Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Pseudorandom unitaries are neither real nor sparse nor noise-robust

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2306.11677 v4 pith:QEFBBFK2 submitted 2023-06-20 quant-ph cs.CCcs.CR

classification quant-phcs.CCcs.CR
keywords quantumprusstatesprsspseudorandomrealboundsefficient
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Pseudorandom quantum states (PRSs) and pseudorandom unitaries (PRUs) possess the dual nature of being efficiently constructible while appearing completely random to any efficient quantum algorithm. In this study, we establish fundamental bounds on pseudorandomness. We show that PRSs and PRUs exist only when the probability that an error occurs is negligible, ruling out their generation on noisy intermediate-scale and early fault-tolerant quantum computers. Further, we show that PRUs need imaginarity while PRS do not have this restriction. This implies that quantum randomness requires in general a complex-valued formalism of quantum mechanics, while for random quantum states real numbers suffice. Additionally, we derive lower bounds on the coherence of PRSs and PRUs, ruling out the existence of sparse PRUs and PRSs. We also show that the notions of PRS, PRUs and pseudorandom scramblers (PRSSs) are distinct in terms of resource requirements. We introduce the concept of pseudoresources, where states which contain a low amount of a given resource masquerade as high-resource states. We define pseudocoherence, pseudopurity and pseudoimaginarity, and identify three distinct types of pseudoresources in terms of their masquerading capabilities. Our work also establishes rigorous bounds on the efficiency of property testing, demonstrating the exponential complexity in distinguishing real quantum states from imaginary ones, in contrast to the efficient measurability of unitary imaginarity. Further, we show an exponential advantage in imaginarity testing when having access to the complex conjugate of the state. Lastly, we show that the transformation from a complex to a real model of quantum computation is inefficient, in contrast to the reverse process, which is efficient. Our results establish fundamental limits on property testing and provide valuable insights into quantum pseudorandomness.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Anticoncentration and State Design of Doped Real Clifford Circuits and Tensor Networks

    quant-ph 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Real stabilizer states follow a new "orthogonal Clifford Porter–Thomas" overlap distribution, reached by shallow real-Clifford circuits in log depth; one imaginary state recovers unitary-Clifford statistics, polylog m...

  2. Non-Clifford Cost of Random Unitaries

    quant-ph 2025-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rigorous bounds establish that t = Theta(k^2) non-Clifford gates are necessary and sufficient for frame-potential approximation to unitary k-designs while t = Theta(nk) suffices for relative-error k-designs.

  3. Efficient witnessing and testing of magic in mixed quantum states

    quant-ph 2025-04 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Efficient witnesses and testing algorithms based on stabilizer Rényi entropy certify and quantify magic in mixed states, with experimental demonstration on IonQ hardware showing robustness under strong noise.

Pith tools