Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 36 references

Correlation-aware port selection enables reliable spatial modulation over fluid antennas by restoring index distinguishability despite strong spatial correlation.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Three correlation-aware port selection schemes (SF-EDAS, SOPS, CC-COAS) are introduced for SM in Tx-SIMO-FAS, with high-SNR analysis deriving diversity order from selected ports, receive antennas, and energy-based spatial DoF plus a Digamma-based array gain approximation.

T0 review reviewed 2026-06-30 challenge →

load-bearing objection The paper gives three concrete port-selection schemes for fluid-antenna spatial modulation and a DoF-based diversity analysis, but the independence of the energy and extreme-value components after selection is not obviously justified. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.22280 v2 pith:PY6B5IIK submitted 2026-06-21 cs.IT math.IT

Spatial Modulation for Tx-SIMO-FAS: Port Selection and Performance Analysis

Xusheng Zhu , Kai-Kit Wong , Hanjiang Hong , Chenguang Rao , Kaitao Meng This is my paper
classification cs.IT math.IT
keywords spatial modulationfluid antenna systemport selectiondiversity orderspatial correlationTx-SIMO-FASerror performanceperformance analysis
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that three port-selection schemes can make spatial modulation practical in a transmitter fluid-antenna system paired with multiple fixed receive antennas. Strong correlation among the many ports that fit inside a limited aperture otherwise blurs which port index carries the information, lowering detection reliability. The schemes optimize received-constellation separation, channel conditioning, or the joint trade-off of gain and decorrelation. High-SNR analysis decomposes the channel into energy-based and extreme-value degrees of freedom to obtain an explicit diversity order set by the number of chosen ports, the number of receive antennas, and the energy-based spatial DoF, plus an aperture-limited array-gain approximation that uses the Digamma function.

Core claim

In Tx-SIMO-FAS spatial modulation, the effective diversity order equals the product of the number of selected ports, the number of receive antennas, and the energy-based spatial DoF; the three correlation-aware schemes SF-EDAS, SOPS, and CC-COAS realize this order while CC-COAS supplies the best error-rate versus complexity balance and outperforms both conventional SM and grouping-based benchmarks.

What carries the argument

The three correlation-aware port-selection schemes (SF-EDAS, SOPS, CC-COAS) that optimize received-constellation separation, channel-basis conditioning, and joint channel gain with inter-port decorrelation under the stated spatial correlation model.

Load-bearing premise

The reliability analysis and performance gains rest on the premise that the three port-selection schemes can be realized without extra hardware constraints or modeling errors beyond the given spatial correlation.

What would settle it

A high-SNR Monte-Carlo simulation in which the observed slope of the bit-error-rate curve deviates from the predicted product of selected ports, receive antennas, and energy-based spatial DoF would falsify the diversity-order claim.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Effective diversity order grows linearly with the number of selected ports and the number of receive antennas once the energy-based spatial DoF is fixed.
  • Aperture-limited array gain is captured by a scalar equivalent independent-look approximation that involves the Digamma function.
  • All three proposed schemes produce lower error rates than conventional spatial modulation and grouping-based benchmarks at the same SNR.
  • CC-COAS supplies the most favorable error-performance versus computational-complexity operating point among the three schemes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same port-selection logic could be tested in multi-user or downlink scenarios that also employ fluid antennas at the transmitter.
  • Validation against measured channel correlation traces from physical fluid-antenna prototypes would check whether the modeled diversity order survives hardware imperfections.
  • The energy-based versus extreme-value DoF split might be reused to analyze index modulation in other spatially correlated arrays.
  • Rate-adaptation rules could be derived directly from the closed-form diversity expression to keep the system near the predicted reliability limit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript considers spatial modulation (SM) in a Tx-SIMO-FAS setup with a single RF chain at the transmitter and multiple fixed antennas at the receiver. It proposes three correlation-aware port-selection algorithms—successive fluid Euclidean-distance-optimized selection (SF-EDAS), successive orthogonal port selection (SOPS), and correlation-constrained orthogonal array selection (CC-COAS)—to mitigate the impact of strong spatial correlation among the large number of fluid-antenna ports. A reliability analysis decomposes the FAS channel into an energy-based degree of freedom and an extreme-value degree of freedom; high-SNR asymptotics then yield an effective diversity order expressed in terms of the number of selected ports, the number of receive antennas, and the energy-based spatial DoF. An aperture-limited array-gain approximation involving the Digamma function is also derived. Numerical results indicate that the proposed schemes outperform conventional SM and grouping-based benchmarks, with CC-COAS providing the best error-performance versus complexity tradeoff.

Significance. If the channel decomposition and the resulting diversity-order expression are rigorously justified, the paper supplies a useful closed-form characterization of the performance limits of FAS-assisted SM under spatial correlation together with three practical, low-complexity port-selection methods. The explicit comparison of error-rate and complexity tradeoffs among the three schemes is a concrete contribution that could guide system design.

major comments (2)
  1. [Reliability analysis / high-SNR asymptotics] Reliability analysis section (high-SNR diversity-order derivation): The effective diversity order is stated to be set by the number of selected ports, receive antennas, and the energy-based spatial DoF after decomposing the channel into an energy-based DoF plus an extreme-value DoF. Under the strong spatial correlation that the port-selection schemes are designed to address, the statistical independence of these two components after selection is not obviously preserved; the manuscript does not appear to re-derive the joint distribution of the post-selection channel or to verify that the extreme-value tail remains unaffected by the selection metric. This independence assumption is load-bearing for the claimed diversity order.
  2. [Port-selection schemes and diversity-order derivation] Port-selection scheme definitions (SF-EDAS, SOPS, CC-COAS): The three algorithms are described as correlation-aware, yet the analysis of the resulting diversity order treats the post-selection channel statistics as if the decomposition remains valid without additional conditioning on the selection criterion. A concrete check—e.g., whether the diversity-order expression changes when the selection metric is substituted back into the joint distribution—would be required to confirm that the claimed order is not an artifact of the decomposition.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Array-gain characterization] The abstract and introduction refer to “the aperture-limited array gain” characterized via a scalar equivalent independent-look approximation involving the Digamma function; the precise definition of this approximation and the range of validity (e.g., number of ports, correlation strength) should be stated explicitly in the main text.
  2. [Numerical results] Numerical results section: the figures comparing the three proposed schemes against conventional SM and grouping-based benchmarks would benefit from explicit labels indicating the correlation coefficient values and the number of fluid-antenna ports used in each curve.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on the reliability analysis. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to provide additional justification for the post-selection statistics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Reliability analysis / high-SNR asymptotics] Reliability analysis section (high-SNR diversity-order derivation): The effective diversity order is stated to be set by the number of selected ports, receive antennas, and the energy-based spatial DoF after decomposing the channel into an energy-based DoF plus an extreme-value DoF. Under the strong spatial correlation that the port-selection schemes are designed to address, the statistical independence of these two components after selection is not obviously preserved; the manuscript does not appear to re-derive the joint distribution of the post-selection channel or to verify that the extreme-value tail remains unaffected by the selection metric. This independence assumption is load-bearing for the claimed diversity order.

    Authors: The decomposition separates the FAS channel into an energy-based component (capturing average power across the aperture) and an extreme-value component (governing the tail of the strongest realization). Port selection operates on the deterministic correlation matrix rather than instantaneous gains, preserving the marginal distributions of the selected ports' fading coefficients. Consequently the extreme-value tail behavior is unaffected. To strengthen the presentation we will add a short appendix in the revision that sketches the conditional joint distribution after each selection rule and confirms the diversity-order expression remains unchanged. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Port-selection schemes and diversity-order derivation] Port-selection scheme definitions (SF-EDAS, SOPS, CC-COAS): The three algorithms are described as correlation-aware, yet the analysis of the resulting diversity order treats the post-selection channel statistics as if the decomposition remains valid without additional conditioning on the selection criterion. A concrete check—e.g., whether the diversity-order expression changes when the selection metric is substituted back into the joint distribution—would be required to confirm that the claimed order is not an artifact of the decomposition.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit substitution of the selection metric would be desirable. Because the schemes are successive and the correlation matrix is fixed, an exact re-derivation is analytically cumbersome. The diversity order is nevertheless obtained from the high-SNR slope of the union bound on the pairwise error probability, which depends only on the number of retained independent paths. In the revision we will include Monte-Carlo verification of the asymptotic slopes for each of the three schemes, demonstrating agreement with the claimed order and thereby providing the requested concrete check. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained analytical modeling.

full rationale

The paper proposes three port-selection schemes (SF-EDAS, SOPS, CC-COAS) and then develops a reliability analysis via explicit channel decomposition into energy-based DoF and extreme-value DoF, followed by high-SNR asymptotics that derive an effective diversity order from the number of selected ports, receive antennas, and the energy-based spatial DoF. This is a standard forward derivation from modeling assumptions to performance metrics rather than any reduction of the claimed result to a fitted parameter, self-definition, or self-citation chain. No load-bearing self-citations, ansatzes smuggled via prior work, or renaming of known results are indicated. The analysis remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work appears to rely on standard wireless channel correlation models whose details are not stated.

reviewed 2026-06-30 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatial Modulation for Tx-SIMO-FAS: Port Selection and Performance Analysis." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PY6B5IIK

@misc{pith2026260622280,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatial Modulation for Tx-SIMO-FAS: Port Selection and Performance Analysis},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PY6B5IIK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.22280}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

This paper considers a single-input multiple-output (SIMO) setup with a fluid antenna system (FAS) at the transmitter side and multiple fixed antennas at the receiver, which is referred to as a Tx-SIMO-FAS. We investigate the use of spatial modulation (SM) utilizing the FAS on a single radio-frequency (RF) chain while the receiver side performs maximum-likelihood detection. Unlike conventional antenna arrays, however, the large number of fluid antenna ports accommodated within a limited aperture introduces strong spatial correlation, which reduces the distinguishability of port indices and degrades the reliability of index detection. To address this challenge, three correlation-aware port-selection schemes are proposed: successive fluid Euclidean-distance-optimized selection (SF-EDAS), successive orthogonal port selection (SOPS), and correlation-constrained orthogonal array selection (CC-COAS). These schemes focus on enhancing received-constellation separation, improving channel-basis conditioning, and jointly optimizing channel gain and inter-port decorrelation, respectively. To understand the performance limits of FAS-SM, a reliability analysis is developed by decomposing the channel into an energy-based degree of freedom (DoF), and an extreme-value DoF. High signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) analysis reveals an effective diversity order determined by the number of selected ports, the number of receive antennas, and the energy-based spatial DoF. Furthermore, the aperture-limited array gain is characterized through a scalar equivalent independent-look approximation involving the Digamma function. Numerical results demonstrate that the proposed schemes significantly outperform conventional SM and grouping-based benchmarks. Among them, CC-COAS achieves the most favorable tradeoff between error performance and computational complexity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22280 by Chenguang Rao, Hanjiang Hong, Kai-Kit Wong, Kaitao Meng, Xusheng Zhu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System model of the proposed Tx-SIMO-FAS SM scheme. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mechanism and decision geometry analysis under different design criteria ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Computational complexity in terms of floating-point operations [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: ASER performance evaluated under different spatial aperture con [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: ASER versus W for different FAS-SM configurations under B = 6 bpcu (SNR = 15 dB). this early-stage performance gain is mainly determined by the extreme-value array gain GF , which reflects the power advantage obtained by selecting the strongest fluid antenna ports before the asymptotic diversity gain becomes dominant. In the high-SNR regime, all three proposed algorithms ex￾hibit a much steeper decay than … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: ASER performance analysis evaluated under varying spatial aperture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: ASER performance validation of the proposed algorithms: (a) SF-EDAS, (b) SOPS, and (c) CC-COAS. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: ASER versus the number of receive antennas [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_9.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Massive MIMO detection techniques: A survey,

    M. A. Albreem, M. Juntti, and S. Shahabuddin, “Massive MIMO detection techniques: A survey,”IEEE Commun. Surveys Tuts., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 3109–3132, 4th Quart., 2019

    work page 2019

  2. [2]

    Performance analysis of RIS-aided double spatial scat- tering modulation for mmWave MIMO systems,

    X. Zhuet al., “Performance analysis of RIS-aided double spatial scat- tering modulation for mmWave MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 6139–6155, Jun. 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    RIS-aided spatial scattering modulation for mmWave MIMO transmissions,

    X. Zhuet al., “RIS-aided spatial scattering modulation for mmWave MIMO transmissions,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 12, pp. 7378– 7392, Dec. 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,

    W. K. Newet al., “A tutorial on fluid antenna system for 6G networks: Encompassing communication theory, optimization methods and hard- ware designs,”IEEE Commun. Surveys & Tuts., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 2325– 2377, Aug. 2025

    work page 2025

  5. [5]

    Fluid antenna systems: Redefining reconfigurable wireless communications,

    W. K. Newet al., “Fluid antenna systems: Redefining reconfigurable wireless communications,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 44, pp. 1013–1044, 2026

    work page 2026

  6. [6]

    Fluid antenna multiple access for 6G: A holistic review,

    H. Honget al., “Fluid antenna multiple access for 6G: A holistic review,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Soc., vol. 7, pp. 2607–2633, Mar. 2026

    work page 2026

  7. [7]

    Performance limits of fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Performance limits of fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 24, no. 11, pp. 2469–2472, Nov. 2020

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Fluid antenna systems,

    K. K. Wong, A. Shojaeifard, K.-F. Tong, and Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1950–1962, Mar. 2021

    work page 1950

  9. [9]

    Movable antenna empowered downlink NOMA systems: Power allocation and antenna position optimization,

    Y . Zhou, W. Chen, Q. Wu, X. Zhu, and N. Cheng, “Movable antenna empowered downlink NOMA systems: Power allocation and antenna position optimization,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 2772–2776, Oct. 2024

    work page 2024

  10. [10]

    Fluid antenna systems: A geometric approach to error probability and fundamental limits,

    X. Zhuet al., “Fluid antenna systems: A geometric approach to error probability and fundamental limits,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 17195–17209, May 2026

    work page 2026

  11. [11]

    An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimiza- tion, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff andq-outage capacity,

    W. K. New, K. K. Wong, H. Xu, K.-F. Tong, and C.-B. Chae, “An information-theoretic characterization of MIMO-FAS: Optimiza- tion, diversity-multiplexing tradeoff andq-outage capacity,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5541–5556, Jun. 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    Codebook-based port selection and combining for CSI-free uplink fluid antenna multiple access,

    C. Raoet al., “Codebook-based port selection and combining for CSI-free uplink fluid antenna multiple access,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 13401–13415, Mar. 2026

    work page 2026

  13. [13]

    Multi-port selection for FAMA: Massive connectivity with fewer RF chains than users,

    H Honget al., “Multi-port selection for FAMA: Massive connectivity with fewer RF chains than users,”arXiv preprint, arXiv:2511.17897, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  14. [14]

    Fluid antenna system-enabled UA V communications in the finite blocklength regime,

    X. Zhuet al., “Fluid antenna system-enabled UA V communications in the finite blocklength regime,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 16714–16729, May 2026

    work page 2026

  15. [15]

    Fluid antenna system- enabled UA V-to-ground communications,

    X. Zhu, K. K. Wong, Q. Wu, H. Shin, Y . Zhang, “Fluid antenna system- enabled UA V-to-ground communications,”arXiv preprint, arXiv:2511. 17416, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    UA V-enabled short-packet communication via fluid antenna systems,

    X. Zhuet al., “UA V-enabled short-packet communication via fluid antenna systems,”arXiv preprint, arXiv:2602.06206, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Fluid reconfigurable intelligent surface with element- level pattern reconfigurability: Beamforming and pattern co-design,

    H. Xiaoet al., “Fluid reconfigurable intelligent surface with element- level pattern reconfigurability: Beamforming and pattern co-design,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 10791–10806, Jan. 2026

    work page 2026

  18. [18]

    Fluid reconfigurable intelligent surface (FRIS) enabling secure wireless com- munications,

    X. Zhu, K. K. Wong, B. Tang, W. Chen, and C.-B. Chae, “Fluid reconfigurable intelligent surface (FRIS) enabling secure wireless com- munications,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 2408–2412, Apr. 2026

    work page 2026

  19. [19]

    A survey on spatial modulation in emerging wireless systems: Research progresses and applications,

    M. Wenet al., “A survey on spatial modulation in emerging wireless systems: Research progresses and applications,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 37, no. 9, pp. 1949–1972, Sept. 2019

    work page 1949

  20. [20]

    Fluid RIS (FRIS)-Assisted Index Modulation for 6G Wireless Communications

    X. Zhuet al., “Fluid RIS (FRIS)-assisted index modulation for 6G wireless communications,”arXiv preprint, arXiv:2605.22508, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    On the performance of 3-D spatial modulation over measured indoor channels,

    X. Zhuet al., “On the performance of 3-D spatial modulation over measured indoor channels,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 71, no. 2, pp. 2110–2115, Feb. 2022

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Single-RF MIMO: From spatial modulation to metasurface-based modulation,

    Q. Li, M. Wen, and M. Di Renzo, “Single-RF MIMO: From spatial modulation to metasurface-based modulation,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 88–95, Aug. 2021

    work page 2021

  23. [23]

    Spatial scattering shift keying for mmWave MIMO systems,

    X. Zhuet al., “Spatial scattering shift keying for mmWave MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 15337–15351, Dec. 2025

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Towards spatial scattering modulation: Detector design and error probability analysis,

    X. Zhuet al., “Towards spatial scattering modulation: Detector design and error probability analysis,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 8520–8534, Oct. 2025

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Transmissive RIS transmitter enabled spatial modulation MIMO systems,

    X. Zhu, Q. Wu, and W. Chen, “Transmissive RIS transmitter enabled spatial modulation MIMO systems,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 899–911, Mar. 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    On the performance of RIS-aided spatial modulation for downlink transmission,

    X. Zhu, Q. Wu, and W. Chen, “On the performance of RIS-aided spatial modulation for downlink transmission,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16203–16217, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  27. [27]

    Position index modulation for fluid antenna system,

    H. Yanget al., “Position index modulation for fluid antenna system,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 16773–16787, Nov. 2024

    work page 2024

  28. [28]

    Fluid antenna index modulation communications,

    Y . Chen and T. Xu, “Fluid antenna index modulation communications,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 1203–1207, Apr. 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Index modulation for fluid antenna-assisted MIMO communications: System design and performance analysis,

    J. Zhuet al., “Index modulation for fluid antenna-assisted MIMO communications: System design and performance analysis,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 9701–9713, Aug. 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Fluid antenna index modulation for MIMO systems: Ro- bust transmission and low-complexity detection,

    X. Guoet al., “Fluid antenna index modulation for MIMO systems: Ro- bust transmission and low-complexity detection,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 12, pp. 15955–15970, Dec. 2025

    work page 2025

  31. [31]

    Advanced channel coding designs for index-modulated fluid antenna systems,

    E. Faddoul, G. M. Kraidy, C. Psomas, and I. Krikidis, “Advanced channel coding designs for index-modulated fluid antenna systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 726–739, Feb. 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Fluid antenna empowered index modulation for RIS-aided mmWave transmissions,

    J. Zhuet al., “Fluid antenna empowered index modulation for RIS-aided mmWave transmissions,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 1635–1647, Feb. 2025

    work page 2025

  33. [33]

    Fluid antenna-empowered receive spatial modulation,

    X. Guoet al., “Fluid antenna-empowered receive spatial modulation,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:2506.07362, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  34. [34]

    Index modulation for covert transmission in continuous- trajectory fluid antenna systems,

    M. Liuet al., “Index modulation for covert transmission in continuous- trajectory fluid antenna systems,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 5197–5202, Mar. 2026

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    Fluid antenna-assisted rectangular differential index modulation: A non-coherent system design, optimization, and perfor- mance analysis,

    P. Zhanget al., “Fluid antenna-assisted rectangular differential index modulation: A non-coherent system design, optimization, and perfor- mance analysis,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 44, pp. 1307–1321, 2026

    work page 2026

  36. [36]

    Movable antenna enhanced MIMO communications with spatial modulation,

    K. Wanget al., “Movable antenna enhanced MIMO communications with spatial modulation,”arXiv preprint, arXiv:2601.12788, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.3 on June 30, 2026.