REVIEW 3 cited by
Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Review
read the original abstract
Due to object detection's close relationship with video analysis and image understanding, it has attracted much research attention in recent years. Traditional object detection methods are built on handcrafted features and shallow trainable architectures. Their performance easily stagnates by constructing complex ensembles which combine multiple low-level image features with high-level context from object detectors and scene classifiers. With the rapid development in deep learning, more powerful tools, which are able to learn semantic, high-level, deeper features, are introduced to address the problems existing in traditional architectures. These models behave differently in network architecture, training strategy and optimization function, etc. In this paper, we provide a review on deep learning based object detection frameworks. Our review begins with a brief introduction on the history of deep learning and its representative tool, namely Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). Then we focus on typical generic object detection architectures along with some modifications and useful tricks to improve detection performance further. As distinct specific detection tasks exhibit different characteristics, we also briefly survey several specific tasks, including salient object detection, face detection and pedestrian detection. Experimental analyses are also provided to compare various methods and draw some meaningful conclusions. Finally, several promising directions and tasks are provided to serve as guidelines for future work in both object detection and relevant neural network based learning systems.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Integration of Object Detection and Small VLMs for Construction Safety Hazard Identification
Detection-guided prompting raises small VLM hazard F1 from 34.5% to 50.6% and BERTScore from 0.61 to 0.82 on construction images with only 2.5 ms added latency.
-
RobustTP: End-to-End Trajectory Prediction for Heterogeneous Road-Agents in Dense Traffic with Noisy Sensor Inputs
RobustTP uses a non-linear motion model plus instance segmentation to create noisy trajectories, then an LSTM-CNN to predict 5-second future positions of heterogeneous agents in dense traffic, claiming up to 18% ADE a...
-
LeukocyteCount: Automatic Identification and Counting for leukocytes using Deep Learning
YOLOv5 plus MobileNetV2 and logistic regression detect and classify four WBC types on BCCD with claimed ~98–99% accuracy and an inconsistent RBC F1 of 99.73%.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.