Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Multi-hop Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs using Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2404.19234 v1 pith:PZK47RQJ submitted 2024-04-30 cs.AI cs.CLcs.DB

classification cs.AIcs.CLcs.DB
keywords answerknowledgelanguagelargeansweringapproachesedgesevaluate
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Knowledge graphs (KGs) are large datasets with specific structures representing large knowledge bases (KB) where each node represents a key entity and relations amongst them are typed edges. Natural language queries formed to extract information from a KB entail starting from specific nodes and reasoning over multiple edges of the corresponding KG to arrive at the correct set of answer nodes. Traditional approaches of question answering on KG are based on (a) semantic parsing (SP), where a logical form (e.g., S-expression, SPARQL query, etc.) is generated using node and edge embeddings and then reasoning over these representations or tuning language models to generate the final answer directly, or (b) information-retrieval based that works by extracting entities and relations sequentially. In this work, we evaluate the capability of (LLMs) to answer questions over KG that involve multiple hops. We show that depending upon the size and nature of the KG we need different approaches to extract and feed the relevant information to an LLM since every LLM comes with a fixed context window. We evaluate our approach on six KGs with and without the availability of example-specific sub-graphs and show that both the IR and SP-based methods can be adopted by LLMs resulting in an extremely competitive performance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reducing Hallucinations in Complex Question Answering using Simple Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (long version)

    cs.CL 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A graph-augmented RAG system with vector and graph query tools halves hallucinations and raises factual correctness scores on the MoNaCo complex QA benchmark.

  2. OntoRAG: Enhancing Question-Answering through Automated Ontology Derivation from Unstructured Knowledge Bases

    cs.AI 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    An automated pipeline derives an ontology from PDFs via LLMs and graphs, reporting higher comprehensiveness and diversity win rates than vector RAG and GraphRAG, but the evaluation is circular and artifacts are missing.

Pith tools