REVIEW 6 cited by
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
NormAd: A Framework for Measuring the Cultural Adaptability of Large Language Models
read the original abstract
To be effectively and safely deployed to global user populations, large language models (LLMs) may need to adapt outputs to user values and cultures, not just know about them. We introduce NormAd, an evaluation framework to assess LLMs' cultural adaptability, specifically measuring their ability to judge social acceptability across varying levels of cultural norm specificity, from abstract values to explicit social norms. As an instantiation of our framework, we create NormAd-Eti, a benchmark of 2.6k situational descriptions representing social-etiquette related cultural norms from 75 countries. Through comprehensive experiments on NormAd-Eti, we find that LLMs struggle to accurately judge social acceptability across these varying degrees of cultural contexts and show stronger adaptability to English-centric cultures over those from the Global South. Even in the simplest setting where the relevant social norms are provided, the best LLMs' performance (< 82\%) lags behind humans (> 95\%). In settings with abstract values and country information, model performance drops substantially (< 60\%), while human accuracy remains high (> 90\%). Furthermore, we find that models are better at recognizing socially acceptable versus unacceptable situations. Our findings showcase the current pitfalls in socio-cultural reasoning of LLMs which hinder their adaptability for global audiences.
Forward citations
Cited by 6 Pith papers
-
XL-SafetyBench: A Country-Grounded Cross-Cultural Benchmark for LLM Safety and Cultural Sensitivity
XL-SafetyBench is a new cross-cultural benchmark showing frontier LLMs decouple jailbreak robustness from cultural sensitivity while local models trade off attack success against neutral-safe rates in a near-linear pa...
-
PLURAL: A Global Dataset for Value Alignment
Synthetic preference data generated from the Integrated Values Survey preserves cross-country value differences and enables DPO fine-tuning that improves LLM cultural alignment across five countries.
-
Validity of LLMs as data annotators: AMALIA on authority
Portugal's 9B-parameter national language model AMALIA agrees with human annotators on coding moral authority but fails a construct-validity test showing it reaches correct codes via surface correlates rather than the...
-
When Meaning Travels: A Granular Lens on Hybrid-MoE's Role in Idiomatic Understanding for Language Models
HybridMoE with controlled hybridization and idiomatic property signals yields 5-6% gains in figurative language representation for multilingual vision-language models.
-
Exploring Cross-lingual Latent Transplantation: Mutual Opportunities and Open Challenges
XTransplant empirically shows that cross-lingual latent transplantation yields mutual benefits for multilingual capability and cultural adaptability in LLMs, especially low-resource ones, while revealing underutilized...
-
Opportunities and Challenges of Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages in Humanities Research
This survey paper identifies opportunities for LLMs in low-resource language humanities research along with challenges in data accessibility, model adaptability, and cultural sensitivity.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.