REVIEW 2 cited by
A Survey on Figure Classification Techniques in Scientific Documents
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Figures visually represent an essential piece of information and provide an effective means to communicate scientific facts. Recently there have been many efforts toward extracting data directly from figures, specifically from tables, diagrams, and plots, using different Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning techniques. This is because removing information from figures could lead to deeper insights into the concepts highlighted in the scientific documents. In this survey paper, we systematically categorize figures into five classes - tables, photos, diagrams, maps, and plots, and subsequently present a critical review of the existing methodologies and data sets that address the problem of figure classification. Finally, we identify the current research gaps and provide possible directions for further research on figure classification.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Patent Figure Classification using Large Vision-language Models
A new dataset pair and a tournament-style multiple-choice query strategy let a fine-tuned InstructBLIP model classify patent figures by type, projection, object, and USPC class, beating CNN baselines on type and USPC.
-
SymbioticRAG: Enhancing Document Intelligence Through Human-LLM Symbiotic Collaboration
A human-in-the-loop RAG system that lets users select relevant document blocks and later uses their interaction logs to improve retrieval, with small user studies showing gains over baseline RAG.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.