Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

TSONN: Time-stepping-oriented neural network for solving partial differential equations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.16491 v1 pith:PQW43MN6 submitted 2023-10-25 cs.LG physics.comp-ph

classification cs.LGphysics.comp-ph
keywords methodneuralmethodsproblemsresultsschemetime-steppingtraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep neural networks (DNNs), especially physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), have recently become a new popular method for solving forward and inverse problems governed by partial differential equations (PDEs). However, these methods still face challenges in achieving stable training and obtaining correct results in many problems, since minimizing PDE residuals with PDE-based soft constraint make the problem ill-conditioned. Different from all existing methods that directly minimize PDE residuals, this work integrates time-stepping method with deep learning, and transforms the original ill-conditioned optimization problem into a series of well-conditioned sub-problems over given pseudo time intervals. The convergence of model training is significantly improved by following the trajectory of the pseudo time-stepping process, yielding a robust optimization-based PDE solver. Our results show that the proposed method achieves stable training and correct results in many problems that standard PINNs fail to solve, requiring only a simple modification on the loss function. In addition, we demonstrate several novel properties and advantages of time-stepping methods within the framework of neural network-based optimization approach, in comparison to traditional grid-based numerical method. Specifically, explicit scheme allows significantly larger time step, while implicit scheme can be implemented as straightforwardly as explicit scheme.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generalizable turbulence closures across bluff-body shapes by PINN-based solver-agnostic training

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Solver-agnostic PINN training yields four RANS closures that generalize across six bluff-body shapes at Re=10^4, with a Reynolds-force model reaching ~8.5% LOSO drag error.

  2. Solving all laminar flows around airfoils all-at-once using a parametric neural network solver

    physics.flu-dyn 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A time-stepping physics-informed neural network solves a high-dimensional parametric space of steady laminar airfoil flows in one 4.6-day run, with 4.6% lift and 1.1% drag errors versus reference simulations.

Pith tools