Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

Integrated optomechanical ultrasonic sensors with nano-Pascal-level sensitivity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read An integrated optomechanical ultrasound sensor reports noise-equivalent pressures of 9.6 nanopascals per root hertz in water and 218 nanopascals per root hertz in air.

desk verdict The device engineering is credible, but the nano-Pascal NEP claim is thermodynamically impossible as stated. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.20219 v1 pith:PUY5MMS6 submitted 2025-06-25 physics.optics physics.ins-det

Xuening Cao , Hao Yang , Min Wang , Zhi-Gang Hu , Zu-Lei Wu , Yuanlei Wang , Jian-Fei Liu , Xin Zhou
show 4 more authors
Jincheng Li Chenghao Lao Qi-Fan Yang Bei-Bei Li
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.ins-det
keywords optomechanicalsensingultrasounddetectionmicroringresonatornoise-equivalentpressurephotoacousticspectroscopyunderwaterimagingsuspendedmembranesiliconnitride
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that an integrated optomechanical ultrasound sensor can detect sound with noise-equivalent pressures of $218\ \mathrm{nPa}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ in air at 289 kHz and $9.6\ \mathrm{nPa}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ in water at 52 kHz. The device is a suspended SiO$_2$ membrane with an embedded high-$Q$ Si$_3$N$_4$ microring, and it uses the membrane's mechanical flapping mode to amplify ultrasound-induced displacement while the ring's optical resonance converts that displacement into a laser-intensity modulation. The paper demonstrates two consequences of this sensitivity: photoacoustic detection of acetylene down to 2.9 ppm with 1 s integration, and underwater transmission imaging with 1.89 mm resolution at drive pressures of 0.3 mPa. A sympathetic reading is that the work establishes chip-scale, photonic ultrasound sensors as a sensitivity class above conventional piezoelectric transducers, with a route to wafer-scale fabrication. If correct, it narrows the gap between bench-top optical microcavity sensors and field-deployable integrated devices.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is simultaneous optical and mechanical resonance in a suspended-membrane–embedded microring. The mechanical flapping mode of the circular SiO$_2$ membrane amplifies the displacement response to incident ultrasound, and the high-$Q$ optical resonance of the embedded Si$_3$N$_4$ ring transduces that amplified displacement into a measurable intensity change. The two resonances work together because the narrow optical linewidth gives a steep transduction slope, while the mechanical linewidth (about 10 kHz in air and 2 kHz in water) provides resonant gain at 289 kHz and 52 kHz, respectively. The sensor is packaged with mode-conversion fibers, so it operates without free-space alignment. The design rule that carries the optimization is the radius ratio $R_\mathrm{ring}/R_\mathrm{mem}=0.52$, which maximises the radial strain on the ring for the $\nu_{(0,0)}$ mode.

What would settle it

An independent acoustic-pressure calibration at the membrane—for example, interferometric measurement of the membrane displacement combined with the known mechanical susceptibility, or a second calibrated reference hydrophone—would settle the claim: if the independently inferred pressure differs from the needle-hydrophone (water) or laser-vibrometer (air) calibration used in the paper by more than the expected uncertainty, the reported NEP values shift by exactly that factor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that operating a microring resonator on a suspended membrane at the coincidence of the optical resonance and the fundamental mechanical flapping mode $\nu_{(0,0)}$ yields nano-Pascal-level noise-equivalent pressures. The membrane, 450 µm in radius and clamped at its periphery, is maximally displaced by incident ultrasound at the flapping mode; the embedded Si$_3$N$_4$ ring, radius 235 µm, is stretched by that displacement, shifting its optical resonance. With the laser locked to the blue-detuned slope of a resonance with intrinsic $Q\approx1.35\times10^6$, the shift appears as an intensity modulation. The paper reports NEP minima of $218\ \mathrm{nPa}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ at 289 kHz in air and $9.6\ \mathrm{nPa}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ at 52 kHz in water, and supports the claim with photoacoustic spectroscopy of C$_2$H$_2$ (minimum detectable concentration 2.9 ppm, 1 s integration) and underwater imaging of an 'F'-shaped groove with 1.89 mm resolution at 0.3 mPa drive pressure. The paper presents the sensitivity as a record for microcavity-based ultrasonic sensors.

Load-bearing premise

All reported nano-Pascal NEP values depend on the absolute calibration of the ultrasound pressure that reaches the membrane, and a constant error in that calibration would rescale every NEP value and the derived figure of merit by the same factor.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The demonstrated sensitivity places integrated photonic ultrasound sensors in the same NEP range as fiber-taper-coupled microdisk optomechanical sensors, without free-space alignment or taper fragility.
  • The photoacoustic demonstration implies that chip-scale sensors can detect trace gases at ppm concentrations with a 1 s integration time, which is relevant for breath analysis and environmental monitoring.
  • The underwater imaging result implies that acoustic imaging at drive pressures of 0.3 mPa is possible, three orders of magnitude below the pressure needed by a commercial hydrophone in the same experiment.
  • The figure of merit NEP $\times \sqrt{A}$ near $10^{-8}\ \mathrm{Pa\,mm}/\sqrt{\mathrm{Hz}}$ suggests the sensitivity is not a consequence of a large sensing area, and therefore similar sensitivity could be expected in scaled-down or arrayed devices.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, the same suspended-membrane mechanical amplifier could be repurposed for other force or displacement sensors (magnetometers, electric-field sensors) by changing the transduction layer, because the flapping-mode gain is generic.
  • Beyond the paper, the demonstrated 0.3 mPa imaging pressure suggests the sensor could operate as a passive underwater listener at much lower ambient acoustic pressures; a direct test would be recording natural underwater sound at frequencies near 52 kHz.
  • Beyond the paper, the reported 38% sensitivity variation across nine devices implies that the single-device record NEP is not yet a population-level guarantee; a straightforward extension is to identify the fabrication parameter (e.g., membrane stress or ring width) that controls the spread.
  • Beyond the paper, the lack of an uncertainty budget for the pressure calibration means a metrological cross-calibration of the two reference instruments (needle hydrophone and laser vibrometer) could make the absolute NEP values reproducible across labs.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper reports an integrated optomechanical ultrasound sensor consisting of a suspended SiO2 membrane with an embedded high-Q Si3N4 microring resonator. The authors claim record-low noise-equivalent pressures of 218 nPa/√Hz at 289 kHz in air and 9.6 nPa/√Hz at 52 kHz in water, and they demonstrate photoacoustic detection of acetylene at 2.9 ppm with 1 s integration and underwater ultrasound imaging with 1.89 mm resolution at drive pressures of 0.3 mPa. The sensor is fabricated with wafer-scale CMOS-compatible processes, packaged with fiber coupling, and characterized using calibrated ultrasound transducers.

Significance. If the reported sensitivities were correct, the work would be a substantial advance over existing integrated photonic ultrasound sensors, whose NEPs are typically in the mPa/√Hz to µPa/√Hz range. The device concept is interesting: a microring embedded in a suspended membrane exploits simultaneous optical and mechanical resonances, and the demonstrations of photoacoustic gas spectroscopy and underwater imaging are relevant to practical applications. The comparison of the measured acetylene spectrum with HITRAN is a useful external validation. However, the central quantitative claim of nano-Pascal-level NEP at mechanical resonance appears thermodynamically inconsistent with the stated device parameters, and the paper does not provide an uncertainty budget for the absolute pressure calibration. As presented, the headline sensitivity therefore cannot be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Figs. 3b, 3e, 3f; Methods: Ultrasound sensitivity characterization] The reported NEP minima are below the thermal fluctuation-dissipation floor for the stated membrane. For a resonant mechanical mode with effective mass m_eff, pressure-coupling area A_eff, angular frequency ω0, and quality factor Q, the thermal-noise-equivalent pressure is p_th = sqrt(4 k_B T m_eff ω0 / Q) / A_eff. Using the manuscript's membrane radius of 450 µm, a thickness stack of about 6.27 µm (4 µm BOX + 265 nm Si3N4 + 2 µm SiO2 cladding), f0 = 52 kHz, and Q = 26 in water, even the most favorable choices of A_eff equal to the full membrane area and m_eff equal to the total mass give p_th ≈ 2 µPa/√Hz; realistic mode-shape factors increase this to about 3 µPa/√Hz. The claimed 9.6 nPa/√Hz is therefore roughly 200-300 times below this bound. Since the measured PSD peak in Fig. 3b is identified as thermomechanical noise, the NEP at resonance cannot be below p_th unless the absolute pressure used for calibration is overestimated by a comparable factor or the NEP derivation is inconsistent. This makes the headline water sensitivity physically impossible with the parameters given in the paper.
  2. [Figs. 3a, 3e; Methods: Ultrasound sensitivity characterization] The same thermodynamic bound applies in air. With f0 = 289 kHz, Q ≈ 29, and the same membrane geometry, p_th is several µPa/√Hz even under the most conservative assumptions for m_eff and A_eff, which is more than an order of magnitude above the claimed 218 nPa/√Hz. The air value is thus also not supported by the stated device parameters and thermomechanical noise identification.
  3. [Methods: Ultrasound sensitivity characterization; Device characterization] No uncertainty budget is provided for the absolute acoustic pressure calibration (needle hydrophone in water, scanning laser vibrometer in air), and the paper reports a 38% device-to-device sensitivity variation, indicating that the headline NEP values are single-device numbers without error bars. In light of the above discrepancy with the fluctuation-dissipation bound, the full calibration chain and the derivation of the NEP from the measured PSD and response spectra need to be re-examined and reported with uncertainties before any quantitative sensitivity claim can be evaluated.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Methods: Device design] The sentence 'we implement R_ring = 450 µm and R_mem = 235 µm' is inconsistent with the main text, which states membrane radius 450 µm and microring radius 235 µm; the stated optimum ratio of 0.52 indicates the main-text values are the intended ones.
  2. [Data availability] The data and code are stated to be 'available upon publication'; a repository link or DOI should be provided, and the phrase 'upon publication' is too vague for a reproducibility standard.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors: 'inluding' in the Conclusion, 'derict' in the Fig. 4e caption, 'A 2silica' in the Extended Data Fig. 1d caption, and a missing closing parenthesis after 'Exail MX-LN-10' in the Methods.
  4. [Fig. 5 and Conclusion] The benchmarking claims involving NEP×√A at the 10^-8 Pa mm/√Hz level inherit the same calibration and thermodynamic issues as the raw NEP values; a revised version should report this figure with uncertainty bars and a clear statement of which devices and frequencies are used.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: NEP values are directly measured (noise PSD divided by calibrated response), the gas spectrum is HITRAN-benchmarked, and the imaging resolution is measured. Prior self-citations are background only and not load-bearing.

full rationale

The claimed NEP values are obtained by combining measured noise power spectral densities with measured single-frequency ultrasound responses (Figs. 3a–3f), not by fitting a model to the target NEP. The acoustic pressure at the sensor location is calibrated with a needle hydrophone in water and a scanning laser vibrometer in air, both external references rather than quantities derived from the sensor itself. The photoacoustic spectroscopy result is validated against the HITRAN database, and the underwater imaging resolution is determined directly from the measured image. Citations to the authors' own prior work (Refs. 23, 43, 44) provide background or transducer pre-calibration only; the pressure calibration at the sensor location is performed independently, so these citations are not load-bearing. No equation in the paper defines a claimed output in terms of another claimed output, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. A separate correctness concern exists—the reported water NEP of 9.6 nPa/√Hz appears to lie roughly two orders of magnitude below the thermomechanical noise floor implied by the paper's own membrane parameters (R = 450 µm, f0 = 52 kHz, Q ≈ 26) and its identification of the PSD peak as thermal noise—but this is a physical-inconsistency or calibration-accuracy issue, not circularity. The absence of an uncertainty budget for the pressure calibration is likewise a missing-support concern, not a circular step.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No parameters are fitted to the central claim; design choices are based on independent simulations and measurements. The paper introduces no new physical entities. It relies on standard thin-plate elasticity, thermal noise limits, and linear optomechanical transduction.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The suspended SiO2 membrane is modeled as a thin circular plate, with mode shape given by Eq. (1) and parameter lambda_00 determined from Ref. 60.
    This model underlies the choice of ring-to-membrane radius ratio and the expectation of maximum displacement at the ring position.
  • domain assumption At the mechanical resonance frequency, the sensor noise is dominated by thermomechanical noise, allowing the quoted NEP to reflect a fundamental limit.
    The paper fits Lorentzian peaks to the noise PSD near resonance and cites ref 42; if other technical noises contribute, the NEP would be higher.
  • domain assumption The optomechanical transduction is linear in displacement over the measurement range, and laser detuning is held at the point of maximum slope.
    This is standard for such sensors and is implicitly required to convert intensity modulation to pressure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Integrated optomechanical ultrasonic sensors with nano-Pascal-level sensitivity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PUY5MMS6

@misc{pith2026250620219,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Integrated optomechanical ultrasonic sensors with nano-Pascal-level sensitivity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PUY5MMS6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.20219}
}
read the original abstract

Ultrasonic sensors are widely used for object detection and localization in underwater and biological settings. The operational range and spatial resolution are inherently limited by sensor sensitivity, in which conventional piezoelectric transducers have been overwhelmed by advanced photonic sensors. Here, we demonstrate an optomechanical ultrasonic sensor integrated into a photonic platform, which comprises a suspended SiO2 membrane embedded with a high-Q Si3N4 microring resonator. By exploiting simultaneous optical and mechanical resonances, the sensor achieves a record low noise-equivalent pressure (NEP) of 218 nPa/Hz^1/2 at 289 kHz in air and 9.6 nPa/Hz^1/2 at 52 kHz in water. We demonstrate its versatility through photoacoustic gas spectroscopy in air and underwater ultrasound imaging, achieving a minimum detectable C2H2 concentration of 2.9 ppm (integration time 1 s) and an imaging resolution of 1.89 mm, respectively. Our work represents a significant advancement in compact CMOS-compatible ultrasound sensing, unlocking new possibilities in biomedical imaging, environmental monitoring, industrial testing, and underwater communications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Precision optomechanical accelerometer via hybrid test mass integration

    physics.app-ph 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A pick-and-place bonded 95 mg platinum sphere on a silicon nitride trampoline yields a chip-integrated accelerometer with 5.5 ng/√Hz peak sensitivity at 117 Hz in air.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

63 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Hu, H.et al.A wearable cardiac ultrasound imager.Na- ture613, 667–675 (2023)

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Wang, C.et al.Bioadhesive ultrasound for long-term continuous imaging of diverse organs.Science377, 517– 523 (2022)

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Rep.15, 9275 (2025)

    Schumacher, T.et al.Confirmation of the scanpyra- mids north face corridor in the great pyramid of giza us- ing multi-modal image fusion from three non-destructive testing techniques.Sci. Rep.15, 9275 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Gervilli´ e-Mouravieff, C., Bao, W., Steingart, D. A. & Meng, Y. S. Non-destructive characterization techniques for battery performance and life-cycle assessment.Nat. Rev. Electr. Eng.1, 547–558 (2024)

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Commun.7, 12316 (2016)

    Gao, Y.et al.Hydrogel microphones for stealthy under- water listening.Nat. Commun.7, 12316 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Rep.15, 8845 (2025)

    Zhao, J.et al.Self-focusing high-frequency ultrasonic transducers for non-destructive testing applications.Sci. Rep.15, 8845 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Com- mun.15, 10237 (2024)

    Wasylowski, D.et al.Operando visualisation of lithium plating by ultrasound imaging of battery cells.Nat. Com- mun.15, 10237 (2024)

    work page 2024

  8. [8]

    Schwarz, M.et al.Optoacoustic dermoscopy of the hu- man skin: Tuning excitation energy for optimal detection bandwidth with fast and deep imaging in vivo.IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging36, 1287–1296 (2017)

    work page 2017

Show all 63 references
  1. [9]

    Commun.15, 1444 (2024)

    Cho, S.et al.An ultrasensitive and broadband trans- parent ultrasound transducer for ultrasound and photoa- coustic imaging in-vivo.Nat. Commun.15, 1444 (2024)

    2024

  2. [10]

    A., Rosenthal, A

    Wissmeyer, G., Pleitez, M. A., Rosenthal, A. & Ntzi- achristos, V. Looking at sound: optoacoustics with all-optical ultrasound detection.Light Sci. App.7, 53 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    & Qiu, Z

    Qiu, Z., Lu, Y. & Qiu, Z. Review of ultrasonic ranging methods and their current challenges.Micromachines13 (2022)

    2022

  4. [12]

    M., Maslov, K

    Winkler, A. M., Maslov, K. I. & Wang, L. V. Noise- equivalent sensitivity of photoacoustics.J. Biomed. Opt. 18, 097003 (2013)

    2013

  5. [13]

    Microsyst

    Jiang, X.et al.Monolithic ultrasound fingerprint sensor. Microsyst. Nanoeng.3, 17059 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    & Yeow, J

    Wang, J., Zheng, Z., Chan, J. & Yeow, J. T. W. Ca- pacitive micromachined ultrasound transducers for in- travascular ultrasound imaging.Microsyst. Nanoeng.6, 73 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Adv.9, eadg8600 (2023)

    Wang, L.et al.Ultrawide-bandwidth high-resolution all- optical intravascular ultrasound using miniaturized pho- toacoustic transducer.Sci. Adv.9, eadg8600 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Wang, H.et al.MEMS ultrasound transducers for en- doscopic photoacoustic imaging applications.Microma- chines11(2020)

    2020

  9. [17]

    K., Ceroici, C., Li, Z

    Ilkhechi, A. K., Ceroici, C., Li, Z. & Zemp, R. Trans- parent capacitive micromachined ultrasonic transducer (CMUT) arrays for real-time photoacoustic applications. Opt. Express28, 13750–13760 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    B., Kashani Ilkhechi, A., Maadi, M., Haven, N

    Dew, E. B., Kashani Ilkhechi, A., Maadi, M., Haven, N. J. M. & Zemp, R. J. Outperforming piezoelectric ultrasonics with high-reliability single-membrane CMUT array elements.Microsyst. Nanoeng.8, 59 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Chen, K., Lee, H.-S., Chandrakasan, A. P. & Sodini, C. G. Ultrasonic imaging transceiver design for CMUT: A three-level 30-Vpp pulse-shaping pulser with improved efficiency and a noise-optimized receiver.IEEE J. Solid- State Circuits48, 2734–2745 (2013)

    2013

  12. [20]

    Optical microphone hears ultrasound.Nat

    Fischer, B. Optical microphone hears ultrasound.Nat. Photon.10, 356–358 (2016)

    2016

  13. [21]

    Ren, J., Li, J., Chen, S., Liu, Y. & Ta, D. Unveiling the potential of ultrasound in brain imaging: Innova- tions, challenges, and prospects.Ultrasonics145, 107465 (2025)

    2025

  14. [22]

    Chen, T.et al.Enhanced ultrasound transmission through skull using flexible matching layer with gradual acoustic impedance.ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces15, 55510–55517 (2023)

    2023

  15. [23]

    & Li, B.-B

    Cao, X., Yang, H., Wu, Z.-L. & Li, B.-B. Ultrasound sensing with optical microcavities.Light Sci. App.13, 159 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Bao, K.et al.Photoacoustic imaging sensors based on in- tegrated photonics: Challenges and trends.Las. Photon. Rev.n/a, 2400414

  17. [25]

    Lett.39, 2838–2840 (2014)

    Xu, F.et al.Fiber-optic acoustic pressure sensor based on large-area nanolayer silver diaghragm.Opt. Lett.39, 2838–2840 (2014)

    2014

  18. [26]

    A.et al.Ultrasensitive plano-concave optical microresonators for ultrasound sensing.Nat

    Guggenheim, J. A.et al.Ultrasensitive plano-concave optical microresonators for ultrasound sensing.Nat. Pho- 8 ton.11, 714–719 (2017)

    2017

  19. [27]

    Ma, J.et al.Flexible microbubble-based Fabry-P´ erot cavity for sensitive ultrasound detection and wide-view photoacoustic imaging.Photonics Res.8, 1558–1565 (2020)

    2020

  20. [28]

    Shnaiderman, R.et al.Fiber interferometer for hybrid optical and optoacoustic intravital microscopy.Optica4, 1180–1187 (2017)

    2017

  21. [29]

    A., ¨Ulgen, O., Shnaiderman, R

    La, T. A., ¨Ulgen, O., Shnaiderman, R. & Ntziachristos, V. Bragg grating etalon-based optical fiber for ultra- sound and optoacoustic detection.Nat. Commun.15, 7521 (2024)

    2024

  22. [30]

    Shnaiderman, R.et al.A submicrometre silicon-on- insulator resonator for ultrasound detection.Nature585, 372–378 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    Yang, J.et al.Multiphysical sensing of light, sound and microwave in a microcavity brillouin laser.Nanophoton- ics9, 2915–2925 (2020)

    2020

  24. [32]

    Sun, J., Meng, J.-W., Tang, S.-J. & Li, C. An encapsu- lated optical microsphere sensor for ultrasound detection and photoacoustic imaging.Science China Physics, Me- chanics & Astronomy65, 224211 (2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Meng, J.-W.et al.Dissipative acousto-optic interactions in optical microcavities.Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 073901 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    Z., Desjardins, A

    Ansari, R., Zhang, E. Z., Desjardins, A. E. & Beard, P. C. All-optical forward-viewing photoacoustic probe for high-resolution 3d endoscopy.Light Sci. App.7, 75 (2018)

    2018

  27. [35]

    Commun.15, 1386 (2024)

    Ma, X.et al.Integrated microcavity electric field sensors using pound-drever-hall detection.Nat. Commun.15, 1386 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    & Guo, L

    Zhang, C., Ling, T., Chen, S.-L. & Guo, L. J. Ultrabroad bandwidth and highly sensitive optical ultrasonic detec- tor for photoacoustic imaging.ACS Photon.1, 1093– 1098 (2014)

    2014

  29. [37]

    Dong, B.et al.Isometric multimodal photoacoustic mi- croscopy based on optically transparent micro-ring ultra- sonic detection.Optica2, 169–176 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Commun.10, 4277 (2019)

    Li, H.et al.Disposable ultrasound-sensing chronic cra- nial window by soft nanoimprinting lithography.Nat. Commun.10, 4277 (2019)

    2019

  31. [39]

    M.et al.A sensitive optical micro-machined ultrasound sensor (omus) based on a silicon photonic ring resonator on an acoustical membrane.Sci

    Leinders, S. M.et al.A sensitive optical micro-machined ultrasound sensor (omus) based on a silicon photonic ring resonator on an acoustical membrane.Sci. Rep.5, 14328 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    J.et al.Sensitive, small, broadband and scalable optomechanical ultrasound sensor in silicon pho- tonics.Nat

    Westerveld, W. J.et al.Sensitive, small, broadband and scalable optomechanical ultrasound sensor in silicon pho- tonics.Nat. Photon.15, 341–345 (2021)

    2021

  33. [41]

    Commun.14, 3250 (2023)

    Pan, J.et al.Parallel interrogation of the chalcogenide- based micro-ring sensor array for photoacoustic tomog- raphy.Nat. Commun.14, 3250 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    & Bowen, W

    Basiri-Esfahani, S., Armin, A., Forstner, S. & Bowen, W. P. Precision ultrasound sensing on a chip.Nat. Com- mun.10, 132 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    Yang, H.et al.High-sensitivity air-coupled megahertz- frequency ultrasound detection using on-chip microcavi- ties.Phys. Rev. Appl.18, 034035 (2022)

    2022

  36. [44]

    Yang, H.et al.Micropascal-sensitivity ultrasound sensors based on optical microcavities.Photonics Res.11, 1139– 1147 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    M., Josse, F

    Vanˇ cura, C., Dufour, I., Heinrich, S. M., Josse, F. & Hi- erlemann, A. Analysis of resonating microcantilevers op- erating in a viscous liquid environment.Sens. Actuators A Phys.141, 43–51 (2008)

    2008

  38. [46]

    Huang, G.et al.Thermorefractive noise in silicon-nitride microresonators.Phys. Rev. A99, 061801 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    & Pradhan, M

    Barik, P. & Pradhan, M. Selectivity in trace gas sensing: recent developments, challenges, and future perspectives. Analyst147, 1024–1054 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Spectrosc.78, 139– 158 (2024)

    Xiong, S.et al.Photoacoustic spectroscopy gas detection technology research progress.Appl. Spectrosc.78, 139– 158 (2024). PMID: 37936290

    2024

  41. [49]

    Photoacoustic-based gas sensing: A review

    Palzer, S. Photoacoustic-based gas sensing: A review. Sensors20(2020)

    2020

  42. [50]

    Actuators A Phys.345, 113807 (2022)

    Wang, F.et al.Techniques to enhance the photoacoustic signal for trace gas sensing: A review.Sens. Actuators A Phys.345, 113807 (2022)

    2022

  43. [51]

    Nature605, 457–463 (2022)

    Shu, H.et al.Microcomb-driven silicon photonic systems. Nature605, 457–463 (2022)

    2022

  44. [52]

    A.et al.Extending the spectrum of fully inte- grated photonics to submicrometre wavelengths.Nature 610, 54–60 (2022)

    Tran, M. A.et al.Extending the spectrum of fully inte- grated photonics to submicrometre wavelengths.Nature 610, 54–60 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Hu, Y.et al.Integrated electro-optics on thin-film lithium niobate.Nat. Rev. Phys.7, 237–254 (2025)

    2025

  46. [54]

    Commun.12, 6650 (2021)

    Xiang, C.et al.High-performance lasers for fully inte- grated silicon nitride photonics.Nat. Commun.12, 6650 (2021)

    2021

  47. [55]

    Snigirev, V.et al.Ultrafast tunable lasers using lithium niobate integrated photonics.Nature615, 411–417 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    Finco, G.et al.Monolithic thin-film lithium niobate broadband spectrometer with one nanometre resolution. Nat. Commun.15, 2330 (2024)

    2024

  49. [57]

    Photon.18, 928–934 (2024)

    Peng, Y.et al.An 8×160 Gb s-1 all-silicon avalanche photodiode chip.Nat. Photon.18, 928–934 (2024)

    2024

  50. [58]

    Bylinkin, A.et al.On-chip phonon-enhanced IR near- field detection of molecular vibrations.Nat. Commun. 15, 8907 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Tufoi, M., Gillich, G.-R., Praisach, Z.-I., Ntakpe, J. L. & Hatiegan, C. An analysis of the dynamic behavior of circular plates from a damage detection perspective. Romanian Journal of Acoustics and Vibration11, 41–46 (2014)

    2014

  52. [60]

    W.Vibration of plates, vol

    Leissa, A. W.Vibration of plates, vol. 160 (Scientific and Technical Information Division, National Aeronau- tics and Space Administration, 1969)

    1969

  53. [61]

    In2020 21st International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelec- tronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE), 1–8 (2020)

    Zunic, M.et al.Design of a micro-opto-mechanical ul- trasound sensor for photoacoustic imaging. In2020 21st International Conference on Thermal, Mechanical and Multi-Physics Simulation and Experiments in Microelec- tronics and Microsystems (EuroSimE), 1–8 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    App.13, 279 (2024)

    Hu, Z.-G.et al.Picotesla-sensitivity microcavity optome- chanical magnetometry.Light Sci. App.13, 279 (2024). Methods Device design We systematically optimize the device geometry to enhance ul- trasound sensitivity (Extended Data Fig. 1a). The key design parameter is the radiu...

    2024

  55. [63]

    During measurements, both valves are closed to maintain a static gas environment, with identical procedures followed for N 2 mea- surements

    to ensure complete air displacement and concentration accuracy. During measurements, both valves are closed to maintain a static gas environment, with identical procedures followed for N 2 mea- surements. A CW pump laser (TOPTICA CTL1550) is used to excite the PA signals of th...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.