Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Review

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1807.05511 v2 pith:PVSVEW7J submitted 2018-07-15 cs.CV

Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Review

classification cs.CV
keywords detectionobjectlearningdeeparchitecturesfeaturesnetworkreview
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

Due to object detection's close relationship with video analysis and image understanding, it has attracted much research attention in recent years. Traditional object detection methods are built on handcrafted features and shallow trainable architectures. Their performance easily stagnates by constructing complex ensembles which combine multiple low-level image features with high-level context from object detectors and scene classifiers. With the rapid development in deep learning, more powerful tools, which are able to learn semantic, high-level, deeper features, are introduced to address the problems existing in traditional architectures. These models behave differently in network architecture, training strategy and optimization function, etc. In this paper, we provide a review on deep learning based object detection frameworks. Our review begins with a brief introduction on the history of deep learning and its representative tool, namely Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Then we focus on typical generic object detection architectures along with some modifications and useful tricks to improve detection performance further. As distinct specific detection tasks exhibit different characteristics, we also briefly survey several specific tasks, including salient object detection, face detection and pedestrian detection. Experimental analyses are also provided to compare various methods and draw some meaningful conclusions. Finally, several promising directions and tasks are provided to serve as guidelines for future work in both object detection and relevant neural network based learning systems.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Integration of Object Detection and Small VLMs for Construction Safety Hazard Identification

    cs.CV 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    Detection-guided prompting raises small VLM hazard F1 from 34.5% to 50.6% and BERTScore from 0.61 to 0.82 on construction images with only 2.5 ms added latency.

  2. RobustTP: End-to-End Trajectory Prediction for Heterogeneous Road-Agents in Dense Traffic with Noisy Sensor Inputs

    cs.RO 2019-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    RobustTP uses a non-linear motion model plus instance segmentation to create noisy trajectories, then an LSTM-CNN to predict 5-second future positions of heterogeneous agents in dense traffic, claiming up to 18% ADE a...

  3. LeukocyteCount: Automatic Identification and Counting for leukocytes using Deep Learning

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0

    YOLOv5 plus MobileNetV2 and logistic regression detect and classify four WBC types on BCCD with claimed ~98–99% accuracy and an inconsistent RBC F1 of 99.73%.