REVIEW 2 cited by
Beyond path selection: Better LLMs for Scientific Information Extraction with MimicSFT and Relevance and Rule-induced(R$^2$)GRPO
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
Previous study suggest that powerful Large Language Models (LLMs) trained with Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) only refines reasoning path without improving the reasoning capacity in math tasks while supervised-finetuning(SFT) with distillation can. We study this from the view of Scientific information extraction (SciIE) where LLMs and reasoning LLMs underperforms small Bert-based models. SciIE require both the reasoning and memorization. We argue that both SFT and RLVR can refine the reasoning path and improve reasoning capacity in a simple way based on SciIE. We propose two-stage training with 1. MimicSFT, using structured reasoning templates without needing high-quality chain-of-thought data, 2. R$^2$GRPO with relevance and rule-induced rewards. Experiments on scientific IE benchmarks show that both methods can improve the reasoning capacity. R$^2$GRPO with mimicSFT surpasses baseline LLMs and specialized supervised models in relation extraction. Our code is available at https://github.com/ranlislz/R2GRPO.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Self-Prompting Small Language Models for Privacy-Sensitive Clinical Information Extraction
Small open-weight language models can self-optimize prompts for clinical named entity recognition in dental notes, reaching micro F1 of 0.864 after DPO on Qwen2.5-14B.
-
Self-Prompting Small Language Models for Privacy-Sensitive Clinical Information Extraction
Self-prompting combined with QLoRA and DPO on small open-weight models yields micro F1 scores up to 0.864 on clinical named entity recognition from 1,200 dental notes.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.