pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28858 · v1 · pith:QDKIDKHGnew · submitted 2026-06-27 · ✦ hep-th

Axions on de Sitter space

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 08:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords compact scalarde Sitter quantizationzero modeU(1) chargeHadamard statesmagnetic monopolespath integraldS invariance
0
0 comments X

The pith

A compact axion on global de Sitter space yields a Hilbert space L²(S¹) ⊗ F where the zero-mode rotor supplies a conserved U(1) charge.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper quantizes a massless minimally coupled compact scalar on global dS_D by canonical methods and isolates the zero mode as a quantum rotor on a circle. Its integer momentum is identified with the U(1) shift charge, so the full space factors as L²(S¹) ⊗ F with F the oscillator Fock space. The neutral zero-particle state built this way is normalizable and invariant under the complete SO(D,1) group, while charged zero-particle states are normalizable but invariant only under SO(D) rotations. This produces a disagreement on particle number between geodesic observers related by boosts, an effect absent when the scalar is non-compact. The authors also evaluate the charged-sector Wightman functions, confirm they are Hadamard, and show that a Euclidean sphere path integral decorated by vertex operators recovers the full space via an extra quantum-rotor partition function.

Core claim

The axion zero mode on global dS_D supplies an additional L²(S¹) factor to the Hilbert space beyond the Fock space of oscillators. The integer momentum on this circle is identified with the conserved U(1) shift symmetry charge. The neutral zero-particle state built from this construction is both normalizable and invariant under the full SO(D,1) de Sitter group, whereas charged zero-particle states are normalizable but invariant only under the SO(D) rotations. This leads to observer-dependent particle numbers in charged sectors under de Sitter boosts.

What carries the argument

The quantum rotor arising from the compact zero mode of the scalar field, whose wavefunctions live on S¹ and whose momentum generates the U(1) shift charge.

If this is right

  • The standard one-particle UIR of SO(D,1) captures only the oscillator sector and misses the zero-mode contribution.
  • Field-strength Wightman two-point functions in charged sectors remain Hadamard but are invariant under the full de Sitter group only at asymptotically early and late times.
  • In dS₃ the axion-photon duality maps the zero-mode charge to magnetic monopoles.
  • The ordinary sphere path integral Z_{S^D} accesses only the neutral sector; charged sectors require vertex-operator insertions whose sum produces the decorated integral Z_QM Z_{S^D}.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The construction suggests that any compact field whose zero mode survives on a compact spatial slice will introduce similar charge sectors and observer dependence on de Sitter.
  • Late-time correlation functions in charged sectors may carry a residual imprint of the early-time non-invariance even after asymptotic restoration of symmetry.
  • The Euclidean decoration by vertex operators provides a concrete way to include topological charges when computing partition functions on spheres or other compact manifolds.

Load-bearing premise

The scalar must be compact so that its zero mode can be quantized as a quantum rotor on a circle, and canonical quantization on global dS_D must cleanly separate this mode from the oscillator sector.

What would settle it

An explicit computation of the action of a de Sitter boost generator on a charged zero-particle state, checking whether the state remains normalizable and invariant or acquires a non-trivial transformation.

read the original abstract

We study a massless minimally coupled compact scalar, or axion, on global $D$-dimensional de Sitter space (dS$_D$). We quantise the theory canonically, determine the quantum dS charges, and find that the axion zero mode supplies a quantum-mechanical factor beyond the oscillator Fock space, $\mathcal{F}$. The full Hilbert space is $\mathcal{H}=L^2(S^1)\otimes\mathcal{F}$, with the integer quantum-mechanical momentum on $L^2(S^1)$ identified with the conserved $\mathrm{U}(1)$ shift charge. The 1-particle unitary irreducible representation (UIR) of the dS group, $\mathrm{SO}(D,1)$, captures the oscillator sector, but misses the zero mode. We find that the neutral 0-particle state is dS-invariant and normalisable. Charged 0-particle states are normalisable, but only $\mathrm{SO}(D)$ invariant. This implies that geodesic observers related by dS boosts do not agree on the particle number in a charged sector, an effect absent in QFTs equipped only with the standard Bunch-Davies vacuum. We compute field-strength Wightman 2-point functions in charged sectors and find that they are Hadamard. For non-zero charge they are not dS-invariant at finite global times, but they are asymptotically so at early and late times. We complement this analysis with a Euclidean perspective. The ordinary $D$-sphere path integral, $Z_{S^D}$, written in terms of Harish-Chandra characters, has access only to the neutral sector. Charged sectors require vertex-operator insertions, and summing over them gives a decorated sphere path integral, $\widehat{Z}_{S^D}=Z_\text{QM}\,Z_{S^D}$, that captures the entire Hilbert space, with $Z_\text{QM}$ denoting the partition function of a quantum rotor at a dimension-dependent effective temperature. Finally, in dS$_3$, we use the duality between an axion and a photon to translate our results to electromagnetism, where the axion zero mode gives rise to magnetic monopoles.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript quantizes a compact massless minimally coupled scalar (axion) on global dS_D via canonical methods on a fixed-t Cauchy slice. The zero mode is isolated and quantized as a quantum rotor on S^1, yielding the full Hilbert space H = L^2(S^1) ⊗ F with the integer momentum on L^2(S^1) identified as the conserved U(1) shift charge. The neutral 0-particle state (constant function on S^1 tensored with Fock vacuum) is claimed to be dS-invariant and normalizable, while charged 0-particle states are normalizable but only SO(D)-invariant. Field-strength Wightman functions in charged sectors are computed and shown to be Hadamard (though not dS-invariant at finite global times, becoming so asymptotically). The Euclidean analysis decorates the S^D path integral with vertex operators to capture charged sectors, yielding a product Z_QM Z_{S^D} with Z_QM the partition function of a quantum rotor at a dimension-dependent temperature. In dS_3 the results are dualized to electromagnetism, with the axion zero mode corresponding to magnetic monopoles.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work provides a concrete Hilbert-space completion for compact scalars on de Sitter that goes beyond the standard oscillator Fock space and Bunch-Davies vacuum. The distinction between neutral and charged sectors with respect to full SO(D,1) invariance, the explicit Hadamard verification, and the Euclidean matching via vertex operators are technically useful. The dS_3–EM duality application supplies a falsifiable link to monopole physics. These elements are grounded in standard quantization and character formulas with no free parameters or ad-hoc axioms introduced.

major comments (1)
  1. [section determining the quantum dS charges and UIR analysis] The decomposition H = L^2(S^1) ⊗ F and the claim that the neutral state is annihilated by the full set of SO(D,1) generators (including boosts) is load-bearing for the normalizability, invariance, and observer-disagreement statements. The zero mode is isolated by spatial averaging on a fixed-t global slice; boosts do not preserve this foliation. The manuscript must show explicitly how the boost generators act on the L^2(S^1) factor (or on the constant function) to preserve dS invariance of the neutral state while leaving charged states only SO(D)-invariant. Without this step the covariance of the claimed results is not established.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract states that the quantum rotor has a 'dimension-dependent effective temperature'; an explicit expression for this temperature (or the precise relation to the sphere radius) would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [section determining the quantum dS charges and UIR analysis] The decomposition H = L^2(S^1) ⊗ F and the claim that the neutral state is annihilated by the full set of SO(D,1) generators (including boosts) is load-bearing for the normalizability, invariance, and observer-disagreement statements. The zero mode is isolated by spatial averaging on a fixed-t global slice; boosts do not preserve this foliation. The manuscript must show explicitly how the boost generators act on the L^2(S^1) factor (or on the constant function) to preserve dS invariance of the neutral state while leaving charged states only SO(D)-invariant. Without this step the covariance of the claimed results is not established.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the action of the boost generators on the L^2(S^1) factor is necessary to rigorously establish covariance. The manuscript derives the decomposition from canonical quantization on a fixed-t slice and identifies the integer momentum with the conserved U(1) charge, which is preserved by the full SO(D,1) isometry group because the underlying shift symmetry commutes with the de Sitter Killing vectors. Consequently the neutral state (constant function on S^1) is annihilated by all generators, while charged states transform only under the SO(D) subgroup. In the revised manuscript we will add an explicit computation in the quantum dS charges section: the boost generators, constructed from the stress-energy tensor, act trivially on the zero-charge sector of L^2(S^1) and as first-order differential operators on non-zero charge wavefunctions, confirming the stated invariance properties. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation is self-contained via canonical quantization

full rationale

The paper derives the Hilbert space decomposition H = L^2(S^1) ⊗ F directly from canonical quantization of the compact scalar on global dS_D, isolating the zero mode via spatial averaging and quantizing its conjugate momentum as a rotor. The dS charges, normalizability statements, Wightman functions, and Euclidean matching via characters and vertex operators follow from the mode expansion, commutation relations, and Harish-Chandra character formulas without any reduction to fitted parameters, self-definitional loops, or load-bearing self-citations. The neutral state invariance and charged-sector properties are computed outputs, not inputs renamed as predictions. The approach is standard and externally benchmarkable against known QFT on dS results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The analysis rests on standard domain assumptions of QFT on curved spacetime without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Canonical quantization applies to a massless minimally coupled compact scalar on global dS_D and separates zero mode from oscillator modes
    Invoked to obtain the Hilbert space decomposition and conserved U(1) charge.
  • domain assumption The dS group SO(D,1) acts via unitary irreducible representations on the oscillator sector
    Used to identify which states are dS-invariant.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5928 in / 1480 out tokens · 32366 ms · 2026-06-30T08:54:50.681823+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

125 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 31 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    A. D. Linde.A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B 108 (1982). Ed. byL.-Z. FangandR. Ruffini, 389–393

  2. [2]

    Planck Collaboration.Planck 2018 Results. VI. Cosmological Parameters, Astronomy & Astrophysics 641 (2020), A6

  3. [3]

    Suzukiet al.The Hubble Space Telescope Cluster Supernova Survey

    N. Suzukiet al.The Hubble Space Telescope Cluster Supernova Survey. V. Improving the Dark-Energy Constraints Above z > 1and Building an Early-Type-Hosted Supernova Sample, The Astrophysical Journal 746 (2012), 85

  4. [4]

    https://www

    Sloan Digital Sky Survey.Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). https://www. sdss.org. (2024)

  5. [5]

    S. Coleet al.The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Power-Spectrum Analysis of the Final Data Set and Cosmological Implications, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 362.2 (2005), 505–534

  6. [6]

    Quantum Gravity In De Sitter Space

    E. Witten.Quantum Gravity in de Sitter Space.Strings 2001: International Conference. (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0106109 [hep-th]

  7. [7]

    Anninos.De Sitter Musings, International Journal of Modern Physics A 27 (2012), 1230013

    D. Anninos.De Sitter Musings, International Journal of Modern Physics A 27 (2012), 1230013. [9]B. Allen.Vacuum States in de Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D 32 (1985), 3136

  8. [8]

    AllenandA

    B. AllenandA. Folacci.The Massless Minimally Coupled Scalar Field in De Sitter Space, Phys. Rev. D 35 (1987), 3771

  9. [9]

    Massless Minimally Coupled Fields in De Sitter Space: O(4)-Symmetric States Versus De Sitter Invariant Vacuum

    K. KirstenandJ. Garriga.Massless minimally coupled fields in de Sitter space: O(4) symmetric states versus de Sitter invariant vacuum, Phys. Rev. D 48 (1993), 567–577. arXiv:gr-qc/9305013

  10. [10]

    Gibbons,A

    J. Gibbons,A. Higuchi, andW. C. C. Lima.Infrared problem in the Faddeev- Popov-ghost propagator in perturbative quantum gravity in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 103.6 (2021), 065016. arXiv:2101.07268 [gr-qc]

  11. [11]

    A. J. TolleyandN. Turok.Quantization of the massless minimally coupled scalar field and the dS / CFT correspondence, (2001). arXiv:hep-th/0108119

  12. [12]

    Cosmic Clustering

    D. AnninosandF. Denef.Cosmic Clustering, JHEP 06 (2016), 181. arXiv: 1111.6061 [hep-th]

  13. [13]

    ChakrabortyandJ

    P. ChakrabortyandJ. Stout.Compact scalars at the cosmological collider, JHEP 03 (2024), 149. arXiv:2311.09219 [hep-th]

  14. [14]

    A Compact Story of Positivity in de Sitter

    P. Chakraborty,T. Cohen,D. Green, andY. Huang.A Compact Story of Positivity in de Sitter, (2025). arXiv:2508.08359 [hep-th]

  15. [15]

    Freese,J

    K. Freese,J. A. Frieman, andA. V. Olinto.Natural inflation with pseudo- Nambu-Goldstone bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990), 3233–3236

  16. [16]

    Extranatural Inflation

    N. Arkani-Hamed,H. -C. Cheng,P. Creminelli, andL. Randall.Extra natural inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003), 221302. arXiv:hep-th/0301218

  17. [17]

    Arvanitaki,S

    A. Arvanitaki,S. Dimopoulos,S. Dubovsky,N. Kaloper, andJ. March- Russell.String Axiverse, Phys. Rev. D 81 (2010), 123530. arXiv: 0905 . 4720 [hep-th]. 39

  18. [18]

    Higuchi.Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on the N Sphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO(N, 1), J

    A. Higuchi.Symmetric Tensor Spherical Harmonics on the N Sphere and Their Application to the De Sitter Group SO(N, 1), J. Math. Phys. 28 (1987). [Erratum: J.Math.Phys. 43, 6385 (2002)], 1553

  19. [19]

    Higuchi.Quantum fields of nonzero spin in de Sitter space-time

    A. Higuchi.Quantum fields of nonzero spin in de Sitter space-time. PhD thesis. (1987)

  20. [20]

    Loparco,J

    M. Loparco,J. Penedones, andY. Ulrich.What is a photon in de Sitter spacetime?, JHEP 02 (2026), 220. arXiv:2505.00761 [hep-th]

  21. [21]

    Ratra.Restoration of spontaneously broken continuous symmetries in de Sitter spacetime, Phys

    B. Ratra.Restoration of spontaneously broken continuous symmetries in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 31 8 (1985)

  22. [22]

    L. H. FordandA. Vilenkin.Global symmetry breaking in two-dimensional flat spacetime and in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 33 10 (1986)

  23. [23]

    Spontaneous symmetry breaking in inflationary cosmology: on the fate of Goldstone Bosons

    D. Boyanovsky.Spontaneous symmetry breaking in inflationary cosmology: on the fate of Goldstone Bosons, Phys. Rev. D 86 (2012), 023509. arXiv: 1205.3761 [astro-ph.CO]

  24. [24]

    Global Aspects of Abelian Duality in Dimension Three

    C. Beasley.Global Aspects of Abelian Duality in Dimension Three, JHEP 08 (2014), 146. arXiv:1405.2123 [hep-th]

  25. [25]

    Electromagnetic Duality and Entanglement Anomalies

    W. Donnelly,B. Michel, andA. Wall.Electromagnetic duality and entan- glement anomalies, Physical Review D 96.4 (2017), 045008. arXiv: 1611.05920 [hep-th]

  26. [26]

    Witten.Duality and Axion Wormholes, (2026)

    E. Witten.Duality and Axion Wormholes, (2026). arXiv: 2601.01587 [hep-th]

  27. [27]

    A. M. Polyakov.Quark confinement and topology of gauge theories, Nucl. Phys. B 120 (1977), 429–458

  28. [28]

    R. D. PecceiandH. R. Quinn.CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977), 1440–1443

  29. [29]

    R. D. PecceiandH. R. Quinn.Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D 16 (1977), 1791–1797

  30. [30]

    Wilczek.Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek.Problem of Strong P and T Invariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978), 279–282. [33]S. Weinberg.A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978), 223–226

  31. [31]

    Vacalis,A

    G. Vacalis,A. Higuchi,R. Bingham, andG. Gregori.Proposal to Use Laser- Accelerated Electrons to Probe the Axion-Electron Coupling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 135.19 (2025), 195003. arXiv:2510.20625 [hep-ph]

  32. [32]

    Preskill,M

    J. Preskill,M. B. Wise, andF. Wilczek.Cosmology of the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983). Ed. byM. A. Srednicki, 127–132

  33. [33]

    L. F. AbbottandP. Sikivie.A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983). Ed. byM. A. Srednicki, 133–136

  34. [34]

    DineandW

    M. DineandW. Fischler.The Not So Harmless Axion, Phys. Lett. B 120 (1983). Ed. byM. A. Srednicki, 137–141

  35. [35]

    P. G. Harriset al.New experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999), 904–907

  36. [36]

    M. V. Romalis,W. C. Griffith, andE. N. Fortson.A New limit on the permanent electric dipole moment of Hg-199, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001), 2505–2508. arXiv:hep-ex/0012001. 40

  37. [37]

    Abelet al.Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys

    C. Abelet al.Measurement of the Permanent Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124.8 (2020), 081803. arXiv:2001.11966 [hep-ex]

  38. [38]

    Axions In String Theory

    P. SvrcekandE. Witten.Axions In String Theory, JHEP 06 (2006), 051. arXiv: hep-th/0605206

  39. [39]

    VafaandE

    C. VafaandE. Witten.Parity Conservation in Quantum Chromodynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984), 535

  40. [40]

    S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory

    D. GaiottoandE. Witten.S-Duality of Boundary Conditions In N=4 Super Yang-Mills Theory, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 13.3 (2009), 721–896. arXiv:0807.3720 [hep-th]

  41. [41]

    Garc´ıa-Valdecasas.Non-invertible symmetries in supergravity, JHEP 04 (2023), 102

    E. Garc´ıa-Valdecasas.Non-invertible symmetries in supergravity, JHEP 04 (2023), 102. arXiv:2301.00777 [hep-th]

  42. [42]

    D-brane Instantons in Type II String Theory

    R. Blumenhagen,M. Cveti ˇc,S. Kachru, andT. Weigand.D-brane Instantons in Type II Orientifolds, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 59 (2009), 269–296. arXiv: 0902.3251 [hep-th]

  43. [43]

    de Sitter Vacua in String Theory

    S. Kachru,R. Kallosh,A. D. Linde, andS. P. Trivedi.de Sitter Vacua in String Theory, Phys. Rev. D 68 (2003), 046005. arXiv: hep-th/0301240 [hep-th]

  44. [44]

    X.-G. WenandE. Witten.World Sheet Instantons and the Peccei-Quinn Sym- metry, Phys. Lett. B 166 (1986), 397–401. [48]V. Guidetti,N. Righi,V. Venken, andA. Westphal.Axionic Festina Lente, JHEP 01 (2023), 114. arXiv:2206.03494 [hep-th]

  45. [45]

    Balasubramanian,P

    V. Balasubramanian,P. Berglund,J. P. Conlon, andF. Quevedo.System- atics of moduli stabilisation in Calabi-Yau flux compactifications, JHEP 03 (2005),

  46. [46]

    arXiv:hep-th/0502058

  47. [47]

    Anninos,D

    D. Anninos,D. M. Hofman, andS. Vitouladitis.One-dimensional Quantum Gravity and the Schwarzian theory, JHEP 03 (2022), 121. arXiv: 2112 . 03793 [hep-th]

  48. [48]

    Anninos,T

    D. Anninos,T. Anous,B. Pethybridge, andG. S ¸eng¨or.The discreet charm of the discrete series in dS 2, J. Phys. A 57.2 (2024), 025401. arXiv: 2307.15832 [hep-th]

  49. [49]

    Argurio,A

    R. Argurio,A. Collinucci,G. Galati,O. Hulik, andE. Paznokas.Non- invertible T-duality at any radius via non-compact SymTFT, SciPost Phys. 18.3 (2025), 089. arXiv:2409.11822 [hep-th]

  50. [50]

    S. R. Coleman.Quantum sine-Gordon equation as the massive Thirring model, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975), 2088

  51. [51]

    Mandelstam.Soliton operators for the quantized sine-Gordon equation, Phys

    S. Mandelstam.Soliton operators for the quantized sine-Gordon equation, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975), 3026

  52. [52]

    A. Karch,D. Tong, andC. Turner.A Web of 2d Dualities:Z 2 Gauge Fields and Arf Invariants, SciPost Phys. 7.1 (2019), 007. arXiv:1902.05550 [hep-th]

  53. [53]

    Anninos,T

    D. Anninos,T. Anous, andA. Rios Fukelman.De Sitter at all loops: the story of the Schwinger model, JHEP 08 (2024), 155. arXiv:2403.16166 [hep-th]

  54. [54]

    de Sitter Vacua & pUniverses

    J. Aguilera-Damia,D. Anninos,T. Anous,J. Gleeson, andA. Rios Fukel- man.de Sitter Vacua & pUniverses, (2026). arXiv:2605.02883 [hep-th]. [58]G. GalatiandS. Vitouladitis, to appear (2026)

  55. [55]

    J. M. KosterlitzandD. J. Thouless.Ordering, metastability and phase transi- tions in two-dimensional systems, J. Phys. C 6 (1973), 1181–1203. 41

  56. [56]

    Savit.Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems, Rev

    R. Savit.Duality in Field Theory and Statistical Systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980), 453

  57. [57]

    Villain.Theory of one-dimensional and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane

    J. Villain.Theory of one-dimensional and two-dimensional magnets with an easy magnetization plane. 2. The Planar, classical, two-dimensional magnet, J. Phys. (France) 36 (1975), 581–590

  58. [58]

    Abelian gauge theories on the lattice: $\theta$-terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles

    T. SulejmanpasicandC. Gattringer.Abelian gauge theories on the lattice: θ-Terms and compact gauge theory with(out) monopoles, Nucl. Phys. B 943 (2019), 114616. arXiv:1901.02637 [hep-lat]

  59. [59]

    Gorantla,H

    P. Gorantla,H. T. Lam,N. Seiberg, andS. -H. Shao.A modified Villain formulation of fractons and other exotic theories, J. Math. Phys. 62.10 (2021), 102301. arXiv:2103.01257 [cond-mat.str-el]

  60. [60]

    Lattice Realizations of Flat Gauging and T-duality Defects at Any Radius

    R. Argurio,G. Galati, andN. Godechal.Lattice Realizations of Flat Gauging and T-duality Defects at Any Radius, (2026). arXiv:2604.09126 [hep-th]

  61. [61]

    C. Bacq,A. Caddeo,S. Demulder, andJ. Erdmenger.Stringy T-duality on the lattice and the twisted Villain model, (2026). arXiv:2605.19925 [hep-th]

  62. [62]

    Removing the Faddeev-Popov zero modes from Yang-Mills theory in spacetimes with compact spatial sections

    J. GibbonsandA. Higuchi.Removing the Faddeev-Popov zero modes from Yang- Mills theory in spacetimes with compact spatial sections, Phys. Rev. D 91.2 (2015), 024006. arXiv:1410.7830 [hep-th]

  63. [63]

    V. A. Letsios,M. N. Semp ´e, andG. A. Silva.Spinning fields on Sd and dSd, unitary irreducible representations, and ladder operators, Phys. Rev. D 111.2 (2025), 025018. arXiv:2410.10964 [hep-th]

  64. [64]

    de Sitter tachyons and related topics

    H. EpsteinandU. Moschella.de Sitter tachyons and related topics, Commun. Math. Phys. 336.1 (2015), 381–430. arXiv:1403.3319 [hep-th]

  65. [65]

    Massless scalar field in two-dimensional de Sitter universe

    M. Bertola,F. Corbetta, andU. Moschella.Massless scalar field in two- dimensional de Sitter universe, Prog. Math. 251 (2007). Ed. byA. Boutet de Monvel,D. Buchholz,D. Iagolnitzer, andU. Moschella, 27–38. arXiv: math-ph/0609080

  66. [66]

    SchomblondandP

    C. SchomblondandP. Spindel.Conditions d’unicit´ e pour le propagateur∆ 1(x,y ) du champ scalaire dans l’univers de de Sitter, fr. Annales de l’institut Henri Poincar´ e. Section A, Physique Th´ eorique 25.1 (1976), 67–78

  67. [67]

    N. A. ChernikovandE. A. Tagirov.Quantum theory of scalar field in de Sitter space-time, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A 9.2 (1968), 109–141

  68. [68]

    Camporesi.Harmonic analysis and propagators on homogeneous spaces, Phys

    R. Camporesi.Harmonic analysis and propagators on homogeneous spaces, Phys. Rept. 196 (1990), 1–134

  69. [69]

    T. S. BunchandP. C. W. Davies.Quantum Field Theory in de Sitter Space: Renormalization by Point Splitting, Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond. A 360 (1978), 117–134

  70. [70]

    Group Averaging for de Sitter free fields

    D. MarolfandI. A. Morrison.Group Averaging for de Sitter free fields, Class. Quant. Grav. 26 (2009), 235003. arXiv:0810.5163 [gr-qc]

  71. [71]

    Higuchi.Linearized gravity in de Sitter space-time as a representation of SO(4,1), Class

    A. Higuchi.Linearized gravity in de Sitter space-time as a representation of SO(4,1), Class. Quant. Grav. 8 (1991), 2005–2021

  72. [72]

    The physical graviton two-point function in de Sitter spacetime with S^3 spatial sections

    A. HiguchiandR. H. Weeks.The Physical graviton two point function in de Sitter space-time with S3 spatial sections, Class. Quant. Grav. 20 (2003), 3005–3022. arXiv:gr-qc/0212031

  73. [73]

    V. A. Letsios.The eigenmodes for spinor quantum field theory in global de Sitter space–time, J. Math. Phys. 62.3 (2021), 032303. arXiv:2011.07875 [gr-qc]. 42

  74. [74]

    C. J. FewsterandR. Verch.The Necessity of the Hadamard Condition, Class. Quant. Grav. 30 (2013), 235027. arXiv:1307.5242 [gr-qc]

  75. [75]

    Anastopoulos.Quantum Theory: A Foundational Approach

    C. Anastopoulos.Quantum Theory: A Foundational Approach. Cambridge Uni- versity Press (2023)

  76. [76]

    Vitouladitis.Higher-form anomalies and state-operator correspondence beyond conformal invariance, SciPost Phys

    S. Vitouladitis.Higher-form anomalies and state-operator correspondence beyond conformal invariance, SciPost Phys. 20 (2026), 011. arXiv:2507.01104 [hep-th]

  77. [77]

    Benini,E

    F. Benini,E. Garc ´ıa-Valdecasas, andS. Vitouladitis.Higher-form entangle- ment asymmetry. Part I. The limits of symmetry breaking, JHEP 05 (2026), 202. arXiv:2512.15898 [hep-th]

  78. [78]

    Penedones,K

    J. Penedones,K. Salehi Vaziri, andZ. Sun.Hilbert space of quantum field theory in de Sitter spacetime, Phys. Rev. D 111.4 (2025), 045001. arXiv: 2301.04146 [hep-th]

  79. [79]

    V. A. Letsios.(Non-)unitarity of strictly and partially massless fermions on de Sitter space, JHEP 05 (2023), 015. arXiv:2303.00420 [hep-th]

  80. [80]

    De Sitter Representations

    K. Hinterbichler.De Sitter Representations, (2026). arXiv: 2606.26221 [hep-th]

Showing first 80 references.