How Can We Know What Language Models Know?
read the original abstract
Recent work has presented intriguing results examining the knowledge contained in language models (LM) by having the LM fill in the blanks of prompts such as "Obama is a _ by profession". These prompts are usually manually created, and quite possibly sub-optimal; another prompt such as "Obama worked as a _" may result in more accurately predicting the correct profession. Because of this, given an inappropriate prompt, we might fail to retrieve facts that the LM does know, and thus any given prompt only provides a lower bound estimate of the knowledge contained in an LM. In this paper, we attempt to more accurately estimate the knowledge contained in LMs by automatically discovering better prompts to use in this querying process. Specifically, we propose mining-based and paraphrasing-based methods to automatically generate high-quality and diverse prompts, as well as ensemble methods to combine answers from different prompts. Extensive experiments on the LAMA benchmark for extracting relational knowledge from LMs demonstrate that our methods can improve accuracy from 31.1% to 39.6%, providing a tighter lower bound on what LMs know. We have released the code and the resulting LM Prompt And Query Archive (LPAQA) at https://github.com/jzbjyb/LPAQA.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet.
Forward citations
Cited by 5 Pith papers
-
RAPTOR: Recursive Abstractive Processing for Tree-Organized Retrieval
RAPTOR introduces a tree-organized retrieval method using recursive abstractive summaries, achieving a 20% absolute accuracy improvement on the QuALITY benchmark when paired with GPT-4.
-
Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Models
Atlas reaches over 42% accuracy on Natural Questions with only 64 examples, outperforming a 540B-parameter model by 3% with 50x fewer parameters.
-
MRKL Systems: A modular, neuro-symbolic architecture that combines large language models, external knowledge sources and discrete reasoning
MRKL is a modular neuro-symbolic architecture that integrates LLMs with external knowledge and discrete reasoning to overcome limitations of pure neural language models.
-
Unsupervised Dense Information Retrieval with Contrastive Learning
Contrastive learning trains unsupervised dense retrievers that beat BM25 on most BEIR datasets and support cross-lingual retrieval across scripts.
-
How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?
Fine-tuned language models store knowledge in parameters to answer questions competitively with retrieval-based open-domain QA systems.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.