Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Optical Switching of $\chi^{(2)}$ in Diamond Photonics

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-12 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Green light can reversibly switch the effective second-order nonlinearity of diamond by changing the charge state of nitrogen-vacancy centers, according to cavity-enhanced second-harmonic measurements.

desk verdict Solid, reversible demonstration of all-optical chi(2) switching in diamond microdisks; the charge-state mechanism is likely but not directly proven, and the paper deserves peer review. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.06792 v3 pith:PUI25WVX submitted 2024-11-22 physics.optics cond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph

classification physics.opticscond-mat.mes-hallquant-ph
keywords second-harmonicgenerationnitrogen-vacancycentersdiamondmicrodiskcharge-stateconversionphotoionizationopticalswitchingwhispering-gallery-modecavityelectric-field-induced
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper aims to establish that the effective second-order optical nonlinearity of diamond can be controlled by the electronic state of defects inside the crystal, not just by its structure. Using a diamond microdisk cavity that is resonant at both the pump wavelength and its second harmonic, the authors generate $\chi^{(2)}$-mediated second-harmonic light from a low-power telecom laser and show that green illumination reversibly quenches that emission by about 80%. They attribute the quenching to the photoionization of negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy (NV$^-$) centers into neutral NV$^0$, which removes the local electric field that makes the effective $\chi^{(2)}$ nonzero in an otherwise centrosymmetric crystal. The effect persists over 40 hours of toggling, so the paper proposes green light as an all-optical switch for second-order nonlinear processes in diamond.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is electric-field-induced second-harmonic generation from charged defects in a centrosymmetric host. Negatively charged NV centers create a local static field $E_{\mathrm{DC}}$; through the third-order susceptibility of diamond this yields an effective second-order response $\chi^{(2)}_{\mathrm{EFISH}}=3\chi^{(3)}E_{\mathrm{DC}}$. The experiment couples this to a high-$Q$ whispering-gallery-mode microdisk that is doubly resonant at $\omega$ and $2\omega$, so two infrared pump photons at $\omega$ convert to one photon at $2\omega$ with milliwatt-level continuous-wave power. Green light drives NV$^-$ into its excited $^3E$ state, from which two infrared photons in the cavity ionize it into the dark $^4A_2$ state of NV$^0$; the charge reconfiguration (NV$^-$ + N$_s^+ \to$ NV$^0$ + N$_s^0$) removes $E_{\mathrm{DC}}$ and quenches the SHG. The wavelength dependence of the quenching is read against the known 637 nm NV$^-$, 575 nm NV$^0$, and 564 nm N$_s$ thresholds, which separates the four spectral regions observed.

What would settle it

A direct test would measure SHG quenching while independently tracking the NV$^-$ to NV$^0$ population, for example by single-shot charge-state detection or by monitoring absorption at the NV$^0$ zero-phonon line in the same cavity. If the SHG quenching does not track NV$^0$ formation, or if comparable quenching appears at wavelengths above 637 nm where NV$^-$ cannot be excited, the charge-state mechanism would be falsified in favor of a thermal or other artifact.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the magnitude of diamond's effective second-order susceptibility $\chi^{(2)}_{\mathrm{eff}}$ depends on the charge state of nitrogen-vacancy centers, and can therefore be switched optically. In a diamond microdisk containing a uniform NV ensemble, continuous-wave infrared light near 1547 nm produces second-harmonic light at the cavity's half-wavelength mode; illuminating the disk with 532 nm light quenches this SHG by roughly 80%, and turning the green light off restores it. The authors connect the quenching to a two-step charge-state conversion: a green photon excites NV$^-$ from its ground state to the excited $^3E$ state, and the intense cavity infrared field then ionizes it with two photons into the long-lived dark $^4A_2$ state of NV$^0$. They further show that the quenching as a function of visible excitation wavelength (480–800 nm) has thresholds at the NV$^-$ zero-phonon line (637 nm), the NV$^0$ zero-phonon line (575 nm), and the substitutional-nitrogen ionization edge (564 nm), consistent with charge-state cycling rather than a thermal or mechanical effect.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim rests on the assumption that the green-induced drop in second-harmonic light is caused by conversion of negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy centers to neutral ones, changing the local electric field, rather than by heating or another optical artifact, and that the correction for background light from the centers is accurate.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Green illumination becomes a reversible, all-optical control knob for $\chi^{(2)}$ in diamond nanophotonics, enabling frequency-conversion and modulation devices that can be switched with a secondary continuous-wave laser.
  • The strength of cavity-enhanced SHG can serve as a non-destructive monitor of the solid-state charge environment inside a diamond device, sensing NV charge-state populations and local electric fields.
  • The effect is deterministic and repeatable over at least 40 hours, so charge-state switching is stable enough for practical device cycling.
  • Shorter visible wavelengths that ionize substitutional nitrogen as well as NV centers produce larger $\chi^{(2)}$ modifications, meaning defect-engineering choices such as NV and nitrogen density directly set the achievable switching contrast.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • My inference: a time-resolved version of this experiment, toggling the green laser and recording SHG with fast time resolution, should reveal the NV$^0$ recombination lifetime under cavity-enhanced infrared pumping and connect switching speed to known charge-state dynamics.
  • My inference: if the local-field EFISH contribution dominates, the switching contrast should scale with the density of charged NV pairs and could be amplified by co-doping or electrical biasing, a testable prediction the paper does not make explicitly.
  • My inference: the same mechanism may transfer to other color-center or defect systems in centrosymmetric materials, where optically switchable charge states would serve as in-situ nonlinearity switches.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports second-harmonic generation (SHG) in a diamond microdisk cavity and demonstrates that the SHG intensity—interpreted as the effective second-order susceptibility χ_eff^(2)—can be suppressed by roughly 80% when the device is illuminated with a green (532 nm) laser, and restored when the green light is removed, over a 40-hour toggling experiment. The authors attribute the quenching to photoionization of negatively charged nitrogen-vacancy (NV−) centers to the neutral charge state (NV0), which changes the local electric field and thereby reduces the defect-induced χ^(2). The evidence includes: unchanged cavity transmission and unchanged third-harmonic signal under green illumination; correlation between green-power-dependent SHG quenching and IR-induced suppression of NV photoluminescence; and a wavelength dependence of the quenching that tracks ionization thresholds of N_s and the NV charge states. The paper concludes that χ_eff^(2) is optically switchable via defect charge-state control, opening a route to second-order nonlinear photonics in diamond.

Significance. If the central claim holds, this is a notable result: it would be the first demonstration of all-optical, reversible switching of χ^(2) in diamond, and it would strengthen the emerging picture that point defects can dominate the effective second-order nonlinearity of centrosymmetric hosts. The experimental controls—particularly the unchanged cavity transmission and third-harmonic signal—rule out a simple cavity-resonance-shift artifact, and the 40-hour repeatability of the switching is a strong practical demonstration. The paper also makes a useful conceptual contribution by connecting NV charge-state dynamics to nonlinear optical readout. However, the mechanistic attribution to NV−/NV0 photoionization is not directly verified in the same device; the evidence is correlational and relies on an untested background-correction assumption. The significance is therefore contingent on whether the authors can close the gap between the SHG response and the defect charge-state population.

major comments (3)
  1. [Fig. 3 and Fig. 4] The central mechanistic claim is that SHG quenching arises from NV−→NV0 photoionization, but the charge-state population is never measured during the SHG experiment. The only charge-state proxy is the IR-induced suppression of NV PL (RPL), which is generated by the same green and IR fields. Because the correlation between RSHG and RPL in Fig. 3(b) does not distinguish photoionization from a common-mode artifact such as green-induced free-carrier absorption or a local electric-field change unrelated to NV charge state, I ask the authors to either measure the NV−/NV0 population directly (for example, by spectrally resolving NV PL under green-only and green+IR conditions, or by charge-state-sensitive readout) or to substantially temper the causal wording in the abstract and conclusion.
  2. [Fig. 3 caption, RSHG correction] The quantitative RSHG values in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 rely on an untested assumption: that PL emitted into the SHG cavity mode is suppressed by the IR field in the same proportion as PL in other modes. If the spatial or spectral population coupled to the SHG mode differs, the background subtraction is biased and the reported quenching values could be distorted. This assumption should be justified experimentally, for example by comparing the IR-induced suppression of PL in multiple spectrally resolved cavity modes, or by using a measurement geometry in which the SHG mode is spectrally clear of NV PL.
  3. [Fig. 4 and discussion] The wavelength-dependence argument in Region II (564–575 nm) is used to distinguish N_s photoionization from NV charge-state cycling, but the data in that region show only a modest increase in RSHG and the gray uncertainty band for RSHG > 0.87 is broad. The claim that Region II is a distinct regime with 'substantially smaller changes to the charge environment' would be stronger with additional data points within that narrow band and with explicit error bars on the mean RSHG values. As presented, the plateau interpretation in Regions II and III is plausible but not uniquely determined by the data.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a grammar error: 'versatile materials' should be 'versatile material', and the sentence 'The modification of χ(2) arises from photoionisation...' is a causal claim that should be flagged as the proposed mechanism rather than an established fact.
  2. [Conclusion] The phrase 'deterministic modulate' is a typo; it should read 'deterministic modulation'.
  3. [Fig. 4(b)] The energy-level diagrams in Fig. 4(b) are informative but would benefit from a clear labeling of which transitions are allowed in each wavelength region; currently the sub-panel boundaries are described only in the caption and text.
  4. [References] Ref. [53] is a preprint from the same group describing the IR-assisted two-photon photoionization mechanism. Since this mechanism is load-bearing for the interpretation, the authors should either cite published work supporting the same mechanism or explicitly state that the present results independently corroborate the preprint.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity; central SHG measurement is self-contained, with only a minor same-group citation for the IR-assisted dark-state mechanism.

full rationale

The paper's central chain is experimental: SHG is measured in a diamond microdisk, green illumination reproducibly quenches it by ~80%, and the quenching's power and wavelength dependence are compared with NV-center photoluminescence suppression and with known NV/N_s energy thresholds. No parameter is fitted to a subset of data and then re-predicted as a new result; RSHG and RPL are both directly measured observables. The interpretation of the wavelength dependence is anchored to externally measured thresholds (Ns 2.2 eV, NV0 ZPL 575 nm, NV- ZPL 637 nm, 3A2-to-2E ionization 2.65 eV), not to quantities defined inside this paper. The cavity-shift controls (unchanged IR transmission and third-harmonic signal) rule out the most obvious re-labeling concern, namely that the 'chi2 change' is just a cavity resonance shift. The only same-group citation is [53], used for the two-IR-photon photoionization pathway from NV- to the dark NV0 state. This is not load-bearing circularity because Fig. 3(a) itself reproduces the IR-field-induced PL suppression, and the paper explicitly concedes that 'further measurements, particularly in the time domain, are required to definitively identify the dominant mechanism.' The Fig. 3 correction for background PL in the SHG mode is an untested assumption that could bias quantitative RSHG values, but it is a measurement-correction caveat rather than an input re-labeled as a prediction. Overall, the central claim does not reduce by construction to its inputs; the honest finding is low-to-negligible circularity, with only a minor self-citation present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result is an experimental observation with a phenomenological model built from prior literature. No free parameters are fitted in this paper. The main premises are the EFISH description of defect-induced chi2 and the literature energy-level assignments used to correlate wavelength dependence with charge-state transitions; both are reasonable but external. One data-processing assumption, uniform PL suppression across modes, is specific to this paper and untested.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The diamond chip hosts NV centers at density roughly 1e13 to 1e14 cm-3 and substitutional nitrogen at roughly 1e17 cm-3.
    Device characterization is taken from refs 50 and 51; the density is not measured in this paper and determines the expected charge-induced nonlinearity.
  • domain assumption The effective second-order susceptibility of a centrosymmetric material is the sum of host and defect contributions (Eq. 2), with the defect contribution modeled as chi2_EFISH = 3 chi3 EDC (Eq. 1).
    Used to interpret SHG quenching as a reduction in local electric field; established in prior silicon and perovskite work (refs 37-41).
  • domain assumption The energy level positions used to assign Regions I-IV in Fig. 4 are correct for the local diamond environment.
    The wavelength-dependence interpretation depends on literature values for the Ns ionization threshold (2.2 eV), the NV0 2E-2A2 transition (2.156 eV), the NV- 3A2-3E transition (1.945 eV), and the NV- photoionization threshold (2.65 eV), from refs 58, 62-64, and 67.
  • ad hoc to paper Photoluminescence measured in the SHG mode is suppressed by the IR field in the same proportion as PL in other modes.
    Used to subtract PL background from the SHG counts in Fig. 3; stated in the figure caption but not independently verified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Optical Switching of $\chi^{(2)}$ in Diamond Photonics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PUI25WVX

@misc{pith2026241206792,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Optical Switching of $\chi^(2)$ in Diamond Photonics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PUI25WVX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.06792}
}
abstract

Diamond's unique physical properties make it a versatile material for a wide range of nonlinear and quantum photonic technologies. However, unlocking diamond's full potential as a nonlinear photonic material with non-zero second-order susceptibility $\chi^{(2)}\neq0$ requires symmetry breaking. In this work, we use a nanoscale cavity to demonstrate second-harmonic generation (SHG) in diamond, and demonstrate, for the first time, that the magnitude of the diamond's effective $\chi^{(2)}$ strongly depends on the electronic configuration of defects in the diamond crystal, such as nitrogen-vacancy centres. The modification of $\chi^{(2)}$ arises from photoionisation from the negative to neutral charge-state, and is manifested by quenching of SHG upon green illumination. Toggling the green illumination allows for optical switching of the device's $\chi^{(2)}$. Optical control of $\chi^{(2)}$ by defect engineering opens the door for second-order nonlinear processes in diamond.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.06792 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Deterministic optical switching of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Photorefractive tuning seeded by third-harmonic light in a diamond photonic crystal cavity

    physics.optics 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Third-harmonic green light generated inside a diamond nanocavity seeds a photorefractive effect that blue-shifts the cavity resonance by 20.2 GHz, enabling deterministic in-situ tuning.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    P. K. Shandilya, S. Fl ˚ agan, N. C. Carvalho, E. Zohari, V. K. Kavatamane, J. E. Losby, and P. E. Barclay, Dia- mond Integrated Quantum Nanophotonics: Spins, Pho- tons and Phonons, Journal of Lightwave Technology 40, 7538 (2022)

  2. [2]

    Janitz, M

    E. Janitz, M. K. Bhaskar, and L. Childress, Cavity quan- tum electrodynamics with color centers in diamond, Op- tica 7, 1232 (2020)

  3. [3]

    Hedrich, D

    N. Hedrich, D. Rohner, M. Batzer, P. Maletinsky, and B. J. Shields, Parabolic Diamond Scanning Probes for Single-Spin Magnetic Field Imaging, Physical Review Applied 14, 064007 (2020)

  4. [4]

    Pasini, N

    M. Pasini, N. Codreanu, T. Turan, A. Riera Moral, C. F. Primavera, L. De Santis, H. K. Beukers, J. M. Brevoord, C. Waas, J. Borregaard, and R. Hanson, Nonlinear Quan- tum Photonics with a Tin-Vacancy Center Coupled to a One-Dimensional Diamond Waveguide, Physical Review Letters 133, 023603 (2024)

  5. [5]

    P. K. Shandilya, D. P. Lake, M. J. Mitchell, D. D. Sukachev, and P. E. Barclay, Optomechanical interface between telecom photons and spin quantum memory, Na- ture Physics 17, 1420 (2021)

  6. [6]

    G. Joe, C. Chia, B. Pingault, M. Haas, M. Chalup- nik, E. Cornell, K. Kuruma, B. Machielse, N. Sinclair, S. Meesala, and M. Lonˇ car, High Q -Factor Diamond Optomechanical Resonators with Silicon Vacancy Cen- ters at Millikelvin Temperatures, Nano Letters 24, 6831 (2024)

  7. [7]

    B. J. M. Hausmann, I. Bulu, V. Venkataraman, P. Deotare, and M. Lonˇ car, Diamond nonlinear photon- ics, Nature Photonics 8, 369 (2014)

  8. [8]

    Riedel, S

    D. Riedel, S. Fl ˚ agan, P. Maletinsky, and R. J. Warburton, Cavity-Enhanced Raman Scattering for In Situ Align- ment and Characterization of Solid-State Microcavities, Physical Review Applied 13, 014036 (2020)

Show all 68 references
  1. [9]

    Fl ˚ agan, P

    S. Fl ˚ agan, P. Maletinsky, R. J. Warburton, and D. Riedel, Microcavity platform for widely tunable optical double resonance, Optica 9, 1197 (2022)

  2. [10]

    Cazzanelli and J

    M. Cazzanelli and J. Schilling, Second order optical nonlinearity in silicon by symmetry breaking, Applied Physics Reviews 3, 011104 (2016)

  3. [11]

    G. Wang, X. Marie, I. Gerber, T. Amand, D. Lagarde, L. Bouet, M. Vidal, A. Balocchi, and B. Urbaszek, Giant Enhancement of the Optical Second-Harmonic Emission of WSe2 Monolayers by Laser Excitation at Exciton Res- onances, Physical Review Letters 114, 097403 (2015)

  4. [12]

    Huang, Y

    W. Huang, Y. Xiao, F. Xia, X. Chen, and T. Zhai, Second Harmonic Generation Control in 2D Layered Materials: Status and Outlook, Advanced Functional Materials 34, 1 (2024)

  5. [13]

    H. Liu, C. Guo, G. Vampa, J. L. Zhang, T. Sarmiento, M. Xiao, P. H. Bucksbaum, J. Vuˇ ckovi´ c, S. Fan, and D. A. Reis, Enhanced high-harmonic generation from an all-dielectric metasurface, Nature Physics 14, 1006 (2018)

  6. [14]

    Y. Zhao, W. Jia, X.-J. Wang, Y. Dong, H.-H. Fang, Y. Yang, and H.-B. Sun, Second-Harmonic Generation in Strained Silicon Metasurfaces, Advanced Photonics Re- search 3, 1 (2022)

  7. [15]

    Buck and T

    M. Buck and T. Schaich, Optical second-harmonic gen- eration on the diamond C(111) surface, Diamond and Related Materials 4, 544 (1995)

  8. [16]

    L¨ upke, Characterization of semiconductor interfaces by second-harmonic generation, Surface Science Reports 35, 75 (1999)

    G. L¨ upke, Characterization of semiconductor interfaces by second-harmonic generation, Surface Science Reports 35, 75 (1999)

  9. [17]

    H. Shi, Y. Zhang, M. Yao, F. Ji, D. Qian, S. Qiao, Y. R. Shen, and W. T. Liu, Surface and bulk contributions to the second-harmonic generation in Bi 2Se3, Physical Re- view B 94, 1 (2016)

  10. [18]

    Galli, D

    M. Galli, D. Gerace, K. Welna, T. F. Krauss, L. O’Faolain, G. Guizzetti, and L. C. Andreani, Low- power continuous-wave generation of visible harmonics in silicon photonic crystal nanocavities, Optics Express 18, 26613 (2010)

  11. [19]

    B. Chen, S. Wu, Y. Ren, X. Wang, D. Wei, and J. Liu, Nonlinear Photon Generations from Subwave- length Whispering-Gallery-Mode Resonator, Nano Let- ters 24, 7467 (2024)

  12. [20]

    D. Z. Anderson, V. Mizrahi, and J. E. Sipe, Model for second-harmonic generation in glass optical fibers based on asymmetric photoelectron emission from defect sites, Optics Letters 16, 796 (1991)

  13. [21]

    E. M. Dianov and D. S. Starodubov, Photoinduced gener- ation of the second harmonic in centrosymmetric media, Quantum Electronics 25, 395 (1995)

  14. [22]

    Nitiss, T

    E. Nitiss, T. Liu, D. Grassani, M. Pfeiffer, T. J. Kip- penberg, and C.-S. Br` es, Formation Rules and Dynamics of Photoinduced χ(2) Gratings in Silicon Nitride Waveg- uides, ACS Photonics 7, 147 (2020)

  15. [23]

    Yakar, E

    O. Yakar, E. Nitiss, J. Hu, and C.-S. Br` es, Generalized coherent photogalvanic effect in coherently seeded waveg- uides, Laser & Photonics Reviews 16, 2200294 (2022)

  16. [24]

    M. A. Porcel, J. Mak, C. Taballione, V. K. Schermer- horn, J. P. Epping, P. J. van der Slot, and K.-J. Boller, Photo-induced second-order nonlinearity in stoichiomet- ric silicon nitride waveguides, Optics Express 25, 33143 vi (2017)

  17. [25]

    Billat, D

    A. Billat, D. Grassani, M. H. Pfeiffer, S. Kharitonov, T. J. Kippenberg, and C. S. Br` es, Large second har- monic generation enhancement in Si 3N4 waveguides by all-optically induced quasi-phase-matching, Nature Com- munications 8, 1 (2017)

  18. [26]

    D. D. Hickstein, D. R. Carlson, H. Mundoor, J. B. Khur- gin, K. Srinivasan, D. Westly, A. Kowligy, I. I. Smalyukh, S. A. Diddams, and S. B. Papp, Self-organized nonlinear gratings for ultrafast nanophotonics, Nature Photonics 13, 494 (2019)

  19. [27]

    X. Lu, G. Moille, A. Rao, D. A. Westly, and K. Srini- vasan, Efficient photoinduced second-harmonic genera- tion in silicon nitride photonics, Nature Photonics 15, 131 (2021)

  20. [28]

    Lu and K

    X. Lu and K. Srinivasan, Considering Photoinduced Second-Harmonic Generation as a dc Kerr Optical Para- metric Oscillation or Amplification Process, Physical Re- view Applied 16, 1 (2021)

  21. [29]

    Nitiss, J

    E. Nitiss, J. Hu, A. Stroganov, and C.-S. Br` es, Optically reconfigurable quasi-phase-matching in silicon nitride mi- croresonators, Nature Photonics 16, 134 (2022)

  22. [30]

    Clementi, L

    M. Clementi, L. Zatti, J. Zhou, M. Liscidini, and C.-S. Br` es, Ultrabroadband Resonant Frequency Doubling on a Chip, arXiv:2412.03322 (2024)

  23. [31]

    P. Li, X. Jiang, M. Huang, L. Kang, S. Chen, A. Gali, and B. Huang, Defect engineering of second-harmonic gener- ation in nonlinear optical semiconductors, Cell Reports Physical Science 3, 101111 (2022)

  24. [32]

    D. Lim, M. C. Downer, and J. G. Ekerdt, Second- harmonic spectroscopy of bulk boron-doped Si(001), Ap- plied Physics Letters 77, 181 (2000)

  25. [33]

    J. L. Fiore, V. V. Fomenko, D. Bodlaki, and E. Borguet, Second harmonic generation probing of dopant type and density at the Si/SiO2 interface, Applied Physics Letters 98, 041905 (2011)

  26. [34]

    Z. Wang, H. Park, Y. H. Lai, J. Xu, C. I. Blaga, F. Yang, P. Agostini, and L. F. DiMauro, The roles of photo- carrier doping and driving wavelength in high harmonic generation from a semiconductor, Nature Communica- tions 8, 1 (2017)

  27. [35]

    R. W. Terhune, P. D. Maker, and C. M. Savage, Optical Harmonic Generation in Calcite, Physical Review Letters 8, 404 (1962)

  28. [36]

    C. H. Lee, R. K. Chang, and N. Bloembergen, Nonlinear Electroreflectance in Silicon and Silver, Physical Review Letters 18, 167 (1967)

  29. [37]

    Timurdogan, C

    E. Timurdogan, C. V. Poulton, M. J. Byrd, and M. R. Watts, Electric field-induced second-order nonlinear op- tical effects in silicon waveguides, Nature Photonics 11, 200 (2017)

  30. [38]

    Widhalm, C

    A. Widhalm, C. Golla, N. Weber, P. Mackwitz, A. Zren- ner, and C. Meier, Electric-field-induced second harmonic generation in silicon dioxide, Optics Express 30, 4867 (2022)

  31. [39]

    Schriever, F

    C. Schriever, F. Bianco, M. Cazzanelli, M. Ghulinyan, C. Eisenschmidt, J. de Boor, A. Schmid, J. Heitmann, L. Pavesi, and J. Schilling, Second-Order Optical Nonlin- earity in Silicon Waveguides: Inhomogeneous Stress and Interfaces, Advanced Optical Materials 3, 129 (2015)

  32. [40]

    Castellan, A

    C. Castellan, A. Trenti, C. Vecchi, A. Marchesini, M. Mancinelli, M. Ghulinyan, G. Pucker, and L. Pavesi, On the origin of second harmonic generation in silicon waveguides with silicon nitride cladding, Scientific Re- ports 9, 1088 (2019)

  33. [41]

    Zhang, Y

    B. Zhang, Y. Huang, F. Ji, X. Miao, F. Gao, W. M. Chen, and I. A. Buyanova, Photoactivated Second Harmonic Generation in Centrosymmetric Double Perovskites, ACS Photonics 10, 3350 (2023)

  34. [42]

    W. Cai, A. P. Vasudev, and M. L. Brongersma, Elec- trically Controlled Nonlinear Generation of Light with Plasmonics, Science 333, 1720 (2011)

  35. [43]

    Motojima, T

    M. Motojima, T. Suzuki, H. Shigekawa, Y. Kainuma, T. An, and M. Hase, Giant nonlinear optical effects in- duced by nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond crystals, Optics Express 27, 32217 (2019)

  36. [44]

    J. S. Levy, M. A. Foster, A. L. Gaeta, and M. Lipson, Harmonic generation in silicon nitride ring resonators, Optics Express 19, 11415 (2011)

  37. [45]

    Zhang, Q

    X. Zhang, Q. T. Cao, Z. Wang, Y. xi Liu, C. W. Qiu, L. Yang, Q. Gong, and Y. F. Xiao, Symmetry-breaking- induced nonlinear optics at a microcavity surface, Nature Photonics 13, 21 (2019)

  38. [46]

    M. W. Puckett, R. Sharma, H.-H. Lin, M.-h. Yang, F. Vallini, and Y. Fainman, Observation of second- harmonic generation in silicon nitride waveguides through bulk nonlinearities, Optics Express 24, 16923 (2016)

  39. [47]

    Haque and S

    A. Haque and S. Sumaiya, An Overview on the Formation and Processing of Nitrogen-Vacancy Photonic Centers in Diamond by Ion Implantation, Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing 1, 6 (2017)

  40. [48]

    Abulikemu, Y

    A. Abulikemu, Y. Kainuma, T. An, and M. Hase, Second- Harmonic Generation in Bulk Diamond Based on Inver- sion Symmetry Breaking by Color Centers, ACS Photon- ics 8, 988 (2021)

  41. [49]

    Abulikemu, Y

    A. Abulikemu, Y. Kainuma, T. An, and M. Hase, Temperature-dependent second-harmonic generation from color centers in diamond, Optics Letters 47, 1693 (2022)

  42. [50]

    V. M. Acosta, E. Bauch, M. P. Ledbetter, C. Santori, K.-M. C. Fu, P. E. Barclay, R. G. Beausoleil, H. Linget, J. F. Roch, F. Treussart, S. Chemerisov, W. Gawlik, and D. Budker, Diamonds with a high density of nitrogen- vacancy centers for magnetometry applications, Physical Re...

  43. [51]

    Masuda, J

    T. Masuda, J. P. E. Hadden, D. P. Lake, M. Mitchell, S. Fl ˚ agan, and P. E. Barclay, Fiber-taper collected emis- sion from NV centers in high- Q/V diamond microdisks, Optics Express 32, 8172 (2024)

  44. [52]

    A. Gali, M. Fyta, and E. Kaxiras, Ab initio supercell cal- culations on nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond: Elec- tronic structure and hyperfine tensors, Physical Review B 77, 155206 (2008)

  45. [53]

    P. K. Shandilya, V. K. Kavatamane, S. Fl ˚ agan, D. P. Lake, D. Sukachev, and P. E. Barclay, Nonlinear opti- cal pumping to a diamond NV center dark state, arXiv: 2411.10638 (2024)

  46. [54]

    N. B. Manson, M. Hedges, M. S. J. Barson, R. Ahlefeldt, M. W. Doherty, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, and M. J. Sell- ars, NV−–N+ pair centre in 1b diamond, New Journal of Physics 20, 113037 (2018)

  47. [55]

    S. M. Blakley, T. T. Mai, S. J. Moxim, J. T. Ryan, A. J. Biacchi, A. R. H. Walker, and R. D. McMichael, Spec- troscopy of photoionization from the 1E singlet state in nitrogen-vacancy centers in diamond, Physical Review B 110, 134109 (2024)

  48. [56]

    M. N. Ashfold, J. P. Goss, B. L. Green, P. W. May, M. E. vii Newton, and C. V. Peaker, Nitrogen in Diamond, Chem- ical Reviews 120, 5745 (2020)

  49. [57]

    R. M. Goldblatt, N. Dontschuk, D. J. McCloskey, A. M. Martin, and A. A. Wood, Quantum electrometry of non- volatile space charges in diamond, arXiv: 2410.19309 (2024)

  50. [58]

    J. Rosa, M. Vanˇ eˇ cek, M. Nesl´ adek, and L. Stals, Pho- toionization cross-section of dominant defects in CVD diamond, Diamond and Related Materials 8, 721 (1999)

  51. [59]

    Orphal-Kobin, K

    L. Orphal-Kobin, K. Unterguggenberger, T. Pregno- lato, N. Kemf, M. Matalla, R.-S. Unger, I. Oster- may, G. Pieplow, and T. Schr¨ oder, Optically Coherent Nitrogen-Vacancy Defect Centers in Diamond Nanos- tructures, Physical Review X 13, 011042 (2023)

  52. [60]

    Siyushev, H

    P. Siyushev, H. Pinto, M. V¨ or¨ os, A. Gali, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Optically Controlled Switching of the Charge State of a Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Center in Di- amond at Cryogenic Temperatures, Physical Review Let- ters 110, 167402 (2013)

  53. [61]

    Wolters, N

    J. Wolters, N. Sadzak, A. W. Schell, T. Schr¨ oder, and O. Benson, Measurement of the Ultrafast Spectral Diffu- sion of the Optical Transition of Nitrogen Vacancy Cen- ters in Nano-Size Diamond Using Correlation Interfer- ometry, Physical Review Letters 110, 027401 (2013)

  54. [62]

    Aslam, G

    N. Aslam, G. Waldherr, P. Neumann, F. Jelezko, and J. Wrachtrup, Photo-induced ionization dynamics of the nitrogen vacancy defect in diamond investigated by single-shot charge state detection, New Journal of Physics 15, 013064 (2013)

  55. [63]

    Bourgeois, E

    E. Bourgeois, E. Londero, K. Buczak, J. Hruby, M. Gulka, Y. Balasubramaniam, G. Wachter, J. Stursa, K. Dobes, F. Aumayr, M. Trupke, A. Gali, and M. Nes- ladek, Enhanced photoelectric detection of NV mag- netic resonances in diamond under dual-beam excitation, Physical Review B...

  56. [64]

    N. B. Manson, K. Beha, A. Batalov, L. J. Rogers, M. W. Doherty, R. Bratschitsch, and A. Leitenstorfer, Assign- ment of the NV 0 575-nm zero-phonon line in diamond to a 2E − 2A2 transition, Physical Review B 87, 155209 (2013)

  57. [65]

    Y. Chu, N. de Leon, B. Shields, B. Hausmann, R. Evans, E. Togan, M. J. Burek, M. Markham, A. Stacey, A. Zi- brov, A. Yacoby, D. Twitchen, M. Loncar, H. Park, P. Maletinsky, and M. Lukin, Coherent Optical Transi- tions in Implanted Nitrogen Vacancy Centers, Nano Let- ters 14, 1...

  58. [66]

    Pfaff, B

    W. Pfaff, B. J. Hensen, H. Bernien, S. B. van Dam, M. S. Blok, T. H. Taminiau, M. J. Tiggelman, R. N. Schouten, M. Markham, D. J. Twitchen, and R. Hanson, Uncondi- tional quantum teleportation between distant solid-state quantum bits, Science 345, 532 (2014)

  59. [67]

    K. Beha, A. Batalov, N. B. Manson, R. Bratschitsch, and A. Leitenstorfer, Optimum Photoluminescence Exci- tation and Recharging Cycle of Single Nitrogen-Vacancy Centers in Ultrapure Diamond, Physical Review Letters 109, 097404 (2012)

  60. [68]

    A. A. Wood, A. Lozovoi, R. M. Goldblatt, C. A. Meriles, and A. M. Martin, Wavelength dependence of nitrogen vacancy center charge cycling, Physical Review B 109, 134106 (2024)

Pith tools

Reviewed August 12, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.