Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 1 cited by

Effect of slow bonds on current fluctuations in the symmetric simple exclusion process

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Localized slow bonds modify the exact large deviation function of current in the SSEP across three geometries.

desk verdict This paper gives exact large-deviation functions for current in SSEP with localized slow bonds across three geometries, with an elementary derivation and cloning simulations that line up. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.26069 v1 pith:PZRMCXE3 submitted 2026-05-25 cond-mat.stat-mech math-phmath.MP

Soumyabrata Saha , Sandeep Jangid , Kapil Sharma , Tridib Sadhu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mechmath-phmath.MP
keywords symmetricsimpleexclusionprocesslargedeviationfunctioncurrentfluctuationsslowbondsintegrabilitycloningalgorithmnon-equilibriumdynamicsparticle
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper derives exact expressions for the large deviation function of particle current when localized slow bonds are added to the symmetric simple exclusion process. It treats a finite lattice coupled to unequal reservoirs, a semi-infinite lattice coupled to one reservoir, and an infinite lattice with slow bonds near the origin. These expressions extend the known homogeneous results and are checked against cloning-algorithm simulations of rare events. An elementary derivation is supplied for the semi-infinite case. The work matters because it shows how a local defect alters global fluctuation statistics while preserving exact solvability.

What carries the argument

Integrability-based methods for the large deviation function of current, applied without modification to lattices containing localized slow bonds.

What would settle it

A numerical evaluation or cloning simulation of the current large deviation function in any of the three geometries that deviates from the closed-form expression given in the paper.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors obtain exact expressions for the large deviation function of the current in the SSEP with localized slow bonds for a finite one-dimensional lattice weakly coupled to unequal reservoirs, a semi-infinite one-dimensional lattice weakly coupled to a boundary reservoir, and an infinite one-dimensional lattice with localized slow bonds near the origin. The expressions are validated by rare-event simulations that use the cloning algorithm. An elementary derivation of the exact large deviation function is also given for the semi-infinite SSEP.

Load-bearing premise

The integrability methods that work for the homogeneous SSEP continue to produce exact results when only localized slow bonds are added.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Exact large deviation functions exist for current fluctuations in each of the three SSEP geometries with slow bonds.
  • The cloning algorithm reproduces the predicted rate functions in all three cases.
  • An elementary derivation recovers the known result for the semi-infinite homogeneous SSEP as a special case.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Local defects of this type can be absorbed into the exact solution without loss of integrability.
  • The same technique may extend to other localized inhomogeneities such as faster bonds or multiple defects.
  • Fluctuation statistics in one-dimensional transport models with bottlenecks become exactly solvable by this route.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives exact expressions for the large-deviation function of the particle current in the symmetric simple exclusion process (SSEP) in the presence of localized slow bonds. Three geometries are treated: (a) finite lattice weakly coupled to unequal reservoirs, (b) semi-infinite lattice with a boundary reservoir, and (c) infinite lattice with slow bonds near the origin. The derivations adapt integrability constructions from the homogeneous SSEP, an elementary derivation is supplied for the semi-infinite case, and the formulas are validated by cloning-algorithm rare-event simulations.

Significance. If the exact expressions hold, the work extends integrability-based large-deviation results to inhomogeneous SSEP, supplying explicit formulas together with direct numerical checks via the cloning algorithm. The elementary derivation for the semi-infinite geometry is a clear strength that complements more elaborate techniques.

minor comments (2)
  1. [Section 2] The definition of the slow-bond hopping rate (denoted α or similar) should be stated explicitly at the beginning of each geometry section to avoid ambiguity when comparing the three cases.
  2. [Figures 3-5] Figure captions for the cloning-algorithm results could include the precise number of clones and the simulation time window used to extract the rate function.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript, accurate summary of the results, and recommendation to accept. No major comments were raised that require addressing.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

The derivations adapt established integrability techniques from the homogeneous SSEP to introduce localized slow bonds as fixed defects, yielding explicit large-deviation expressions for the three geometries together with an elementary derivation for the semi-infinite case and independent numerical checks via the cloning algorithm. No step reduces by the paper's own equations to a fitted input, self-definition, or unverified self-citation chain; the central results remain independent of the target quantities and rest on methods external to the present manuscript.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the continued applicability of integrability methods to the modified SSEP; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Integrability-based methods yield exact large-deviation functions for the homogeneous SSEP and extend to the case of localized slow bonds.
    The abstract states that exact results have been obtained using integrability-based methods and are modified in the presence of slow bonds.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Effect of slow bonds on current fluctuations in the symmetric simple exclusion process." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PZRMCXE3

@misc{pith2026260526069,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Effect of slow bonds on current fluctuations in the symmetric simple exclusion process},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PZRMCXE3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.26069}
}
read the original abstract

The symmetric simple exclusion process (SSEP) is a paradigmatic model of classical non-equilibrium dynamics. Exact results for large deviations of particle current in the SSEP have been obtained in various settings using integrability-based methods. In this Article, we discuss how these results are modified in the presence of localized slow bonds. We consider three conventional geometries: (a) a finite one-dimensional lattice weakly coupled to unequal reservoirs at its boundaries, (b) a semi-infinite one-dimensional lattice weakly coupled to a boundary reservoir, and (c) an infinite one-dimensional lattice with localized slow bonds near the origin. For each case, we present exact expressions for the large deviation function of current and validate them through rare-event simulations based on the cloning algorithm. In connection with our results, we present an elementary derivation of the exact large deviation function for the current in the semi-infinite SSEP, complementing recent results obtained through more elaborate techniques.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.26069 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The lattice is initially populated according to a Bernoulli product measure with uniform density ρb. With time, particles are exchanged between the lattice and the reservoir. We denote by QT the net flow of particles from the reservoir to the lattice in time T. 1. Fast coupling regime For γ = 1, the long-time statistics of QT follows a similar statistics as in the infinite-line example, where the generating function… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Symmetric jump rates in the SSEP on an infinite lattice. Across the defect bond connecting sites [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An exactly solvable macroscopic fluctuation theory of single-file diffusion

    cond-mat.stat-mech 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    For Brownian hard-rod single-file diffusion, exact large-deviation functions for tracer position and integrated current follow from a canonical mapping to point particles.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

107 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Fast coupling regime 6

  2. [2]

    Effect of slow bonds on current fluctuations in the symmetric simple exclusion process

    Slow coupling regime 7 C. SSEP on a finite lattice coupled to boundary reservoirs 9 III. Macroscopic fluctuation theory for SSEP with slow bonds on an infinite lattice 9 A. Coarse-graining for uniform jump rates (α=γ= 1) 11 B. Coarse-graining in the presence of a slow bond 12 C. Current statistics across the slow bond with marginal jump rate 13 Scaled cum...

    work page Pith review arXiv 2026

  3. [3]

    7 −2 −1 0 1 2 λ −1 0 1 2 µsi(λ) (a) Simulation Theory −2 −1 0 1 2 λ 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 µslow si (λ) (b) Γ = 1 Γ = 2 Γ → ∞ FIG

    Fast coupling regime Forγ= 1, the long-time statistics ofQ T follows a similar statistics as in the infinite-line example, where the generating function eλQT ≍e √ T µsi(λ,ρa,ρb),(9) with the scgfµ si(λ, ρa, ρb) =R si(ω(λ, ρa, ρb)) in (6) obtained recently [15] using MFT. 7 −2 −1 0 1 2 λ −1 0 1 2 µsi(λ) (a) Simulation Theory −2 −1 0 1 2 λ 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 µ...

  4. [4]

    The complete formula as a piece-wise function (6) is constructed [15] by analytical continuation demanding convexity of the scgf and confirmed in numerical simulation shown in Fig

    The known expression (3) forR inf(ω) solves forR si(ω). The complete formula as a piece-wise function (6) is constructed [15] by analytical continuation demanding convexity of the scgf and confirmed in numerical simulation shown in Fig. 4a

  5. [5]

    Slow coupling regime Similar to the infinite-line case, the fast coupling result remains unchanged forγlarger than∼1/ √ T. In the marginal case,γ= Γ√ T with Γ a positive valued parameter, we write the corresponding scgfµ slow si (λ, ρa, ρb) = Rslow si (ω(λ, ρa, ρb),Γ) in a variational formula: Rslow si (ω,Γ) = min z n Γ sinh2 (z−arcsinh √ω) +R si sinh2 z ...

  6. [6]

    The solid lines are the theoretical results (18) for different Γ, and the data points are the corresponding results from rare-event simulations using cloning algorithm

    The jump rates across the system-reservoir bonds is parametrized byγ= Γ L with values of Γ indicated in the plot legends. The solid lines are the theoretical results (18) for different Γ, and the data points are the corresponding results from rare-event simulations using cloning algorithm. The Γ→ ∞corresponds to the fast coupling result arcsinh p ω(λ, ρa,...

  7. [7]

    Classical and Quantum Dynamics in Out-of-Equilibrium Systems

    to depend on the fugacity parameterλand the density (ρ a andρ b) solely through a single functionω(λ, ρ a, ρb). Within hydrodynamics this is a direct consequence of a rotational symmetry in the MFT action [17]. Our exact results for different geometries re-affirms that this parametric dependence is robust even in presence of defect bonds. Although the res...

  8. [8]

    Spohn,Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles(Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991)

    H. Spohn,Large Scale Dynamics of Interacting Particles(Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1991)

    1991

Show all 107 references
  1. [9]

    Kipnis and C

    C. Kipnis and C. Landim,Scaling Limits of Interacting Particle Systems(Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999)

    1999

  2. [10]

    T. M. Liggett,Stochastic Interacting Systems: Contact, Voter and Exclusion Processes(Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999)

    1999

  3. [11]

    Derrida, Lecture notes on large deviations in non-equilibrium diffusive systems, SciPost Phys

    B. Derrida, Lecture notes on large deviations in non-equilibrium diffusive systems, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes , 106 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    Derrida, Non-equilibrium steady states: Fluctuations and large deviations of the density and of the current, J

    B. Derrida, Non-equilibrium steady states: Fluctuations and large deviations of the density and of the current, J. Stat. Mech.2007, P07023 (2007)

    2007

  5. [13]

    Mallick, The exclusion process: A paradigm for non-equilibrium behaviour, Physica A418, 17–48 (2015)

    K. Mallick, The exclusion process: A paradigm for non-equilibrium behaviour, Physica A418, 17–48 (2015)

    2015

  6. [14]

    T. Chou, K. Mallick, and R. K. P. Zia, Non-equilibrium statistical mechanics: from a paradigmatic model to biological transport, Rep. Prog. Phys.74, 116601 (2011)

    2011

  7. [15]

    McCulloch, J

    E. McCulloch, J. De Nardis, S. Gopalakrishnan, and R. Vasseur, Full counting statistics of charge in chaotic many-body quantum systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 210402 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    Turkeshi, P

    X. Turkeshi, P. Calabrese, and A. De Luca, Quantum mpemba effect in random circuits, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 040403 (2025)

    2025

  9. [17]

    McCulloch, J

    E. McCulloch, J. A. Jacoby, and S. Gopalakrishnan, Long-lived local quantum coherences from hydrodynamic large deviations (2026), arXiv:2604.27074 [quant-ph]

    2026 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Bodineau and B

    T. Bodineau and B. Derrida, Current fluctuations in nonequilibrium diffusive systems: An additivity principle, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 180601 (2004)

    2004

  11. [19]

    Bodineau and B

    T. Bodineau and B. Derrida, Cumulants and large deviations of the current through non-equilibrium steady states, C. R. Physique8, 540–555 (2007)

    2007

  12. [20]

    Derrida, B

    B. Derrida, B. Dou¸ cot, and P. E. Roche, Current fluctuations in the one-dimensional symmetric exclusion process with open boundaries, J. Stat. Phys.115, 717–748 (2004)

    2004

  13. [21]

    Derrida and A

    B. Derrida and A. Gerschenfeld, Current fluctuations of the one dimensional symmetric simple exclusion process with step initial condition, J. Stat. Phys.136, 1–15 (2009)

    2009

  14. [22]

    Sharma, S

    K. Sharma, S. Saha, S. Jangid, and T. Sadhu, Large deviations of current for the symmetric simple exclusion process on a semi-infinite line and on an infinite line with a slow bond, Phys. Rev. E113, L052101 (2026)

    2026

  15. [23]

    Grabsch, H

    A. Grabsch, H. Moriya, K. Mallick, T. Sasamoto, and O. B´ enichou, Semi-infinite simple exclusion process: From current fluctuations to target survival, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 117102 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Derrida and A

    B. Derrida and A. Gerschenfeld, Current fluctuations in one dimensional diffusive systems with a step initial density profile, J. Stat. Phys.137, 978–1000 (2009)

    2009

  17. [25]

    Saha and T

    S. Saha and T. Sadhu, Current fluctuations in a semi-infinite line, J. Stat. Mech.2023, 073207 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Sadhu, S

    T. Sadhu, S. N. Majumdar, and D. Mukamel, Long-range steady-state density profiles induced by localized drive, Phys. Rev. E84, 051136 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Sadhu, S

    T. Sadhu, S. N. Majumdar, and D. Mukamel, Long-range correlations in a locally driven exclusion process, Phys. Rev. E 90, 012109 (2014)

    2014

  20. [28]

    Sadhu, S

    T. Sadhu, S. N. Majumdar, and D. Mukamel, Non-local response in a lattice gas under a shear drive, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical47, 505005 (2014)

    2014

  21. [29]

    C. Maes, K. Netoˇ cn´ y, and B. M. Shergelashvili, Nonequilibrium relation between potential and stationary distribution for driven diffusion, Phys. Rev. E80, 011121 (2009)

    2009

  22. [30]

    S. A. Janowsky and J. L. Lebowitz, Finite-size effects and shock fluctuations in the asymmetric simple-exclusion process, Phys. Rev. A45, 618 (1992)

    1992

  23. [31]

    Sch¨ utz, Generalized Bethe ansatz solution of a one-dimensional asymmetric exclusion process on a ring with blockage, J

    G. Sch¨ utz, Generalized Bethe ansatz solution of a one-dimensional asymmetric exclusion process on a ring with blockage, J. Stat. Phys.71, 471–505 (1993)

    1993

  24. [32]

    S. A. Janowsky and J. L. Lebowitz, Exact results for the asymmetric simple exclusion process with a blockage, J. Stat. Phys.77, 35–51 (1994)

    1994

  25. [33]

    Juh´ asz, L

    R. Juh´ asz, L. Santen, and F. Igl´ oi, Partially asymmetric exclusion processes with sitewise disorder, Phys. Rev. E74, 061101 (2006)

    2006

  26. [34]

    Bahadoran and T

    C. Bahadoran and T. Bodineau, Properties and conjectures for the flux of TASEP with site disorder, Braz. J. Probab. Stat.29, 282–312 (2015)

    2015

  27. [35]

    Franco, P

    T. Franco, P. Gon¸ calves, and G. M. Sch¨ utz, Scaling limits for the exclusion process with a slow site, Stoch. Process. Their 21 Appl.126, 800–831 (2016)

    2016

  28. [36]

    Sakai and T

    I. Sakai and T. Akimoto, Unexpected effects of disorder on current fluctuations in the symmetric simple exclusion process, Phys. Rev. E111, 014134 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    Cividini, D

    J. Cividini, D. Mukamel, and H. A. Posch, Driven tracers in narrow channels, Phys. Rev. E95, 012110 (2017)

    2017

  30. [38]

    Lobaskin and M

    I. Lobaskin and M. R. Evans, Driven tracers in a one-dimensional periodic hard-core lattice gas, J. Stat. Mech.2020, 053202 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    Grabsch, P

    A. Grabsch, P. Rizkallah, P. Illien, and O. B´ enichou, Driven tracer in the symmetric exclusion process: Linear response and beyond, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 020402 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    Lobaskin, M

    I. Lobaskin, M. R. Evans, and K. Mallick, Matrix product solution for a partially asymmetric 1d lattice gas with a free defect, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.55, 205002 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Lobaskin, M

    I. Lobaskin, M. R. Evans, and K. Mallick, Integrability of two-species partially asymmetric exclusion processes, J. Phys. A: Math. Theor.56, 165003 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Bertini, A

    L. Bertini, A. De Sole, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, Macroscopic fluctuation theory for stationary non-equilibrium states, J. Stat. Phys.107, 635–675 (2002)

    2002

  35. [43]

    Bertini, A

    L. Bertini, A. De Sole, D. Gabrielli, G. Jona-Lasinio, and C. Landim, Macroscopic fluctuation theory, Rev. Mod. Phys. 87, 593 (2015)

    2015

  36. [44]

    Saha and T

    S. Saha and T. Sadhu, Large deviations in the symmetric simple exclusion process with slow boundaries: A hydrodynamic perspective, SciPost Phys.17, 033 (2024)

    2024

  37. [45]

    Mallick, H

    K. Mallick, H. Moriya, and T. Sasamoto, Exact solutions to macroscopic fluctuation theory through classical integrable systems, J. Stat. Mech.2024, 074001 (2024)

    2024

  38. [46]

    Mallick, H

    K. Mallick, H. Moriya, and T. Sasamoto, Exact solution of the macroscopic fluctuation theory for the symmetric exclusion process, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 040601 (2022)

    2022

  39. [47]

    Saha and T

    S. Saha and T. Sadhu, Large deviations of density in the non-equilibrium steady state of boundary-driven diffusive systems (2026), arXiv:2501.03164v2 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2026

  40. [48]

    M. R. Evans and T. Hanney, Nonequilibrium statistical mechanics of the zero-range process and related models, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.38, R195 (2005)

    2005

  41. [49]

    R. J. Harris, A. R´ akos, and G. M. Sch¨ utz, Current fluctuations in the zero-range process with open boundaries, J. Stat. Mech.2005, P08003 (2005)

    2005

  42. [50]

    Enaud and B

    C. Enaud and B. Derrida, Large deviation functional of the weakly asymmetric exclusion process, J. Stat. Phys.114, 537–562 (2004)

    2004

  43. [51]

    Gorissen and C

    M. Gorissen and C. Vanderzande, Current fluctuations in the weakly asymmetric exclusion process with open boundaries, Phys. Rev. E86, 051114 (2012)

    2012

  44. [52]

    Kipnis, C

    C. Kipnis, C. Marchioro, and E. Presutti, Heat flow in an exactly solvable model, J. Stat. Phys.27, 65–74 (1982)

    1982

  45. [53]

    Bertini, D

    L. Bertini, D. Gabrielli, and J. L. Lebowitz, Large deviations for a stochastic model of heat flow, J. Stat. Phys.121, 843–885 (2005)

    2005

  46. [54]

    Sch¨ utz and S

    G. Sch¨ utz and S. Sandow, Non-Abelian symmetries of stochastic processes: Derivation of correlation functions for random- vertex models and disordered-interacting-particle systems, Phys. Rev. E49, 2726 (1994)

    1994

  47. [55]

    Franceschini, P

    C. Franceschini, P. Gon¸ calves, and B. Salvador, Hydrodynamical behavior for the symmetric simple partial exclusion with open boundary, Math. Phys. Anal. Geom.26, 11 (2023)

    2023

  48. [56]

    S. Saha, S. Jangid, T. A. de Pirey, J. U. Klamser, and T. Sadhu, A bottom-up approach to fluctuating hydrodynamics: Coarse-graining of stochastic lattice gases and the dean-kawasaki equation (2026), arXiv:2601.02319 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2026

  49. [57]

    Giardin` a, J

    C. Giardin` a, J. Kurchan, and F. Redig, Duality and exact correlations for a model of heat conduction, J. Math. Phys. 48, 033301 (2007)

    2007

  50. [58]

    Vafayi and M

    K. Vafayi and M. H. Duong, Weakly nonequilibrium properties of a symmetric inclusion process with open boundaries, Phys. Rev. E90, 052143 (2014)

    2014

  51. [59]

    J. S. Hager, J. Krug, V. Popkov, and G. M. Sch¨ utz, Minimal current phase and universal boundary layers in driven diffusive systems, Phys. Rev. E63, 056110 (2001)

    2001

  52. [60]

    P. L. Krapivsky, Dynamics of repulsion processes, J. Stat. Mech.2013, P06012 (2013)

    2013

  53. [61]

    Y. Baek, Y. Kafri, and V. Lecomte, Dynamical symmetry breaking and phase transitions in driven diffusive systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.118, 030604 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    S. Katz, J. L. Lebowitz, and H. Spohn, Phase transitions in stationary nonequilibrium states of model lattice systems, Phys. Rev. B28, 1655(R) (1983)

    1983

  55. [63]

    S. Katz, J. L. Lebowitz, and H. Spohn, Nonequilibrium steady states of stochastic lattice gas models of fast ionic conductors, J. Stat. Phys.34, 497–537 (1984)

    1984

  56. [64]

    Kundu and J

    A. Kundu and J. Cividini, Exact correlations in a single-file system with a driven tracer, EPL115, 54003 (2016)

    2016

  57. [65]

    Cividini, A

    J. Cividini, A. Kundu, S. N. Majumdar, and D. Mukamel, Correlation and fluctuation in a random average process on an infinite line with a driven tracer, J. Stat. Mech.2016, 053212 (2016)

    2016

  58. [66]

    Grabsch, D

    A. Grabsch, D. Venturelli, and O. B´ enichou, Macroscopic fluctuation theory of interacting Brownian particles, Phys. Rev. E113, 054128 (2026)

    2026

  59. [67]

    S. Saha, J. Kethepalli, B. Guiselin, J. De Nardis, and T. Sadhu, Universal tracer statistics in single-file transport (2026), arXiv:2604.24741 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    2026 arXiv

  60. [68]

    Agranov, S

    T. Agranov, S. Ro, Y. Kafri, and V. Lecomte, Macroscopic fluctuation theory and current fluctuations in active lattice gases, SciPost Phys.14, 045 (2023)

    2023

  61. [69]

    Mukherjee, S

    R. Mukherjee, S. Saha, T. Sadhu, A. Dhar, and S. Sabhapandit, Hydrodynamics of a hard-core active lattice gas, Phys. 22 Rev. E111, 024128 (2025)

    2025

  62. [70]

    Doyon, G

    B. Doyon, G. Perfetto, T. Sasamoto, and T. Yoshimura, Ballistic macroscopic fluctuation theory, SciPost Phys.15, 136 (2023)

    2023

  63. [71]

    Kethepalli, A

    J. Kethepalli, A. Urilyon, T. Sadhu, and J. De Nardis, Ballistic macroscopic fluctuation theory via mapping to point particles, SciPost Phys.20, 105 (2026)

    2026

  64. [72]

    Baldasso, O

    R. Baldasso, O. Menezes, A. Neumann, and R. R. Souza, Exclusion process with slow boundary, J. Stat. Phys.167, 1112–1142 (2017)

    2017

  65. [73]

    Erignoux, P

    C. Erignoux, P. Gon¸ calves, and G. Nahum, Hydrodynamics for SSEP with non-reversible slow boundary dynamics: Part I, the critical regime and beyond, J. Stat. Phys.181, 1433–1469 (2020)

    2020

  66. [74]

    Erignoux, P

    C. Erignoux, P. Gon¸ calves, and G. Nahum, Hydrodynamics for SSEP with non-reversible slow boundary dynamics: Part II, below the critical regime, ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat.17, 791–823 (2020)

    2020

  67. [75]

    Franco, P

    T. Franco, P. Gon¸ calves, and A. Neumann, Equilibrium fluctuations for the slow boundary exclusion process, inFrom Particle Systems to Partial Differential Equations, edited by P. Gon¸ calves and A. J. Soares (Springer International Publishing, 2017) p. 177–197

    2017

  68. [76]

    Landim, A

    C. Landim, A. Milanes, and S. Olla, Stationary and nonequilibrium fluctuations in boundary driven exclusion processes, Markov Process. Related Fields14, 165–184 (2008)

    2008

  69. [77]

    Franco, P

    T. Franco, P. Gon¸ calves, and A. Neumann, Non-equilibrium and stationary fluctuations of a slowed boundary symmetric exclusion, Stoch. Process. Their Appl.129, 1413–1442 (2019)

    2019

  70. [78]

    Gon¸ calves, M

    P. Gon¸ calves, M. Jara, O. Menezes, and A. Neumann, Non-equilibrium and stationary fluctuations for the SSEP with slow boundary, Stoch. Process. Their Appl.130, 4326–4357 (2020)

    2020

  71. [79]

    Franco, P

    T. Franco, P. Gon¸ calves, C. Landim, and A. Neumann, Dynamical large deviations for the boundary driven symmetric exclusion process with Robin boundary conditions, ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat.19, 1497–1546 (2022)

    2022

  72. [80]

    Franco, P

    T. Franco, P. Gon¸ calves, and A. Neumann, Large deviations for the SSEP with slow boundary: The non-critical case, ALEA, Lat. Am. J. Probab. Math. Stat.20, 359–394 (2023)

    2023

  73. [81]

    Franco, P

    T. Franco, P. Gon¸ calves, and A. Neumann, Hydrodynamical behavior of symmetric exclusion with slow bonds, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist.49, 402–427 (2013)

    2013

  74. [82]

    Capit˜ ao and P

    P. Capit˜ ao and P. Gon¸ calves, Hydrodynamics of weakly asymmetric exclusion with slow boundary, inFrom Particle Systems to Partial Differential Equations, edited by C. Bernardin, F. Golse, P. Gon¸ calves, V. Ricci, and A. J. Soares (Springer International Publishing, 2021) p...

    2021

  75. [83]

    Franceschini, P

    C. Franceschini, P. Gon¸ calves, and F. Sau, Symmetric inclusion process with slow boundary: Hydrodynamics and hydro- statics, Bernoulli28, 1340–1381 (2022)

    2022

  76. [84]

    Franco, P

    T. Franco, P. Gon¸ calves, and A. Neumann, Phase transition in equilibrium fluctuations of symmetric slowed exclusion, Stoch. Process. Their Appl.123, 4156 (2013)

    2013

  77. [85]

    Franco and A

    T. Franco and A. Neumann, Large deviations for the exclusion process with a slow bond, Ann. Appl. Probab.27, 3547–3587 (2017)

    2017

  78. [86]

    Derrida, O

    B. Derrida, O. Hirschberg, and T. Sadhu, Large deviations in the symmetric simple exclusion process with slow boundaries, J. Stat. Phys.182, 15 (2021)

    2021

  79. [87]

    Bouley, C

    A. Bouley, C. Erignoux, and C. Landim, Steady state large deviations for one-dimensional, symmetric exclusion processes in weak contact with reservoirs, Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist.61, 1127–1162 (2025)

    2025

  80. [88]

    Derrida, J

    B. Derrida, J. L. Lebowitz, and E. R. Speer, Free energy functional for nonequilibrium systems: An exactly solvable case, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 150601 (2001)

    2001

  81. [89]

    Appert-Rolland, B

    C. Appert-Rolland, B. Derrida, V. Lecomte, and F. van Wijland, Universal cumulants of the current in diffusive systems on a ring, Phys. Rev. E78, 021122 (2008)

    2008

  82. [90]

    G. M. Sch¨ utz, Exactly solvable models for many-body systems far from equilibrium, inPhase Transitions and Critical Phenomena, Vol. 19, edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz (Academic Press, 2001) p. see eq. (9.106)

    2001

  83. [91]

    Johansson, Shape fluctuations and random matrices, Comm

    K. Johansson, Shape fluctuations and random matrices, Comm. Math. Phys.209, 437–476 (2000)

    2000

  84. [92]

    C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, A fredholm determinant representation in ASEP, J. Stat. Phys.132, 291–300 (2008)

    2008

  85. [93]

    C. A. Tracy and H. Widom, Total current fluctuations in the asymmetric simple exclusion process, J. Math. Phys.50, 095204 (2009)

    2009

  86. [94]

    Giardin` a, J

    C. Giardin` a, J. Kurchan, and L. Peliti, Direct evaluation of large-deviation functions, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 120603 (2006)

    2006

  87. [95]

    Lecomte and J

    V. Lecomte and J. Tailleur, A numerical approach to large deviations in continuous time, J. Stat. Mech.2007, P03004 (2007)

    2007

  88. [96]

    P´ erez-Espigares and P

    C. P´ erez-Espigares and P. I. Hurtado, Sampling rare events across dynamical phase transitions, Chaos29, 083106 (2019)

    2019

  89. [97]

    Andreanov, G

    A. Andreanov, G. Biroli, J.-P. Bouchaud, and A. Lef` evre, Field theories and exact stochastic equations for interacting particle systems, Phys. Rev. E74, 030101 (2006)

    2006

  90. [98]

    Lef` evre and G

    A. Lef` evre and G. Biroli, Dynamics of interacting particle systems: stochastic process and field theory, J. Stat. Mech. 2007, P07024 (2007)

    2007

  91. [99]

    Dennery and A

    P. Dennery and A. Krzywicki,Mathematics for Physicists(Dover Publications, Mineola, New York, USA, 2012)

    2012

  92. [100]

    Derrida and T

    B. Derrida and T. Sadhu, Large deviations conditioned on large deviations II: Fluctuating hydrodynamics, J. Stat. Phys. 177, 151–182 (2019)

    2019

  93. [101]

    P. C. Martin, E. D. Siggia, and H. A. Rose, Statistical dynamics of classical systems, Phys. Rev. A8, 423 (1973)

    1973

  94. [102]

    H. K. Janssen, On a Lagrangean for classical field dynamics and renormalization group calculations of dynamical critical properties, Z. Physik B23, 377–380 (1976)

    1976

  95. [103]

    De Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes critiques, J

    C. De Dominicis, Techniques de renormalisation de la th´ eorie des champs et dynamique des ph´ enom` enes critiques, J. 23 Phys. Colloques37, C1 (1976)

    1976

  96. [104]

    De Dominicis and L

    C. De Dominicis and L. Peliti, Field-theory renormalization and critical dynamics aboveT c: Helium, antiferromagnets, and liquid-gas systems, Phys. Rev. B18, 353 (1978)

    1978

  97. [105]

    Spohn, Stretched exponential decay in a kinetic Ising model with dynamical constraint, Commun

    H. Spohn, Stretched exponential decay in a kinetic Ising model with dynamical constraint, Commun. Math. Phys.125, 3–12 (1989)

    1989

  98. [106]

    Mukherjee, P

    S. Mukherjee, P. Pareek, M. Barma, and S. K. Nandi, Stretched exponential to power-law: crossover of relaxation in a kinetically constrained model, J. Stat. Mech.2024, 023205 (2024)

    2024

  99. [107]

    J. F. Wienand, S. Karch, A. Impertro, C. Schweizer, E. McCulloch, R. Vasseur, S. Gopalakrishnan, M. Aidelsburger, and I. Bloch, Emergence of fluctuating hydrodynamics in chaotic quantum systems, Nat. Phys.20, 1732–1737 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.