REVIEW 2 cited by
On Incorporating Inductive Biases into VAEs
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
On Incorporating Inductive Biases into VAEs
read the original abstract
We explain why directly changing the prior can be a surprisingly ineffective mechanism for incorporating inductive biases into VAEs, and introduce a simple and effective alternative approach: Intermediary Latent Space VAEs(InteL-VAEs). InteL-VAEs use an intermediary set of latent variables to control the stochasticity of the encoding process, before mapping these in turn to the latent representation using a parametric function that encapsulates our desired inductive bias(es). This allows us to impose properties like sparsity or clustering on learned representations, and incorporate human knowledge into the generative model. Whereas changing the prior only indirectly encourages behavior through regularizing the encoder, InteL-VAEs are able to directly enforce desired characteristics. Moreover, they bypass the computation and encoder design issues caused by non-Gaussian priors, while allowing for additional flexibility through training of the parametric mapping function. We show that these advantages, in turn, lead to both better generative models and better representations being learned.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Neural Operator-enabled Topology-informed Evolutionary Strategy for PDE-Constrained Optimization
NOTES couples a DeepONet topology decoder with CMA-ES in a PCA-derived latent space, achieving >95% deflection efficiency on nanophotonic metagratings and compliance of 246 on MBB beams, outperforming direct CMA-ES an...
-
Medical Model Synthesis Architectures: A Case Study
MedMSA framework retrieves knowledge via language models then builds formal probabilistic models to produce uncertainty-weighted differential diagnoses from symptoms.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.