Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

ColorFoil: Investigating Color Blindness in Large Vision and Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.11685 v2 pith:PTQRXMXO submitted 2024-05-19 cs.CV cs.CL

classification cs.CVcs.CL
keywords modelscolorgroupvitperceptionabilitybridgetowerclipcolorfoil
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the utilization of Transformer architecture, large Vision and Language (V&L) models have shown promising performance in even zero-shot settings. Several studies, however, indicate a lack of robustness of the models when dealing with complex linguistics and visual attributes. In this work, we introduce a novel V&L benchmark - ColorFoil, by creating color-related foils to assess the models' perception ability to detect colors like red, white, green, etc. We evaluate seven state-of-the-art V&L models including CLIP, ViLT, GroupViT, and BridgeTower, etc. in a zero-shot setting and present intriguing findings from the V&L models. The experimental evaluation indicates that ViLT and BridgeTower demonstrate much better color perception capabilities compared to CLIP and its variants and GroupViT. Moreover, CLIP-based models and GroupViT struggle to distinguish colors that are visually distinct to humans with normal color perception ability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Good CREPE needs more than just Sugar: Investigating Biases in Compositional Vision-Language Benchmarks

    cs.CV 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Blind text-only likelihood models match or exceed CLIP on many compositionality benchmarks because positives and negatives differ systematically in length, plausibility, or image style.

  2. Assessing Color Vision Test in Large Vision-language Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    State-of-the-art vision-language models score only about 20% on a new synthetic color vision test, and LoRA fine-tuning on the same test distribution raises accuracy to about 94%.

Pith tools