Pith. sign in

REVIEW 6 minor 2 cited by

On the uniqueness of the Kerr-(A)dS metric as a type II(D) solution in six dimensions

T0 review · 0 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Under four stated assumptions, the most general six-dimensional vacuum spacetime with cosmological constant and a repeated null direction is locally the doubly-spinning Kerr-NUT-(A)dS metric with NUT parameters switched off; each solution…

desk verdict A solid and honest classification of six-dimensional Λ-vacuum type II(D) spacetimes that is narrower than the title suggests because of the asymptotic fall-off assumption, but that assumption is disclosed and the math appears sound. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.10532 v2 pith:PNPICQ6G submitted 2025-05-15 gr-qc hep-th

David Kokoška , Marcello Ortaggio This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qchep-th
keywords WeyltypeIIDspacetimesKerr-(A)dSmetricKerr-SchildmetricsopticalmatrixKerr-NUT-(A)dsix-dimensionalvacuumcosmologicalconstant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Under four assumptions—Weyl type II or more special, a non-degenerate “generic” optical matrix, and a fall-off condition on the Weyl tensor—the paper integrates the full field equations for six-dimensional vacuum spacetimes with a cosmological constant. It obtains one explicit metric form, (129), built from two polynomials $P(s)$ and $Q(r)$ and carrying one discrete and three continuous parameters. Every member of the family is of the more special Weyl type D and admits a Kerr–Schild form, and the family is locally isometric to the doubly-spinning Kerr-NUT-(A)dS metrics with NUT parameters set to zero. The factorized subclass is exactly the Kerr-(A)dS metric and its analytic-continuation and infinite-rotation limits, unified by a discrete parameter. A reader should care because this is a uniqueness theorem: inside the stated class there is no exotic type II vacuum beyond the known rotating black hole family, and the boundary of the theorem is explicitly the asymptotic fall-off assumption.

What carries the argument

The central object is the optical matrix $L_{ij}=\ell_{a;b}m_{(i)}^a m_{(j)}^b$, which encodes the expansion, shear, and twist of the null congruence $\ell$; its inverse has the form $L^{-1}=r\,\mathbb{1}-b$, with $b$ a constant antisymmetric matrix under the assumptions. The asymptotic fall-off (12) turns the optical constraint into the block-diagonal form (64), so in six dimensions the whole problem is carried by the two invariants $b_{23}$ and $b_{45}$ and the genericity condition $b_{45}^2\neq b_{23}^2$. The paper integrates the higher-dimensional Newman–Penrose (frame-projected Bianchi and Ricci) equations order by order: appendix B fixes the exact $r$-dependence of the Weyl scalars $\Phi_{ij}$ and of $U$, and section 4 integrates the transverse equations into the polynomials $P(s)$ and $Q(r)$. The mechanism that closes the integration is the pairing of the optical constraint (14) with the fall-off (12), which kills all integration functions except the ones appearing in $P$ and $Q$ and the mass-like constant $\mu$.

What would settle it

Compute the large-$r$ decay of $C_{ijkm}$ for the NUT-charged doubly-spinning Kerr-NUT-(A)dS metrics with nonzero NUT parameters and a non-degenerate generic optical matrix. If those metrics violate (12) while remaining $\Lambda$-vacuum and of type II, the fall-off condition—not the algebraic type—is the actual boundary of the uniqueness theorem; if they satisfy (12) but are absent from (129), the classification would be wrong.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, in six dimensions, the only $Λ$-vacuum spacetimes with a non-degenerate generic optical matrix and Weyl type II or more special satisfying the asymptotic fall-off (12) are the metrics (129) with (114) and (130). The integration fixes all free functions: the antisymmetric part of the optical matrix is block-diagonal with invariants $b_{23}, b_{45}$, the assumption $b_{45}^2 \neq b_{23}^2$ selects the generic case, and the remaining constants enter through $P(s)=\lambda s^6+2\hat U_0 s^4-c_0s^2-d_0$ and $Q(r)=\lambda r^6-2\hat U_0 r^4-c_0 r^2+\mu r+d_0$. These metrics are all of Weyl type D, they are manifestly Kerr–Schild with the null vector $\ell$ as the Kerr–Schild vector, and they are locally isometric to the zero-NUT doubly-spinning Kerr-NUT-(A)dS family. When $P(s)$ factorizes into three real roots, after normalization the metric becomes the generalized doubly-spinning Kerr-(A)dS metric (143), with $\epsilon=+1$ recovering the Kerr-(A)dS black holes, $\epsilon=-1$ their analytic continuation, and $\epsilon=0$ the infinite-rotation limit.

Load-bearing premise

The result stands on assuming the spatial Weyl components fall off faster than $1/r^2$ along the null congruence (eq. (12)); relax that and NUT-charged Kerr-NUT-(A)dS metrics and static black holes with generic Einstein horizons enter the class, so the “most general” label no longer holds.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Genuine Weyl type II is forbidden: every solution satisfying the assumptions is of the more special type D.
  • All solutions are Kerr–Schild; therefore the six-dimensional Kerr–Schild Einstein spacetimes with non-degenerate Kerr–Schild vector and generic optical matrix are now classified, extending the Ricci-flat classification to nonzero cosmological constant.
  • The whole family is locally the zero-NUT doubly-spinning Kerr-NUT-(A)dS family, so no new vacuum metric beyond that known family appears in this class.
  • With factorized $P(s)$, the three branches $\epsilon=+1,-1,0$ unify Kerr-(A)dS, its analytic continuation, and its infinite-rotation limit in a single line element.
  • The aligned Maxwell potential (131) solves the sourcefree equations both in the full spacetime and in the $\mu=0$ background, giving a Kerr–Schild double-copy instance for the whole family.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Relaxing the fall-off condition (12) appears to be exactly what admits NUT charge and generic Einstein horizons; if so, the uniqueness result can be read as “no NUT, no exotic horizon” rather than as a statement about Weyl type alone.
  • The unified even-dimensional metric form in appendix C suggests the same strategy may classify higher even dimensions, with the six-dimensional integration serving as the template for a conjectural all-dimensions uniqueness theorem.
  • Because the Maxwell potential is constructed from the same Kerr–Schild covector, one testable extension is whether every type D Kerr–Schild vacuum in this family admits an aligned electromagnetic field satisfying the sourcefree equations, i.e., whether the double copy holds on the whole classification boundary rather than solution by solution.
  • The non-factorized branch of $P(s)$, which the paper notes remains Einstein but changes the root structure of the metric functions, may describe deformed horizon topologies; studying the roots of $P(s)$ in Lorentzian-signature regions is a direct test of which parameter ranges are physical.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper studies six-dimensional Λ-vacuum spacetimes that admit a non-degenerate Weyl aligned null direction with a 'generic' optical matrix and are of Weyl type II or more special. Under an additional asymptotic fall-off assumption, C_ijkm = o(r^-2) (eq. (12)), the authors integrate the higher-dimensional Newman-Penrose equations and obtain the local metric (129) with metric functions (114) and (130). They show that every such metric is of Weyl type D and admits a Kerr-Schild form, and that the family is locally isometric to the doubly-spinning Kerr-NUT-(A)dS metrics of Chen-Lü-Pope with NUT parameters switched off; when the polynomial P(s) factorizes, the metric reduces to the extended Kerr-(A)dS family (143) with epsilon = +/-1, 0. Appendix C provides a unified even-dimensional form of these metrics in several coordinate systems.

Significance. The paper is a substantial advance over the five-dimensional classification of type II vacua and over the earlier Lambda = 0 six-dimensional result [46]. Its main strength is explicitness: the assumptions are stated up front, the excluded non-generic subcases are declared, and the principal computational steps are displayed rather than delegated. The local-isometry statement and the unified coordinate presentation in appendix C are valuable side results. The fall-off assumption (12) is not a harmless technicality: it is used in appendix B to eliminate exactly the integration constants that would carry NUT charges and generic Einstein-horizon deformations, and footnote 5 states this limitation. Thus the classification is best read as a classification of the asymptotically well-behaved generic twisting sector; within that stated scope the argument appears coherent.

minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 4.1.1, after Eq. (129)] The sentence 'The Einstein spacetimes (129) are of constant curvature iff mu = 0, which also implies that the metric is manifestly KS' is confusing and should be rewritten. Equation (129) is manifestly Kerr-Schild for all values of mu, since the Q(r) term is the Kerr-Schild term; the constant-curvature statement and the Kerr-Schild statement should be separated.
  2. [Sec. 1.2 and Sec. 4.1.1] The abstract and item (a) count 'one discrete (normalized) and three continuous parameters', but the discrete parameter epsilon is not defined until Section 4.2 and the general metric (129) is written with U_0hat unnormalized. Please state in Section 4.1.1 that the scaling freedom (67)-(69) can be used to normalize 2U_0hat to epsilon in {-1, 0, 1}.
  3. [Sec. 3.2, Eqs. (107)-(109)] The construction of the four commuting vector fields (107)-(108) is essential for defining the coordinates (109), but the text refers to [46] and to the unpublished thesis [78] for details. Since the formulas are explicit, a short verification of the commutativity would make the paper more self-contained; at minimum, the reference to [78] should be updated or supplemented.
  4. [Table 1, Sec. 4.2] The layout of Table 1 is hard to parse: the entries for lambda < 0 are not clearly aligned with the rows, and it is not obvious which sign restrictions apply to the epsilon = +1 row for lambda < 0. Please reformat the table so that each row explicitly gives the conditions for both lambda > 0 and lambda < 0.
  5. [Sec. 4.2, item 1] There is a typographical double period after 'coordinates y1 and y2. .' in item 1; please correct it.
  6. [Title and Sec. 1.2] The title 'On the uniqueness of the Kerr-(A)dS metric as a type II(D) solution in six dimensions' is stronger than what is proved, because the fall-off condition (12) excludes NUT-charged Kerr-NUT-(A)dS metrics and static black holes with generic Einstein horizons, as the authors acknowledge in footnote 5. The abstract qualifies the statement correctly, but a title or opening sentence that mentions the asymptotic fall-off assumption would prevent misreading.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the metric family is obtained by direct integration of the field equations, not by fitting or renaming known solutions, and the conditional fall-off assumption is explicitly disclosed.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. Section 2 fixes the r-dependence from the Sachs equation and from the Bianchi and Ricci identities; the optical constraint (14) follows from the stated fall-off assumption (12) via the independent result [51], and is not equivalent to the final metric. The advertised family (129) with (114) and (130) is obtained by integrating the remaining Newman-Penrose and Ricci equations: the constants mu, U_0, c_0 and d_0 appear as integration constants, not as parameters fitted to reproduce Kerr-(A)dS. The match with the doubly-spinning Kerr-NUT-(A)dS family is a post-hoc coordinate identification via (C18)-(C19), not an input. The only load-bearing assumption with real exclusionary power is the asymptotic fall-off C_ijkm = o(r^{-2}), eq. (12); in appendix B it forces the integration functions in (B14) and (B24) to vanish, ruling out NUT-charged and generic-horizon solutions. The paper explicitly discloses this limitation in footnote 5 and in section 1.2, so the uniqueness claim is conditional rather than circular. Citations to the authors' earlier Lambda=0 classification [46] and to [51] are independent published results whose stated assumptions do not include the present target metric, and no fitted input is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The derivation is self-contained given the standard higher-dimensional NP formalism and the explicitly stated domain assumptions. No free parameters are fitted: the constants μ, Û0, c0, d0 are integration constants that label the solutions. No new entities are introduced; the paper postulates no new fields or forces.

assumptions (5)
  • standard math The higher-dimensional Newman-Penrose formalism, including Bianchi identities (A8)-(A14), Ricci identities (A19)-(A24), and commutators (A15)-(A18), is valid for Λ-vacuum spacetimes.
    The entire derivation is carried out in this formalism, established in refs. [20,28,72-74] and summarized in appendix A.
  • standard math Given an mWAND, there exists a geodesic mWAND (theorem of [38]), and the null frame can be chosen parallelly transported with L_{i1}=0 and the optical matrix in the form (10).
    Used in section 2.1 to set up the frame and the Sachs equation solution.
  • domain assumption The spacetime is a Λ-vacuum (Einstein) solution of dimension six, i.e., R_ab = (n-1)λg_ab with n=6.
    Defines the physical class studied.
  • domain assumption Weyl type II or more special, with non-degenerate optical matrix (det L ≠ 0), genericity b²45≠b²23 and nonconstant b23, b45, and the fall-off C_ijkm = o(r^-2).
    Assumptions 1-4 of section 1.2; they define the class and are explicitly stated. The fall-off also implies the optical constraint and b_(ij)=0 via eqs. (12)-(15).
  • domain assumption Φ0 ≠ 0, i.e., the spacetime is not of constant curvature; Φ0 is normalized to a constant by an r-independent boost.
    Section 2.3, eq. (26); excludes the trivial constant-curvature case and fixes the r-parametrization.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On the uniqueness of the Kerr-(A)dS metric as a type II(D) solution in six dimensions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PNPICQ6G

@misc{pith2026250510532,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On the uniqueness of the Kerr-(A)dS metric as a type II(D) solution in six dimensions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PNPICQ6G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.10532}
}
abstract

We study the class of six-dimensional $\Lambda$-vacuum spacetimes which admit a non-degenerate multiple Weyl aligned null direction l (thus being of Weyl type~II or more special) with a ``generic'' optical matrix. Subject to an additional assumption on the asymptotic fall-off of the Weyl tensor, we obtain the most general metric of this class, which is specified by one discrete (normalized) and three continuous parameters. All solutions turn out to be Kerr--Schild spacetimes of type~D and, in passing, we comment on their Kerr--Schild double copy. We further show that the obtained family is locally isometric to the general doubly-spinning Kerr-NUT-(A)dS metric with the NUTs parameters switched off. In particular, the Kerr-(A)dS subclass and its extensions (i.e., analytic continuation and ``infinite-rotation'' limit) are recovered when certain polynomial metric functions are assumed to be fully factorized. As a side result, a unified metric form which encompasses all three branches of the extended Kerr-(A)dS family in all even dimensions is presented in an appendix.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Mass/electric versus NUT/magnetic charges: duality from scattering amplitudes in $D\geq4$ and for all bosonic spins

    hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Kerr-NUT mass/electric and equal-NUT/magnetic charges are dual in D≥4, realized as J_σ ↔ J_−σ in 3-point amplitudes generated by a spin-raising operator for all bosonic spins.

  2. Classification of $\Lambda \neq 0$-vacuum algebraically special spacetimes with conformally flat $\mathscr I$ from Weyl tensor expansion

    gr-qc 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In four-dimensional Lambda-vacuum spacetimes, algebraic specialness plus local conformal flatness of null infinity forces the asymptotic Weyl data into the Kerr-de Sitter-like class.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 77 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [46]

    Ortaggio

    M. Ortaggio. On the uniqueness of the Myers-Perry spacetime as a type II(D) solution in six dimensions. JHEP, 06:042, 2017

    work page 2017

  2. [70]

    W. Chen, H. L¨ u, and C. N. Pope. General Kerr-NUT-AdS metrics in all dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav. , 23:5323–5340, 2006

    work page 2006

  3. [1]

    Stephani, D

    H. Stephani, D. Kramer, M. MacCallum, C. Hoenselaers, and E. Herlt. Exact Solutions of Einstein’s Field Equations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 2003

    2003

  4. [2]

    J. B. Griffiths and J. Podolsk´ y. Exact Space-Times in Einstein’s General Relativity . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2009

    2009

  5. [3]

    B. Carter. A new family of Einstein spaces. Phys. Lett. A, 26:399–400, 1968

    1968

  6. [4]

    B. Carter. Hamilton-Jacobi and Schrodinger separable solutions of Einstein’s equations. Commun. Math. Phys. , 10:280–310, 1968

    1968

  7. [5]

    Kinnersley

    W. Kinnersley. Type D vacuum metrics. J. Math. Phys. , 10:1195–1203, 1969

    1969

  8. [6]

    R. Debever. On type D expanding solutions of Einstein-Maxwell equations. Bull. Soc. Math. Belg. , 23:360–376, 1971

    1971

Show all 92 references
  1. [7]

    B. Carter. Black hole equilibrium states. In C. De Witt and B. S. De Witt, editors, Black holes , pages 57–214. Gordon and Breach, New York, 1973

    1973

  2. [8]

    J. F. Pleba´ nski. A class of solutions of Einstein-Maxwell equations. Ann. Physics, 90:196–255, 1975

    1975

  3. [9]

    J. F. Pleba´ nski and M. Demia´ nski. Rotating, charged, and uniformly accelerating mass in general relativity.Ann. Physics, 98:98–127, 1976

    1976

  4. [10]

    Garc´ ıa D´ ıaz

    A. Garc´ ıa D´ ıaz. Electrovac type D solutions with cosmological constant.J. Math. Phys. , 25:1951–1954, 1984

    1951

  5. [11]

    Debever, N

    R. Debever, N. Kamran, and R. G. McLenaghan. Exhaustive integration and a single expression for the general solution of the type D vacuum and electrovac field equations with cosmological constant for a nonsingular aligned Maxwell field. J. Math. Phys. , 25:1955–1972, 1984

    1955

  6. [12]

    R. P. Kerr and A. Schild. A new class of vacuum solutions of the Einstein field equations. In G. Barb` era, editor,Atti del Convegno sulla Relativit` a Generale: Problemi dell’Energia e Onde Gravitazionali , pages 1–12, Firenze, 1965

    1965

  7. [13]

    R. P. Kerr and A. Schild. Some algebraically degenerate solutions of Einstein’s gravitational field equations. Proc. Symp. Appl. Math. , 17:199–209, 1965

    1965

  8. [14]

    G. C. Debney, R. P. Kerr, and A. Schild. Solutions of the Einstein and Einstein-Maxwell equations. J. Math. Phys., 10:1842–1854, 1969

    1969

  9. [15]

    F. R. Tangherlini. Schwarzschild field in n dimensions and the dimensionality of space problem. Il Nuovo Cimento , 27:636–651, 1963

    1963

  10. [16]

    R. C. Myers and M. J. Perry. Black holes in higher dimensional space-times. Ann. Phys. (N.Y.), 172:304–347, 1986

    1986

  11. [17]

    Chakrabarti

    A. Chakrabarti. Kerr metric in eight dimensions. Phys. Lett. B, 172:175–179, 1986

    1986

  12. [18]

    S. W. Hawking, C. J. Hunter, and M. M. Taylor-Robinson. Rotation and the AdS/CFT correspondence. Phys. Rev. D, 59:064005, 1999

    1999

  13. [19]

    G. W. Gibbons, H. L¨ u, D. N. Page, and C. N. Pope. Rotating black holes in higher dimensions with a cosmological constant. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93:171102, 2004

    2004

  14. [20]

    Pravda, A

    V. Pravda, A. Pravdov´ a, A. Coley, and R. Milson. Bianchi identities in higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav., 21:2873–2897, 2004. See also V. Pravda, A. Pravdov´ a, A. Coley and R. Milson Class. Quantum Grav. 24 (2007) 1691 (corrigendum). 15In the present appendix, we have...

    2007

  15. [21]

    Coley and N

    A. Coley and N. Pelavas. Algebraic classification of higher dimensional spacetimes. Gen. Rel. Grav. , 38:445–461, 2006

    2006

  16. [22]

    Hamamoto, T

    N. Hamamoto, T. Houri, T. Oota, and Y. Yasui. Kerr-NUT-de Sitter curvature in all dimensions. J. Phys. A , 40:F177–F184, 2007

    2007

  17. [23]

    Pravda, A

    V. Pravda, A. Pravdov´ a, and M. Ortaggio. Type D Einstein spacetimes in higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav., 24:4407–4428, 2007

    2007

  18. [24]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. Higher dimensional Kerr-Schild spacetimes. Class. Quantum Grav. , 26:025008, 2009

    2009

  19. [25]

    Ortaggio, J

    M. Ortaggio, J. Podolsk´ y, and M. ˇZofka. Robinson-Trautman spacetimes with an electromagnetic field in higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav. , 25:025006, 2008

    2008

  20. [26]

    Coley, R

    A. Coley, R. Milson, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. Classification of the Weyl tensor in higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav., 21:L35–L41, 2004

    2004

  21. [27]

    A. Coley. Classification of the Weyl tensor in higher dimensions and applications. Class. Quantum Grav., 25:033001, 2008

    2008

  22. [28]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. Algebraic classification of higher dimensional spacetimes based on null alignment. Class. Quantum Grav. , 30:013001, 2013

    2013

  23. [29]

    Emparan and H

    R. Emparan and H. S. Reall. A rotating black ring solution in five dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett., 88:101101, 2002

    2002

  24. [30]

    Pravda and A

    V. Pravda and A. Pravdov´ a. WANDs of the black ring. Gen. Rel. Grav., 37:1277–1287, 2005

    2005

  25. [31]

    Monteiro, D

    R. Monteiro, D. O’Connell, and C. D. White. Black holes and the double copy. JHEP, 12:056, 2014

    2014

  26. [32]

    Dereli and M

    T. Dereli and M. G¨ urses. The generalized Kerr-Schild transform in eleven-dimensional supergravity. Phys. Lett. B, 171:209–211, 1986

    1986

  27. [33]

    B. Coll, S. R. Hildebrandt, and J. M. M. Senovilla. Kerr-Schild symmetries. Gen. Rel. Grav., 33:649–670, 2001

    2001

  28. [34]

    M´ alek and V

    T. M´ alek and V. Pravda. Kerr-Schild spacetimes with (A)dS background. Class. Quantum Grav., 28:125011, 2011

    2011

  29. [35]

    Ortaggio and A Srinivasan

    M. Ortaggio and A Srinivasan. Charging Kerr-Schild spacetimes in higher dimensions. Phys. Rev. D, 110:044035, 2024

    2024

  30. [36]

    Srinivasan

    A. Srinivasan. Algebraic and optical properties of generalized Kerr-Schild spacetimes in arbitrary dimensions. Phys. Rev. D, 111:064061, 2025

    2025

  31. [37]

    M. Durkee. Type II Einstein spacetimes in higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav. , 26:195010, 2009

    2009

  32. [38]

    Durkee and H

    M. Durkee and H. S. Reall. A higher-dimensional generalization of the geodesic part of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem. Class. Quantum Grav. , 26:245005, 2009

    2009

  33. [39]

    Garcia-Parrado G´ omez-Lobo and L

    A. Garcia-Parrado G´ omez-Lobo and L. Wylleman. A new special class of Petrov type D vacuum space-times in dimension five. J. Phys.: Conf. Series , 314:012024, 2011

    2011

  34. [40]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, A. Pravdov´ a, and H. S. Reall. On a five-dimensional version of the Goldberg-Sachs theorem. Class. Quantum Grav. , 29:205002, 2012

    2012

  35. [41]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. On the Goldberg-Sachs theorem in higher dimensions in the non-twisting case. Class. Quantum Grav. , 30:075016, 2013

    2013

  36. [42]

    H. S. Reall, A. A. H. Graham, and C. P. Turner. On algebraically special vacuum spacetimes in five dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav. , 30:055004, 2013

    2013

  37. [43]

    G. B. de Freitas, M. Godazgar, and H. S. Reall. Uniqueness of the Kerr-de Sitter spacetime as an algebraically special solution in five dimensions. Commun. Math. Phys. , 340:291–323, 2015

    2015

  38. [44]

    Wylleman

    L. Wylleman. Finalizing the classification of type II or more special Einstein spacetimes in five dimensions, arXiv:1511.02824 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  39. [45]

    G. B. de Freitas, M. Godazgar, and H. S. Reall. Twisting algebraically special solutions in five dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav., 33:095002, 2016

    2016

  40. [47]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. On higher dimensional Einstein spacetimes with a non-degenerate double Weyl aligned null direction. Class. Quantum Grav. , 35:075004, 2018

    2018

  41. [48]

    Tintˇ era and V

    T. Tintˇ era and V. Pravda. On the Goldberg–Sachs theorem in six dimensions. Gen. Rel. Grav., 51:111, 2019

    2019

  42. [49]

    Taghavi-Chabert

    A. Taghavi-Chabert. Twisting non-shearing congruences of null geodesics, almost CR structures and Einstein metrics in even dimensions. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. , 201:655–693, 2022

    2022

  43. [50]

    Mars and C

    M. Mars and C. Pe´ on-Nieto. Covariant classification of conformal Killing vectors of locally conformally flat n- manifolds with an application to Kerr-de Sitter spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D, 106:084045, 2022

    2022

  44. [51]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. Asymptotically flat, algebraically special spacetimes in higher dimen- sions. Phys. Rev. D, 80:084041, 2009. 23

    2009

  45. [52]

    Ortaggio and A

    M. Ortaggio and A. Pravdov´ a. Asymptotic behaviour of the Weyl tensor in higher dimensions. Phys. Rev. D, 90:104011, 2014

    2014

  46. [53]

    Podolsk´ y and M

    J. Podolsk´ y and M. Ortaggio. Robinson-Trautman spacetimes in higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav. , 23:5785–5797, 2006

    2006

  47. [54]

    M. M. Caldarelli, R. Emparan, and M. J. Rodriguez. Black rings in (Anti)-de Sitter space. JHEP, 11:011, 2008

    2008

  48. [55]

    Armas and N

    J. Armas and N. A. Obers. Blackfolds in (anti)-de Sitter backgrounds. Phys. Rev. D, 83:084039, 2011

    2011

  49. [56]

    M. M. Caldarelli, R. G. Leigh, A. C. Petkou, P. M. Petropoulos, V. Pozzoli, and K. Siampos. Vorticity in holographic fluids. In Proceedings of Proceedings of the Corfu Summer Institute 2011 — PoS(CORFU2011) , volume 155, page 076, 2012

    2011

  50. [57]

    Gnecchi, K

    A. Gnecchi, K. Hristov, D. Klemm, C. Toldo, and O. Vaughan. Rotating black holes in 4d gauged supergravity. JHEP, 01:127, 2014

    2014

  51. [58]

    D. Klemm. Four-dimensional black holes with unusual horizons. Phys. Rev. D, 89:084007, 2014

    2014

  52. [59]

    R. A. Hennigar, R. B. Mann, and D. Kubizˇ n´ ak. Entropy inequality violations from ultraspinning black holes.Phys. Rev. Lett., 115:031101, 2015

    2015

  53. [60]

    R. A. Hennigar, D. Kubizˇ n´ ak, R. B. Mann, and N. Musoke. Ultraspinning limits and super-entropic black holes. JHEP, 06:096, 2015

    2015

  54. [61]

    Mars, T.-T

    M. Mars, T.-T. Paetz, and J. Senovilla. Classification of Kerr–de Sitter-like spacetimes with conformally flat I. Class. Quantum Grav. , 34:095010, 2017

    2017

  55. [62]

    Mars, T.-T

    M. Mars, T.-T. Paetz, and J. Senovilla. Limit of Kerr–de Sitter spacetime with infinite angular-momentum param- eter a. Phys. Rev. D, 97:024021, 2018

    2018

  56. [63]

    Mars and C

    M. Mars and C. Pe´ on-Nieto. Classification of Kerr–de Sitter-like spacetimes with conformally flatI in all dimensions. Phys. Rev. D, 105:044027, 2022

    2022

  57. [64]

    Ortaggio

    M. Ortaggio. Bel-Debever criteria for the classification of the Weyl tensor in higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav., 26:195015, 2009

    2009

  58. [65]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. On higher dimensional Einstein spacetimes with a warped extra dimension. Class. Quantum Grav. , 28:105006, 2011

    2011

  59. [66]

    Ashtekar and S

    A. Ashtekar and S. Das. Asymptotically anti-de Sitter spacetimes: conserved quantities. Class. Quantum Grav. , 17:L17–L30, 2000

    2000

  60. [67]

    Pravdov´ a and V

    A. Pravdov´ a and V. Pravda. The Newman-Penrose formalism in higher dimensions: vacuum spacetimes with a non-twisting geodetic multiple Weyl aligned null direction. Class. Quantum Grav. , 25:235008, 2008

    2008

  61. [68]

    G. W. Gibbons and D. L. Wiltshire. Space-time as a membrane in higher dimensions. Nucl. Phys. B, 287:717–742, 1987

    1987

  62. [69]

    Birmingham

    D. Birmingham. Topological black holes in anti-de Sitter space. Class. Quantum Grav. , 16:1197–1205, 1999

    1999

  63. [71]

    P. T. Chru´ sciel, W. Cong, and F. Gray. Kerr-AdS type higher dimensional black holes with non-spherical cross- sections of horizons. Class. Quantum Grav. , 42:155007, 2025

    2025

  64. [72]

    Coley, R

    A. Coley, R. Milson, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. Vanishing scalar invariant spacetimes in higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav. , 21:5519–5542, 2004

    2004

  65. [73]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. Ricci identities in higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav. , 24:1657– 1664, 2007

    2007

  66. [74]

    Durkee, V

    M. Durkee, V. Pravda, A. Pravdov´ a, and H. S. Reall. Generalization of the Geroch-Held-Penrose formalism to higher dimensions. Class. Quantum Grav. , 27:215010, 2010

    2010

  67. [75]

    Kub´ ıˇ cek.Gravitace ve vyˇ sˇ s´ ıch dimenz´ ıch

    J. Kub´ ıˇ cek.Gravitace ve vyˇ sˇ s´ ıch dimenz´ ıch. Diploma thesis, Charles University in Prague, 2015

    2015

  68. [76]

    Ortaggio, V

    M. Ortaggio, V. Pravda, and A. Pravdov´ a. Type III and N Einstein spacetimes in higher dimensions: general properties. Phys. Rev. D, 82:064043, 2010

    2010

  69. [77]

    F. R. Gantmacher. The theory of Matrices , volume 1. Chelsea Publishing Company, Providence, 1959

    1959

  70. [78]

    Kokoˇ ska

    D. Kokoˇ ska. PhD thesis, Charles University, Prague. To appear

  71. [79]

    Bahjat-Abbas, A

    N. Bahjat-Abbas, A. Luna, and C. D. White. The Kerr-Schild double copy in curved spacetime. JHEP, 12:004, 2017

    2017

  72. [80]

    Carrillo-Gonz´ alez, R

    M. Carrillo-Gonz´ alez, R. Penco, and M. Trodden. The classical double copy in maximally symmetric spacetimes. JHEP, 04:028, 2018

    2018

  73. [81]

    Chen and H

    W. Chen and H. L¨ u. Kerr-Schild structure and harmonic 2-forms on (A)ds-Kerr-NUT metrics. Phys. Lett. B, 658:158–163, 2008. 24

    2008

  74. [82]

    Krtouˇ s

    P. Krtouˇ s. Electromagnetic field in higher-dimensional black-hole spacetimes. Phys. Rev. D, 76:084035, 2007

    2007

  75. [83]

    A.N. Aliev. Gyromagnetic ratio of charged Kerr–anti-de Sitter black holes. Class. Quantum Grav. , 24:4669–4678, 2007

    2007

  76. [84]

    A.N. Aliev. Electromagnetic properties of Kerr-anti-de Sitter black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 75:084041, 2007

    2007

  77. [85]

    V. P. Frolov, P. Krtouˇ s, and D. Kubizˇ n´ ak. Weakly charged generalized Kerr–NUT–(A)dS spacetimes.Phys. Lett. B, 771:254–256, 2017

    2017

  78. [86]

    Chawla and C

    S. Chawla and C. Keeler. Aligned fields double copy to Kerr-NUT-(A)dS. JHEP, 04:005, 2023

    2023

  79. [87]

    Kol´ aˇ r and P

    I. Kol´ aˇ r and P. Krtouˇ s. NUT-like and near-horizon limits of Kerr-NUT-(A)dS spacetimes.Phys. Rev. D, 95:124044, 2017

    2017

  80. [88]

    Klemm, V

    D. Klemm, V. Moretti, and L. Vanzo. Rotating topological black holes. Phys. Rev. D, 57:6127–6137, 1998. See also D. Klemm, V. Moretti, and L. Vanzo (1999), Erratum: Rotating topological black holes [Phys. Rev. D 57, 6127 (1998)], Phys. Rev. D 60:109902

    1999

  81. [89]

    D. Klemm. Rotating black branes wrapped on Einstein spaces. JHEP, 11:019, 1998

    1998

  82. [90]

    Ortaggio

    M. Ortaggio. Higher dimensional spacetimes with a geodesic, shearfree, twistfree and expanding null congruence. In Proceedings of the XVII SIGRAV Conference (Torino, September 4–7, 2006) , 2007. gr-qc/0701036

    2006 arXiv

  83. [91]

    R. P. Kerr. Gravitational field of a spinning mass as an example of algebraically special metrics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 11:237–238, 1963

    1963

  84. [92]

    Mars and C

    M. Mars and C. Pe´ on-Nieto. Free data at spacelikeI and characterization of Kerr-de Sitter in all dimensions. Eur. Phys. J. C , 81:914, 2021. 25

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.