REVIEW 2 cited by
Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defense
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Stochastic Activation Pruning for Robust Adversarial Defense
read the original abstract
Neural networks are known to be vulnerable to adversarial examples. Carefully chosen perturbations to real images, while imperceptible to humans, induce misclassification and threaten the reliability of deep learning systems in the wild. To guard against adversarial examples, we take inspiration from game theory and cast the problem as a minimax zero-sum game between the adversary and the model. In general, for such games, the optimal strategy for both players requires a stochastic policy, also known as a mixed strategy. In this light, we propose Stochastic Activation Pruning (SAP), a mixed strategy for adversarial defense. SAP prunes a random subset of activations (preferentially pruning those with smaller magnitude) and scales up the survivors to compensate. We can apply SAP to pretrained networks, including adversarially trained models, without fine-tuning, providing robustness against adversarial examples. Experiments demonstrate that SAP confers robustness against attacks, increasing accuracy and preserving calibration.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Improving Adversarial Robustness of Zero-Shot CLIP with Confidence-Aware Weighting
CAW adds a confidence-weighted KL loss and feature-alignment regularization to CLIP adversarial fine-tuning, raising average AutoAttack robust accuracy from 31.6% to 33.5% on 15 datasets.
-
Pruning Strategies for Backdoor Defense in LLMs
Attention-head pruning partially lowers backdoor attack effects in BERT without trigger knowledge, but the best strategy depends on trigger type and the attack is weakened, not removed.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.