Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Active Instruction Tuning: Improving Cross-Task Generalization by Training on Prompt Sensitive Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2311.00288 v1 pith:QC7OMTF3 submitted 2023-11-01 cs.CL cs.AI

classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords taskstraininggeneralizationinstructiontuningmodelsprompttask
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Instruction tuning (IT) achieves impressive zero-shot generalization results by training large language models (LLMs) on a massive amount of diverse tasks with instructions. However, how to select new tasks to improve the performance and generalizability of IT models remains an open question. Training on all existing tasks is impractical due to prohibiting computation requirements, and randomly selecting tasks can lead to suboptimal performance. In this work, we propose active instruction tuning based on prompt uncertainty, a novel framework to identify informative tasks, and then actively tune the models on the selected tasks. We represent the informativeness of new tasks with the disagreement of the current model outputs over perturbed prompts. Our experiments on NIV2 and Self-Instruct datasets demonstrate that our method consistently outperforms other baseline strategies for task selection, achieving better out-of-distribution generalization with fewer training tasks. Additionally, we introduce a task map that categorizes and diagnoses tasks based on prompt uncertainty and prediction probability. We discover that training on ambiguous (prompt-uncertain) tasks improves generalization while training on difficult (prompt-certain and low-probability) tasks offers no benefit, underscoring the importance of task selection for instruction tuning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. ART: Adaptive Relation Tuning for Generalized Relation Prediction

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    ART adapts VLMs for visual relation classification via instruction tuning with adaptive, uncertainty-based instance selection, improving generalization to unseen and rare relations.

  2. Towards Objective Fine-tuning: How LLMs' Prior Knowledge Causes Potential Poor Calibration?

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning on data aligned with an LLM's prior knowledge induces overconfidence, and CogCalib mitigates this by gating a calibration loss to known data.

  3. Improving Task Diversity in Label Efficient Supervised Finetuning of LLMs

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Weighted Task Diversity allocates the annotation budget across tasks in inverse proportion to the base model's average confidence, improving MMLU and AlpacaEval scores with up to 80% fewer labels.

Pith tools