Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 30 references

The paper argues that helicoidal twist density and magnetic gauge coupling reorganize the relative phase space, set a zero-energy localization threshold, and at a critical stiffness switch the quantum spectrum from harmonic to quartic 4/3 s

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

On a helicoidal surface, the twist density and magnetic field renormalize the two-body effective kinetic term, controlling classical localization, a pitchfork bifurcation, and a harmonic-to-quartic transition of the quantum spectrum.

T0 review reviewed 2026-08-05 challenge →

load-bearing objection The exact two-body reduction and classical phase-space analysis are genuine and correct; the quartic critical spectrum in Sec. 5 is not supported because it rests on a local expansion used exactly where the localization length diverges. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2608.02659 v1 pith:PT2GS5N4 submitted 2026-08-01 quant-ph

Curvature as a control field in helicoidal two-body systems

Abdullah Guvendi , Hassan Hassanabadi This is my paper
classification quant-ph PACS 03.65.-w03.65.Ge
keywords helicoidal manifoldcurvature-gauge couplingconstrained two-body dynamicszero-energy localizationpitchfork bifurcationspectral reconstructionquartic criticalitygeometric control
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that geometric deformation can act as a control field, not just a passive background. Using a two-body system constrained to a helicoidal surface in a uniform magnetic field, it derives an exact reduced Hamiltonian for the relative coordinate. The twist density and magnetic field enter through a curvature-renormalized kinetic factor and a gauge-shifted conserved momentum. The paper shows that this composite structure creates classically bounded phases with two or four turning points, localizes zero-energy states when the conserved momentum is below a threshold, and produces a pitchfork bifurcation when an effective stiffness coefficient vanishes. At that same critical surface, the low-energy quantum spectrum is claimed to pass from harmonic equidistant levels to quartic levels with exponent 4/3, so geometry alone would control localization and spectral organization without external confinement.

Core claim

Central claim: on the helicoidal surface, the embedding geometry and the projected magnetic gauge field become intrinsic control parameters for the two-body relative motion. After reduction, the Hamiltonian is H = p_xi^2/mu + kappa xi^2 + (p_v - alpha xi^2)^2/[mu(1 + Omega^2 xi^2)] - g/sqrt(xi^2 + a^2). The geometry appears through the inverse inertia factor 1/(1 + Omega^2 xi^2), and the magnetic field appears through the shifted conserved momentum p_v - alpha xi^2. Expanding the potential near the axis gives Veff = C0 + A xi^2 + B xi^4, with C0 = p_v^2/mu - g/a and A = kappa - (2 alpha p_v + Omega^2 p_v^2)/mu + g/(2 a^3). The paper uses this normal form to derive the localization threshold

What carries the argument

The key object is the exact reduced Hamiltonian H = p_xi^2/mu + kappa xi^2 + (p_v - alpha xi^2)^2/[mu(1 + Omega^2 xi^2)] - g/sqrt(xi^2 + a^2), obtained by Legendre transform after eliminating the cyclic longitudinal coordinate. It carries the argument through two structures: the curvature-renormalized kinetic factor 1/(1 + Omega^2 xi^2), which makes the effective inertia position dependent, and the gauge-shifted conserved momentum p_v - alpha xi^2, which encodes the magnetic field. The reduced potential's normal form Veff = C0 + A xi^2 + B xi^4 is what turns geometry into control: the coefficient A acts as a renormalized stiffness that sets the localization length, signals the pitchfork bifu

Load-bearing premise

The paper uses a local expansion of the effective potential near the symmetry axis as though it held globally; in particular, as the effective stiffness A approaches zero, the harmonic localization length diverges, so the quartic term can no longer be treated as a small perturbation exactly in the regime where the 4/3 spectrum is predicted.

What would settle it

Numerically solve the full one-dimensional Schrodinger equation with the exact effective potential Veff(xi) = kappa xi^2 + (p_v - alpha xi^2)^2/[mu(1 + Omega^2 xi^2)] - g/sqrt(xi^2 + a^2) for parameters satisfying the A = 0 condition, and compare low-lying energy differences with the quartic prediction En - C0 proportional to (n + gamma)^(4/3). If the ratios of adjacent gaps deviate from the 4/3 exponent once the exact potential's large-|xi| quadratic asymptotics are included, the claimed spectral criticality fails.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • At fixed energy, varying twist density or magnetic field switches the classically allowed region between two and four turning points, so geometry alone reconfigures the accessible phase space.
  • Zero-energy localization exists only when p_v^2/mu < g/a, and the localization length is set by sqrt(-C0/A); both the threshold and the length are tunable through twist density and magnetic field.
  • When the renormalized stiffness A crosses zero, the axial configuration becomes unstable and two symmetric minima appear, giving a pitchfork bifurcation with a soft-mode precursor at the threshold.
  • At A = 0 the low-energy quantum spectrum leaves the harmonic equidistant form and follows the quartic critical law En - C0 ~ (hbar^4 B/mu^2)^(1/3)(n + gamma)^(4/3); individual states can be switched on or off by tuning the critical coupling gc(n).
  • In the flat limit the model recovers the ordinary two-body problem, so the quartic critical behavior is an intrinsic effect of the helicoidal geometry and gauge projection.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mathematical structure, a rational curvature dressing 1/(1 + Omega^2 xi^2) and a quadratic gauge shift alpha xi^2, would arise for any surface with a Killing direction and a quadratically growing projected gauge field; the A = 0 critical surface and the 4/3 spectrum should therefore be a generic feature of such reductions, not an accident of the helicoid.
  • Using the paper's own large-distance expansion Veff ~ (kappa + alpha^2/(mu Omega^2)) xi^2, the true spectrum is bounded below by quadratic confinement; the quartic 4/3 scaling can only hold in an intermediate low-energy window before the quadratic asymptotics take over, a crossover the paper does not compute.
  • If the conserved momentum p_v can be varied externally, the zero-energy threshold p_v^2/mu < g/a functions as a switch controlled by geometry and magnetic field, suggesting a concrete design principle for state-selective on/off control in curved photonic or synthetic quantum platforms.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a curvature–gauge framework for a charged two-body system constrained to a helicoidal surface. It derives an exact reduced Hamiltonian (Eq. 2.28) in which the helicoidal twist density and magnetic field dress the kinetic sector through a position-dependent metric factor and a shifted canonical momentum. The classical analysis yields a biquadratic turning-point equation, zero-energy localization criteria, a geometry-induced stiffness renormalization, and a symmetry-breaking bifurcation at A=0. The quantum part quantizes the reduced Hamiltonian, obtains harmonic spectra away from criticality, and claims that at the A=0 surface the spectrum reconstructs to the quartic scaling E_n - C0 ~ (ℏ^4 B/μ^2)^{1/3}(n+γ)^{4/3} (Eq. 5.21). The stated conclusion is that geometry alone, without external confinement, controls localization and spectral universality.

Significance. If the central quantum claim is correct, the paper offers a genuinely interesting mechanism: the intrinsic geometry and gauge projection of a curved embedding act as tunable control fields, producing a classical-to-quantum correspondence between a soft mode and a spectral universality transition. The classical reduction is a clear strength: the exact Hamiltonian, the biquadratic turning-point condition, and the threshold inequalities are derived in closed form with no fitted parameters, and the algebraic relations are explicit and checkable. However, the signature quantum result—the quartic critical spectrum—is obtained from a Taylor expansion of the effective potential whose validity is not established in the regime where the harmonic localization length diverges. The paper therefore currently establishes the classical reorganization convincingly, but the quantum spectral reconstruction, which is the main advertised novelty, rests on an uncontrolled approximation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 5, Eqs. (5.20)–(5.21)] The quartic critical spectrum is derived by setting Veff ≈ C0 + Bξ^4 at A=0, using the Taylor expansion that is valid only for |ξ| ≪ min(ω^{-1}, a) (Eq. 3.8). However, the harmonic localization length ℓq = (ℏ^2/(μA))^{1/4} (Eq. 5.13) diverges as A→0, so the low-lying states at the purported critical point are not confined to the radius where the quartic truncation is accurate. The exact potential has a quadratic large-|ξ| tail (Eq. 4.17), so the spectrum could interpolate between quartic and quadratic behavior. The manuscript neither solves the full Schrödinger equation (5.3) with the exact Veff (5.4) on the A=0 surface nor provides an error bound for the truncation. Because Eq. (5.21) is the central evidence for 'spectral reconstruction' and 'critical universality', this is a load-bearing gap.
  2. [Sec. 4, Eqs. (4.8) and (4.13)] The same local quartic normal form is used to draw global conclusions about the zero-energy localization length ℓloc = sqrt(-C0/A) and the symmetry-broken minima ξ⋆ = ±sqrt(-A/(2B)). For parameter values where |ξ⋆| is not small, or where A is near zero, the exact effective potential differs from the quartic approximation. In particular, the large-distance behavior (4.17) is quadratic, so the existence and location of the minima should be checked against the exact Veff. This does not necessarily invalidate the classical bifurcation picture, but the manuscript presently asserts these results without a validity estimate.
  3. [Sec. 3, Eqs. (3.8)–(3.12)] The derivation of the localization threshold and the harmonic oscillator frequency ωeff = 2√(A/μ) uses the expansion around ξ=0. The threshold C0<0 (Eq. 3.14) is exact because it only uses Veff(0), but the subsequent harmonic approximation for the zero-energy turning points and the Bohr–Sommerfeld spectrum assumes that A is positive and that higher-order terms are negligible over the classically allowed region. The paper does not check whether the anharmonic terms Bξ^4 remain small for the actual turning-point extent, especially near the bifurcation boundary. This is a local-validity issue that propagates into the semiclassical quantization (Eq. 3.27).
minor comments (4)
  1. [General notation] The symbol B is used for both the magnetic field and the quartic coefficient of the effective potential (Eqs. 3.12 and 5.10). This is confusing in Section 5, where both appear in adjacent equations. Please rename one of them (e.g., use β for the quartic coefficient).
  2. [Fig. 1] The caption states that color scales indicate the values of ω and B, but panels (d)–(f) are not described in enough detail to interpret the four turning points or the phase diagram. It would help to indicate the line types and the exact definition of the plotted boundaries in panel (f).
  3. [References] Reference [19] is the authors' own unpublished preprint and is cited for several central results. While self-citation is not inappropriate, the paper would benefit from independent support for the key classical-reduction steps and from a clearer distinction between previously established results and new contributions.
  4. [Typos] There are minor typographical issues, e.g., 'the spec tral' in the Abstract and 'equ ation' in Section 6. A careful proofread is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circular derivation chain: all results follow algebraically from the stated reduced Hamiltonian; self-citations are not load-bearing, though the A=0 quartic spectrum rests on an unvalidated truncation.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. Starting from the embedding (2.2), the metric (2.3)-(2.4), and the symmetric gauge pullback (2.8)-(2.10), the paper constructs the Lagrangian (2.11) and obtains the exact reduced Hamiltonian (2.21)/(2.28) without fitting parameters. The turning-point classification is the algebraic discriminant of the biquadratic (2.33)-(2.35); the zero-energy threshold (3.13)-(3.14) is the value of Veff at ξ=0 in the normal form; the bifurcation surface (4.12) is the coefficient A=0 in that same Taylor expansion; and the harmonic spectrum (5.15) is the standard oscillator spectrum with the paper's coefficient A. Eq. (5.21) is likewise the known quartic-oscillator scaling applied to the truncated potential C0+Bξ^4, cited to Bender-Wu. None of these steps renames a fit as a prediction. Self-citations ([19], [26]) supply the single-particle setup and interaction form, but the paper rederives the reduction from the embedding and uses standard results (Bender-Wu, Bohr-Sommerfeld); the cited prior work is not invoked as an unverified uniqueness theorem. The substantive weakness is a validity gap, not circularity: the quartic truncation is derived under |ξ| << min(ω^-1,a) (3.8), yet Eq. (5.21) is evaluated at A=0, where the harmonic localization length (5.13) diverges and the wavefunction support extends beyond the expansion domain. This makes the 4/3 spectral claim underived against the exact Veff, but it does not make the claim equivalent to an input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

Four hand-chosen model inputs (g, a, p_v, kappa) plus the physical controls omega and B set every threshold and phase boundary. Five structural assumptions carry the conclusions, most notably the one-dimensional reduction and the global use of the local quartic expansion. No new particles, forces, or dimensions are introduced; the 'curvature-gauge control field' is a framing of existing metric and electromagnetic structures.

free parameters (4)
  • g (attractive interaction strength)
    Introduced in Eq. (3.1) to generate the localization effect; all thresholds (p_v^2/mu < g/a, g_c(n)) scale with it; free model input, not derived.
  • a (short-distance regularization length) = 0.6 in figures
    Eq. (3.1); smooths the interaction at the helicoidal axis; controls expansion coefficients A and B through g/(2a^3) and 3g/(8a^5) and the validity range |xi| << a.
  • p_v (conserved longitudinal canonical momentum) = 1 or 4 in figures
    Frozen Killing-sector momentum acting as a control variable; enters C0, A, B and the threshold p_v^2/mu < g/a.
  • kappa = k/2 (harmonic interaction strength) = 0.04 to 0.12 in figures
    Interaction strength in Sec. 2; retained in Eq. (3.2) even after the text says the harmonic interaction is replaced by the attractive one, a modeling ambiguity.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The restriction to the reflection-symmetric submanifold Xi = 0 with Xi_dot = 0 is a legitimate reduction whose conclusions carry over to the two-body problem.
    Stated after Eq. (2.17); the full metric and gauge sectors couple collective and relative coordinates, so the reduction discards a channel; the paper does not prove the sector is invariant under the full flow.
  • ad hoc to paper The Taylor expansion of the effective potential around xi = 0 truncated at quartic order (Eqs. 3.9-3.12) is valid and sufficient for the global and quantum conclusions drawn.
    Validity is stated as |xi| << min(omega^-1, a) (Eq. 3.8), but the quantum critical claims are made at A = 0 where the harmonic localization length diverges, i.e., outside the perturbative regime.
  • standard math Bohr-Sommerfeld quantization of the reduced 1D Hamiltonian (Eq. 3.24) and the replacement p_xi^2 -> -hbar^2 d^2/dxi^2 (Eq. 5.1) capture the quantum spectrum, with no additional metric-dependent operator-ordering corrections.
    Standard WKB correspondence for a 1D reduction; the paper explicitly assumes no additional metric-dependent ordering (Sec. 5), which is a choice.
  • ad hoc to paper The quartic oscillator spectral scaling E_n ~ (hbar^4*B/mu^2)^(1/3)(n + gamma)^(4/3) (Eq. 5.21) applies to the full effective potential near A = 0.
    Imported from Bender-Wu [29, 30] for a pure quartic potential; the actual effective potential is quartic only locally and quadratic at large |xi| (Eq. 4.17), so the regime of validity is unverified.
  • domain assumption The classical and quantum dynamics of the two-body system on the helicoid are governed by the reduced single-coordinate Hamiltonian with frozen p_v serving as a parameter.
    Central to the entire paper; relies on the cyclic character of v in the reduced sector and on treating p_v as a conserved control variable rather than a dynamical degree of freedom.

reviewed 2026-08-05 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Curvature as a control field in helicoidal two-body systems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PT2GS5N4

@misc{pith2026260802659,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Curvature as a control field in helicoidal two-body systems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PT2GS5N4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2608.02659}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Geometry is increasingly recognized as an active physical resource capable of modifying the behavior of quantum systems beyond conventional external control mechanisms. Here, we establish a curvature--gauge framework in which the geometry of an embedded manifold functions as a tunable control field for classical trajectories and quantum states. By deriving an exact reduced Hamiltonian for a two-body system confined to a helicoidal surface, we demonstrate that curvature modifies the effective kinetic structure while a projected gauge field reconstructs the conserved momentum landscape. This geometric renormalization produces controllable transitions between distinct dynamical regimes, including bounded phase-space structures, zero-energy localization, symmetry-breaking bifurcations, and critical soft-mode behavior. Quantization of the geometry-dependent effective potential reveals a corresponding spectral reconstruction, where harmonic confinement evolves into quartic critical states at the localization threshold. These results establish engineered geometry as a general route for controlling localization and spectral organization in curved quantum, electronic, photonic, and synthetic platforms, where deformation itself becomes a functional degree of freedom rather than a passive constraint.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2608.02659 by Abdullah Guvendi, Hassan Hassanabadi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Geometric and dynamical signatures of the helicoidal two-particle system. The results are obtained from the exact reduced Hamiltonian H = p 2 ξ µ + κξ2 + (pv−αξ2) 2 µ(1+Ω2ξ2) , with µ = q = 1, k = 0.08 (κ = 0.04), pv = 4, E = 18, and the reference parameters ω = 3.5 and B = 2.5 (Ω = 1.75, α = 1.09375). The color scales in panels (a)–(c) indicate the corresponding values of the control parameters ω and B. (… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Geometry–gauge controlled zero-energy localization. The effective potential governing the zero-energy trajectories is shown for pv = 1, µ = 1, κ = 0.12, q = 1, and a = 0.6. The black dashed line denotes the zero-energy boundary Veff (ξ; pv ) = 0, while the regions with Veff (ξ; pv) < 0 correspond to the classically accessible localization domains. (a) Magnetic-field dependence for ω = 1 and g = 2.8 with B … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Geometry–gauge phase structure of zero-energy localization. Phase diagrams characterizing the emergence of zero-energy bound trajectories on the helicoidal manifold. (a) The numerical localization strength S = − minξ Veff (ξ; pv) in the (B, ω) plane, obtained from the full effective potential. Positive values of S indicate the existence of a classically accessible zero-energy localization region. (b) The g… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Geometry–gauge controlled quantum localization thresholds. The contour maps display the dimensionless critical coupling g˜c(n) = µgc(n) ap2 v required to support the nth localized quantum state below the zero-energy threshold, shown as a function of the helicoidal deformation parameter Ω and the dimensionless magnetic field B. The critical coupling is obtained from the semiclassical threshold condition gc(… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Atanasov, A

    V . Atanasov, A. Saxena, ”Helicoidal graphene nanoribbo ns: Chiraltronics” Physical Review B, 92 035440 (2015)

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    V . T. Phong, E. J. Mele, ”Boundary modes from periodic mag netic and pseudo- magnetic fields in graphene” Physical Review Letters, 128 176406 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Soares, A.E

    C.C. Soares, A.E. Obispo, A.G. Jir´ on Vicente, L.B. Cast ro, ”Ef- fects of a uniform magnetic field on twisted graphene nanorib bons” Annals of Physics, 535 2200258 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Gurtas Dogan, K

    S. Gurtas Dogan, K. Hasanirokh, O. Mustafa, A. Guvendi, ” Twist- induced effects on Weyl pairs in magnetized graphene nanori bbons” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 481 20240632 (2025)

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Zhang, G

    D-B. Zhang, G. Seifert, K. Chang, ”Strain-induced pseud omagnetic fields in twisted graphene nanoribbons” Physical Review Letters, 112 096805 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Guvendi, O

    A. Guvendi, O. Mustafa, A. Karabulut, ”Damped photonic m odes in helical graphene” Annals of Physics, 480 170132 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Guvendi, S

    A. Guvendi, S. Gurtas Dogan, O. Mustafa, K. Hasanirokh, ”Photonic modes in twisted graphene nanoribbons” Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures, 166 116146 (2025)

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    Ferrari, G

    G. Ferrari, G. Cuoghi, ”Schr¨ odinger equation for a part icle on a curved surface in an electric and magnetic field” Physical review letters, 100 230403 (2008)

    work page 2008

  9. [9]

    Guvendi, H

    A. Guvendi, H. Hassanabadi, ”Fermion-antifermion pair in magnetized optical wormhole background” Physics Letters B, 843 138045 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Gurtas Dogan, A

    S. Gurtas Dogan, A. Guvendi, O. Mustafa, ”Geometric and wave optics in a BTZ optical metric-based wormhole” Physics Letters B, 868 139824 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Gurtas Dogan, A

    S. Gurtas Dogan, A. Guvendi, O. Mustafa, ”Ray and wave op tics in an optical wormhole” Physics Letters B, 868 139626 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Gurtas Dogan, A

    S. Gurtas Dogan, A. Guvendi, O. Mustafa, ”Ray geodesics and wave propagation on the Beltrami surface: optics of an optical wo rmhole” European Physical Journal C, 85 896 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    Gurtas Dogan, O

    S. Gurtas Dogan, O. Mustafa, G. Turgut, A. Guvendi, ”Ray and wave optics in twisted graphene nanoribbons” Physica Scripta, 100 075512 (2025)

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    Guvendi, S

    A. Guvendi, S. Gurtas Dogan, O. Mustafa, H. Hassan- abadi, ”Charged particle dynamics in singular spacetimes: hy- drogenic mapping and curvature-corrected thermodynamics ” International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physi cs, (2026)

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    Lopes dos Santos, N.M.R

    J.M.B. Lopes dos Santos, N.M.R. Peres, A.H. Castro Neto , ”Continuum model of the twisted graphene bilayer” Physical Review B, 86 155449 (2012)

    work page 2012

  16. [16]

    Gonzalez, J

    J. Gonzalez, J. Herrero, ”Graphene wormholes: A conden sed matter illustration of Dirac fermions in curved space” Nuclear physics B, 825 426–443 (2010)

    work page 2010

  17. [17]

    Errehymy, A

    A. Errehymy, A. Guvendi, S. G. Dogan, O. Mustafa, ”Frame - dragging and light deflection in rotating optical wormhole s pacetimes” Physics Letters B, 869 139847 (2025)

    work page 2025

  18. [18]

    Garcia, P .J

    G.Q. Garcia, P .J. Porf´ ırio, D.C. Moreira, C. Furtado,”Graphene wormhole trapped by external magnetic field” Nuclear Physics B, 950 114853 (2020)

    work page 2020

  19. [19]

    Phase-space structure and nonlinear dynamics of a charged particle on a helicoidal manifold under a magnetic field

    A. Guvendi, H. Hassanabadi, S. Gurtas Dogan, O. Mustafa , ”Phase-space structure and nonlinear dynamics of a charged particle on a helicoidal manifold under a magnetic field” arXiv:2607.07726 [physics.class-ph] (2026). 9

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  20. [20]

    Koloˇ s, M

    M. Koloˇ s, M. Shahzadi, A. Tursunov, ”Charged particle dynam- ics in parabolic magnetosphere around Schwarzschild black holes” European Physical Journal C, 83 323 (2023)

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Narzilloev, J

    B. Narzilloev, J. Rayimbaev, A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmed ov, C. Bambi, ”Dy- namics of charged particles and magnetic dipoles around mag netized quasi- Schwarzschild black holes” European Physical Journal C, 81 269 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    A. N. Aliev, N. ¨Ozdemir, ”Motion of charged parti- cles around a rotating black hole in a magnetic field” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 336 241–248 (2002)

    work page 2002

  23. [23]

    Turimov, Y

    B. Turimov, Y . Turaev, B. Ahmedov, Z. Stuchl´ ık, ”Circu lar motion of test particles around wormhole represented by exponenti al metric” Physics of the Dark Universe, 35 100946 (2022)

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Goldstein, C

    H. Goldstein, C. P . Poole, and J. L. Safko, ”Classical Me chanics”, 3rd ed., Pearson Education / Addison-Wesley, Boston, (2013) 636 pages

    work page 2013

  25. [25]

    Downing, M.E

    C.A. Downing, M.E. Portnoi, ”Bielectron vortices in tw o-dimensional Dirac semimetals” Nature communications, 8 897 (2017)

    work page 2017

  26. [26]

    Guvendi, M

    A. Guvendi, M. An, G.Turgut, O. Mustafa, ”Bielectron V o rtices in Monolayer Dirac Semimetals” Advanced Theory and Simulations, 9 e00974 (2026)

    work page 2026

  27. [27]

    Modern quantum mechanic s

    J.J. Sakurai, J. Napolitano, “Modern quantum mechanic s” (Cambridge University Press 2020)

    work page 2020

  28. [28]

    Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals (1st e d.)

    K. Gottfried, “Quantum Mechanics: Fundamentals (1st e d.)” (CRC Press, Boca Raton (1974) 528 pages))

    work page 1974

  29. [29]

    Bender, T.T

    C.M. Bender, T.T. Wu, ”Anharmonic oscillator” Physical Review, 184 1231 (1969)

    work page 1969

  30. [30]

    Bender, T.T

    C.M. Bender, T.T. Wu, ”Anharmonic oscillator. II. A stu dy of perturbation theory in large order” Physical Review D, 7 1620 (1973). 10

    work page 1973

This paper was first reviewed by deepseek-v4-flash on August 5, 2026.