Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Colorado in Context: Congressional Redistricting and Competing Fairness Criteria in Colorado

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.06049 v2 pith:PUNS43GE submitted 2020-11-11 cs.CY physics.soc-phstat.AP

classification cs.CYphysics.soc-phstat.AP
keywords coloradocountiesdistrictsnumberpartisanredistrictingboundariescompetitive
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we apply techniques of ensemble analysis to understand the political baseline for Congressional representation in Colorado. We generate a large random sample of reasonable redistricting plans and determine the partisan balance of each district using returns from state-wide elections in 2018, and analyze the 2011/2012 enacted districts in this context. Colorado recently adopted a new framework for redistricting, creating an independent commission to draw district boundaries, prohibiting partisan bias and incumbency considerations, requiring that political boundaries (such as counties) be preserved as much as possible, and also requiring that mapmakers maximize the number of competitive districts. We investigate the relationships between partisan outcomes, number of counties which are split, and number of competitive districts in a plan. This paper also features two novel improvements in methodology--a more rigorous statistical framework for understanding necessary sample size, and a weighted-graph method for generating random plans which split approximately as few counties as acceptable human-drawn maps.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Parameter Effects in ReCom Ensembles

    physics.soc-ph 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across seven states and three chamber types, ReCom parameter settings materially affect partisan and minority-opportunity statistics and consistently affect average margin, while population tolerance has negligible impact.

Pith tools