Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

Automated Progressive Red Teaming

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.03876 v3 pith:PTKH33VT submitted 2024-07-04 cs.CR cs.CL

classification cs.CRcs.CL
keywords llmsteamingaprtattackautomatedeffectivelyframeworkvulnerabilities
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Ensuring the safety of large language models (LLMs) is paramount, yet identifying potential vulnerabilities is challenging. While manual red teaming is effective, it is time-consuming, costly and lacks scalability. Automated red teaming (ART) offers a more cost-effective alternative, automatically generating adversarial prompts to expose LLM vulnerabilities. However, in current ART efforts, a robust framework is absent, which explicitly frames red teaming as an effectively learnable task. To address this gap, we propose Automated Progressive Red Teaming (APRT) as an effectively learnable framework. APRT leverages three core modules: an Intention Expanding LLM that generates diverse initial attack samples, an Intention Hiding LLM that crafts deceptive prompts, and an Evil Maker to manage prompt diversity and filter ineffective samples. The three modules collectively and progressively explore and exploit LLM vulnerabilities through multi-round interactions. In addition to the framework, we further propose a novel indicator, Attack Effectiveness Rate (AER) to mitigate the limitations of existing evaluation metrics. By measuring the likelihood of eliciting unsafe but seemingly helpful responses, AER aligns closely with human evaluations. Extensive experiments with both automatic and human evaluations, demonstrate the effectiveness of ARPT across both open- and closed-source LLMs. Specifically, APRT effectively elicits 54% unsafe yet useful responses from Meta's Llama-3-8B-Instruct, 50% from GPT-4o (API access), and 39% from Claude-3.5 (API access), showcasing its robust attack capability and transferability across LLMs (especially from open-source LLMs to closed-source LLMs).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Automated Capability Discovery via Foundation Model Self-Exploration

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ACD automatically generates thousands of open-ended tasks and clusters them into dozens of capability and failure categories, with LLM-vs-human scoring agreement (F1 = 0.86).

  2. A Red Teaming Framework for Large Language Models: A Case Study on Faithfulness Evaluation

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Introduces a multi-role red teaming framework using attacker and jury models that increases attack success rates by up to 7.9% on LLM faithfulness in question-answering tasks.

  3. A Real-Time, Self-Tuning Moderator Framework for Adversarial Prompt Detection

    cs.CR 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    RTST, a two-agent moderator with an explainable Behavior ledger and per-prompt weight updates, reduced attack success rate from 12-63% to 0-17% on three jailbreak benchmarks with Gemini 2.5 Flash.

  4. Adversarial Preference Learning for Robust LLM Alignment

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    APL iteratively trains an attacker to generate adversarial prompt rewrites and a defender to resist them, using the defender's own preference probabilities as the attack signal.

Pith tools