Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 7 minor 47 references

ProsodyLM: Uncovering the Emerging Prosody Processing Capabilities in Speech Language Models

T0 review · 3 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read ProsodyLM shows that word-level prosody tokens let a text LLM learn focus, emotion, and style from pretraining alone.

desk verdict The word-level prosody token idea is new and the evaluation is broad, but the decoder-fidelity control and the statistics on small emotion effects need strengthening. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.20091 v2 pith:QFEHHBGW submitted 2025-07-27 cs.CL eess.AS

Kaizhi Qian , Xulin Fan , Junrui Ni , Slava Shechtman , Mark Hasegawa-Johnson , Chuang Gan , Yang Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLeess.AS
keywords prosodyspeechlanguagemodelsemergentabilitiestokenizationexpressivesynthesiscontrastivefocusemotionrecognitionconsistency
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

ProsodyLM claims that the reason speech large language models fail to pick up prosody is the tokenization, not the scale or the pretraining data. The paper proposes representing each utterance as its text transcription followed by word-level prosody tokens—five numbers per word for duration, pitch level, pitch range, pitch slope, and energy—and pretraining an 8-billion-parameter text LLM on roughly 30k hours of audiobooks in this hybrid format. After continual pretraining alone, with no task-specific fine-tuning, the model shows measurable prosody understanding and generation: it places contrastive focus on the right word in clarifications, recognizes emphasized words and five acted emotions from input speech, and carries style contrasts across speakers in long contexts. An ordinary LLM can therefore acquire surprisingly diverse prosody processing as an emergent capability if the speech is represented in a form the text model can read.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the prosody token stream: each utterance is a [Text] section followed by a [Prosody] section in which every word is followed by a five-dimensional vector, covering average phone duration, log-F0 range, log-F0 median, log-F0 slope, and log-energy. Each dimension is clipped, normalized, and quantized into 512 shared bins, and an optional global token encodes sentence-level prosody extremity. Because each dimension has a clear high/low meaning and the content is already separated as text, the LM does not have to re-align or re-infer what the tokens mean; the decoder then maps the chosen word-level values back to phone-level durations and frame-level F0 and energy through retrained predictors built on a pretrained TTS decoder.

What would settle it

Shuffle the word-level prosody tokens across the words of the reference utterances in the emphasis-detection setup: if the model's emphasis probability lift stays as large as with correctly aligned tokens, the measured understanding is not actually driven by the prosody tokens, and the central claim would collapse.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that interleaving text with explicit word-level prosody tokens is sufficient for a standard text LLM to develop prosody processing capabilities through next-token pretraining alone. The conventional alternative, feeding discrete acoustic or semantic codec tokens into the LLM, does not produce obvious emerging prosody skills at the same data budget. With the proposed scheme, the model learns three dependencies: content determines prosody (style following and contrastive focus), prosody determines content (emphasis and emotion detection shown through relative log-probability increases), and prosody shapes prosody (style copying across dialogue turns). The authors report that the model also slows down in clarification repeats, and that the hybrid tokenization barely increases text perplexity compared with a text-only model trained on the same audiobooks.

Load-bearing premise

The result depends on the audio-to-token and token-to-audio pipeline faithfully preserving real prosody; if that pipeline distorts or compresses the prosody contrasts, the measured skills could be overstated or misattributed.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Prosody understanding and prosody control can be trained with the same next-token prediction objective used for text, so new prosody benchmarks do not need task-specific fine-tuning.
  • A speech LM trained this way can read emphasis and emotion from a user's voice and use that to adjust its response, because the Prosody-to-Content dependency is learned during pretraining.
  • Expressive synthesis can be steered with ordinary style words such as "quickly" or "in a high voice," and the model realizes them as measurable pitch, duration, and energy differences.
  • The same architecture can handle long-form narration and dialogue, maintaining prosody consistency across sentences and speakers without an explicit style-conditioning module.
  • Content modeling is largely preserved: the hybrid token format raises perplexity on held-out audiobooks by only about two points relative to a text-only model fine-tuned on the same data.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The mechanism suggests that token legibility, not model scale alone, may be what unlocks prosody emergence; a much smaller LM with the same tokens would be a direct test of that hypothesis.
  • The paper's five prosody dimensions do not cover voice quality, which the authors state as a limitation; extending the same separable-token idea to voice quality or articulation rate is a natural next step, but it is not yet demonstrated.
  • The probability-lift metrics used for emphasis and emotion may understate the model's skill when content and prosody conflict; listener forced-choice tests on the synthesized audio would reveal whether the perceived prosody matches the measured token-level behavior.
  • Because pretraining is audiobook-only, conversational prosody such as question contours, backchannels, and repaired turns remains untested; showing the same emergence on spontaneous dialogue would be the strongest confirmation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper proposes ProsodyLM, a speech language model pre-trained on text interleaved with word-level prosody tokens (duration, log-F0 range/median/slope, log-energy). The authors claim that this tokenization scheme enables a standard text LLM (Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct, LoRA-tuned on 29.9k hours of Librilight audiobooks) to acquire diverse prosody processing capabilities through pre-training alone, without task-specific fine-tuning. The evaluation covers three dependency types: content-to-prosody (direct and indirect style following, contrastive focus in clarification dialogues), prosody-to-content (emphasis detection, emotion recognition), and prosody-to-prosody (dialogue style continuation), using acoustic metrics, listening tests, and comparisons with group-A (same training pipeline, different tokenizers) and group-B (commercial or stronger systems) baselines.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper is significant for the speech LM community: it demonstrates that a simple, interpretable prosody tokenization can elicit emerging prosody behaviors from a text LM, and it contributes a reusable evaluation suite covering three prosody-dependency categories. The paper includes objective acoustic measurements, MOS listening tests, ablations (global token, content-to-content capability retention), and audio demos, and the evaluations are zero-shot with respect to the target tasks, so circularity is low. However, the interpretation of the headline results depends on the fidelity of the StyleTTS2-derived encoder/decoder chain and on the statistical support for some of the smaller effects; both need strengthening before the claims can be fully credited.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Appendix B, Table 1] The central claim of emergent prosody processing is evaluated on synthetic audio produced by a modified StyleTTS2 decoder whose duration and prosody predictors are retrained to condition on the LM's word-level tokens (Eq. 2 in Appendix B). The manuscript does not report the decoder's fidelity: it never quantifies how faithfully the retrained predictors realize a given word-level prosody token sequence, nor does it provide an oracle-token control (feeding ground-truth word-level prosody tokens into the decoder and measuring the resulting F0, duration, and energy contrasts). Without such a control, the large gaps in Table 1 (e.g., direct F0 pair: ProsodyLM 18.51 vs. MIMI-tok 1.86 and StyleTTS2 3.25) cannot be unambiguously attributed to the LM's token choices, because the decoder itself may amplify or attenuate prosodic differences. Please add a decoder-fidelity experiment and, ideally, an oracle-token condition, and also specify the decoder architectures used for the group-A baselines, since the StyleTTS2 decoder cannot directly consume MIMI or GLM4V tokens.
  2. [§4.3.2, Table 3] The claim that ProsodyLM recognizes all five emotions is not statistically supported for Happy and Angry. The average log-probability increases are 0.014 (sd 0.007) for Happy and 0.021 (sd 0.010) for Angry, so the two-standard-deviation intervals include zero; no significance tests, bootstrap confidence intervals, or multiple-comparison correction across the five emotion words are reported. The paper should provide per-emotion significance testing and discuss these small effect sizes explicitly, or restrict the emotion-recognition claim to the emotions for which effects are robust.
  3. [§4.2.3, Figure 2, Appendix E.2] The contrastive-focus claim (on-focus stress and post-focus compression) is based on average F0 curves plotted without error bars or significance tests, yet the text states that the F0 in the post-focus case is 'always significantly suppressed.' Please add per-condition error bars and pairwise statistical tests (e.g., on-focus vs. pre-focus and post-focus vs. pre-focus for each sentence component) in both the main figure and the full results in Appendix E.2.
minor comments (7)
  1. [§3.1] The special token for sentence-level prosody is written inconsistently as '[global]' and '[Global]' in the same paragraph; please unify the notation.
  2. [Appendix B] The manuscript contains a placeholder 'Figure xx' in the decoder description; this should be replaced with a real figure reference.
  3. [§4.1] For the group-A baselines, the paper says they are 'almost the same' as ProsodyLM except for the tokenization, but it never explains how the StyleTTS2 decoder is adapted to MIMI or GLM4V tokens; please clarify the decoding pipeline for each baseline.
  4. [Appendix E.2] In the text, 'classification' should be 'clarification' (e.g., 'during the classification setting' appears in the paragraph about symbol-rate adjustment).
  5. [Table 3 caption] The caption 'Average increase in log output probability emotion recognition' is missing a preposition; it should read '...in log output probability for emotion recognition.'
  6. [Appendix A] The sentence 'The percentiles of capping the five dimension are listed below' should be 'the five dimensions'; also, the closing parenthesis after '100' in the cap table appears misplaced.
  7. [Appendix C] Only a few examples of the instruction paraphrases are listed; for reproducibility, please provide the full set of 65 paraphrases or state where they will be made available.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: zero-shot evaluations with fixed tokenizer; the only self-citation is non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The claimed emergent prosody capabilities are evaluated zero-shot: the pre-training objective is next-token prediction on the fixed prosody-token sequence, and no evaluation task contributes gradients, hyperparameters, or token definitions. The five prosody dimensions are defined a priori in Section 3.1 and Appendix A, not fit to the test metrics; the decoder's predictors are retrained only to render LM-chosen word-level tokens into finer-grained contours (Appendix B), which is a realization step, not a task-specific fit. The self-citation to Shechtman (2023) for the five-dimension vector is definitional but self-contained, since the paper explicitly specifies how each dimension is computed and does not lean on the citation for the validity of any empirical claim. The possible concern that measured F0/duration/energy contrasts are partly decoder artifacts is a measurement-fidelity or comparative-statistics issue, not circularity: the LM's token choices are generated before decoding and are not constrained by the test labels. Thus no step reduces by construction to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard numerical tools, off-the-shelf ASR and prosody extractors, and the assumption that audiobooks provide the text-prosody co-occurrence signal. No target result is used to set constants.

free parameters (5)
  • Prosody quantization bins = 512
    Hand-chosen, not fitted to any evaluation outcome; a standard quantization size.
  • Clipping percentiles for prosody dimensions = e.g., 0.1 to 99.9 for most dims, 100 upper cap for energy
    Hand-chosen to remove outliers; not fitted to the target results but affects the token distribution.
  • LoRA rank and alpha = rank 64, alpha 16
    Standard large LoRA configuration; not tuned to specific tasks.
  • Training hyperparameters = 3 epochs, batch 64, lr 1e-4, warmup 0.1, cosine schedule
    Chosen for the continuous pre-training; not fitted to the evaluation tasks.
  • Pre-training instruction 'Spin a narrative' and paraphrases = 65 ChatGPT-4o paraphrases
    An instruction prompt to set the audiobook narrative context; not a fitted parameter.
assumptions (5)
  • standard math F0 slope via linear regression, L2 norm for energy, and log transforms are valid numerical methods for the prosody features.
    Used in Appendix A to define the five prosody dimensions; standard numerical methods.
  • domain assumption Whisper transcriptions and StyleTTS2 aligner, pitch, and energy extractors provide accurate word boundaries and prosody contours.
    The tokenizer depends on these off-the-shelf tools; Sections 3.1 and 3.2 and Appendix A.
  • domain assumption The five-dimensional word-level prosody vector (duration, F0 range, F0 median, F0 slope, log-energy) is a sufficient representation of the prosody needed for the tested tasks.
    The paper acknowledges it cannot capture voice quality (Section 5); the claim is limited to these dimensions.
  • domain assumption Audiobook pre-training data contains enough co-occurrence between textual style descriptions and prosodic realizations for the model to learn the mappings.
    The zero-shot style-following and emotion results rely on this; Section 3.3 and the experiments.
  • domain assumption The retrained StyleTTS2 decoder can faithfully convert word-level prosody tokens into audio with the intended acoustic contrasts.
    Section 3.2 and Appendix B; the evaluation measures acoustic features of decoded audio.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ProsodyLM: Uncovering the Emerging Prosody Processing Capabilities in Speech Language Models." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QFEHHBGW

@misc{pith2026250720091,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ProsodyLM: Uncovering the Emerging Prosody Processing Capabilities in Speech Language Models},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QFEHHBGW}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.20091}
}
read the original abstract

Speech language models refer to language models with speech processing and understanding capabilities. One key desirable capability for speech language models is the ability to capture the intricate interdependency between content and prosody. The existing mainstream paradigm of training speech language models, which converts speech into discrete tokens before feeding them into LLMs, is sub-optimal in learning prosody information -- we find that the resulting LLMs do not exhibit obvious emerging prosody processing capabilities via pre-training alone. To overcome this, we propose ProsodyLM, which introduces a simple tokenization scheme amenable to learning prosody. Each speech utterance is first transcribed into text, followed by a sequence of word-level prosody tokens. Compared with conventional speech tokenization schemes, the proposed tokenization scheme retains more complete prosody information, and is more understandable to text-based LLMs. We find that ProsodyLM can learn surprisingly diverse emerging prosody processing capabilities through pre-training alone, ranging from harnessing the prosody nuances in generated speech, such as contrastive focus, understanding emotion and stress in an utterance, to maintaining prosody consistency in long contexts.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.20091 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The overall framework of PROSODYLM. each sentence is encoded into two sections, the [Text] section followed by the [Prosody] section, separated by two special tokens, <SEP1> and <SEP2>, respectively. The [Text] section contains the text transcription of the utterance, e.g., ‘How are you?’ He asked. The [Prosody] section defines word-level prosody in the following format: [Global] <SIL> [Dur] how [5-dim Prosody] <SIL… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Average F0 under different focus conditions for selected methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Average F0 under different focus conditions for all methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Symbol rate comparison between first-time and second-time uttering the sentence [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_4.png]

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION format.date year duplicate empty "emp...

  2. [2]

    Dm-codec: Distilling multimodal representations for speech tokenization

    Md Mubtasim Ahasan, Md Fahim, Tasnim Mohiuddin, AKM Rahman, Aman Chadha, Tariq Iqbal, M Ashraful Amin, Md Mofijul Islam, and Amin Ahsan Ali. Dm-codec: Distilling multimodal representations for speech tokenization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.15017, 2024

    arXiv

  3. [3]

    dmel: Speech tokenization made simple

    He Bai, Tatiana Likhomanenko, Ruixiang Zhang, Zijin Gu, Zakaria Aldeneh, and Navdeep Jaitly. dmel: Speech tokenization made simple. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.15835, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Audiolm: a language modeling approach to audio generation

    Zal \'a n Borsos, Rapha \"e l Marinier, Damien Vincent, Eugene Kharitonov, Olivier Pietquin, Matt Sharifi, Dominik Roblek, Olivier Teboul, David Grangier, Marco Tagliasacchi, et al. Audiolm: a language modeling approach to audio generation. IEEE/ACM transactions on audio, speech, and language processing, 31: 0 2523--2533, 2023 a

    2023

  5. [5]

    Soundstorm: Efficient parallel audio generation

    Zal \'a n Borsos, Matthew Sharifi, Damien Vincent, Eugene Kharitonov, Neil Zeghidour, and Marco Tagliasacchi. Soundstorm: Efficient parallel audio generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.09636, 2023 b

    arXiv 2023

  6. [6]

    Giveness, contrasitiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view

    Wallace Chafe. Giveness, contrasitiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. Li, pp.\ 25--56, 1976

    work page 1976

  7. [7]

    Dc-spin: A speaker-invariant speech tokenizer for spoken language models

    Heng-Jui Chang, Hongyu Gong, Changhan Wang, James Glass, and Yu-An Chung. Dc-spin: A speaker-invariant speech tokenizer for spoken language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.24177, 2024

    arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Drawspeech: Expressive speech synthesis using prosodic sketches as control conditions

    Weidong Chen, Shan Yang, Guangzhi Li, and Xixin Wu. Drawspeech: Expressive speech synthesis using prosodic sketches as control conditions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04256, 2025

    arXiv 2025

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Emphassess: a prosodic benchmark on assessing emphasis transfer in speech-to-speech models

    Maureen de Seyssel, Antony D'Avirro, Adina Williams, and Emmanuel Dupoux. Emphassess: a prosodic benchmark on assessing emphasis transfer in speech-to-speech models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2312.14069, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  2. [10]

    High fidelity neural audio compression

    Alexandre D \'e fossez, Jade Copet, Gabriel Synnaeve, and Yossi Adi. High fidelity neural audio compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.13438, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Moshi: a speech-text foundation model for real-time dialogue

    Alexandre D \'e fossez, Laurent Mazar \'e , Manu Orsini, Am \'e lie Royer, Patrick P \'e rez, Herv \'e J \'e gou, Edouard Grave, and Neil Zeghidour. Moshi: a speech-text foundation model for real-time dialogue. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.00037, 2024

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Elevenlabs voice generation platform

    ElevenLabs . Elevenlabs voice generation platform. https://elevenlabs.com, 2023. Accessed 2024-12-01

    2023

  5. [13]

    Recent advances in discrete speech tokens: A review

    Yiwei Guo, Zhihan Li, Hankun Wang, Bohan Li, Chongtian Shao, Hanglei Zhang, Chenpeng Du, Xie Chen, Shujie Liu, and Kai Yu. Recent advances in discrete speech tokens: A review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.06490, 2025

    2025

  6. [14]

    Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models

    Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, et al. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models. ICLR, 1 0 (2): 0 3, 2022

    2022

  7. [15]

    Step-audio: Unified understanding and generation in intelligent speech interaction

    Ailin Huang, Boyong Wu, Bruce Wang, Chao Yan, Chen Hu, Chengli Feng, Fei Tian, Feiyu Shen, Jingbei Li, Mingrui Chen, et al. Step-audio: Unified understanding and generation in intelligent speech interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.11946, 2025

    2025 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Repcodec: A speech representation codec for speech tokenization

    Zhichao Huang, Chutong Meng, and Tom Ko. Repcodec: A speech representation codec for speech tokenization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.00169, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice, 2025

    Brendan Iribe, Ankit Kumar, and Sesame Team. Crossing the uncanny valley of conversational voice, 2025. URL https://www.sesame.com/research/crossing_the_uncanny_valley_of_voice

    2025

  10. [18]

    An open source emotional speech corpus for human robot interaction applications

    Jesin James, Li Tian, and Catherine Inez Watson. An open source emotional speech corpus for human robot interaction applications. In Interspeech, pp.\ 2768--2772, 2018

    2018

  11. [19]

    Style mixture of experts for expressive text-to-speech synthesis

    Ahad Jawaid, Shreeram Suresh Chandra, Junchen Lu, and Berrak Sisman. Style mixture of experts for expressive text-to-speech synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03637, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Wavtokenizer: an efficient acoustic discrete codec tokenizer for audio language modeling

    Shengpeng Ji, Ziyue Jiang, Wen Wang, Yifu Chen, Minghui Fang, Jialong Zuo, Qian Yang, Xize Cheng, Zehan Wang, Ruiqi Li, et al. Wavtokenizer: an efficient acoustic discrete codec tokenizer for audio language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16532, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  13. [21]

    Libri-light: A benchmark for asr with limited or no supervision

    Jacob Kahn, Morgane Riviere, Weiyi Zheng, Evgeny Kharitonov, Qiantong Xu, Pierre-Emmanuel Mazar \'e , Julien Karadayi, Vitaliy Liptchinsky, Ronan Collobert, Christian Fuegen, et al. Libri-light: A benchmark for asr with limited or no supervision. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE Inter...

    2020

  14. [22]

    Paralinguistics-aware speech-empowered large language models for natural conversation

    Heeseung Kim, Soonshin Seo, Kyeongseok Jeong, Ohsung Kwon, Soyoon Kim, Jungwhan Kim, Jaehong Lee, Eunwoo Song, Myungwoo Oh, Jung-Woo Ha, et al. Paralinguistics-aware speech-empowered large language models for natural conversation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.05706, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    On generative spoken language modeling from raw audio

    Kushal Lakhotia, Eugene Kharitonov, Wei-Ning Hsu, Yossi Adi, Adam Polyak, Benjamin Bolte, Tu-Anh Nguyen, Jade Copet, Alexei Baevski, Abdelrahman Mohamed, et al. On generative spoken language modeling from raw audio. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics...

    2021

  16. [24]

    Whisma: A speech-llm to perform zero-shot spoken language understanding

    Mohan Li, Cong-Thanh Do, Simon Keizer, Youmna Farag, Svetlana Stoyanchev, and Rama Doddipatla. Whisma: A speech-llm to perform zero-shot spoken language understanding. In 2024 IEEE Spoken Language Technology Workshop (SLT), pp.\ 1115--1122. IEEE, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Styletts 2: Towards human-level text-to-speech through style diffusion and adversarial training with large speech language models

    Yinghao Aaron Li, Cong Han, Vinay Raghavan, Gavin Mischler, and Nima Mesgarani. Styletts 2: Towards human-level text-to-speech through style diffusion and adversarial training with large speech language models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 36: 0 19594--19...

    2023

  18. [26]

    Generative spoken dialogue language modeling

    Tu Anh Nguyen, Eugene Kharitonov, Jade Copet, Yossi Adi, Wei-Ning Hsu, Ali Elkahky, Paden Tomasello, Robin Algayres, Benoit Sagot, Abdelrahman Mohamed, et al. Generative spoken dialogue language modeling. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 11: 0 250...

    2023

  19. [27]

    Spirit-lm: Interleaved spoken and written language model

    Tu Anh Nguyen, Benjamin Muller, Bokai Yu, Marta R Costa-Jussa, Maha Elbayad, Sravya Popuri, Christophe Ropers, Paul-Ambroise Duquenne, Robin Algayres, Ruslan Mavlyutov, et al. Spirit-lm: Interleaved spoken and written language model. Transactions of the Association for Computa...

    2025

  20. [28]

    Long-form speech generation with spoken language models

    Se Jin Park, Julian Salazar, Aren Jansen, Keisuke Kinoshita, Yong Man Ro, and RJ Skerry-Ryan. Long-form speech generation with spoken language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18603, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  21. [29]

    Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision

    Alec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Tao Xu, Greg Brockman, Christine McLeavey, and Ilya Sutskever. Robust speech recognition via large-scale weak supervision. In International conference on machine learning, pp.\ 28492--28518. PMLR, 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    Prosospeech: Enhancing prosody with quantized vector pre-training in text-to-speech

    Yi Ren, Ming Lei, Zhiying Huang, Shiliang Zhang, Qian Chen, Zhijie Yan, and Zhou Zhao. Prosospeech: Enhancing prosody with quantized vector pre-training in text-to-speech. In ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp...

    2022

  23. [31]

    Audiopalm: A large language model that can speak and listen

    Paul K Rubenstein, Chulayuth Asawaroengchai, Duc Dung Nguyen, Ankur Bapna, Zal \'a n Borsos, F \'e lix de Chaumont Quitry, Peter Chen, Dalia El Badawy, Wei Han, Eugene Kharitonov, et al. Audiopalm: A large language model that can speak and listen. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12925, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Shechtman, S

    Fernandez R. Shechtman, S. A neural tts system with parallel prosody transfer from unseen speakers. In Proc. Interspeech, 2023

    2023

  25. [33]

    Naturalspeech 2: Latent diffusion models are natural and zero-shot speech and singing synthesizers

    Kai Shen, Zeqian Ju, Xu Tan, Yanqing Liu, Yichong Leng, Lei He, Tao Qin, Sheng Zhao, and Jiang Bian. Naturalspeech 2: Latent diffusion models are natural and zero-shot speech and singing synthesizers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.09116, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    An analysis of the use of qualifications on the amazon mechanical turk online labor market

    Ianna Sodr \'e and Francisco Brasileiro. An analysis of the use of qualifications on the amazon mechanical turk online labor market. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 26: 0 837--872, 2017

    2017

  27. [35]

    Last: Language model aware speech tokenization

    Arnon Turetzky and Yossi Adi. Last: Language model aware speech tokenization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.03701, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  28. [36]

    Neural codec language models are zero-shot text to speech synthesizers

    Chengyi Wang, Sanyuan Chen, Yu Wu, Ziqiang Zhang, Long Zhou, Shujie Liu, Zhuo Chen, Yanqing Liu, Huaming Wang, Jinyu Li, et al. Neural codec language models are zero-shot text to speech synthesizers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.02111, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  29. [37]

    Freeze-omni: A smart and low latency speech-to-speech dialogue model with frozen llm

    Xiong Wang, Yangze Li, Chaoyou Fu, Yunhang Shen, Lei Xie, Ke Li, Xing Sun, and Long Ma. Freeze-omni: A smart and low latency speech-to-speech dialogue model with frozen llm. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.00774, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Mini-omni: Language models can hear, talk while thinking in streaming

    Zhifei Xie and Changqiao Wu. Mini-omni: Language models can hear, talk while thinking in streaming. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.16725, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Clapspeech: Learning prosody from text context with contrastive language-audio pre-training

    Zhenhui Ye, Rongjie Huang, Yi Ren, Ziyue Jiang, Jinglin Liu, Jinzheng He, Xiang Yin, and Zhou Zhao. Clapspeech: Learning prosody from text context with contrastive language-audio pre-training. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10763, 2023

    2023 arXiv

  32. [40]

    Soundstream: An end-to-end neural audio codec

    Neil Zeghidour, Alejandro Luebs, Ahmed Omran, Jan Skoglund, and Marco Tagliasacchi. Soundstream: An end-to-end neural audio codec. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing, 30: 0 495--507, 2021

    2021

  33. [41]

    Glm-4-voice: Towards intelligent and human-like end-to-end spoken chatbot

    Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Mingdao Liu, Kedong Wang, Shengmin Jiang, Lei Zhao, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. Glm-4-voice: Towards intelligent and human-like end-to-end spoken chatbot. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.02612, 2024 a

    2024 arXiv

  34. [42]

    Scaling speech-text pre-training with synthetic interleaved data

    Aohan Zeng, Zhengxiao Du, Mingdao Liu, Lei Zhang, Shengmin Jiang, Yuxiao Dong, and Jie Tang. Scaling speech-text pre-training with synthetic interleaved data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2411.17607, 2024 b

    2024 arXiv

  35. [44]

    Speechgpt: Empowering large language models with intrinsic cross-modal conversational abilities

    Dong Zhang, Shimin Li, Xin Zhang, Jun Zhan, Pengyu Wang, Yaqian Zhou, and Xipeng Qiu. Speechgpt: Empowering large language models with intrinsic cross-modal conversational abilities. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.11000, 2023 b

    2023 arXiv

  36. [45]

    Speechtokenizer: Unified speech tokenizer for speech large language models

    Xin Zhang, Dong Zhang, Shimin Li, Yaqian Zhou, and Xipeng Qiu. Speechtokenizer: Unified speech tokenizer for speech large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.16692, 2023 c

    2023 arXiv

  37. [46]

    @esa (Ref

    \@ifxundefined[1] #1\@undefined \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo \@ifnum[1] #1 \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo \@ifx[1] #1 \@firstoftwo \@secondoftwo [2] @ #1 \@temptokena #2 #1 @ \@temptokena \@ifclassloaded agu2001 natbib The agu2001 class already includes natbib coding, so you should ...

  38. [47]

    \@lbibitem[] @bibitem@first@sw\@secondoftwo \@lbibitem[#1]#2 \@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@namedef br@#2 \@nameuse br@#2\@extra@b@citeb \@ifundefined b@#2\@extra@b@citeb @num @parse #2 @tmp #1 NAT@b@open@#2 NAT@b@shut@#2 \@ifnum @merge>\@ne @bibitem@firs...

  39. [48]

    One key desirable capability for speech language models is the ability to capture the intricate interdependency between content and prosody

    @open @close @open @close and [1] URL: #1 \@ifundefined chapter * \@mkboth \@ifxundefined @sectionbib * \@mkboth * \@mkboth\@gobbletwo \@ifclassloaded amsart * \@ifclassloaded amsbook * \@ifxundefined @heading @heading NAT@ctr thebibliography [1] @ \@biblabel @NAT@ctr \@bibset...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.