Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

AI-Powered Assistive Technologies for Visual Impairment

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read AI-powered assistive technologies—computer vision apps, NLP screen readers, and wearables—have already improved independence, mobility, education, and social interaction for visually impaired people, the review argues.

desk verdict A tidy but unreliable narrative review: the organization and coverage are fine, but the reference list has placeholder entries and synthetic DOIs that undermine the whole enterprise. read the letter →

arxiv 2503.15494 v1 pith:Q2JY2LCE submitted 2025-01-14 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CY

Prudhvi Naayini , Praveen Kumar Myakala , Chiranjeevi Bura , Anil Kumar Jonnalagadda , Srikanth Kamatala This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CY
keywords visualimpairmentassistivetechnologyartificialintelligencecomputervisionnaturallanguageprocessingwearabledevicesaccessibilityscreenreaders
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper is a review rather than a new experiment. It tries to establish that AI-powered assistive technologies—real-time object and scene recognition, natural-language screen readers and voice assistants, and wearable smart glasses and navigation bands—have already moved from prototypes into tools that support independence for visually impaired people. The review assembles prevalence statistics, product examples, application domains, and challenge lists to argue that these tools improve daily living, mobility, education, employment, and social interaction. It further claims that deep learning, multimodal interfaces, and real-time processing are the mechanisms behind the gains, while affordability, connectivity, privacy, bias, and limited language support keep those gains unevenly distributed. The paper's conclusion is that continued interdisciplinary work can make the technologies more equitable and more effective.

What carries the argument

The paper's organizing device is a three-part taxonomy: computer vision turns camera input into speech, Braille, or haptic feedback; natural language processing turns text and voice into accessible information; and wearable devices embed these capabilities in glasses and bands for real-time use. Alongside the taxonomy, the review introduces a simple accessibility metric, $A = U_f/U_t \times 100$, where $U_f$ counts functionalities accessible to visually impaired users and $U_t$ counts functionalities available to sighted users. This ratio is offered as a quantitative way to score a technology's accessibility, and the rest of the argument proceeds through tables that pair each technology with its functionality and its claimed benefit.

What would settle it

Checking whether the cited DOIs and product pages resolve to real publications and working tools—and then running a small user study where participants complete navigation and reading tasks with Seeing AI, Envision Glasses, and OrCam MyEye—would settle the claim: if the flagship tools do not perform as described, or users show no measurable improvement, the review's central assertion fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, stated on the paper's own terms, is that AI-powered assistive technologies represent a significant advancement in the quality of life for visually impaired individuals. The review organizes the field into three streams—computer vision, natural language processing, and wearable devices—and maps each to concrete tools: apps that read barcodes and describe scenes, screen readers and voice assistants that convert text and commands into speech or Braille, and glasses and wristbands that recognize faces or detect obstacles. It argues that these capabilities translate into measurable gains across independent living, navigation, education, employment, social interaction, and mental well-being. The paper also claims that the remaining obstacles are not primarily technical, since the tools exist and work; the obstacles are cost, the digital divide, ethical and privacy risks, and weak adaptation to languages and cultures outside English-speaking contexts.

Load-bearing premise

The review's reliability depends on the premise that its cited sources genuinely exist and accurately describe the tools, studies, and policies they cover; if key citations are fabricated or inaccurate, the overview's account of the field would lose its support.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Off-the-shelf apps such as Seeing AI, Google Lookout, and Be My Eyes already give users real-time reading, indoor navigation, and on-demand human help in ordinary settings.
  • Screen readers and AI-enhanced Braille displays, including free options, give visually impaired students and workers access to textbooks, code, and web platforms that were previously hard to use.
  • Wearables such as Envision Glasses, OrCam MyEye, and the Sunu Band make object recognition, face identification, and obstacle avoidance practical outside the lab.
  • The same evidence implies that without subsidies, open-source alternatives, and reliable connectivity, the benefits concentrate among wealthier users and leave rural and low-income populations behind.
  • Future gains depend on privacy-preserving local processing, bias mitigation, support for low-resource languages, and integration with augmented reality, IoT, and 5G.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The accessibility ratio $A$ could be turned into a standardized benchmark: for each device, enumerate its full feature list, count how many are usable without sight, and track how that ratio changes under poor lighting, low bandwidth, and non-English input.
  • The same computer-vision and NLP stack described here generalizes to situational impairments—reading a phone screen in glare, navigating while distracted, or bridging a language barrier—so the design lessons extend beyond registered visual impairment.
  • A controlled field study measuring task-completion time, error rate, and self-reported independence with these tools would put quantitative weight behind the quality-of-life claim; the paper reports vendor capabilities and qualitative impacts rather than such measurements.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a narrative review of AI-powered assistive technologies for people with visual impairments. It surveys computer vision, natural language processing, and wearable devices; discusses applications in independent living, mobility, education, social interaction, and mental health; and outlines challenges and future directions. The paper presents no new experimental data; its argument rests entirely on a synthesis of cited sources, many of which are product pages or references that cannot be verified.

Significance. If its evidence base were trustworthy, this review would provide a useful, well-organized entry point to an important and growing application area. The broad qualitative message—that AI-based tools can improve independence and quality of life—is consistent with common knowledge and prior work. The paper's structure, tables, and pipeline figures make the landscape accessible to a broad readership. However, the manuscript's contribution as a review depends entirely on the reliability of its citations, and that reliability is not established. The review therefore cannot currently serve as a dependable synthesis for the field.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.3.3, §4.5, §5.3, §5.4, §4.1.2] The evidentiary basis of the review is compromised by unverifiable references. Refs [17] and [24] use the synthetic-looking DOI prefix 10.5678; ref [20] lists 'John Smith and Sarah Lee' with a placeholder e-location ID in JMIR; ref [29] uses generic names and has no verifiable DOI; ref [30] assigns an Elsevier DOI (10.1016/j.jair.2023.03.015) to the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, which is not an Elsevier journal, and lists 'Jane Doe and John Smith'; ref [12] points to a domain that does not resolve. These references support specific claims: workplace productivity in §4.3.3, mental-health effects in §4.5, usability challenges in §5.3, cultural and linguistic adaptation in §5.4, and smart-home voice assistants in §4.1.2. Since the paper presents no original data, these citations are the entire support for the central claim. I could not verify them, and their placeholder features suggest they may be fabricated; the authors must either verify and correct every reference or remove the unsupported claims.
  2. [Table 1 and §5.1] Quantitative statements are presented without independent sourcing. Table 1 reports prevalence percentages (49%, 23%, 10%, 6%, 12%) for causes of visual impairment without any citation, and the 2023 date and treatability classifications also lack sources. §5.1 states that OrCam MyEye and Envision Glasses cost 'upwards of $2,000' and cites vendor pages [11,4]; vendor marketing is not an adequate basis for cost and effectiveness claims. These figures matter because the policy recommendations in §4.6 and §6 rest on assumptions about prevalence and affordability. The authors should replace vendor pages and unsourced statistics with peer-reviewed or official WHO/CDC data, or clearly label them as approximate industry figures.
  3. [§2.2] The accessibility metric A is defined but never used anywhere else in the manuscript. The equation, introduced as a 'mathematical framework for accessibility metrics,' is not referenced in any later section, no values are computed, and no existing study is shown to have applied this specific formula. Either demonstrate its use in evaluating the technologies reviewed, or delete Section 2.2, because as written it is an orphaned formalism that does not contribute to the review's argument.
  4. [§3.1–3.3 and §4.4] Product capability claims rely heavily on manufacturer descriptions and promotional pages (e.g., refs [3], [4], [11], [18], [19]). For example, the claim that Seeing AI enables users to identify products by reading barcodes and that OrCam MyEye provides facial recognition is taken at face value from the vendors. No independent evaluation, user study, or benchmark is cited. A review of assistive technology should at least acknowledge the absence of peer-reviewed evaluations and distinguish vendor-reported features from measured performance.
minor comments (5)
  1. [References] Reference [1] has a truncated URL and should be completed and verified.
  2. [Author affiliations] The email address 'Chiranjeevi.Bua@colorado.edu' appears to be a typo for 'Chiranjeevi.Bura@colorado.edu'.
  3. [Figure 3] Figure 3 is a generic flowchart and is not referenced in the text; consider removing it or integrating it explicitly.
  4. [Reference [32]] Reference [32] is a self-citation by two of the authors and appears in §6.2 in the context of federated learning; this is acceptable, but the authors should double-check the formatting of the journal name and DOI.
  5. [General formatting] The abstract, keywords, and running headers contain line-break artifacts and irregular spacing that should be cleaned in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the review synthesizes external claims and contains no derivation loop, fitted prediction, or load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

This manuscript is a narrative review of AI-powered assistive technologies for visual impairment. It presents no new experiments, no fitted parameters, and no mathematical derivation that is then used to support its conclusions. The only quantitative formula, A = Uf/Ut × 100 in Section 2.2, is introduced as an illustrative accessibility metric and is not used to predict an outcome or to justify any later claim; it is a definition, not a circular step. The central conclusion that AI-powered assistive technologies improve quality of life is supported by citations to vendor pages, news reports, and prior studies, and it is not derived from any of the paper's own constructs. The single self-citation, Reference [32], appears in Section 6.2 within a bullet about federated learning and data privacy. That citation supports a future-direction suggestion and is not load-bearing for the paper's main claims, so it does not constitute circularity. Concerns about the verifiability of some cited references are evidentiary or integrity concerns about the review's sourcing, not circularity within the paper's reasoning chain. Under the stated rules, no quoted equation, definition, or self-citation reduces the paper's claims to its own inputs. The appropriate finding is therefore a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper has no fit parameters or invented entities. The load-bearing assumptions are that its background statistics are accurate, that commercial products work as described, and that the cited academic references are real. The self-citation (Reference 32) is limited to future directions and does not drive the main content.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The global prevalence and cause-distribution statistics in Table 1 are accurate.
    Section 2 and Table 1 cite References 1 and 2, but the individual percentages (49%, 23%, 10%, 6%, 12%) are not traceable to a specific table in the cited sources as printed.
  • domain assumption Commercial products work as described in the text.
    Sections 3 and 4 describe Seeing AI, Lookout, Be My Eyes, Envision Glasses, OrCam MyEye, Sunu Band, JAWS, and NVDA based on vendor pages and blogs (References 3, 4, 11, 13, 14, 15); no independent evaluation is cited.
  • ad hoc to paper The cited academic references are real and support the statements attributed to them.
    Because several entries have generic author names and synthetic-looking identifiers, the paper silently assumes these references exist and say what is claimed.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of AI-Powered Assistive Technologies for Visual Impairment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q2JY2LCE

@misc{pith2026250315494,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: AI-Powered Assistive Technologies for Visual Impairment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q2JY2LCE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2503.15494}
}
read the original abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is revolutionizing assistive technologies. It offers innovative solutions to enhance the quality of life for individuals with visual impairments. This review examines the development, applications, and impact of AI-powered tools in key domains, such as computer vision, natural language processing (NLP), and wearable devices. Specific advancements include object recognition for identifying everyday items, scene description for understanding surroundings, and NLP-driven text-to-speech systems for accessing digital information. Assistive technologies like smart glasses, smartphone applications, and AI-enabled navigation aids are discussed, demonstrating their ability to support independent travel, facilitate social interaction, and increase access to education and employment opportunities. The integration of deep learning models, multimodal interfaces, and real-time data processing has transformed the functionality and usability of these tools, fostering inclusivity and empowerment. This article also addresses critical challenges, including ethical considerations, affordability, and adaptability in diverse environments. Future directions highlight the need for interdisciplinary collaboration to refine these technologies, ensuring equitable access and sustainable innovation. By providing a comprehensive overview, this review underscores AI's transformative potential in promoting independence, enhancing accessibility, and fostering social inclusion for visually impaired individuals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2503.15494 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of Visual Impairment by Cause (2023) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Computer Vision Pipeline for Assistive Applicati [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Flowchart for Assistive Technology: Screen Inter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: User identifying a friend in a social setting using [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Impact of AI-powered assistive technologies on me [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Talking Spell: A Wearable System Enabling Real-Time Anthropomorphic Voice Interaction with Everyday Objects

    cs.HC 2025-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Talking Spell is a wearable system that detects objects, creates an anthropomorphic persona for each, and lets users hold voice conversations with them via a touch-triggered wand.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [17]

    The role of voice assista nts in enhancing workplace productivity for visually impaired individuals

    Laura Peters and Derek Wilson. The role of voice assista nts in enhancing workplace productivity for visually impaired individuals. Journal of Accessible T echnology in W orkplaces , 11(3):180–195, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5678/jatw.2024.004567

    work page arXiv 2024

  2. [20]

    The role of ai in mental health a ssessment and treatment personalization

    John Smith and Sarah Lee. The role of ai in mental health a ssessment and treatment personalization. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 26(1):e12345, 2024

    work page 2024

  3. [24]

    Encouraging accessibility i n ai development through public policy

    Alex Chen and Priya Singh. Encouraging accessibility i n ai development through public policy. Journal of AI Ethics, 10(4):240–259, 2024. https://doi.org/10.5678/jaie.2024.003456

    work page arXiv 2024

  4. [29]

    Usability challenges i n assistive technologies: Bridging the gap between innovation and accessibility

    Rebecca Johnson and Thomas Lee. Usability challenges i n assistive technologies: Bridging the gap between innovation and accessibility. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction , 36(7):620–645, 2024

    work page 2024

  5. [30]

    Adapting ai for multilingual an d multicultural contexts: A comprehensive review

    Jane Doe and John Smith. Adapting ai for multilingual an d multicultural contexts: A comprehensive review. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 56(3):123–145, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jair.2023.03.015

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jair.2023.03.015 2023

  6. [12]

    https://www.accessibilitytechjournal.com/articles/voice-assistants

    Mark Johnson. Smart home integration for visually impa ired individuals: The role of voice assistants, 2024. "https://www.accessibilitytechjournal.com/articles/voice-assistants"

    work page 2024

  7. [3]

    Seeing ai: A free app that narrates the world a round you, 2023

    Microsoft. Seeing ai: A free app that narrates the world a round you, 2023. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/seeing-ai

    work page 2023

  8. [4]

    Envision glasses: Ai-powered smart glasses f or the visually impaired, 2023

    Envision. Envision glasses: Ai-powered smart glasses f or the visually impaired, 2023. https://www.letsenvision.com

    work page 2023

  9. [11]

    Orcam myeye: Ai-powered wearable assistive technology, 2023

    OrCam Technologies. Orcam myeye: Ai-powered wearable assistive technology, 2023. https://www.orcam.com/en/myeye/. 10 AI-Powered Assistive Technologies for Visual Impairment N aayini et al

    work page 2023

  10. [18]

    Orcam myeye: Wearable assistive t echnology

    OrCam Technologies. Orcam myeye: Wearable assistive t echnology. https://www.orcam.com/. Accessed: 2025-01-11

    work page 2025

  11. [19]

    Be my eyes: V olunteer network connecting mil lions, 2024

    Be My Eyes. Be my eyes: V olunteer network connecting mil lions, 2024. https://www.bemyeyes.com

    work page 2024

Show all 41 references
  1. [1]

    World Report on Vision, 2019

    World Health Organization. World Report on Vision, 2019. https://www.who.int/publications-detail/world-repor t-on

    2019

  2. [2]

    The economic burden of g lobal blindness: A price too high! The British Journal of Ophthalmology , 80(4):276, 1996

    Andrew F Smith and J Graham Smith. The economic burden of g lobal blindness: A price too high! The British Journal of Ophthalmology , 80(4):276, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.80.4.276

    1996 doi

  3. [5]

    Chinese robot guide dog aims to improve indepen dence for visually impaired

    Reuters. Chinese robot guide dog aims to improve indepen dence for visually impaired. https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmac euticals/chinese-robot-guide-dog-aims-improve-ind

  4. [6]

    How ai is revolutionizing assistive tech nology for the visually impaired

    TechStrong AI. How ai is revolutionizing assistive tech nology for the visually impaired. https://techstrong.ai/articles/how-ai-is-revolution izing-assistive-technology-for-the-visually-impa 2023

    2023

  5. [7]

    Deep lear ning based wearable as- sistive system for visually impaired people

    Yimin Lin, Kai Wang, Wanxin Yi, and Shiguo Lian. Deep lear ning based wearable as- sistive system for visually impaired people. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Inter- national Conference on Computer Vision W orkshops (ICCVW) , pages 2504–2513, 2019. https://openaccess.thecvf.co...

    2019

  6. [8]

    Lookout: Ai-powered vision assistance, 2023

    Google. Lookout: Ai-powered vision assistance, 2023. https://support.google.com/accessibility/android/answer/903

    2023

  7. [9]

    Natural language processing in assistive tech- nologies

    Inge Gavat, Andreea Griparis, and Svetlana Segarceanu. Natural language processing in assistive tech- nologies. The Romanian Journal of T echnical Sciences. Applied Mechan ics., 68(2-3):129–140, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.59277/RJTS-AM.2023.2-3.02

    2023 doi

  8. [10]

    Airis : An ai-powered wearable assistive device for the visually im paired

    Dionysia Danai Brilli, Evangelos Georgaras, Stefania Tsilivaki, Nikos Melanitis, and Konstantina Nikita. Airis : An ai-powered wearable assistive device for the visually im paired. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.07606 , 2024. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.07606

    2024 doi arXiv

  9. [13]

    National federation of the blind jernigan institute research collaboration: Su nu band, 2015

    National Federation of the Blind. National federation of the blind jernigan institute research collaboration: Su nu band, 2015. https://nfb.org/blog/national-federation-blind-jern igan-institute-research-collaboration-su

    2015

  10. [14]

    Jaws screen reader

    Freedom Scientific. Jaws screen reader. https://www.freedomscientific.com/. Accessed: 2025-01-11

    2025

  11. [15]

    Nvda: Nonvisual desktop access

    NV Access. Nvda: Nonvisual desktop access. https://www.nvaccess.org/. Accessed: 2025-01-11

    2025

  12. [16]

    Making mathematics acc essible through ai and braille displays

    Microsoft Accessibility Blog. Making mathematics acc essible through ai and braille displays. https://blogs.microsoft.com/accessibility/making-ma thematics-accessible/. Accessed: 2025-01-11

    2025

  13. [21]

    Impact of ai-powered ass istive technologies on mental health and well-being: A review of recent innovations

    Alice Taylor and Mark Johnson. Impact of ai-powered ass istive technologies on mental health and well-being: A review of recent innovations. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction , 39(8):967–984, 2023

    2023

  14. [22]

    Government subsidi es and initiatives for assistive technologies

    Norden and Australian Government. Government subsidi es and initiatives for assistive technologies. https://www.norden.org/en/info-norden/loan-assistiv e-devices-norway, 2024. Accessed: 2025- 01-11

    2024

  15. [23]

    Who report on assistive tec hnology accessibility, 2023

    World Health Organization. Who report on assistive tec hnology accessibility, 2023. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/as sistive-technology

    2023

  16. [25]

    Training programs fo r visually impaired individuals, 2023

    National Federation of the Blind. Training programs fo r visually impaired individuals, 2023. https://www.nfb.org/resources/training

    2023

  17. [26]

    Privacy in the ai era: How do we protect our personal information? https://hai.stanford.edu/news/privacy-ai-era-how-do -we-protect-our-personal-information ,

    Stanford HAI. Privacy in the ai era: How do we protect our personal information? https://hai.stanford.edu/news/privacy-ai-era-how-do -we-protect-our-personal-information ,

  18. [27]

    Biased technology: Automated discrim ination in facial recognition

    ACLU Minnesota. Biased technology: Automated discrim ination in facial recognition. https://www.aclu-mn.org/en/news/biased-technology-a utomated-discrimination-facial-recognition,

  19. [31]

    Police surveillance and facial recognition: Why data pri- vacy is an imperative for communities of color, 2023

    Caitlin Chin Nicol Turner Lee. Police surveillance and facial recognition: Why data pri- vacy is an imperative for communities of color, 2023. Access ed: 2025-01-11 [Online] https://www.brookings.edu/articles/police-surveilla nce-and-facial-recognition

    2023

  20. [32]

    Federated learning and data pri- vacy: A review of challenges and opportunities

    Praveen Kumar Myakala, Chiranjeevi Bura, and Anil Kuma r Jonnalagadda. Federated learning and data pri- vacy: A review of challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews , 5(12):1867–1879, 2024. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.1224.3512

    2024

  21. [33]

    Diverse ai training data for inclusivity and eli minating bias

    Shaip. Diverse ai training data for inclusivity and eli minating bias. https://www.shaip.com/blog/diverse-ai-training-data -for-inclusivity-and-eliminating-bias/ ,

  22. [34]

    Ai for accessibility: Empowering people wi th disabilities, 2023

    Microsoft. Ai for accessibility: Empowering people wi th disabilities, 2023. https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/ai/ai-for-accessibi lity

    2023

  23. [35]

    Government Accountability Office

    U.S. Government Accountability Office. Facial recogni tion technology: Current and planned uses by federal agencies, 2021. https://www.gao.gov/assets/gao-21-526.pdf

    2021

  24. [36]

    Facial recognition technology re gulation: A practical guide for congress, 2019

    Open the Government. Facial recognition technology re gulation: A practical guide for congress, 2019. https://www.openthegovernment.org/wp-content/upload s/2019/07/Facial-Recognition-Technology-Regulation_

    2019

  25. [37]

    11 AI-Powered Assistive Technologies for Visual Impairment N aayini et al

    Accessed: 2025-01-11. 11 AI-Powered Assistive Technologies for Visual Impairment N aayini et al

    2025

  26. [38]

    Denise RS Almeida, Konstantin Shmarko, and Elizabeth L omas. The ethics of facial recogni- tion technologies, surveillance, and accountability in an age of artificial intelligence: a compar- ative analysis of us, eu, and uk regulatory frameworks. AI and Ethics , 2(3):377–387, 2...

    2021 doi

  27. [41]

    Natural language understanding of lo w-resource languages in voice assistants: Advance- ments, challenges and mitigation strategies

    Ashlesha V Kadam. Natural language understanding of lo w-resource languages in voice assistants: Advance- ments, challenges and mitigation strategies. International Journal of Language, Literature and Culture (IJLLC),

  28. [42]

    https://aipublications.com/uploads/issue_files/3IJLLC-OCT20231-Natural.pdf. 12

  29. [2023]

    Accessed: 2025-01-11

    2025

  30. [2024]

    Accessed: 2025-01-09

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.