Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Nonlinear Dynamics of the Inner Horizon in Reissner-Nordstr\"om Black Holes: Insights into Mass Inflation

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mass inflation drives the inner horizon of a Reissner-Nordström black hole inward to zero radius, making the interior Schwarzschild-like.

desk verdict The new dynamic-horizon setup is a legitimate direction, but the central claim that ρ(v)→0 as v→∞ does not follow from the paper's own Eq. (39). read the letter →

arxiv 2412.14618 v1 pith:PZAPL7TC submitted 2024-12-19 gr-qc

Nihar Ranjan Ghosh , Malay K. Nandy This is my paper · ORCID
classification gr-qc MSC 83C5783C75 PACS 04.70.-s04.20.-q
keywords massinflationReissner-NordströmblackholeinnerhorizondynamicsCauchyinstabilitymassivescalarfieldS-waveapproximationKlein-GordonequationSchwarzschildlimit
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that mass inflation—the runaway growth of the black hole's mass function near the inner horizon—drives the inner (Cauchy) horizon of a charged, spherically symmetric Reissner-Nordström black hole to shrink inward, with its radius tending to zero in the infinite advanced-time limit: $\rho(v)\to 0^+$ as $v\to\infty$. This would erase the inner horizon as a boundary of predictability and make the black-hole interior approach a Schwarzschild-like geometry. The paper further claims that both the shrinking of the horizon and the growth of the mass function accelerate as the mass of the perturbing scalar field increases. A sympathetic reader would care because the fate of the inner horizon decides whether the classical route through a charged black hole to other universes survives, and prior studies disagreed on exactly what happens there.

What carries the argument

The central object is the time-dependent inner-horizon radius $\rho(v)$, about which the redshift function $f$ and the scalar field $\varphi$ are expanded in powers of $x=r-\rho(v)$. This perturbative machinery converts the Einstein–Maxwell–Klein–Gordon system into three coupled nonlinear ODEs, equations (25)–(27), for $\rho$, $\varphi_1$, and $\varphi_2$. Introducing $\zeta=\varphi_1\exp(\int f_1\,dv)$ and then the ansatz $\eta(v)=\int\zeta\,dv=e^{\beta v}$ reduces the system to the integral equation (39), whose left-hand side integrates to a 12th-order polynomial in $\rho$ multiplied by $\exp(2\mu^2\rho/\beta)$. The polynomial-exponential form of equation (40) is what prevents analytic inversion, so the paper obtains $\rho(v)$ numerically and reads off the inward motion and the Schwarzschild limit.

What would settle it

Fix $\beta$ by matching the solution of equations (25)–(27) to the unperturbed Reissner-Nordström state at $v=v_0$ (for instance, requiring $\varphi_1(v_0)$, $\rho'(v_0)$, and $m(v_0)$ to take their RN values), then integrate equation (40) numerically: if any physically allowed $\beta$ produces a positive stationary $\rho$ or an outward-moving horizon, the claim that $\rho\to 0^+$ holds generically is false. A cleaner test is a direct numerical integration of the full coupled PDEs (10) and (11) without the S-wave perturbative truncation, checking whether the inward motion survives beyond leading order.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the inner horizon's motion is an essential part of mass inflation: the horizon radius $\rho(v)=(m_0+m(v))-\sqrt{(m_0+m(v))^2-Q^2}$ obeys a nonlinear dynamical equation coupled to the scalar-field amplitudes, and solving that system gives a polynomial-exponential relation whose numerical inversion shows $\rho(v)\to 0^+$ as $v\to\infty$. By equation (23), $\rho\approx Q^2/[2(m_0+m(v))]$, so the mass function diverges, $m(v)\to\infty$, in the same limit. The paper presents this as evidence that a Reissner-Nordström spacetime perturbed by a massive chargeless scalar field tends toward a Schwarzschild-like geometry, with the inner Cauchy horizon destroyed rather than merely singular. The quoted shrinking is inward and faster for larger scalar-field mass.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the exponential ansatz $\eta(v)=e^{\beta v}$ with the real parameter $\beta$ never fixed by initial data or any physical condition; the sign and magnitude of $\beta$ control whether the horizon shrinks, grows, or reaches zero in the claimed limit.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the central claim is right, the inner Cauchy horizon shrinks to zero radius, so the Reissner-Nordström interior loses its charged, two-horizon character and approaches a Schwarzschild-like geometry.
  • The mass function $m(v)$ diverges as $\rho\to 0^+$, showing that mass inflation persists even when the horizon is allowed to move, though the growth is weaker than the double-exponential 'superinflation' found for a static horizon in the authors' earlier model.
  • Larger scalar-field mass means faster horizon contraction and faster mass growth, because the scalar is more strongly blueshifted near the horizon.
  • Because equation (40) cannot be inverted analytically, quantitative statements about the approach to Schwarzschild require numerical solution; the paper relies on that numerical inversion for its figures.
  • The perturbation series about the moving horizon gives the scalar field in powers of $x=r-\rho(v)$, with the leading amplitude $\varphi_1(v)$ driving the horizon equation (25); this is why the horizon motion and mass inflation are inseparably coupled.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper's claims: since $\beta$ is a free parameter, a different sign choice would reverse the direction of horizon motion; the paper's inward-shrinking result is therefore not a parameter-free prediction until $\beta$ is fixed by initial data or late-time tail matching.
  • Beyond the paper's claims: the same coupled-equation method could be applied to the Kerr interior, where a dynamic inner horizon under massive-field accretion may show analogous shrinking and a weakening of the classical mass-inflation singularity strength.
  • Beyond the paper's claims: if the inner horizon genuinely collapses to zero, gravitational-wave ringdown or quasi-normal-mode observations of a charged-black-hole merger could in principle constrain the scalar-field mass via the horizon-shrinking rate.
  • Beyond the paper's claims: the far-from-extremal approximation $m_0\gg Q$ used in equation (23) can be tested by keeping higher-order terms in the expansion of $\rho(v)$; the near-extremal regime may show a qualitatively different fate for the inner horizon.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies mass inflation in a Reissner-Nordström black hole perturbed by a minimally coupled massive, chargeless scalar field, focusing on the dynamics of the inner horizon. Working in the S-wave approximation and expanding about the time-dependent inner horizon, the authors derive a set of coupled nonlinear ODEs for the horizon radius ρ(v), the mass function m(v), and scalar-field expansion coefficients. After an exponential ansatz and a sequence of approximations, they obtain an integral equation, Eq. (39), and a twelfth-degree polynomial equation, Eq. (40), which they solve numerically. The central claim is that the inner horizon moves inward and ρ(v)→0+ as v→∞, so that the Reissner-Nordström spacetime becomes Schwarzschild-like in the infinite advanced time limit, with a corresponding divergence of the mass function. The paper also claims that higher scalar-field mass yields faster horizon shrinking and faster mass inflation.

Significance. If the central claim were established, the result would be significant: it would suggest that massive scalar perturbations destroy the inner Cauchy horizon and drive the charged black hole interior toward a Schwarzschild-like geometry, with strong implications for mass inflation and the possibility of extending spacetime beyond the Cauchy horizon. The paper has strengths: it formulates a dynamical-horizon perturbation scheme, derives a closed-form integral equation for the horizon radius, and attempts to go beyond the static-horizon treatment of the authors' earlier work. The comparison with prior mass-inflation models is useful. However, as detailed below, the main asymptotic claim is not a consequence of the displayed mathematics: the central equation admits the claimed behavior only under a measure-zero fine-tuning, and the derivation relies on unstated free parameters and an unproven approximation. These issues affect the abstract, Section 4, and the quantitative content of the figures, so the significance of the paper as it stands is not established.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, Eqs. (39)-(40)] The asymptotic claim ρ(v)→0 as v→∞ is not supported by Eq. (39). For β>0, the right-hand side C/(2β)(e^{2βv}−e^{2βv0}) grows without bound, while the left-hand side ∫_ρ^{r−} s^{12} exp(2μ²s/β) ds is bounded above by ∫_0^{r−} s^{12} exp(2μ²s/β) ds, so no real solution with ρ≥0 exists beyond a finite advanced time. For β<0, the right-hand side tends to the finite value −C e^{2βv0}/(2β); generically ρ(v) approaches the positive root of L(ρ∞)=−C e^{2βv0}/(2β), and only the measure-zero choice L(0)=−C e^{2βv0}/(2β) yields ρ→0. Hence the Abstract and Section 4 conclusion that the spacetime becomes Schwarzschild-like is not a consequence of the displayed mathematics.
  2. [Section 3, around Eq. (36)] The substitution η(v)=e^{βv} is an ansatz, not a derivation. The real parameter β is never fixed by initial data or by any physical condition, and its sign determines whether the horizon shrinks, grows, or reaches ρ=0 at finite v. Figures 1 and 2 do not report β or the initial data, so the plotted curves and the stated dependence on the scalar mass μ are not reproducible or parameter-free predictions.
  3. [Section 3, Eq. (31)] Equation (31) omits the arbitrary constant from the indefinite integral in Eq. (30). Including it adds a term −ρ'(v)K to Eq. (36); this term is generally not negligible and changes the exponential solution, and K is never fixed or discussed. The subsequent derivation of Eq. (39) therefore relies on an unstated additional assumption.
  4. [Section 3, Eqs. (28)-(29)] The last term in Eq. (28) is dropped because it is said to be 'an exponentially decreasing function of v', but at this stage ρ(v) is unknown; the decay property depends on the very shrinking behavior the paper is trying to prove. The statement that the approximation is consistent with results showing ρ→0 is circular, since those results are derived using the dropped term. Equation (30) and all subsequent equations inherit this unproven approximation.
  5. [Section 3, Eq. (40)] Equation (40) is not algebraically equivalent to Eq. (39). Integrating Eq. (39) gives L(ρ)=F(r−)−C/(2β)(e^{2βv}−e^{2βv0}); expressed as exp(2μ²ρ/β)P12(ρ)=F(r−)−C e^{2βv0}/(2β)+C e^{2βv}/(2β). The displayed Eq. (40) omits the constant F(r−)−C e^{2βv0}/(2β), which matters for the late-time limit and for the numerical solution.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3, Eq. (28)] The symbol r0 appears in the integrand of Eq. (28), but the subsequent Eq. (29) uses ρ; this typo obscures the derivation.
  2. [Figures 1 and 2] The figure captions and the text disagree on the scalar mass values: Figure 1 caption lists μ=0.01,1.00, while the text says μ=0.10,1.00; Figure 2 caption lists μ=0.01,0.10, while the text says μ=0.10,1.00. Please reconcile.
  3. [Abstract and Introduction] The word 'illusive' should be 'elusive' if that is the intended meaning, and the title and text contain repeated formatting errors such as 'Reissner-Nordst r¨ om'.
  4. [Section 3, Eq. (22)] The third term in the expansion of ρ(v) has an incorrect coefficient: the expansion of m−√(m²−Q²) gives Q^6/(16M^5), not Q^6/(2M^5), so Eq. (22) should be corrected even though only the leading term is used.
  5. [Section 4 and Figures] The numerical solution of Eq. (40) is not described: no numerical method, parameter values for β and the integration constants, or error estimates are given, so the plotted curves cannot be reproduced or independently checked.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The claimed ρ→0/Schwarzschild-like limit is not a consequence of the equations: Eq. (29) discards a term by invoking the very late-time behavior to be derived, and the exponential ansatz leaves β free, so the asymptotic outcome is an unstated fine-tuning rather than a prediction.

  1. other [Section 3, Eqs. (28)-(29) and the paragraph following Eq. (29)]
    "Since the last term is an exponentially decreasing function of v, we can write ... in the late time approximation. We shall see that this approximation is consistent with our results of calculation, showing that ρ → 0 as v → ∞, as illustrated later in Figure 1."

    The 'last term' in Eq. (28) is exp(−∫Q²/ρ³dv) d/dv(5φ1/ρ). Whether this term is exponentially decreasing depends on whether ∫Q²/ρ³dv grows without bound, i.e. on whether ρ(v) actually tends to 0. The paper discards the term on that basis, solves the simplified equation to obtain ρ→0, and then cites the same ρ→0 as the consistency check for the approximation. The approximation is therefore justified by the very conclusion it is used to produce, with no independent estimate of the neglected term.

  2. other [Section 3, Eqs. (36)-(40); Section 4 and Abstract]
    "To solve this differential equation, we substitute η(v)=e^{βv}, leading to exp(βv−∫f1dv)=ρ^5 exp(−βv−c1+μ²ρ/β) ... Equation (39) can be integrated to obtain the dynamics of the inner horizon ρ(v) ... Analytical solution of equation (39) results in a 12th order polynomial in ρ ... exp[2μ²/β ρ(v)] ∑ a_nρ^n(v)=C/(2β) exp(2βv)."

    The real parameter β is never fixed by initial data, by the field equations, or by any physical condition. Its sign controls the behavior of Eq. (39): for β>0 the right-hand side grows without bound while the left-hand side is bounded by ∫_0^{r-} s^{12} exp(2μ²s/β) ds, so no real solution exists beyond finite v; for β<0 the right-hand side tends to a finite limit, generically giving ρ∞>0. Only the measure-zero choice of the integration constant that makes that finite limit equal to the maximum left-hand-side integral yields ρ→0 as v→∞. The paper neither fixes β nor reports the required fine-tuning, and no parameter values are given for Figures 1 and 2.

full rationale

The paper contains no meaningful self-citation circularity: reference [19] is prior work by the same authors, but the quantitative derivation here is attempted from the coupled field equations rather than imported from [19]. The main circularity is internal. First, the late-time approximation in Eqs. (28)-(29) drops a term because it is declared 'exponentially decreasing', which is only true if ρ(v)→0, the very result the approximated equation is then used to establish; the text explicitly validates the approximation by the conclusion ('We shall see that this approximation is consistent with our results of calculation, showing that ρ→0 as v→∞'). Second, the exponential ansatz η=e^{βv} introduces a free real parameter β whose sign and magnitude determine the asymptotics. Eq. (39) does not force ρ→0: β>0 makes the right side unbounded while the left side is bounded, and β<0 generically gives a positive limiting radius; ρ→0 requires a special relation between β and the integration constants that is never stated or justified. Thus the headline claim that the Reissner-Nordström spacetime becomes Schwarzschild-like is not a parameter-free prediction of the derivation; it is an input selected through an unreported choice of β and the integration constant. This reduces the central claim to a constructed outcome of the ansatz, warranting a circularity score of 6 rather than a purely correctness critique.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation rests on several domain assumptions and two ad hoc choices (the dropped term and the β ansatz) plus two free constants. There are no newly invented particles or fields. The heaviest burden is the unsupported β ansatz, since the qualitative fate of the horizon depends on its sign.

free parameters (2)
  • β = not specified
    Introduced by the ansatz η=e^{βv} in Section 3; controls the rate and type of horizon evolution and is not fixed by initial data or physics. No value is reported for Figures 1 and 2.
  • integration constant in Eq (31) = 0 (assumed)
    Integrating Eq (30) to obtain Eq (31) drops an arbitrary constant; setting it to zero is a free choice not discussed in the paper.
assumptions (7)
  • standard math Standard Einstein-Maxwell equations with a minimally coupled massive scalar field
    Section 2, Eqs (2)-(5); the field equations are taken as the theoretical framework.
  • domain assumption S-wave approximation with scalar field Φ=φ(r,v)/r and intensity falling off as 1/r²
    Section 3, Eq (12); restricts the scalar field configuration and removes angular dependence.
  • domain assumption No outgoing or backscattered scalar radiation; the scalar field depends only on advanced time v and radius r
    The metric and field ansatz (7) and Φ(r,v) in Section 2 exclude outgoing modes, which are the key ingredient in Poisson-Israel mass inflation; this is not justified.
  • domain assumption Black hole initially far from extremality, m0≫Q, truncating ρ≈Q²/(2(m0+m(v)))
    Eq (23) drops higher-order terms in the expansion (22); used throughout the derivation.
  • domain assumption Perturbative expansion about the dynamic inner horizon truncated at order x
    Eqs (16)-(21); the expansion is taken near r=ρ(v), with no proof of convergence or control of higher orders.
  • ad hoc to paper The last term in Eq (28) is exponentially decreasing and may be dropped
    The justification in the text relies on the shrinking behavior that the resulting equation is used to prove; no independent error bound is given.
  • ad hoc to paper Exponential ansatz η=e^{βv}
    Used to reduce Eq (36); β is an unconstrained free parameter and the ansatz does not follow from the initial data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Nonlinear Dynamics of the Inner Horizon in Reissner-Nordstr\"om Black Holes: Insights into Mass Inflation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PZAPL7TC

@misc{pith2026241214618,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Nonlinear Dynamics of the Inner Horizon in Reissner-Nordstr\"om Black Holes: Insights into Mass Inflation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PZAPL7TC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.14618}
}
read the original abstract

The well-known instability of the inner horizon of a Reissner-Nordstr\"om black hole, first suggested by Simpson and Penrose, although studied extensively, has remained illusive so far as several studies led to varied conclusions about the dynamical nature of the inner horizon. In this work, we therefore focus upon the dynamic nature of the inner horizon in the course of mass inflation. We model this phenomenon with a massive chargeless scalar field minimally coupled with the Reissner-Nordstr\"om spacetime. Employing the Einstein-Maxwell field equation coupled with the Klein-Gordon equation, we obtain a nonlinear dynamical equation for the inner horizon coupled with the dynamics of the mass function and the scalar field. In the S-wave approximation, we develop a perturbative solution about the dynamic inner horizon and obtain an analytical solution as a polynomial of twelfth degree. Our detailed analysis shows that the inner horizon moves inward in the course of mass inflation. Higher the mass of the scalar field, faster are the shrinking rate of the inner horizon and the rate of mass inflation. Our solution for dynamic shrinking of the inner horizon suggests that a Reissner-Nordstr\"om spacetime tends towards a Schwarzschild-like geometry, in the infinite advanced time limit.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.14618 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Evolution of the inner horizon ρ(v) with respect to the advanced time v as a consequence of the nonlinear dynamical equation for ρ(v) given by Equation (25), obtained for scalar mass values µ = 0.01, 1.00 in Planckian units. We further define R ζ(v)dv = η(v), so that 2η ′′ − f1η ′ − 5ρ ′ r η ′ − ρ ′µ 2 η = 0. (36) To solve this differential equation, we substitute η(v) = e βv, leading to exp  βv − Z f1dv = ρ 5 exp… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of the mass function m(v) with respect to the advanced time v as a consequence of the dynamical equation for m(v) given by Equation (13), obtained for scalar mass values µ = 0.01, 1.00 in Planckian units. Equation (39) can be integrated to obtain the dynamics of the inner horizon ρ(v) due to the massive chargeless scalar field. Subsequently, equation (23) can be used to obtain the dynamic behavior of the m… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Scrambling in charged hairy black holes and the Kasner interior

    hep-th 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    In a charged hairy black hole, increasing the boundary deformation parameter lowers the Lyapunov exponent relative to surface gravity but can push it above the axion Reissner-Nordström value, and generally shortens th...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Inner-horizon instability and mas s inflation in black holes

    Eric Poisson and Werner Israel. Inner-horizon instability and mas s inflation in black holes. Physical Review Letters , 63(16):1663, 1989

    work page 1989

  2. [2]

    ¨Uber die Eigengravitation des elektrischen Feldes nach der Ein- steinschen Theorie

    Hans Reissner. ¨Uber die Eigengravitation des elektrischen Feldes nach der Ein- steinschen Theorie. Annalen der Physik , 355(9):106–120, 1916. 15

    work page 1916

  3. [3]

    On the Energy of the Gravitational Field in Einstein’s The- ory II Verhandl

    G Nordstrom. On the Energy of the Gravitational Field in Einstein’s The- ory II Verhandl. Koninkl. Ned. Akad. Wetenschap., Afdel. Natuurk., Amsterd am, 26:1201–1208, 1918

    work page 1918

  4. [4]

    Change of relativistic collapse into anticollapse and kine matics of a charged sphere

    ID Novikov. Change of relativistic collapse into anticollapse and kine matics of a charged sphere. JETP Lett.(USSR)(Engl. Transl.) , 3, 1966

    work page 1966

  5. [5]

    Internal instability in a Reiss ner-Nordstr¨ om black hole

    Michael Simpson and Roger Penrose. Internal instability in a Reiss ner-Nordstr¨ om black hole. International Journal of Theoretical Physics , 7:183–197, 1973

    work page 1973

  6. [6]

    R. Penrose. Battelle Rencontres - 1967 Lectures in Mathematic s and Physics (Ed. by C. M. DeWitt and J. A. Wheeler). XVII + 557 S. m. Fig. New York/Amsterdam 1968. W. A. Benjamin, Inc. Zamm-zeitschrift Fur Angewandte Mathematik Und Mechanik , 50:782–782, 1970

    work page 1967

  7. [7]

    The physics of the relativis tic counter- streaming instability that drives mass inflation inside black holes

    Andrew JS Hamilton and Pedro P Avelino. The physics of the relativis tic counter- streaming instability that drives mass inflation inside black holes. Physics Reports, 495(1):1–32, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    Structure of the singularity inside a realistic rotating bla ck hole

    Amos Ori. Structure of the singularity inside a realistic rotating bla ck hole. Physical Review Letters , 68(14):2117, 1992

    work page 1992

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Mass inflation in a rotating charged black hole

    Alfio Bonanno. Mass inflation in a rotating charged black hole. Physical Review D , 53(12):7373, 1996

    1996

  2. [10]

    Perturbative approach to the inner structure of a r otating black hole

    Amos Ori. Perturbative approach to the inner structure of a r otating black hole. General Relativity and Gravitation , 29(7):881–929, 1997

    1997

  3. [11]

    The interior structure of slowly rotating bla ck holes

    Andrew JS Hamilton. The interior structure of slowly rotating bla ck holes. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 26(16):165006, 2009

    2009

  4. [12]

    Internal structure of black holes

    Werner Israel and Eric Poisson. Internal structure of black holes. Physical Review D , 41(6):1796, 1990

    1990

  5. [13]

    Mass inflat ion in the loop black hole

    Eric G Brown, Robert Mann, and Leonardo Modesto. Mass inflat ion in the loop black hole. Physical Review D , 84(10):104041, 2011

    2011

  6. [14]

    Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact ma ss-inflation solu- tion

    Amos Ori. Inner structure of a charged black hole: An exact ma ss-inflation solu- tion. Physical Review Letters , 67(7):789, 1991. 16

    1991

  7. [15]

    Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gra vitational collapse

    Richard H Price. Nonspherical perturbations of relativistic gra vitational collapse. I. Scalar and gravitational perturbations. Physical Review D , 5(10):2419, 1972

    1972

  8. [16]

    Singularities in conformally flat spacetimes

    Frank J Tipler. Singularities in conformally flat spacetimes. Physics Letters A , 64(1):8–10, 1977

    1977

  9. [17]

    Singular space-times

    George FR Ellis and Bernd G Schmidt. Singular space-times. General Relativity and Gravitation , 8:915–953, 1977

    1977

  10. [18]

    Analytic study of the null singularity ins ide spherical charged black holes

    Lior M Burko and Amos Ori. Analytic study of the null singularity ins ide spherical charged black holes. Physical Review D , 57(12):R7084, 1998

    1998

  11. [19]

    Mass superinflation in the Reissner- Nordstr¨ om black hole.Nuclear Physics B , 1008:116712, 2024

    Nihar Ranjan Ghosh and Malay K Nandy. Mass superinflation in the Reissner- Nordstr¨ om black hole.Nuclear Physics B , 1008:116712, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Stress-energy tensor near a charged, rotat ing, evaporating black hole

    William A Hiscock. Stress-energy tensor near a charged, rotat ing, evaporating black hole. Physical Review D , 15(10):3054, 1977

    1977

  13. [21]

    Energy-mom entum tensor near an evaporating black hole

    Paul CW Davies, Stephen A Fulling, and William G Unruh. Energy-mom entum tensor near an evaporating black hole. Physical Review D , 13(10):2720, 1976

    1976

  14. [22]

    Mass inflation: The semiclassic al regime

    Roberto Balbinot and Eric Poisson. Mass inflation: The semiclassic al regime. Physical Review Letters , 70(1):13, 1993

    1993

  15. [23]

    Internal structure of ch arged black holes

    Dong-il Hwang and Dong-han Yeom. Internal structure of ch arged black holes. Physical Review D , 84(6):064020, 2011

    2011

  16. [24]

    Black hole inner horizon evaporation in semiclassical gravity

    Carlos Barcel´ o, Valentin Boyanov, Ra´ ul Carballo-Rubio, and L uis J Garay. Black hole inner horizon evaporation in semiclassical gravity. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 38(12):125003, 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Classical mass inflation versus semiclassical inner horizon inflation

    Carlos Barcel´ o, Valentin Boyanov, Ra´ ul Carballo-Rubio, and LJ Garay. Classical mass inflation versus semiclassical inner horizon inflation. Physical Review D , 106(12):124006, 2022

    2022

  18. [26]

    Regular black holes without mass inflation instab ility

    Ra´ ul Carballo-Rubio, Francesco Di Filippo, Stefano Liberati, C ostantino Pa- cilio, and Matt Visser. Regular black holes without mass inflation instab ility. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2022(9):1–14, 2022

    2022

  19. [27]

    Stable rotating regular black holes

    Edgardo Franzin, Stefano Liberati, Jacopo Mazza, and Vania V ellucci. Stable rotating regular black holes. Physical Review D , 106(10):104060, 2022. 17

    2022

  20. [28]

    Semiclassical instability of inner-extremal regu lar black holes

    Tyler McMaken. Semiclassical instability of inner-extremal regu lar black holes. Physical Review D , 107(12):125023, 2023

    2023

  21. [29]

    Cauchy horizon instability for Reissner- Nordstrom black holes in de Sitter space

    PR Brady and E Poisson. Cauchy horizon instability for Reissner- Nordstrom black holes in de Sitter space. Classical and Quantum Gravity , 9(1):121, 1992

    1992

  22. [30]

    Stability of black holes in de Sitter spac e

    Felicity Mellor and Ian Moss. Stability of black holes in de Sitter spac e. Physical Review D , 41(2):403, 1990

    1990

  23. [31]

    Cauchy horiz on singularity without mass inflation

    Patrick R Brady, Dario Nunez, and Sukanya Sinha. Cauchy horiz on singularity without mass inflation. Physical Review D , 47(10):4239, 1993

    1993

  24. [32]

    Black holes in de Sitter space and the stability conjecture of Cauchy horizons

    Rong-Gen Cai and Ru-Keng Su. Black holes in de Sitter space and the stability conjecture of Cauchy horizons. Physical Review D , 52(2):666, 1995

    1995

  25. [33]

    Testing a stability conjecture for C auchy hori- zons

    TM Helliwell and DA Konkowski. Testing a stability conjecture for C auchy hori- zons. Physical Review D , 47(10):4322, 1993

    1993

  26. [34]

    Instabilities of the Cauchy horizon in Kerr black holes

    DA Konkowski and TM Helliwell. Instabilities of the Cauchy horizon in Kerr black holes. Physical Review D , 50(2):841, 1994

    1994

  27. [35]

    Classical stability and qu antum instability of black-hole Cauchy horizons

    Dragoljub Markovi´ c and Eric Poisson. Classical stability and qu antum instability of black-hole Cauchy horizons. Physical Review Letters , 74(8):1280, 1995

    1995

  28. [36]

    Non-singular black holes and mass inflation in modified gravity

    Manuel Bertipagani, Massimiliano Rinaldi, Lorenzo Sebastiani, and Sergio Zerbini. Non-singular black holes and mass inflation in modified gravity. Physics of the Dark Universe , 33:100853, 2021

    2021

  29. [37]

    R egular evaporat- ing black holes with stable cores

    Alfio Bonanno, Amir-Pouyan Khosravi, and Frank Saueressig. R egular evaporat- ing black holes with stable cores. Physical Review D , 107(2):024005, 2023

    2023

  30. [38]

    Inner horizon instability and the unstable cores of regular black holes

    Ra´ ul Carballo-Rubio, Francesco Di Filippo, Stefano Liberati, C ostantino Pacilio, and Matt Visser. Inner horizon instability and the unstable cores of regular black holes. Journal of High Energy Physics , 2021(5):1–16, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    R egular black holes with stable cores

    Alfio Bonanno, Amir-Pouyan Khosravi, and Frank Saueressig. R egular black holes with stable cores. Physical Review D , 103(12):124027, 2021

    2021

  32. [40]

    Mass inflation without Cauchy horizons

    Ra´ ul Carballo-Rubio, Francesco Di Filippo, Stefano Liberati, a nd Matt Visser. Mass inflation without Cauchy horizons. Physical Review Letters , 133(18):181402, 2024. 18

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.