REVIEW 1 cited by
Six indications of radical new physics in supernovae Ia
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
After more than forty years since the basic standard model for supernovae Ia was proposed many astronomers are still hopeful that this phenomenon will ultimately be understood in terms of Newtonian gravity plus nuclear and particle physics as they existed in the 1930's. In spite of this fact there are at least six nagging puzzles in supernova physics that suggest some radical new physics input may be necessary. "Radical" in this context means a physics idea that did not exist in the 1930's and that is still not experimentally confirmed in 2017.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Extending the susy model to core-collapse supernovae
With one new tuned parameter, the paper claims a single supersymmetric phase transition can explain both Type Ia and core-collapse supernovae, heavy element production, and the black hole mass gap.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.