Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

On Two XAI Cultures: A Case Study of Non-technical Explanations in Deployed AI System

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2112.01016 v1 pith:QBGOEAP4 submitted 2021-12-02 cs.HC cs.AIcs.CY

classification cs.HCcs.AIcs.CY
keywords non-technicalcaseexpertsstakeholdersculturesdecisionsdeployedexplainable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

Explainable AI (XAI) research has been booming, but the question "$\textbf{To whom}$ are we making AI explainable?" is yet to gain sufficient attention. Not much of XAI is comprehensible to non-AI experts, who nonetheless, are the primary audience and major stakeholders of deployed AI systems in practice. The gap is glaring: what is considered "explained" to AI-experts versus non-experts are very different in practical scenarios. Hence, this gap produced two distinct cultures of expectations, goals, and forms of XAI in real-life AI deployments. We advocate that it is critical to develop XAI methods for non-technical audiences. We then present a real-life case study, where AI experts provided non-technical explanations of AI decisions to non-technical stakeholders, and completed a successful deployment in a highly regulated industry. We then synthesize lessons learned from the case, and share a list of suggestions for AI experts to consider when explaining AI decisions to non-technical stakeholders.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Explingo: Explaining AI Predictions using Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Explingo uses GPT-4o to convert SHAP explanations into natural-language narratives and to grade them on four quality metrics, with a few exemplars improving style but nudging correctness down.

Pith tools