25]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00975 , year=

    Large Deviations of the ^4_3 Measure via Stochastic Quantisation , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.00975 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Construction of the 1d Self-repelling

    Giles, Harry and Gr. Construction of the 1d Self-repelling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.05286 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  27. [27]

    Fractional stochastic

    Jin, Ruhong and Perkowski, Nicolas , journal=. Fractional stochastic

  28. [28]

    Stochastic Process

    Luo, Dejun and Zhu, Rongchan , TITLE =. Stochastic Process. Appl. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , PAGES =. doi:10.1016/j.spa.2021.06.013 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.spa.2021.06.013 2021

  29. [29]

    Discrete Contin

    Grotto, Francesco and Pappalettera, Umberto , TITLE =. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. Ser. B , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2021154 , URL =

    work page doi:10.3934/dcdsb.2021154 2022

  30. [30]

    and Turra, M

    Gubinelli, M. and Turra, M. , TITLE =. Stoch. Dyn. , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1142/S0219493720400055 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219493720400055 2020

  31. [31]

    Critical and supercritical singular

    Gr\"afner, Lukas , year=. Critical and supercritical singular

  32. [32]

    Cherny i, A. S. , TITLE =. Teor. Veroyatnost. i Primenen. , FJOURNAL =. 2001 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1137/S0040585X97979093 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1137/s0040585x97979093 2001

  33. [34]

    Energy solutions of singular

    Gr. Energy solutions of singular. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.07680 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [35]

    Shigekawa, Ichir o , TITLE =. J. Math. Kyoto Univ. , FJOURNAL =. 1992 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/kjm/1250519405 , URL =

    arXiv 1992

  35. [36]

    , TITLE =

    Dafermos, Constantine M. , TITLE =. 2010 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04048-1 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/978-3-642-04048-1 2010

  36. [37]

    2004 , PAGES =

    Cannarsa, Piermarco and Sinestrari, Carlo , TITLE =. 2004 , PAGES =

    2004

  37. [38]

    , TITLE =

    Evans, Lawrence C. , TITLE =. 2010 , PAGES =. doi:10.1090/gsm/019 , URL =

    doi:10.1090/gsm/019 2010

  38. [39]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18112 , year=

    Parabolic stochastic quantisation of the fractional ^4_3 model in the full subcritical regime , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.18112 , year=

    arXiv

  39. [40]

    and Hairer, Martin , TITLE =

    Friz, Peter K. and Hairer, Martin , TITLE =. [2020] 2020 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41556-3 , URL =

    doi:10.1007/978-3-030-41556-3 2020

  40. [41]

    and Zheng, Wei An , TITLE =

    Lyons, Terence J. and Zheng, Wei An , TITLE =. Ast\'erisque , FJOURNAL =. 1988 , PAGES =

    1988

  41. [42]

    2013 , ISBN =

    Stratila, Serban , TITLE =. 2013 , ISBN =

    2013

  42. [43]

    2020 , note=

    Einf\"uhrung in die Komplexe Analysis , author=. 2020 , note=

    2020

  43. [44]

    2012 , note=

    Funktionentheorie , author=. 2012 , note=

    2012

  44. [45]

    2023 , note=

    Funktionentheorie , author=. 2023 , note=

    2023

  45. [46]

    , TITLE =

    Taylor, Michael E. , TITLE =. 2019 , PAGES =. doi:10.1090/gsm/202 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1090/gsm/202 2019

  46. [47]

    and Shakarchi, Rami , TITLE =

    Stein, Elias M. and Shakarchi, Rami , TITLE =. 2003 , PAGES =

    2003

  47. [48]

    1993 , PAGES =

    Freitag, Eberhard and Busam, Rolf , TITLE =. 1993 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-07350-6 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-662-07350-6 1993

  48. [49]

    2009 , PAGES =

    Freitag, Eberhard and Busam, Rolf , TITLE =. 2009 , PAGES =. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-93983-2 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-540-93983-2 2009

  49. [50]

    Konarovskyi, Vitalii and M\"uller, Fenna , TITLE =. J. Evol. Equ. , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s00028-024-01018-w , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00028-024-01018-w 2024

  50. [51]

    1990 , PAGES =

    Kunita, Hiroshi , TITLE =. 1990 , PAGES =

    1990

  51. [52]

    Mytnik, Leonid and Perkins, Edwin and Sturm, Anja , TITLE =. Ann. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2006 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/009117906000000331 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/009117906000000331 2006

  52. [53]

    Galeati, Lucio and Gubinelli, Massimiliano , TITLE =. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4171/rmi/1280 , URL =

    work page doi:10.4171/rmi/1280 2022

  53. [54]

    and Zhang, Huilin , TITLE =

    Friz, Peter K. and Zhang, Huilin , TITLE =. J. Differential Equations , FJOURNAL =. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1016/j.jde.2018.01.031 , URL =

    doi:10.1016/j.jde.2018.01.031 2018

  54. [55]

    Periodic homogenization for singular

    Kremp, Helena and Perkowski, Nicolas , journal=. Periodic homogenization for singular

  55. [56]

    Hao, Zimo and Zhang, Xicheng , journal=. S

  56. [57]

    Cannizzaro, Giuseppe and Haunschmid-Sibitz, Levi and Toninelli, Fabio , TITLE =. Ann. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2022 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/22-aop1589 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/22-aop1589 2022

  57. [58]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14244 , year=

    The Gaussian free-field as a stream function: asymptotics of effective diffusivity in infra-red cut-off , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14244 , year=

    arXiv

  58. [59]

    Rough weak solutions for singular

    Kremp, Helena and Perkowski, Nicolas , journal=. Rough weak solutions for singular

  59. [60]

    Mathematische Annalen , pages=

    Surface quasi-geostrophic equation perturbed by derivatives of space-time white noise , author=. Mathematische Annalen , pages=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  60. [61]

    Gu, Yu and Komorowski, Tomasz , TITLE =. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar\'e. 2024 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/23-aihp1392 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/23-aihp1392 2024

  61. [62]

    Weak well-posedness of energy solutions to singular

    Gr. Weak well-posedness of energy solutions to singular. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.09046 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  62. [63]

    Harang, Fabian Andsem and Perkowski, Nicolas , TITLE =. Stoch. Dyn. , FJOURNAL =. 2021 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1142/S0219493721400104 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1142/s0219493721400104 2021

  63. [64]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08274 , year=

    Level crossings of fractional Brownian motion , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.08274 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  64. [65]

    Forum Math

    Matsuda, Toyomu and Perkowski, Nicolas , TITLE =. Forum Math. Sigma , FJOURNAL =. 2024 , PAGES =. doi:10.1017/fms.2024.32 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1017/fms.2024.32 2024

  65. [66]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10340 , year=

    Rough stochastic differential equations , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.10340 , year=

    arXiv

  66. [67]

    Hairer, Martin and Li, Xue-Mei , TITLE =. Ann. Probab. , FJOURNAL =. 2020 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1214/19-AOP1408 , URL =

    work page doi:10.1214/19-aop1408 2020

  67. [68]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01343 , year=

    Taming singular stochastic differential equations: A numerical method , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01343 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  68. [69]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06583 , year=

    Lecture notes on rough paths and applications to machine learning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.06583 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [70]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14674 , year=

    Signature methods in machine learning , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14674 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [71]

    IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine , year=

    New directions in the applications of rough path theory , author=. IEEE BITS the Information Theory Magazine , year=

  71. [72]

    Hambly, Ben and Lyons, Terry , TITLE =. Ann. of Math. (2) , FJOURNAL =. 2010 , NUMBER =. doi:10.4007/annals.2010.171.109 , URL =

    doi:10.4007/annals.2010.171.109 2010

  72. [73]

    International

    Liverani, Carlangelo , TITLE =. International. 1996 , ISBN =

    1996

  73. [74]

    Superdiffusive central limit theorem for a

    Armstrong, Scott and Bou-Rabee, Ahmed and Kuusi, Tuomo , journal=. Superdiffusive central limit theorem for a

  74. [75]

    ACM Computing Surveys , volume=

    Diffusion models: A comprehensive survey of methods and applications , author=. ACM Computing Surveys , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  75. [76]

    Diaconis, Persi , TITLE =. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) , FJOURNAL =. 2009 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-08-01238-X , URL =

    doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-08-01238-x 2009

  76. [77]

    and Peres, Yuval , TITLE =

    Levin, David A. and Peres, Yuval , TITLE =. 2017 , PAGES =. doi:10.1090/mbk/107 , URL =

    doi:10.1090/mbk/107 2017

  77. [78]

    Norris, J. R. , TITLE =. 1998 , PAGES =

    1998

  78. [79]

    Duke Math

    Cannizzaro, Giuseppe and Erhard, Dirk and Toninelli, Fabio , TITLE =. Duke Math. J. , FJOURNAL =. 2023 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1215/00127094-2022-0094 , URL =

    doi:10.1215/00127094-2022-0094 2023

  79. [80]

    Weak coupling limit of a

    Yang, Huanyu and Yang, Zhilin , journal=. Weak coupling limit of a

  80. [81]

    Non-uniqueness for the transport equation with

    Modena, Stefano and Sz\'. Non-uniqueness for the transport equation with. Ann. PDE , FJOURNAL =. 2018 , NUMBER =. doi:10.1007/s40818-018-0056-x , URL =

    work page doi:10.1007/s40818-018-0056-x 2018

Showing first 80 references.