REVIEW 3 cited by
Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Tasks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Instruction tuning (IT) achieves impressive zero-shot generalization results by training large language models (LLMs) on a massive amount of diverse tasks with instructions. However, how to select new tasks to improve the performance and generalizability of IT models remains an open question. Training on all existing tasks is impractical due to prohibiting computation requirements, and randomly selecting tasks can lead to suboptimal performance. In this work, we propose active instruction tuning based on prompt uncertainty, a novel framework to identify informative tasks, and then actively tune the models on the selected tasks. We represent the informativeness of new tasks with the disagreement of the current model outputs over perturbed prompts. Our experiments on NIV2 and Self-Instruct datasets demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms other baseline strategies for task selection, achieving better out-of-distribution generalization with fewer training tasks. Additionally, we introduce a task map that categorizes and diagnoses tasks based on prompt uncertainty and prediction probability. We discover that training on ambiguous (prompt-uncertain) tasks improves generalization while training on difficult (prompt-certain and low-probability) tasks offers no benefit, underscoring the importance of task selection for instruction tuning.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
ART: Adaptive Relation Tuning for Generalized Relation Prediction
ART adapts VLMs for visual relation classification via instruction tuning with adaptive, uncertainty-based instance selection, improving generalization to unseen and rare relations.
-
Towards Objective Fine-tuning: How LLMs' Prior Knowledge Causes Potential Poor Calibration?
Fine-tuning on data aligned with an LLM's prior knowledge induces overconfidence, and CogCalib mitigates this by gating a calibration loss to known data.
-
Improving Task Diversity in Label Efficient Supervised Finetuning of LLMs
Weighted Task Diversity allocates the annotation budget across tasks in inverse proportion to the base model's average confidence, improving MMLU and AlpacaEval scores with up to 80% fewer labels.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.