Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 4 cited by

Chiral Invariant Mass Constraints from HESS J1731 347 in an Extended Parity Doublet Model with Isovector Scalar Meson

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that the ultra-light compact object HESS J1731-347, treated as a neutron star, confines the nucleon's chiral invariant mass to 740-860 MeV once the isovector scalar meson a0(980) is included in a parity doublet model.

desk verdict A worthwhile model-dependent parameter study that credibly narrows m0 to 740–860 MeV with the a0 meson and HESS J1731-347, but the per-curve NJL tuning weakens the headline constraint. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.16684 v1 pith:Q3DITFET submitted 2025-06-20 nucl-th astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRhep-ph

Yuk-Kei Kong , Bikai Gao , Masayasu Harada This is my paper · ORCID
classification nucl-thastro-ph.HEastro-ph.SRhep-ph
keywords paritydoubletmodelchiralinvariantmassisovectorscalarmesonneutronstarHESSJ1731-347symmetryincompressibilityskewnesshadron-quarkcrossover
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims the lightest known neutron-star candidate, HESS J1731-347, can be used to fix the chiral invariant mass $m_0$ of the nucleon, the part of the nucleon mass that survives when chiral symmetry is restored. Working in a parity doublet model extended by the isovector scalar meson $a_0(980)$, the authors build a unified hadron-quark equation of state and compare its mass-radius predictions with HESS J1731-347 and other neutron-star observations including PSR J0437-4715, GW170817, PSR J0740+6620, and PSR J0030+0451. They find that all observations, together with the empirical constraint on the symmetry incompressibility $K_{\rm sym}$, are satisfied within $2\sigma$ only for $740\,\mathrm{MeV} \lesssim m_0 \lesssim 860\,\mathrm{MeV}$ at $L_0 = 57.7\,\mathrm{MeV}$. The $a_0$ meson makes the equation of state stiffer in the isovector channel, so the allowed $m_0$ band is shifted upward relative to earlier parity-doublet studies without it. The paper also reports a residual tension: the $1\sigma$ neutron-star constraint is not fully compatible with the $K_{\rm sym}$ constraint, and the quoted band is the $2\sigma$ overlap.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is a parity doublet Lagrangian with $U(2)_L \times U(2)_R$ chiral symmetry and hidden local symmetry for the vector mesons, evaluated in the mean-field approximation. The chiral invariant mass $m_0$ enters through the effective nucleon mass formula $$m^*_{\$\alpha$ j} = \frac12\left[\sqrt{(g_1+g_2)^2(\$\sigma$ - j a)^2 + $4m_0^{2}$} + \$\alpha$(g_1-g_2)(\$\sigma$ - j a)\right],$$ where $\alpha=\pm$ labels the parity partner and $j=\pm$ the isospin. The isovector scalar meson $a_0(980)$ contributes through the mean field $a$, generating an attractive force in the isovector channel that stiffens the asymmetric equation of state. To reach neutron-star densities, the hadronic equation of state is smoothly connected to a quark matter equation of state by a polynomial interpolation of pressure as a function of baryon chemical potential between $2n_0$ and $5n_0$. The quantities that carry the argument are the mass-radius curves from the stellar-structure equations and the symmetry-energy Taylor coefficients $K_{\rm sym}$ and $Q_{\rm sym}$, which the $a_0$ meson makes highly sensitive to $m_0$.

What would settle it

A measurement showing HESS J1731-347 is not a neutron star, for example a bare quark-matter surface signature, or a future radius determination more than $2\sigma$ away from the quoted $10.4^{+0.86}_{-0.78}$ km, would remove the astrophysical anchor; independently, an experimental $K_{\rm sym}$ that excludes the model's predicted curve for $m_0$ in 740-860 MeV at $L_0 \approx 57.7$ MeV would rule out the claimed band.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a model-dependent constraint on the chiral invariant mass $m_0$ of the nucleon. In the parity doublet model, the positive- and negative-parity nucleons $N(939)$ and $N(1535)$ are chiral partners that become degenerate with common mass $m_0$ when chiral symmetry is restored. The paper adds the $a_0(980)$ meson to this framework, constructs a unified equation of state by smoothly crossing over from hadronic matter to quark matter in the density window between $2n_0$ and $5n_0$, and solves the stellar-structure equations to obtain mass-radius relations. These relations are compared with HESS J1731-347, PSR J0437-4715, GW170817, PSR J0740+6620, and PSR J0030+0451. The result is that all of these observations, plus the $K_{\rm sym}$ constraint, can be accommodated within $2\sigma$ when $740\,\mathrm{MeV} \lesssim m_0 \lesssim 860\,\mathrm{MeV}$ for $L_0 = 57.7\,\mathrm{MeV}$. The $a_0$ meson shifts this band upward compared with models without it, because its attractive isovector force stiffens the equation of state and therefore requires a larger $m_0$ to keep the hadronic sector soft enough for the very light, small HESS J1731-347.

Load-bearing premise

The constraint rests on treating HESS J1731-347 as a neutron star with mass $0.77^{+0.20}_{-0.17}\,M_\odot$ and radius $10.4^{+0.86}_{-0.78}$ km, and on the quark-model parameters $H$ and $g_V$ not being tuned to the same neutron-star observations used to build the allowed region; if either assumption fails, the $740\,\mathrm{MeV} \lesssim m_0 \lesssim 860\,\mathrm{MeV}$ band no longer follows.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If $m_0$ really lies between 740 and 860 MeV, the nucleon mass is not purely generated by chiral symmetry breaking: most of the vacuum nucleon mass would remain even if chiral symmetry were restored.
  • The identification of HESS J1731-347 as an ultra-light neutron star would force the dense-matter equation of state to be soft at low density, selecting large $m_0$ and small $L_0$ values in this model.
  • The $a_0$ meson's inclusion moves the allowed $m_0$ band upward compared with earlier constraints in the same model family, making the isovector scalar channel a quantitatively important ingredient for neutron-star equations of state.
  • The strong $m_0$ dependence that the $a_0$ meson induces in $K_{\rm sym}$ and $Q_{\rm sym}$ means that terrestrial measurements of these higher-order symmetry coefficients can independently probe the chiral invariant mass, without relying on compact-object radius estimates.
  • The $1\sigma$ tension between the neutron-star data and the $K_{\rm sym}$ constraint implies that tighter radius measurements for HESS J1731-347 and a better-determined $K_{\rm sym}$ are prerequisites for pushing the $m_0$ band below the current $2\sigma$ level.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to scan systematically over the quark-model parameters $H$ and $g_V$, which the paper fixes differently for different mass-radius curves; such a scan would show whether the 740-860 MeV band survives or widens under quark-sector uncertainties.
  • If HESS J1731-347 is later confirmed to be a quark star rather than a hadronic neutron star, the astrophysical $m_0$ band would lose its anchor, but the predicted sensitivity of $K_{\rm sym}$ and $Q_{\rm sym}$ to $m_0$ would remain a testable nuclear-matter signature independent of the object's composition.
  • The paper assumes a smooth hadron-quark crossover between $2n_0$ and $5n_0$; exploring the same model with a first-order phase transition could either shift the allowed $m_0$ or reveal that the $1\sigma$ tension with neutron-star data is a phase-transition artifact.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript studies asymmetric nuclear matter and neutron star structure in an extended parity doublet model that includes the isovector scalar a0(980) meson. The authors compute the symmetry incompressibility Ksym and symmetry skewness Qsym as functions of the chiral invariant mass m0 and the symmetry-energy slope L0, then construct a unified hadron-quark crossover equation of state by interpolating between the parity doublet model and an NJL-type quark model. Solving the TOV equation, they compare the resulting mass-radius curves with HESS J1731-347, PSR J0437-4715, GW170817, PSR J0740+6620, and PSR J0030+0451. The central claim is that, for L0 = 57.7 MeV, the model satisfies the neutron-star and Ksym constraints within 2σ for 740 MeV ≲ m0 ≲ 860 MeV, and that the a0 meson shifts the allowed m0 upward relative to earlier work without it. Hadronic model parameters are listed in tables, while the NJL quark-sector parameters appear only in figure captions.

Significance. If the central constraint holds, the paper would provide a useful hadronic-model-based constraint on the chiral invariant mass of the nucleon and would quantify how the a0(980) meson stiffens the neutron-star equation of state and shifts the allowed m0 band. The hadronic-sector calculation is a reasonable extension of Ref. [65], and the reported m0-dependence of Ksym and Qsym in the presence of the a0 meson is a clean, checkable result. However, the significance of the headline m0 constraint is materially weakened by the fact that the NJL parameters H and gV are changed from curve to curve without a documented selection criterion; as presented, Figure 5 is an envelope over several distinct hybrid models rather than a constraint from one unified equation of state.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4.1, Figures 3 and 4] The mass-radius curves do not come from a single model parameter set. In Figure 3, the m0 = 700, 800, and 850 MeV curves use (H,gV)/G = (1.5,0.7)/(1.55,0.8), (1.45,0.7)/(1.5,0.8), and (1.4,0.7)/(1.4,0.8), respectively, and in Figure 4 the five L0 curves at fixed m0 = 850 MeV use different gV/G values. Section 4.1 gives no criterion for choosing these NJL parameters, and no table lists the quark-sector parameter set used for every (m0, L0) point entering Figure 5. The claimed 2σ band is therefore an envelope over different quark-sector tunings, and the statement in the abstract and Section 5 that 'the equation of state in the present model satisfies all observational constraints' is not established for a single parameter set. The authors should fix (H,gV) at one value, or give a clear selection rule and show that the m0 band survives with the NJL parameters held fixed.
  2. [Section 4.2, Figure 5] The construction of the 1σ and 2σ credible regions is not specified. The text states that the mass-radius relations satisfy the constraints of the listed pulsars and GW170817, but no likelihood, prior, or credibility-level calculation is described, and it is unclear whether a curve must pass through every individual posterior interval, through some combined posterior, or through a single region such as the HESS J1731-347 contour. Without this information the headline 'within 2σ credible region' is not reproducible. Please specify the statistical procedure and, ideally, overlay the individual data constraints.
  3. [Tables 3-5 and Figures 3-4] The hadronic parameter tables list values for m0 = 600, 700, 800, and 900 MeV, but the mass-radius plots use m0 = 850 MeV. The paper does not state whether the parameters at 850 MeV are interpolated, refitted, or obtained by some other procedure. This information is needed to reproduce the central curves and the resulting constraint.
  4. [Sections 1, 5, and Abstract] The central conclusion is conditional on HESS J1731-347 being a neutron star, but this condition is not consistently carried through the paper. The abstract and the opening of Section 5 present the 740-860 MeV band as a constraint on m0, while the final sentence of Section 5 acknowledges that the interpretation depends on the object being confirmed as a neutron star. Since the introduction itself cites quark-star interpretations of the same object, the headline result should be restated as conditional, with a brief sensitivity discussion or an explicit statement that the quark-star interpretation is outside the present model's scope.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] There are several typographical errors, including 'higer order' in Section 5, 'asymmertic' in the abstract, 'invairant' near the end of Section 4.2, and 'thea 0(980)Meson' in the header title.
  2. [Figure 4 caption] The caption assigns the same NJL parameter pair to two different curves in two places (both red and purple are listed as (1.55,0.8), and both black and yellow-green are listed as (1.55,0.9)); the color-to-parameter mapping should be corrected.
  3. [Figure 3 caption] The caption says 'L=40 MeV' but the text uses L0; please use L0 = 40 MeV for consistency.
  4. [Section 3 and Figure 5] The pink Ksym-region in Figure 5 is not derived in the text; Section 3 gives a one-dimensional constraint at fixed L0, so the figure should explain how the L0-dependent Ksym band is obtained from the curves in Figure 1.
  5. [Section 4.1] The polynomial interpolation P(μB) is mentioned but the six boundary conditions and interpolation coefficients are not given; since this is adopted from Ref. [42] the omission is acceptable, but a brief statement of the matching conditions would improve reproducibility.
  6. [Figures 3 and 4] The notation for the NJL parameters is inconsistent: Figure 3 uses '(H, gV)/G' while Figure 4 uses '(H/G,gv/G)'; the notation should be unified and defined in the text.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The m0 constraint is a genuine comparison of hadronic-model outputs with external NS and Ksym data; only a redundant self-cited Ksym band appears, so no significant circularity.

  1. other [Section 4.2 (Fig. 5 discussion)]
    "The constraint from the symmetry incompressibility Ksym presented in Ref. [86] is also included for comparison."

    The Ksym band shown in Fig. 5 is attributed to Ref. [86], a prior paper by two of the present authors, rather than to the external compilation Ref. [83] used in Section 3. This is a minor self-citation in the final allowed-region plot. It is not load-bearing: the Ksym calculation is independently repeated in this paper, and the comparison with the external value Ksym = -107 +/- 88 MeV from Ref. [83] already yields 640 MeV < m0 < 860 MeV for L0 = 57.7 MeV, while the lower end of the quoted final interval 740-860 MeV is set by the 2-sigma NS band. The self-citation is therefore redundant rather than a forced input or a renamed prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is not circular in the sense defined by the analysis rules. The PDM parameters are fixed from vacuum hadron masses and saturation properties (n0, B0, K0, S0), not from the NS observations used to constrain m0. Ksym and Qsym are computed as higher-order derivatives of the symmetry energy and compared with an external experimental compilation, so the resulting m0 preference is a genuine model prediction against independent data. The NS mass-radius curves are generated by solving the TOV equation from an EoS built by interpolating the PDM and an NJL-type quark model; the HESS J1731-347 mass and radius are inputs, not outputs, of that calculation. The main caveat is that the NJL parameters (H/G, gV/G) are listed separately for each hadronic curve in Figs. 3-4, so Fig. 5's blue band is an envelope over several quark-sector settings rather than a single unified EoS. This weakens the strength of the phrasing 'the equation of state in the present model satisfies all observational constraints,' but it is not a circular step: the paper does not fit those quark parameters to the HESS data, and it does not rename a fitted quantity as a prediction. Under the stated rules, model flexibility and incomplete parameter-bookkeeping are robustness concerns, not constructional circularity. The only self-citation entering the final figure is the Ksym band from Ref. [86], which is redundant because the same quantity is recomputed and checked against external data in Section 3; hence the overall circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 8 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central constraint rests on a calibrated effective model: eleven hadronic parameters are fixed to nuclear saturation and meson masses, m0 and L0 are scanned, and the quark EoS parameters H and gV add further freedom. The parity doublet interpretation of N(1535), the crossover interpolation, and the neutron-star interpretation of HESS J1731-347 are assumptions not derived in the paper.

free parameters (8)
  • m0 = 600-900 MeV scanned; final 2-sigma range 740-860 MeV
    Chiral invariant mass of the nucleon; the target parameter, treated as an input and scanned by hand rather than fitted.
  • L0 = 40-80 MeV scanned; focus at 57.7 MeV
    Slope of the symmetry energy at saturation; scanned because the accepted value is 57.7 +/- 19 MeV, and used with S0 to set g_rhoNN and lambda_omegarho.
  • g1, g2 = 8.48,14.93 at m0=600 MeV to 5.96,12.41 at m0=900 MeV (Table 3)
    Yukawa couplings fitted to the vacuum nucleon masses 939 MeV and 1535 MeV via Eq. (20) for each m0.
  • mu2_sigma, lambda4, lambda6, g_omegaNN = Table 3 values
    Determined to reproduce saturation density n0=0.16 fm^-3, binding energy B0=16 MeV, incompressibility K0=240 MeV, and the vacuum stationary condition Eq. (35).
  • mu2_a, gamma4 = Table 3 values
    Fitted to the meson masses m_eta and m_a0(980) via Eq. (36), with mu2_a = mu2_sigma - K.
  • lambda_prime6 = 0
    Set to zero following Refs. [65,82] because it is sub-leading in the large Nc expansion and has small effect on matter properties.
  • g_rhoNN, lambda_omegarho = Tables 4 and 5
    Fitted to the symmetry energy S0=31 MeV and to each chosen value of L0.
  • NJL parameters H and gV (H/G, gV/G) = Examples (1.4,0.7) to (1.55,1.0) in Figures 3 and 4; no global table for the final region
    Quark sector parameters of the NJL model used in the crossover; they are chosen per hadronic curve, introducing flexibility into the compatibility test with observations.
assumptions (8)
  • domain assumption SU(2)L x SU(2)R x U(1)A chiral symmetry with U(1)A anomaly via the Kobayashi-Maskawa-'t Hooft term defines the meson potential.
    Used throughout Section 2.1; the effective Lagrangian is assumed to be the correct low-energy description.
  • domain assumption N(939) and N(1535) are chiral parity partners whose vacuum masses follow Eq. (20).
    Central to identifying m0; if N(1535) is not the chiral partner, the model's m0 interpretation changes.
  • domain assumption Mean-field approximation: meson fields are replaced by classical condensates as in Eq. (21).
    Used in Section 2.2; ignores fluctuations and possible inhomogeneous phases.
  • ad hoc to paper The hadron-quark transition is a smooth crossover implemented by polynomial interpolation between 2n0 and 5n0 with six boundary conditions.
    Section 4.1; no derivation of the crossover form is given, and alternative interpolation choices would change the EoS and M-R relations.
  • domain assumption The NJL-type quark model of Ref. [42], with parameters H and gV, describes deconfined quark matter.
    Section 4.1; the quark sector is taken from prior work and its parameters are varied without a global fit.
  • ad hoc to paper HESS J1731-347 is a neutron star with the reported mass and radius.
    Sections 1 and 5; the paper itself cites quark star interpretations of the same object in the introduction.
  • domain assumption The observational constraints from NICER, GW170817, HESS, and other sources are valid within their stated credible intervals.
    Section 4.2; the final m0 range inherits these intervals without re-analysis of systematic errors.
  • standard math TOV equations for static spherical stars describe neutron star structure.
    Section 4.2; used to convert the unified EoS into mass-radius relations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Chiral Invariant Mass Constraints from HESS J1731 347 in an Extended Parity Doublet Model with Isovector Scalar Meson." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q3DITFET

@misc{pith2026250616684,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Chiral Invariant Mass Constraints from HESS J1731 347 in an Extended Parity Doublet Model with Isovector Scalar Meson},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q3DITFET}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.16684}
}
abstract

The recent discovery of a central compact object (CCO) within the supernova remnant HESS J1731-347, with mass $0.77^{+0.20}_{-0.17} \ M_\odot $ and radius $10.4^{+0.86}_{-0.78}$ km is the lightest and smallest compact object ever observed. We identify it as an ultra-light Neutron star (NS) and constrain the chiral invariant mass of nucleon $m_0$ from the observational data of NS using an extended parity doublet model with including the isovector scalar meson $a_0(980)$. We study the higher order asymmertic matter properties such as the symmetry incompressibility $K_{sym}$ and the symmetry skewness $Q_{sym}$ in the presence of $a_0$ meson. We find that $K_{sym}$ and $Q_{sym}$ is sensitive to the chiral invariant mass of nucleon $m_0$ in the presence of $a_0$ meson. We show that the equation of state in the present model satisfies all observational constraints within $2\sigma$ credible region including the HESS J1731-347 observation, as well as the constraint from $K_{sym}$ when $740 \,\text{ MeV} \lesssim m_0 \lesssim 860 \,\text{ MeV}$ for $L_0 = $ 57.7 MeV. Yet, the $1\sigma$ constraint from neutron stars appears to be not fully compatible with the constraint from $K_{sym}$ from the present model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.16684 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. shows the Ksym as a function of m0 in the models with and without the a0 meson, for various values of L0. The recently accepted value of Ksym = −107 ± 88 MeV, as given in Ref. [83], is indicated by the pink band. We observe that the inclusion of the a0 meson has a significant impact on Ksym, especially when m0 is small. In particular, Ksym becomes positive and increases rapidly as m0 decreases in the a0 model: Ksym … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. m0 dependence of Qsym with different L0. Solid curve represents the model with a0 meson and dashed curve represents the model without a0. The blue region is the recent accepted value of Qsym as summarized in Ref. [84]. 4. Neutron star matter Neutron stars (NSs) provide unique cosmic laboratories for studying matter under extreme conditions. Recent precise measurements of NS masses and radii have significantly constr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mass-radius relation for m0 = 700, 800, 850 MeV with fixed value of L = 40 MeV con￾nected with different combination of NJL model parameter H and gV. Blue curve is connected with (H, gV)/G = (1.5, 0.7),(1.55, 0.8); green curve is connected with (H, gV)/G = (1.45, 0.7),(1.5, 0.8); red curve is connected with (H, gV)/G = (1.4, 0.7),(1.4, 0.8). See Ref. [42] for details of the NJL model. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Radius (… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: M-R relations for m0 = 850 MeV with different L0. The red curve is connected to (H/G,gv/G) = (1.55,0.8); the purple curve is connected to (H/G,gv/G) = (1.55,0.8); the black curve is connected to (H/G,gv/G) = (1.55,0.9); the yellow green curve is connected to (H/G,gv/G)…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Allowed region for m0 and L0. The blue region shows the value of m0 and L0 which the MR relations satisfy the 1 σ and 2 σ constraints from the NSs observational data. The pink region shows the constraint from symmetry incompressibility Ksym 5. Summary In this work, we …

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Suppression of dynamical momentum-space shell by chiral symmetry

    nucl-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    In a parity doublet model, self-consistent minimization keeps the quark fraction at zero up to about 8n0, showing quark onset and chiral restoration need not coincide.

  2. Ferromagnetic instabilities in quarkyonic matter

    nucl-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quarkyonic neutron matter can turn ferromagnetic below about 5.5 n0, but only with a hand-chosen negative spin-spin interaction constant.

  3. Origin of nucleon mass in the light of PSR J0614-3329 with quark-hadron crossover

    nucl-th 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The parity doublet model combined with the new NICER radius measurement restricts the chiral invariant nucleon mass m0 to 800-860 MeV, implying it is at least 85% of the nucleon mass.

  4. Subsurface Vacancy Engineering Enables Atomically Clean and Oxidation-Resistant Copper Interfaces for Anode-Free Lithium Metal Batteries

    cond-mat.mtrl-sci 2025-08 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    The abstract and the body of this preprint are entirely different papers, leaving the headline battery claim unsubstantiated.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

88 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages · cited by 4 Pith papers

  1. [51]

    Reconciling constraints from the supernova remnant HESS J1731-347 with the parity doublet model

    Gao, B.; Yan, Y.; Harada, M. Reconciling constraints from the supernova remnant HESS J1731-347 with the parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. C2024, 109, 065807. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.065807

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.065807

  2. [65]

    Neutron star matter based on a parity doublet model including the a0(980) meson

    Kong, Y.K.; Minamikawa, T.; Harada, M. Neutron star matter based on a parity doublet model including the a0(980) meson. Phys. Rev. C2023, 108, 055206. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.055206

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.055206

  3. [1]

    GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral.Phys

    Abbott, B.P .; et al. GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral.Phys. Rev. Lett. 2017, 119, 161101, [arXiv:gr-qc/1710.05832]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

    arXiv 2017

  4. [2]

    GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state

    Abbott, B.P .; et al. GW170817: Measurements of neutron star radii and equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 161101, [arXiv:gr-qc/1805.11581]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.161101

    arXiv 2018

  5. [3]

    The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data

    Miller et al., M.C. The Radius of PSR J0740+6620 from NICER and XMM-Newton Data. The Astrophysical Journal Letters 2021, 918, L28. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac089b 2021

  6. [4]

    A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy

    Riley, T.E.; et al. A NICER View of the Massive Pulsar PSR J0740+6620 Informed by Radio Timing and XMM-Newton Spectroscopy

  7. [5]

    A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant.Nature Astronomy2022, 6, 1444–1451

    Doroshenko, V .; Suleimanov, V .; Pühlhofer, G.; Santangelo, A. A strangely light neutron star within a supernova remnant.Nature Astronomy2022, 6, 1444–1451. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-022-01800-1

    doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01800-1

  8. [6]

    Properties of isospin asymmetric quark matter in quark stars

    Chu, P .C.; Li, X.H.; Liu, H.; Ju, M.; Zhou, Y. Properties of isospin asymmetric quark matter in quark stars. Phys. Rev. C 2023, 108, 025808. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.108.025808

    doi:10.1103/physrevc.108.025808 2023

Show all 88 references
  1. [7]

    Color-flavor locked quark stars in light of the compact object in the HESS J1731-347 and the GW190814 event

    Oikonomou, P .T.; Moustakidis, C.C. Color-flavor locked quark stars in light of the compact object in the HESS J1731-347 and the GW190814 event. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 063010, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2304.12209]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.108.0630 10

    2023 arXiv

  2. [8]

    Confronting Strange Stars with Compact-Star Observations and New Physics

    Yang, S.H.; Pi, C.M.; Zheng, X.P .; Weber, F. Confronting Strange Stars with Compact-Star Observations and New Physics. Universe2023, p. 202, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2304.09614]. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe9050202

    arXiv

  3. [9]

    Confronting recent light compact star observations with color-flavor locked quark matter2025

    Kourmpetis, K.; Laskos-Patkos, P .; Moustakidis, C.C. Confronting recent light compact star observations with color-flavor locked quark matter2025. [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2505.10329]

    arXiv

  4. [10]

    Linear sigma model with parity doubling

    DeTar, C.; Kunihiro, T. Linear sigma model with parity doubling. Phys. Rev. D 1989, 39, 2805–2808. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.39.2805

    1989

  5. [11]

    Nucleons and parity doubling across the deconfinement transition

    Aarts, G.; Allton, C.; Hands, S.; Jäger, B.; Praki, C.; Skullerud, J.I. Nucleons and parity doubling across the deconfinement transition. Phys. Rev. D2015, 92, 014503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.92.014503

    doi

  6. [12]

    Light baryons below and above the deconfinement transition: medium effects and parity doubling

    Aarts, G.; Allton, C.; De Boni, D.; Hands, S.; Jäger, B.; Praki, C.; Skullerud, J.I. Light baryons below and above the deconfinement transition: medium effects and parity doubling. Journal of High Energy Physics 2017, 2017, 34, [arXiv:hep-lat/1703.09246]. https://doi.org/10.10...

    2017 arXiv

  7. [13]

    Masses of hadrons in the chiral symmetry restored vacuum

    Kim, J.; Lee, S.H. Masses of hadrons in the chiral symmetry restored vacuum. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 014014. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.014014

    2022 doi

  8. [14]

    Chiral Symmetry of Baryons

    Jido, D.; Oka, M.; Hosaka, A. Chiral Symmetry of Baryons. Progress of Theoretical Physics 2001, 106, 873–908, [https://academic.oup.com/ptp/article-pdf/106/5/873/5373808/106-5-873.pdf]. https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP .106.873

    2001 doi

  9. [15]

    Chiral partner structure of light nucleons in an extended parity doublet model

    Yamazaki, T.; Harada, M. Chiral partner structure of light nucleons in an extended parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. D 2019, 99, 034012, [arXiv:hep-ph/1809.02359]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.99.034012

    2019 arXiv

  10. [16]

    Parity Doubling of the Nucleon and First Order Chiral Transition in Dense Matter

    Hatsuda, T.; Prakash, M. Parity Doubling of the Nucleon and First Order Chiral Transition in Dense Matter. Phys. Lett. B 1989, 224, 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-2693(89)91040-X

    1989 doi

  11. [17]

    Cold, dense nuclear matter in a SU(2) parity doublet model

    Zschiesche, D.; Tolos, L.; Schaffner-Bielich, J.; Pisarski, R.D. Cold, dense nuclear matter in a SU(2) parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. C2007, 75, 055202, [nucl-th/0608044]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.75.055202

    arXiv

  12. [18]

    Nuclear matter and neutron stars in a parity doublet model

    Dexheimer, V .; Schramm, S.; Zschiesche, D. Nuclear matter and neutron stars in a parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. C 2008, 77, 025803, [arXiv:nucl-th/0710.4192]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.77.025803

    2008 arXiv

  13. [19]

    Neutron stars within the SU(2) parity doublet model.Eur

    Dexheimer, V .; Pagliara, G.; Tolos, L.; Schaffner-Bielich, J.; Schramm, S. Neutron stars within the SU(2) parity doublet model.Eur. Phys. J. A2008, 38, 105–113, [arXiv:nucl-th/0805.3301]. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2008-10652-0. 14 of 16

    arXiv

  14. [20]

    Thermodynamics of dense hadronic matter in a parity doublet model

    Sasaki, C.; Mishustin, I. Thermodynamics of dense hadronic matter in a parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. C 2010, 82, 035204, [arXiv:hep-ph/1005.4811]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.82.035204

    2010 arXiv

  15. [21]

    Conformal anomaly and the vector coupling in dense matter

    Sasaki, C.; Lee, H.K.; Paeng, W.G.; Rho, M. Conformal anomaly and the vector coupling in dense matter. Phys. Rev. D 2011, 84, 034011, [arXiv:hep-ph/1103.0184]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.84.034011

    2011 arXiv

  16. [22]

    Nuclear matter within a dilatation-invariant parity doublet model: The role of the tetraquark at nonzero density

    Gallas, S.; Giacosa, F.; Pagliara, G. Nuclear matter within a dilatation-invariant parity doublet model: The role of the tetraquark at nonzero density. Nucl. Phys. A 2011, 872, 13–24, [arXiv:hep-ph/1105.5003]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2011.09.008

    2011 arXiv

  17. [23]

    Dilaton-Limit Fixed Point in Hidden Local Symmetric Parity Doublet Model

    Paeng, W.G.; Lee, H.K.; Rho, M.; Sasaki, C. Dilaton-Limit Fixed Point in Hidden Local Symmetric Parity Doublet Model. Phys. Rev. D2012, 85, 054022, [arXiv:hep-ph/1109.5431]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85.054022

    arXiv

  18. [24]

    The hadronic SU(3) Parity Doublet Model for Dense Matter, its extension to quarks and the strange equation of state

    Steinheimer, J.; Schramm, S.; Stocker, H. The hadronic SU(3) Parity Doublet Model for Dense Matter, its extension to quarks and the strange equation of state. Phys. Rev. C 2011, 84, 045208, [arXiv:hep-ph/1108.2596]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.0 45208

    2011 arXiv

  19. [25]

    Hybrid Stars in an SU(3) parity doublet model

    Dexheimer, V .; Steinheimer, J.; Negreiros, R.; Schramm, S. Hybrid Stars in an SU(3) parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. C 2013, 87, 015804, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1206.3086]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.87.015804

    2013 arXiv

  20. [26]

    Interplay between ω-nucleon interaction and nucleon mass in dense baryonic matter

    Paeng, W.G.; Lee, H.K.; Rho, M.; Sasaki, C. Interplay between ω-nucleon interaction and nucleon mass in dense baryonic matter. Phys. Rev. D2013, 88, 105019, [arXiv:nucl-th/1303.2898]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.88.105019

    arXiv

  21. [27]

    Effective model for the QCD phase transitions at finite baryon density

    Benic, S.; Mishustin, I.; Sasaki, C. Effective model for the QCD phase transitions at finite baryon density. Phys. Rev. D 2015, 91, 125034, [arXiv:hep-ph/1502.05969]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.91.125034

    2015 arXiv

  22. [28]

    Asymmetric nuclear matter in a parity doublet model with hidden local symmetry

    Motohiro, Y.; Kim, Y.; Harada, M. Asymmetric nuclear matter in a parity doublet model with hidden local symmetry. Phys. Rev. C 2015, 92, 025201, [arXiv:nucl-th/1505.00988]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.C 95, 059903 (2017)], https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.0 25201

    2017 arXiv

  23. [29]

    Higher-order baryon number susceptibilities: Interplay between the chiral and the nuclear liquid-gas transitions

    Mukherjee, A.; Steinheimer, J.; Schramm, S. Higher-order baryon number susceptibilities: Interplay between the chiral and the nuclear liquid-gas transitions. Phys. Rev. C 2017, 96, 025205, [arXiv:nucl-th/1611.10144]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96 .025205

    2017 arXiv

  24. [30]

    Examination of N∗(1535) as a probe to observe the partial restoration of chiral symmetry in nuclear matter

    Suenaga, D. Examination of N∗(1535) as a probe to observe the partial restoration of chiral symmetry in nuclear matter. Phys. Rev. C2018, 97, 045203, [arXiv:nucl-th/1704.03630]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.045203

    arXiv

  25. [31]

    Catalysis of partial chiral symmetry restoration by ∆ matter

    Takeda, Y.; Kim, Y.; Harada, M. Catalysis of partial chiral symmetry restoration by ∆ matter. Phys. Rev. C 2018, 97, 065202, [arXiv:nucl-th/1704.04357]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.065202

    2018 arXiv

  26. [32]

    The application of the Quark-Hadron Chiral Parity-Doublet Model to neutron star matter

    Mukherjee, A.; Schramm, S.; Steinheimer, J.; Dexheimer, V . The application of the Quark-Hadron Chiral Parity-Doublet Model to neutron star matter. Astron. Astrophys. 2017, 608, A110, [arXiv:nucl-th/1706.09191]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/2017 31505

    2017 arXiv

  27. [33]

    Scale-invariant hidden local symmetry, topology change, and dense baryonic matter

    Paeng, W.G.; Kuo, T.T.S.; Lee, H.K.; Ma, Y.L.; Rho, M. Scale-invariant hidden local symmetry, topology change, and dense baryonic matter. II. Phys. Rev. D2017, 96, 014031, [arXiv:nucl-th/1704.02775]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.96.014031

    arXiv

  28. [34]

    Net-baryon number fluctuations in the Hybrid Quark-Meson-Nucleon model at finite density

    Marczenko, M.; Sasaki, C. Net-baryon number fluctuations in the Hybrid Quark-Meson-Nucleon model at finite density. Phys. Rev. D2018, 97, 036011, [arXiv:hep-ph/1711.05521]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.97.036011

    arXiv

  29. [35]

    Dual chiral density waves in nuclear matter

    Abuki, H.; Takeda, Y.; Harada, M. Dual chiral density waves in nuclear matter. Epj Web Conf. 2018, 192, 00020, [arXiv:hep- ph/1809.06485]. https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201819200020

    2018 arXiv

  30. [36]

    Chiral symmetry restoration by parity doubling and the structure of neutron stars

    Marczenko, M.; Blaschke, D.; Redlich, K.; Sasaki, C. Chiral symmetry restoration by parity doubling and the structure of neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D2018, 98, 103021, [arXiv:nucl-th/1805.06886]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.98.103021

    arXiv

  31. [37]

    Parity Doubling and the Dense Matter Phase Diagram under Constraints from Multi-Messenger Astronomy

    Marczenko, M.; Blaschke, D.; Redlich, K.; Sasaki, C. Parity Doubling and the Dense Matter Phase Diagram under Constraints from Multi-Messenger Astronomy. Universe 2019, 5, 180, [arXiv:nucl-th/1905.04974]. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe5080180

    2019 arXiv

  32. [38]

    Constraint to chiral invariant masses of nucleons from GW170817 in an extended parity doublet model

    Yamazaki, T.; Harada, M. Constraint to chiral invariant masses of nucleons from GW170817 in an extended parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. C2019, 100, 025205, [arXiv:nucl-th/1901.02167]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.025205

    1901 arXiv

  33. [39]

    Charmed Mesons in Nuclear Matter Based on Chiral Effective Models

    Harada, M.; Yamazaki, T. Charmed Mesons in Nuclear Matter Based on Chiral Effective Models. Jps Conf. Proc. 2019, 26, 024001. https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP .26.024001

    2019 doi

  34. [40]

    Toward a unified equation of state for multi-messenger astronomy

    Marczenko, M.; Blaschke, D.; Redlich, K.; Sasaki, C. Toward a unified equation of state for multi-messenger astronomy. Astron. Astrophys.2020, 643, A82, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2004.09566]. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038211

    2020 arXiv

  35. [41]

    Dense nuclear matter based on a chiral model with parity doublet structure

    Harada, M. Dense nuclear matter based on a chiral model with parity doublet structure. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Hadron Spectroscopy and Structure, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811219313_0113

    2020 doi

  36. [42]

    Quark-hadron crossover equations of state for neutron stars: Constraining the chiral invariant mass in a parity doublet model

    Minamikawa, T.; Kojo, T.; Harada, M. Quark-hadron crossover equations of state for neutron stars: Constraining the chiral invariant mass in a parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. C2021, 103, 045205. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.045205

    doi

  37. [43]

    Reconciling Multi-messenger Constraints with Chiral Symmetry Restoration

    Marczenko, M.; Redlich, K.; Sasaki, C. Reconciling Multi-messenger Constraints with Chiral Symmetry Restoration. Astrophys. J. Lett.2022, 925, L23, [arXiv:nucl-th/2110.11056]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac4b61

    2022 arXiv

  38. [44]

    Chiral condensates for neutron stars in hadron-quark crossover: From a parity doublet nucleon model to a Nambu–Jona-Lasinio quark model

    Minamikawa, T.; Kojo, T.; Harada, M. Chiral condensates for neutron stars in hadron-quark crossover: From a parity doublet nucleon model to a Nambu–Jona-Lasinio quark model. Phys. Rev. C 2021, 104, 065201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.104. 065201

    2021 doi

  39. [45]

    Chiral symmetry restoration and ∆ matter formation in neutron stars

    Marczenko, M.; Redlich, K.; Sasaki, C. Chiral symmetry restoration and ∆ matter formation in neutron stars. Phys. Rev. D 2022, 105, 103009, [arXiv:nucl-th/2203.00269]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.105.103009

    2022 arXiv

  40. [46]

    Impacts of the U(1)A anomaly on nuclear and neutron star equation of state based on a parity doublet model

    Gao, B.; Minamikawa, T.; Kojo, T.; Harada, M. Impacts of the U(1)A anomaly on nuclear and neutron star equation of state based on a parity doublet model. Phys. Rev. C2022, 106, 065205. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.065205. 15 of 16

    doi

  41. [47]

    Chiral restoration of nucleons in neutron star matter: studies based on a parity doublet model2023

    Minamikawa, T.; Gao, B.; Kojo, T.; Harada, M. Chiral restoration of nucleons in neutron star matter: studies based on a parity doublet model2023. [arXiv:nucl-th/2302.00825]

    arXiv

  42. [48]

    Parity doublet model for baryon octets: Diquark classifications and mass hierarchy based on the quark-line diagram

    Minamikawa, T.; Gao, B.; kojo, T.; Harada, M. Parity doublet model for baryon octets: Diquark classifications and mass hierarchy based on the quark-line diagram. Phys. Rev. D 2023, 108, 076017, [arXiv:hep-ph/2306.15564]. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.076017

    2023 arXiv

  43. [49]

    Parity doublet model for baryon octets: Ground states saturated by good diquarks and the role of bad diquarks for excited states

    Gao, B.; Kojo, T.; Harada, M. Parity doublet model for baryon octets: Ground states saturated by good diquarks and the role of bad diquarks for excited states. Phys. Rev. D 2024, 110, 016016, [arXiv:hep-ph/2403.18214]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD. 110.016016

    2024 arXiv

  44. [50]

    Fluctuations near the liquid-gas and chiral phase transitions in hadronic matter2023

    Marczenko, M.; Redlich, K.; Sasaki, C. Fluctuations near the liquid-gas and chiral phase transitions in hadronic matter2023. [arXiv:nucl-th/2301.09866]

    arXiv

  45. [52]

    Exploring the first-order phase transition in neutron stars using the parity doublet model and a Nambu–Jona-Lasinio–type quark model

    Gao, B.; Yuan, W.L.; Harada, M.; Ma, Y.L. Exploring the first-order phase transition in neutron stars using the parity doublet model and a Nambu–Jona-Lasinio–type quark model. Phys. Rev. C 2024, 110, 045802, [arXiv:nucl-th/2407.13990]. https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.110.045802

    2024 arXiv

  46. [53]

    Quarkyonic matter with chiral symmetry restoration

    Gao, B.; Harada, M. Quarkyonic matter with chiral symmetry restoration. Phys. Rev. D 2025, 111, 016024, [arXiv:nucl- th/2410.16649]. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.111.016024

    2025 arXiv

  47. [54]

    Hybrid stars with large quark cores within the parity doublet model and modified NJL model

    Yuan, W.L.; Gao, B.; Yan, Y.; Xu, R. Hybrid stars with large quark cores within the parity doublet model and modified NJL model

  48. [55]

    Constraints on the strength of first-order phase transition in the low density region2025

    Gao, B. Constraints on the strength of first-order phase transition in the low density region2025. [arXiv:nucl-th/2505.21970]

    arXiv

  49. [56]

    From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics2018, 81, 056902

    Baym, G.; Hatsuda, T.; Kojo, T.; Powell, P .D.; Song, Y.; Takatsuka, T. From hadrons to quarks in neutron stars: a review.Reports on Progress in Physics2018, 81, 056902. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aaae14

    doi

  50. [57]

    New Neutron Star Equation of State with Quark–Hadron Crossover

    Baym, G.; Furusawa, S.; Hatsuda, T.; Kojo, T.; Togashi, H. New Neutron Star Equation of State with Quark–Hadron Crossover. The Astrophysical Journal2019, 885, 42. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab441e

    doi

  51. [58]

    Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar

    Cromartie, H.T.; et al. Relativistic Shapiro delay measurements of an extremely massive millisecond pulsar. Nature Astron. 2019, 4, 72–76, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1904.06759]. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-019-0880-2

    2019 arXiv

  52. [59]

    Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger

    Abbott, B.P .; et al. Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2017, 848, L12, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1710.05833]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

    2017 arXiv

  53. [60]

    PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter

    Miller, M.; et al. PSR J0030+0451 Mass and Radius from NICER Data and Implications for the Properties of Neutron Star Matter. Astrophys. J. Lett.2019, 887, L24, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1912.05705]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab50c5

    2019 arXiv

  54. [61]

    A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation

    Riley, T.E.; et al. A NICER View of PSR J0030+0451: Millisecond Pulsar Parameter Estimation. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2019, 887, L21, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1912.05702]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab481c

    2019 arXiv

  55. [62]

    Refined Mass and Geometric Measurements of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620

    Fonseca, E.; et al. Refined Mass and Geometric Measurements of the High-mass PSR J0740+6620. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2021, 915, L12, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2104.00880]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac03b8

    2021 arXiv

  56. [63]

    Tidal Deformabilities and Radii of Neutron Stars from the Observation of GW170817

    De, S.; Finstad, D.; Lattimer, J.M.; Brown, D.A.; Berger, E.; Biwer, C.M. Tidal Deformabilities and Radii of Neutron Stars from the Observation of GW170817. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2018, 121, 091102, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1804.08583]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 259902 (2018)], https:...

    2018 arXiv

  57. [64]

    GW170817: Joint Constraint on the Neutron Star Equation of State from Multimessenger Observations

    Radice, D.; Perego, A.; Zappa, F.; Bernuzzi, S. GW170817: Joint Constraint on the Neutron Star Equation of State from Multimessenger Observations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2018, 852, L29, [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/1711.03647]. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041 -8213/aaa402

    2018 arXiv

  58. [66]

    Nuclear matter in relativistic mean field theory with isovector scalar meson

    Kubis, S.; Kutschera, M. Nuclear matter in relativistic mean field theory with isovector scalar meson. Physics Letters B 1997, 399, 191–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0370-2693(97)00306-7

    1997 doi

  59. [67]

    Neutron Stars in Relativistic Mean Field Theory with Isovector Scalar Meson1998

    Kubis, S.; Kutschera, M.; Stachniewicz, S. Neutron Stars in Relativistic Mean Field Theory with Isovector Scalar Meson1998. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV .ASTRO-PH/9802303

    doi

  60. [68]

    Asymmetric Nuclear Matter in Relativistic Mean-field Models with Isoscalar- and Isovector- meson Mixing

    Miyatsu, T.; Cheoun, M.K.; Saito, K. Asymmetric Nuclear Matter in Relativistic Mean-field Models with Isoscalar- and Isovector- meson Mixing. The Astrophysical Journal2022, 929, 82. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f40

    doi

  61. [69]

    Effects of Isoscalar- and Isovector-scalar Meson Mixing on Neutron Star Structure

    Li, F.; Cai, B.J.; Zhou, Y.; Jiang, W.Z.; Chen, L.W. Effects of Isoscalar- and Isovector-scalar Meson Mixing on Neutron Star Structure. The Astrophysical Journal2022, 929, 183. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5e2a

    doi

  62. [70]

    Massive neutron stars with small radii in relativistic mean-field models optimized to nuclear ground states, 2022

    Miyatsu, T.; Cheoun, M.K.; Kim, K.; Saito, K. Massive neutron stars with small radii in relativistic mean-field models optimized to nuclear ground states, 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV .2209.02861

    2022 doi arXiv

  63. [71]

    Effects of an isovector scalar meson on the equation of state of dense matter within a relativistic mean field model

    Thakur, V .; Kumar, R.; Kumar, P .; Kumar, V .; Kumar, M.; Mondal, C.; Agrawal, B.K.; Dhiman, S.K. Effects of an isovector scalar meson on the equation of state of dense matter within a relativistic mean field model. Physical Review C 2022, 106. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrev...

    2022 doi

  64. [72]

    Neutron stars with isovector scalar correlations.The European Physical Journal A 2005, 25, 293–298

    Liu, B.; Guo, H.; Toro, M.D.; Greco, V . Neutron stars with isovector scalar correlations.The European Physical Journal A 2005, 25, 293–298. https://doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2005-10095-1

    2005 doi

  65. [73]

    Effect of the δ meson on the instabilities of nuclear matter under strong magnetic fields

    Rabhi, A.; Providência, C.; Providência, J.D. Effect of the δ meson on the instabilities of nuclear matter under strong magnetic fields. Phys. Rev. C2009, 80, 025806. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.80.025806. 16 of 16

    doi

  66. [74]

    On the Lorentz structure of the symmetry energy

    Gaitanos, T.; Toro, M.D.; Typel, S.; Baran, V .; Fuchs, C.; Greco, V .; Wolter, H. On the Lorentz structure of the symmetry energy. Nuclear Physics A2004, 732, 24–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2003.12.001

    2003 doi

  67. [75]

    Collective modes of asymmetric nuclear matter in quantum hadrodynamics.Phys

    Greco, V .; Colonna, M.; Di Toro, M.; Matera, F. Collective modes of asymmetric nuclear matter in quantum hadrodynamics.Phys. Rev. C2003, 67, 015203. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.67.015203

    doi

  68. [76]

    Asymmetric nuclear matter: The role of the isovector scalar channel.Phys

    Liu, B.; Greco, V .; Baran, V .; Colonna, M.; Di Toro, M. Asymmetric nuclear matter: The role of the isovector scalar channel.Phys. Rev. C2002, 65, 045201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.65.045201

    doi

  69. [77]

    Neutron star properties in density-dependent relativistic mean field theory with consideration of an isovector scalar meson

    Wang, S.; Zhang, H.F.; Dong, J.M. Neutron star properties in density-dependent relativistic mean field theory with consideration of an isovector scalar meson. Phys. Rev. C2014, 90, 055801. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.055801

    doi

  70. [78]

    Relativistic mean-field interaction with density-dependent meson- nucleon vertices based on microscopical calculations

    Roca-Maza, X.; Viñas, X.; Centelles, M.; Ring, P .; Schuck, P . Relativistic mean-field interaction with density-dependent meson- nucleon vertices based on microscopical calculations. Phys. Rev. C 2011, 84, 054309. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.84.054 309

    2011 doi

  71. [79]

    Is theρ Meson a Dynamical Gauge Boson of Hidden Local Symmetry? Phys

    Bando, M.; Kugo, T.; Uehara, S.; Yamawaki, K.; Yanagida, T. Is theρ Meson a Dynamical Gauge Boson of Hidden Local Symmetry? Phys. Rev. Lett.1985, 54, 1215–1218. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.54.1215

    1985 doi

  72. [80]

    Nonlinear Realization and Hidden Local Symmetries

    Bando, M.; Kugo, T.; Yamawaki, K. Nonlinear Realization and Hidden Local Symmetries. Phys. Rept. 1988, 164, 217–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/0370-1573(88)90019-1

    1988 doi

  73. [81]

    Hidden local symmetry at loop: A New perspective of composite gauge boson and chiral phase transition

    Harada, M.; Yamawaki, K. Hidden local symmetry at loop: A New perspective of composite gauge boson and chiral phase transition. Phys. Rept.2003, 381, 1–233, [hep-ph/0302103]. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(03)00139-X

    2003 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Nuclear Matter and Finite Nuclei: Recent Studies Based on Parity Doublet Model

    Kong, Y.K.; Kim, Y.; Harada, M. Nuclear Matter and Finite Nuclei: Recent Studies Based on Parity Doublet Model. Symmetry 2024, 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym16091238

    2024 doi

  75. [83]

    Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Using Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817

    Li, B.A.; Cai, B.J.; Xie, W.J.; Zhang, N.B. Progress in Constraining Nuclear Symmetry Energy Using Neutron Star Observables Since GW170817. Universe2021, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7060182

    doi

  76. [84]

    Skyrme interaction and nuclear matter constraints

    Dutra, M.; Lourenco, O.; Sá Martins, J.S.; Delfino, A.; Stone, J.R.; Stevenson, P .D. Skyrme interaction and nuclear matter constraints. Phys. Rev. C2012, 85, 035201. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.035201

    doi

  77. [85]

    Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817

    Abbott et al., B.P . Properties of the Binary Neutron Star Merger GW170817. Physical Review X 2019, 9. https://doi.org/10.1103/ physrevx.9.011001

    2019

  78. [86]

    A Study of Effects from a0(980) Meson to Asymmetric Matter Based on a Parity Doublet Model

    Yukkei KONG, M.H. A Study of Effects from a0(980) Meson to Asymmetric Matter Based on a Parity Doublet Model. Nuclear Physics Review2024, 41, 787–793. https://doi.org/10.11804/NuclPhysRev.41.QCS2023.04. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:The statements, opinions and data contained in...

    doi

  79. [2021]

    [arXiv:astro-ph.HE/2105.06980]

    arXiv

  80. [2025]

    [arXiv:nucl-th/2502.17859]

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.