Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

TinyML Security: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Resource-Constrained Machine Learning Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.07114 v1 pith:Q5VMHM5F submitted 2024-11-11 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords tinymlsecuritydeviceslearningmachinesolutionssystemscomputing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Tiny Machine Learning (TinyML) systems, which enable machine learning inference on highly resource-constrained devices, are transforming edge computing but encounter unique security challenges. These devices, restricted by RAM and CPU capabilities two to three orders of magnitude smaller than conventional systems, make traditional software and hardware security solutions impractical. The physical accessibility of these devices exacerbates their susceptibility to side-channel attacks and information leakage. Additionally, TinyML models pose security risks, with weights potentially encoding sensitive data and query interfaces that can be exploited. This paper offers the first thorough survey of TinyML security threats. We present a device taxonomy that differentiates between IoT, EdgeML, and TinyML, highlighting vulnerabilities unique to TinyML. We list various attack vectors, assess their threat levels using the Common Vulnerability Scoring System, and evaluate both existing and possible defenses. Our analysis identifies where traditional security measures are adequate and where solutions tailored to TinyML are essential. Our results underscore the pressing need for specialized security solutions in TinyML to ensure robust and secure edge computing applications. We aim to inform the research community and inspire innovative approaches to protecting this rapidly evolving and critical field.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. How Breakable Is Privacy: Probing and Resisting Model Inversion Attacks in Collaborative Inference

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A mutual-information-based criterion, Dmia, predicts model inversion attack difficulty in collaborative inference, and the SiftFunnel defense suppresses the criterion's factors to raise reconstruction error with only ...

Pith tools