Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Weakly-Supervised Hierarchical Models for Predicting Persuasive Strategies in Good-faith Textual Requests

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2101.06351 v1 pith:PZIG4KTL submitted 2021-01-16 cs.CL cs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.CY
keywords persuasivestrategieslabelsmodelinggood-faithhierarchicalpersuasionrequests
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Modeling persuasive language has the potential to better facilitate our decision-making processes. Despite its importance, computational modeling of persuasion is still in its infancy, largely due to the lack of benchmark datasets that can provide quantitative labels of persuasive strategies to expedite this line of research. To this end, we introduce a large-scale multi-domain text corpus for modeling persuasive strategies in good-faith text requests. Moreover, we design a hierarchical weakly-supervised latent variable model that can leverage partially labeled data to predict such associated persuasive strategies for each sentence, where the supervision comes from both the overall document-level labels and very limited sentence-level labels. Experimental results showed that our proposed method outperformed existing semi-supervised baselines significantly. We have publicly released our code at https://github.com/GT-SALT/Persuasion_Strategy_WVAE.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Communication Styles and Reader Preferences of LLM and Human Experts in Explaining Health Information

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    LLM-generated health fact-checking articles score lower on expert-style communication metrics but are preferred by lay readers, suggesting structured presentation may outweigh traditional quality cues.

Pith tools