Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Bayes-Optimal Effort Allocation in Crowdsourcing: Bounds and Index Policies

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1512.09204 v1 pith:PYQWO6OF submitted 2015-12-31 cs.LG cs.AIstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.AIstat.ML
keywords policyallocationbayes-optimalcrowdsourcingeffortindexboundother
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider effort allocation in crowdsourcing, where we wish to assign labeling tasks to imperfect homogeneous crowd workers to maximize overall accuracy in a continuous-time Bayesian setting, subject to budget and time constraints. The Bayes-optimal policy for this problem is the solution to a partially observable Markov decision process, but the curse of dimensionality renders the computation infeasible. Based on the Lagrangian Relaxation technique in Adelman & Mersereau (2008), we provide a computationally tractable instance-specific upper bound on the value of this Bayes-optimal policy, which can in turn be used to bound the optimality gap of any other sub-optimal policy. In an approach similar in spirit to the Whittle index for restless multiarmed bandits, we provide an index policy for effort allocation in crowdsourcing and demonstrate numerically that it outperforms other stateof- arts and performs close to optimal solution.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools