Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Investigating the effect of non-resonant background variation on the CARS data analysis and classification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2406.17829 v1 pith:Q6AL4AX6 submitted 2024-06-25 physics.optics physics.data-anstat.AP

Investigating the effect of non-resonant background variation on the CARS data analysis and classification

classification physics.optics physics.data-anstat.AP
keywords carsramandatadifferentanalysisbackgroundlstmmethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
read the original abstract

: Non-resonant background (NRB) plays a significant role in coherent anti-Stokes Raman scattering (CARS) spectroscopic applications. All the recent works primarily focused on removing the NRB using different deep learning methods, and only one study explored the effect of NRB. Hence, in this work, we systematically investigated the impact of NRB variation on Raman signal retrieval. The NRB is simulated as a linear function with different strengths relative to the resonant Raman signal, and the variance also changed for each NRB strength. The resonant part of nonlinear susceptibility is extracted from real experimental Raman data; hence, the simulated CARS data better approximate the experimental CARS spectra. Then, the corresponding Raman signal is retrieved by four different methods: maximum entropy method (MEM), Kramers-Kronig (KK), convolutional neural network (CNN), and long short-term memory (LSTM) network. Pearson correlation measurements and principal component analysis combined with linear discriminant analysis (PCA-LDA) modelling revealed that MEM and KK methods have an edge over LSTM and CNN for higher NRB strengths. It is also demonstrated that normalizing the input data favors LSTM and CNN predictions. In contrast, background removal from the predictions significantly influenced Pearson correlation but not the classification accuracies for MEM and KK. This comprehensive study is done for the first time to the best of our knowledge and has the potential to impact the CARS spectroscopy and microscopy applications in different areas.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.