REVIEW 1 cited by
$\Lambda_c N$ interaction from lattice QCD and its application to $\Lambda_c$ hypernuclei
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
The interaction between $\Lambda_c$ and a nucleon ($N$) is investigated by employing the HAL QCD method in the (2+1)-flavor lattice QCD on a $(2.9~\mathrm{fm})^3$ volume at $m_\pi \simeq 410,~570,~700$ MeV. We study the central potential in $^1S_0$ channel as well as central and tensor potentials in $^3S_1 - $$^3D_1$ channel, and find that the tensor potential for $\Lambda_c N$ is negligibly weak and central potentials in both $^1S_0$ and $^3S_1 - $$^3D_1$ channels are almost identical with each other except at short distances. Phase shifts and scattering lengths calculated with these potentials show that the interaction of $\Lambda_c N$ system is attractive and has a similar strength in $^1S_0$ and $^3S_1$ channels at low energies (i.e. the kinetic energy less than about $40$ MeV). While the attractions are not strong enough to form two-body bound states, our results lead to a possibility to form $\Lambda_c$ hypernuclei for sufficiently large atomic numbers ($A$). To demonstrate this, we derive a single-folding potential for $\Lambda_c$ hypernuclei from the $\Lambda_c$-nucleon potential obtained in lattice QCD, and find that $\Lambda_c$ hypernuclei can exist for $A \ge 12$ with the binding energies of a few MeV. We also estimate the Coulomb effect for the $\Lambda_c$ hypernuclei.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Hermitizing the HAL QCD potential in the derivative expansion
A formalism is given to convert the non-Hermitian HAL QCD potential into a Hermitian one order by order, with exact treatment at next-to-leading order, and the NLO correction for Xi-Xi(1S0) is small.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.