REVIEW 1 cited by
BINGO! Simple Optimizers Win Big if Problems Collapse to a Few Buckets
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
BINGO! Simple Optimizers Win Big if Problems Collapse to a Few Buckets
read the original abstract
Traditional multi-objective optimization in software engineering (SE) can be slow and complex. This paper introduces the BINGO effect: a novel phenomenon where SE data surprisingly collapses into a tiny fraction of possible solution "buckets" (e.g., only 100 used from 4,096 expected). We show the BINGO effect's prevalence across 39 optimization in SE problems. Exploiting this, we optimize 10,000 times faster than state-of-the-art methods, with comparable effectiveness. Our new algorithms (LITE and LINE), demonstrate that simple stochastic selection can match complex optimizers like DEHB. This work explains why simple methods succeed in SE-real data occupies a small corner of possibilities-and guides when to apply them, challenging the need for CPU-heavy optimization. Our data and code are public at GitHub (see anon-artifacts/bingo).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
When to Use Which? Benchmarking Optimisers for Configurable Systems under Varying Budgets
Across 22 configurable systems and budgets from 100 to 10,000 evaluations, FLASH is the most consistently effective optimiser, while GA and IRACE catch up only at large budgets.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.