Nonlocal Cubic Density Gibbs Measures from Bosonic Gibbs States with Three-Body Interactions

Hao Liang

Nonlocal Cubic Density Gibbs Measures from Bosonic Gibbs States with Three-Body Interactions

T0 review · 0 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A bosonic gas with nonlocal three-body interactions has a classical cubic Gibbs measure as its mean-field limit.

desk verdict A genuine, carefully executed extension of the LNR quantum-to-classical program to nonlocal cubic three-body interactions; Theorem 2.1 holds together, and the real caveats are the restrictive channel assumptions plus a small motivational identity bug. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.23041 v1 pith:PU4SQCD4 submitted 2026-07-25 math-ph math.APmath.MPmath.PR

Hao Liang This is my paper · ORCID

classification math-phmath.APmath.MPmath.PR MSC 81V7035Q5535Q4081P16

keywords bosonicGibbsstatesthree-bodyinteractionnonlinearmeasuresmean-fieldlimitdensity-channelrepresentationcoherentrelativefreeenergyreduceddensitymatrices

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to show that, in a high-temperature mean-field limit, a gas of bosons with a renormalized nonlocal three-body interaction is asymptotically described by a classical nonlinear Gibbs measure with a cubic density energy. The central result is that the relative free energy of the quantum Gibbs state converges to the classical free energy, and that every fixed-order reduced density matrix converges, in Hilbert–Schmidt norm, to the corresponding correlation operator of the classical measure. The proof works for interactions built from nonnegative density channels in dimensions two and three, with a smallness condition in three dimensions. If correct, it gives a complete quantum-to-classical reduction for these cubic interactions and supplies a general channel framework that also covers known positive-type quadratic models.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the density-channel representation of the interaction: v(x−y,x−z)=∫dν(ω)∫dr Jω(x−r)Jω(y−r)Jω(z−r), with nonnegative channels Jω. Each channel is renormalized by centering λdΓ(τ_rJω) at its free-state expectation, and the same centering defines the classical cubic energy D0. The proof then uses the coherent-state representation of the free Gibbs state, the Gibbs variational principle on both quantum and classical sides, uniform exponential estimates for the cubic interaction, and a Fock-space loop expansion that yields pointwise domination of the interacting reduced density kernels by the free ones. These ingredients together give the matching free-energy bounds and t

What would settle it

Compute, for a single smooth channel on the 3-torus with total strength Θ just above 1/43200, the exponential moment E exp((1+δ)D_{λ,K}) as K→∞; the paper's bound diverges exactly at 1/43200, so a finite value would show the smallness assumption is not sharp, while divergence would confirm it is a real threshold. A second check: allow one channel J to change sign while keeping |J| in the same L^3 class and test the pointwise kernel domination Γ^{(1)}_λ≤Γ^{(1)}_0; failure would show nonnegativity is essential.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes Theorem 2.1: under Assumption 2.1, as λ↓0, −log(Zλ/Z0) converges to −log z, and for every fixed k≥1, k!λ^k Γλ^{(k)} converges in Hilbert–Schmidt norm to γμ^{(k)}=∫|u^{⊗k}⟩⟨u^{⊗k}| dμ(u). Here dμ(u)=z^{-1}e^{-D0[u]} dμ0(u) is the nonlinear classical Gibbs measure, with μ0 the Gaussian free field and D0 the renormalized cubic density interaction. The proof treats the quantum interaction and the classical energy through the same density-channel representation, so the renormalizations match at finite λ and converge together. This is a full quantum-to-classical reduction for nonlocal cubic density interactions: both thermodynamic quantities and all fixed-order correlations b

Load-bearing premise

The proof relies on the three-body potential being assembled from nonnegative 'density channels' whose total strength is finite and, in three dimensions, so small that a certain explicit constant stays below 1/43200; the nonnegativity drives the key comparison of quantum and classical densities, and the smallness controls the exponential tails.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The relative free energy of the interacting bosonic Gibbs state equals the free energy of the classical nonlinear Gibbs measure, so thermodynamic quantities become computable from the classical functional.
Every fixed-order reduced density matrix of the quantum gas is asymptotically the corresponding correlation operator of the classical field distribution, so k-body observables are governed by the classical measure.
The convergence upgrades to L^r convergence of the integral kernels for every finite r in d=2 and for r<3 in d=3.
The framework includes quadratic positive-type channels as a special case, recovering known two-body results without extra weighted-summability assumptions.
Under the stated assumptions the classical nonlinear measure is well-defined with finite partition function, so it can serve as a reference object for further analysis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural extension the paper does not pursue is to odd p-body density interactions beyond cubic; the same channel-based renormalization and coherent-state comparison would likely work if an analogue of the one-channel exponential estimate can be proved.
In d=2, where no smallness condition is needed, the quantitative error estimates leave room for a joint limit in which the channel width shrinks with λ; the paper flags this but does not prove it.
The channel representation suggests that position-space renormalization of translated density channels is the more fundamental operation than Fourier-space renormalization, which may simplify derivations for non-translation-invariant interactions.
A testable consequence is that the quadratic submodel requires no smallness condition, so comparing convergence rates between the quadratic and cubic cases would isolate the cost of the cubic term.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know: this is a genuine new result. Theorem 2.1 extends the Lewin–Nam–Rougerie quantum-to-classical derivation to nonlocal cubic density-channel interactions, and the proof is internally consistent. I went through the main line carefully and found no load-bearing flaw. The cubic channel result is not in the literature; the quadratic special case reduces to the known LNR model. The coherent-state upper-symbol method is a real technical departure from the lower-symbol/de Finetti route, and the Ginibre-loop kernel domination is a nice piece of work. Constants are explicit, and the paper is honest about its limits: Remark 2.3 concedes that the d=3 smallness condition is incompatible with the delta-function limit, so the local Φ^6_d measure is not obtained here. That is a boundary, not a hidden flaw.

The soft spots are proportionate. Assumption 2.1 is doing a lot of work: nonnegativity of the channels is used exactly where the proof needs it, in the exponential-tail estimates and in the loop domination, and without J≥0 the argument collapses. The d=3 smallness bound Θ_{3,δ}<1/43200 is very restrictive, but it is explicit and honestly stated. The stress-test concern about Eq. (1.2) is correct: the mode-channel identity as written misses a complex conjugate (or a normalization adjustment). That is in the motivational Section 1.1, not in the proof of Theorem 2.1, where the channels are real and nonnegative, so it does not affect the central claim. Minor manuscript issues: duplicate references [35]/[36], an unclear citation in Section 2.1, and a missing identifier for [33]. None of these undermine the main theorem, but they should be cleaned up.

There is also some reliance on imported ingredients from [30] and [28], in particular Lemma 11.4 of [30]. That is normal in this field, and the paper credits it properly, but a referee should check those imports carefully along with the terse joint-spectral Jensen steps.

Bottom line: this is for people working on derivations of nonlinear Gibbs measures from many-body quantum systems, and for constructive QFT folks tracking the Φ^6_d program. It deserves a serious referee, not a desk reject. I would accept it with revision and ask for the quadratic identity fix, the reference cleanup, and a short note making the role of nonnegativity even more explicit.

Referee Report

0 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the high-temperature mean-field limit (λ↓0) of grand-canonical bosonic Gibbs states on the torus T^d, d=2,3, with a nonlocal, translation-invariant three-body interaction defined through nonnegative density channels. Under Assumption 2.1—finite ∫║J_ω║_{L∞}^3 dν and, for d=3, the smallness condition Θ_{3,δ}<1/43200—Theorem 2.1 proves convergence of the relative free energy −log(Z_λ/Z_0) to −log z for the classical nonlinear Gibbs measure dμ=z^{-1}e^{-D_0}dμ_0, and Hilbert–Schmidt convergence of every fixed-order reduced density matrix k!λ^k Γ_λ^{(k)} to γ_μ^{(k)}=∫|u^{⊗k}⟩⟨u^{⊗k}|dμ(u). The proof uses density-channel renormalization, the coherent-state representation of the free Gibbs state, exponential tail estimates on both classical and quantum sides, a Gibbs-variational comparison, and a Ginibre loop representation to obtain pointwise kernel domination by the free kernels.

Significance. If correct, Theorem 2.1 is a significant quantum-to-classical reduction: it gives a rigorous derivation of a nonlocal cubic (Φ^6-like) nonlinear Gibbs measure from many-body bosonic Gibbs states, going beyond the quadratic positive-type setting of [30]. The proof is unusually explicit: constants are tracked, the channel hypotheses are stated precisely, and there are no fitted parameters. The restrictions—nonnegative channels and the d=3 smallness condition—are real but are exactly the properties used by the monotonicity and exponential-integrability arguments. The paper is not machine-checked and imports Lemma 11.4 of [30], but the central derivation appears internally consistent and the burden of circularity is low, since the classical measure is constructed from the same channel data and its convergence is proved rather than assumed.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (1.2), (1.4)] The displayed identity is false as written: for k≠0, ∫ J_k(x−r)J_k(y−r)dr = 0 because of the factor e^{-2ik·r}. The correct kernel is ∫ overline{J_k(x−r)}J_k(y−r)dr, and correspondingly (1.4) should use overline{J_ω(x−r)}J_ω(y−r). This does not affect Theorem 2.1, since the cubic channels are real and the quadratic energy uses |X|^2, but the claim that (1.4) contains the positive-type model needs this correction.
[Section 3, Remark 2.2] The quadratic-channel case is presented as a result but only as a sketch. If the quadratic analogue is claimed as a theorem, it should be stated with its precise assumptions (complex channels, unweighted summability) and a full proof or a precise reference; otherwise the passage should be explicitly labelled as an informal sketch.
[Proposition 8.3] The proof relies on Lemma 11.4 of [30] without stating it. Since this lemma is load-bearing for the Hilbert–Schmidt convergence of reduced density matrices, please state the lemma or give a self-contained proof, even if it is short, to make the paper more readable.
[References] References [35] and [36] appear to be the same arXiv preprint with the same title. These should be unified, and the citation text around [36] should be checked for accidental duplication.
[Proof of Corollary 2.4] The phrase 'finite-volume embedding for exponents below 2, and interpolation for exponents above 2' is terse. A one-sentence explanation of the exact interpolation scheme would help the reader verify the claimed L^r range, especially in d=3 where the uniform L^s bound is restricted to s<3.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the classical measure is the proved limit, not an input; all cited lemmas are external.

full rationale

The derivation is self-contained in the relevant sense. The classical nonlinear Gibbs measure is defined in Eq. (2.4) from the same channel data (J_omega) as the quantum Hamiltonian, but the theorem does not assume the quantum-to-classical convergence; it proves it. No parameter is fitted to the quantum side, and no 'prediction' is obtained by renaming an input. The proof chain is: (i) construct the classical measure and prove its exponential integrability (Propositions 4.7, 4.8); (ii) prove classical partition-function convergence z_lambda -> z (Proposition 5.2); (iii) prove matching lower and upper bounds for the relative free energy using Golden-Thompson, the coherent-state representation of the free Gibbs state, and quantum exponential estimates (Propositions 6.4, 7.2, 7.4); (iv) establish trace-norm closeness of the Gibbs state to the coherent trial state (Corollary 7.5); and (v) upgrade to Hilbert-Schmidt convergence of all fixed-order reduced density matrices using the external estimate [30, Lemma 11.4] together with uniform S2 bounds from the Ginibre loop representation (Proposition C.2, Corollary C.3). The cited results [28], [30], [31], [39] are by other authors and are used as external lemmas with stated assumptions; there are no load-bearing self-citations, no imported uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz smuggled in via a citation. The only flagged mathematical concern, the apparent conjugation/normalization issue in the motivational identity (1.2), concerns the quadratic special case and is not used in the proof of Theorem 2.1, where J_omega is real and nonnegative. Under the paper's explicit Assumption 2.1, the main theorem is therefore a genuine asymptotic derivation rather than a circular statement.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the channel representation of the interaction and standard tools of mathematical physics. No parameter is fitted to data; all constants are explicit. Density channels are a mathematical representation, not a new physical entity.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Assumption 2.1: v has the channel representation v(x−y,x−z)=∫_Ω dν(ω)∫_{T^d} Jω(x−r)Jω(y−r)Jω(z−r) dr with Jω≥0 and ∫||Jω||^3_{L∞} dν<∞; if d=3, Θ_{3,δ}<1/43200.
Defines the interaction class; nonnegativity drives the kernel domination in Appendix C and the smallness condition drives exponential integrability in d=3.
standard math Feynman–Kac formula and Ginibre loop representation for traces and reduced density matrices (Appendix C).
Used to obtain pointwise kernel domination Γ^{(k)}_λ ≤ Γ^{(k)}_0 and the uniform S2 bounds in Proposition 8.3.
standard math Gibbs variational principle and monotonicity of quantum relative entropy under completely positive trace-preserving maps.
Used for the free-energy lower and upper bounds in Sections 7.1 and 7.2.
standard math Gaussian moment and Wick identities, including ∫|u^{⊗k}⟩⟨u^{⊗k}| dµ_C = k! C^{⊗k}, and the tail bounds in Lemmas A.1 and A.2.
Foundation of the mass renormalization, exponential estimates, and Hilbert–Schmidt convergence proofs.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlocal Cubic Density Gibbs Measures from Bosonic Gibbs States with Three-Body Interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PU4SQCD4

@misc{pith2026260723041,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlocal Cubic Density Gibbs Measures from Bosonic Gibbs States with Three-Body Interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PU4SQCD4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.23041}
}

read the original abstract

We study the high-temperature mean-field limit of grand-canonical bosonic Gibbs states on the torus with renormalized nonlocal three-body interactions. In dimensions two and three, we construct the limiting nonlinear classical Gibbs measure and prove convergence of the relative free energy and of the reduced density matrices of every fixed order; in three dimensions, a smallness condition on the interaction is imposed. The proof combines the density-channel representation of the interaction with a coherent-state variational method based on the upper-symbol representation of the free Gibbs state. The same framework also contains, as a special case, the homogeneous positive-type model studied by Lewin, Nam, and Rougerie (2021).

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 6 linked inside Pith

[36]

Derivation of gibbs measure from gibbs state with the fractional bessel interaction in two dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.21583, 2026

Phan Th` anh Nam, Rongchan Zhu, and Xiangchan Zhu. Derivation of gibbs measure from gibbs state with the fractional bessel interaction in two dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.21583, 2026

arXiv 2026
[33]

Phan Th` anh Nam, Zhilin Yang, and Xiangchan Zhu.P(Φ) 2 Theory from many-body quantum Gibbs states.arXiv preprint, 2026

2026
[30]

Classical field theory limit of many-body quantum gibbs states in 2d and 3d.Inventiones Mathematicae, 224(2), 2021

Mathieu Lewin, Phan Th` anh Nam, and Nicolas Rougerie. Classical field theory limit of many-body quantum gibbs states in 2d and 3d.Inventiones Mathematicae, 224(2), 2021

2021
[28]

Derivation of nonlinear gibbs measures from many-body quantum mechanics.Journal de l’ ´Ecole polytechnique—Math´ ematiques, 2:65–115, 2015

Mathieu Lewin, Phan Th` anh Nam, and Nicolas Rougerie. Derivation of nonlinear gibbs measures from many-body quantum mechanics.Journal de l’ ´Ecole polytechnique—Math´ ematiques, 2:65–115, 2015

2015
[1]

Periodic nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 166(1):1–26, 1994

Jean Bourgain. Periodic nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 166(1):1–26, 1994

1994
[2]

Invariant measures for the 2d-defocusing nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation.Commu- nications in mathematical physics, 176(2):421–445, 1996

Jean Bourgain. Invariant measures for the 2d-defocusing nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation.Commu- nications in mathematical physics, 176(2):421–445, 1996

1996
[3]

Invariant measures for the gross-piatevskii equation.Journal de math´ ematiques pures et appliqu´ ees, 76(8):649–702, 1997

Jean Bourgain. Invariant measures for the gross-piatevskii equation.Journal de math´ ematiques pures et appliqu´ ees, 76(8):649–702, 1997

1997
[4]

Invariant measures for nls in infinite volume.Communications in mathematical physics, 210(3):605–620, 2000

Jean Bourgain. Invariant measures for nls in infinite volume.Communications in mathematical physics, 210(3):605–620, 2000

2000

Show all 40 references

[5]

Almost sure global well posedness for the radial nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation on the unit ball i: the 2d case

Jean Bourgain and Aynur Bulut. Almost sure global well posedness for the radial nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation on the unit ball i: the 2d case. InAnnales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, Analyse non lin´ eaire, volume 31, pages 1267–1288. Elsevier, 2014

2014
[6]

Jean Bourgain and Aynur Bulut. Almost sure global well-posedness for the radial nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation on the unit ball ii: the 3d case.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 16(6):1289–1325, 2014

2014
[7]

Invariant gibbs measures for the three dimensional cubic nonlinear wave equation.Inventiones mathematicae, 236(3):1133–1411, 2024

Bjoern Bringmann, Yu Deng, Andrea R Nahmod, and Haitian Yue. Invariant gibbs measures for the three dimensional cubic nonlinear wave equation.Inventiones mathematicae, 236(3):1133–1411, 2024

2024
[8]

Random data cauchy theory for supercritical wave equations i: local theory.Inventiones mathematicae, 173(3):449–475, 2008

Nicolas Burq and Nikolay Tzvetkov. Random data cauchy theory for supercritical wave equations i: local theory.Inventiones mathematicae, 173(3):449–475, 2008

2008
[9]

Random data cauchy theory for supercritical wave equations ii: A global existence result.Inventiones mathematicae, 173(3):477–496, 2008

Nicolas Burq and Nikolay Tzvetkov. Random data cauchy theory for supercritical wave equations ii: A global existence result.Inventiones mathematicae, 173(3):477–496, 2008

2008
[10]

The euclidean Φ 4 2 theory as a limit of an inhomogeneous bose gas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.12241, 2026

Cristina Caraci, Antti Knowles, Alessio Ranallo, and Pedro Torres Giesteira. The euclidean Φ 4 2 theory as a limit of an inhomogeneous bose gas.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.12241, 2026

2026
[11]

Two-dimensional nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation with random radial data.Analysis & PDE, 5(5):913–960, 2012

Yu Deng. Two-dimensional nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation with random radial data.Analysis & PDE, 5(5):913–960, 2012

2012
[12]

Invariant gibbs measures and global strong solutions for nonlinear schr¨ odinger equations in dimension two.Annals of Mathematics, 200(2):399–486, 2024

Yu Deng, Andrea Nahmod, and Haitian Yue. Invariant gibbs measures and global strong solutions for nonlinear schr¨ odinger equations in dimension two.Annals of Mathematics, 200(2):399–486, 2024

2024
[13]

Invariant gibbs measure and global strong solutions for the hartree nls equation in dimension three.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 62(3), 2021

Yu Deng, Andrea R Nahmod, and Haitian Yue. Invariant gibbs measure and global strong solutions for the hartree nls equation in dimension three.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 62(3), 2021

2021
[14]

A perturbative microscopic derivation of the focusing Φ 6 1 mea- sure with rough cut-off.arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.20400, 2026

Shahnaz Farhat and Andrew Rout. A perturbative microscopic derivation of the focusing Φ 6 1 mea- sure with rough cut-off.arXiv preprint arXiv:2607.20400, 2026

2026 arXiv
[15]

Gibbs measures of nonlinear schr¨ odinger equations as limits of many-body quantum states in dimensions d⩽3.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 356(3):883–980, 2017

J¨ urg Fr¨ ohlich, Antti Knowles, Benjamin Schlein, and Vedran Sohinger. Gibbs measures of nonlinear schr¨ odinger equations as limits of many-body quantum states in dimensions d⩽3.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 356(3):883–980, 2017

2017
[16]

A microscopic derivation of time-dependent correlation functions of the 1D cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Advances in Mathematics, 353:67–115, 2019

J¨ urg Fr¨ ohlich, Antti Knowles, Benjamin Schlein, and Vedran Sohinger. A microscopic derivation of time-dependent correlation functions of the 1D cubic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation.Advances in Mathematics, 353:67–115, 2019

2019
[17]

A path-integral analysis of interacting bose gases and loop gases.arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.11714, 2020

J¨ urg Fr¨ ohlich, Antti Knowles, Benjamin Schlein, and Vedran Sohinger. A path-integral analysis of interacting bose gases and loop gases.arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.11714, 2020

2001 arXiv
[18]

The mean-field limit of quan- tum bose gases at positive temperature.Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 35(4):955– 1030, 2022

J¨ urg Fr¨ ohlich, Antti Knowles, Benjamin Schlein, and Vedran Sohinger. The mean-field limit of quan- tum bose gases at positive temperature.Journal of the American Mathematical Society, 35(4):955– 1030, 2022

2022
[19]

Interacting loop ensembles and bose gases

J¨ urg Fr¨ ohlich, Antti Knowles, Benjamin Schlein, and Vedran Sohinger. Interacting loop ensembles and bose gases. InAnnales Henri Poincar´ e, volume 24, pages 1439–1503. Springer, 2023

2023
[20]

The euclideanφ4 2 theory as a limit of an interacting bose gas.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 27(11):4399–4468, 2025

J¨ urg Fr¨ ohlich, Antti Knowles, Benjamin Schlein, and Vedran Sohinger. The euclideanφ4 2 theory as a limit of an interacting bose gas.Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 27(11):4399–4468, 2025

2025
[21]

The large-mass limit of interacting quan- tum gases in the continuum.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.23020, 2026

Spyros Garouniatis, Grega Saksida, and Vedran Sohinger. The large-mass limit of interacting quan- tum gases in the continuum.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.23020, 2026

2026 arXiv
[22]

Reduced density matrices of quantum gases

Jean Ginibre. Reduced density matrices of quantum gases. I. limit of infinite volume.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 6(2):238–251, 1965

1965
[23]

Reduced density matrices of quantum gases

Jean Ginibre. Reduced density matrices of quantum gases. II. cluster property.Journal of Mathe- matical Physics, 6(2):252–262, 1965

1965
[24]

Reduced density matrices of quantum gases

Jean Ginibre. Reduced density matrices of quantum gases. III. hard-core potentials.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 6(9):1432–1446, 1965. 50 H. LIANG

1965
[25]

Some applications of functional integration in statistical mechanics.Statistical me- chanics and quantum field theory, 327, 1971

Jean Ginibre. Some applications of functional integration in statistical mechanics.Statistical me- chanics and quantum field theory, 327, 1971

1971
[26]

TheP(Φ) 2 euclidean quantum field theory as classical statistical mechanics.Annals of Mathematics, 101(1):111–189, 1975

Francesco Guerra, Lon Rosen, and Barry Simon. TheP(Φ) 2 euclidean quantum field theory as classical statistical mechanics.Annals of Mathematics, 101(1):111–189, 1975

1975
[27]

Φ 4 2 theory limit of a many-body bosonic free energy.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 67(6):061902, 2026

Lucas Jougla and Nicolas Rougerie. Φ 4 2 theory limit of a many-body bosonic free energy.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 67(6):061902, 2026

2026
[29]

Gibbs measures based on 1D (an)harmonic oscillators as mean-field limits.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59(4):041901, 2018

Mathieu Lewin, Phan Th` anh Nam, and Nicolas Rougerie. Gibbs measures based on 1D (an)harmonic oscillators as mean-field limits.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 59(4):041901, 2018

2018
[31]

Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities.Communications in Mathe- matical Physics, 40(2):147–151, 1975

G¨ oran Lindblad. Completely positive maps and entropy inequalities.Communications in Mathe- matical Physics, 40(2):147–151, 1975

1975
[32]

Derivation of the focusing Φ6 1 measure in the optimal mass regime from many-body quantum gibbs states.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.25755, 2026

Lin L¨ u, Phan Th` anh Nam, and Rongchan Zhu. Derivation of the focusing Φ6 1 measure in the optimal mass regime from many-body quantum gibbs states.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.25755, 2026

2026 arXiv
[34]

Φ4 3 Theory from many-body quantum Gibbs states.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04884, 2025

Phan Th` anh Nam, Rongchan Zhu, and Xiangchan Zhu. Φ4 3 Theory from many-body quantum Gibbs states.arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.04884, 2025

2025 arXiv
[37]

Construction of quantum fields from markoff fields.Journal of Functional Analysis, 12(1):97–112, 1973

Edward Nelson. Construction of quantum fields from markoff fields.Journal of Functional Analysis, 12(1):97–112, 1973

1973
[38]

Probability theory and euclidean field theory

Edward Nelson. Probability theory and euclidean field theory. InConstructive quantum field theory, pages 94–124. Springer, 2007

2007
[39]

Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

Masanori Ohya and D´ enes Petz.Quantum entropy and its use. Springer Science & Business Media, 2004

2004
[40]

InP(Φ) 2 Euclidean (Quantum) Field Theory

Barry Simon.P(Φ) 2 euclidean (quantum) field theory. InP(Φ) 2 Euclidean (Quantum) Field Theory. Princeton University Press, 2015

2015
[41]

Vedran Sohinger. A microscopic derivation of gibbs measures for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equa- tions with unbounded interaction potentials.International Mathematics Research Notices, 2022(19):14964–15063, 2022. School of Mathematical Sciences, Peking University, Beijing, 100871...

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [36]

Derivation of gibbs measure from gibbs state with the fractional bessel interaction in two dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.21583, 2026

Phan Th` anh Nam, Rongchan Zhu, and Xiangchan Zhu. Derivation of gibbs measure from gibbs state with the fractional bessel interaction in two dimensions.arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.21583, 2026

arXiv 2026

[2] [33]

Phan Th` anh Nam, Zhilin Yang, and Xiangchan Zhu.P(Φ) 2 Theory from many-body quantum Gibbs states.arXiv preprint, 2026

2026

[3] [30]

Classical field theory limit of many-body quantum gibbs states in 2d and 3d.Inventiones Mathematicae, 224(2), 2021

Mathieu Lewin, Phan Th` anh Nam, and Nicolas Rougerie. Classical field theory limit of many-body quantum gibbs states in 2d and 3d.Inventiones Mathematicae, 224(2), 2021

2021

[4] [28]

Derivation of nonlinear gibbs measures from many-body quantum mechanics.Journal de l’ ´Ecole polytechnique—Math´ ematiques, 2:65–115, 2015

Mathieu Lewin, Phan Th` anh Nam, and Nicolas Rougerie. Derivation of nonlinear gibbs measures from many-body quantum mechanics.Journal de l’ ´Ecole polytechnique—Math´ ematiques, 2:65–115, 2015

2015

[5] [1]

Periodic nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 166(1):1–26, 1994

Jean Bourgain. Periodic nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation and invariant measures.Communications in Mathematical Physics, 166(1):1–26, 1994

1994

[6] [2]

Invariant measures for the 2d-defocusing nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation.Commu- nications in mathematical physics, 176(2):421–445, 1996

Jean Bourgain. Invariant measures for the 2d-defocusing nonlinear schr¨ odinger equation.Commu- nications in mathematical physics, 176(2):421–445, 1996

1996

[7] [3]

Invariant measures for the gross-piatevskii equation.Journal de math´ ematiques pures et appliqu´ ees, 76(8):649–702, 1997

Jean Bourgain. Invariant measures for the gross-piatevskii equation.Journal de math´ ematiques pures et appliqu´ ees, 76(8):649–702, 1997

1997

[8] [4]

Invariant measures for nls in infinite volume.Communications in mathematical physics, 210(3):605–620, 2000

Jean Bourgain. Invariant measures for nls in infinite volume.Communications in mathematical physics, 210(3):605–620, 2000

2000