Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

HWD: A Novel Evaluation Score for Styled Handwritten Text Generation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2310.20316 v1 pith:PS5RRDDA submitted 2023-10-31 cs.CV cs.DL

HWD: A Novel Evaluation Score for Styled Handwritten Text Generation

classification cs.CV cs.DL
keywords handwritingevaluationimagesstyledtextgenerationhandwrittenmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Styled Handwritten Text Generation (Styled HTG) is an important task in document analysis, aiming to generate text images with the handwriting of given reference images. In recent years, there has been significant progress in the development of deep learning models for tackling this task. Being able to measure the performance of HTG models via a meaningful and representative criterion is key for fostering the development of this research topic. However, despite the current adoption of scores for natural image generation evaluation, assessing the quality of generated handwriting remains challenging. In light of this, we devise the Handwriting Distance (HWD), tailored for HTG evaluation. In particular, it works in the feature space of a network specifically trained to extract handwriting style features from the variable-lenght input images and exploits a perceptual distance to compare the subtle geometric features of handwriting. Through extensive experimental evaluation on different word-level and line-level datasets of handwritten text images, we demonstrate the suitability of the proposed HWD as a score for Styled HTG. The pretrained model used as backbone will be released to ease the adoption of the score, aiming to provide a valuable tool for evaluating HTG models and thus contributing to advancing this important research area.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. InkShield: Writing Style Protection Against Unauthorized Handwriting Mimicry

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    Edge-confined, decoy-guided adversarial perturbations on handwriting references cut target-writer Top-1/Top-5 retrieval of One-DM generations from ~12%/37% to ~2%/9% while keeping LPIPS ≈ 0.008.

  2. InkShield: Writing Style Protection Against Unauthorized Handwriting Mimicry

    cs.CR 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A stroke-edge-masked, decoy-guided perturbation added to released handwriting references reduces target-writer style mimicry by one-shot generators from ~12% to ~2% Top-1 retrieval while preserving readability.