Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A doubly robust learner for regression and inference with right-censored outcomes

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2411.04909 v2 pith:QFHLTYAQ submitted 2024-11-07 stat.ME math.STstat.TH

classification stat.MEmath.STstat.TH
keywords regressionoutcomesright-censoreddoublymethodnonparametricpseudo-outcomesrepresentation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper introduces a general framework for doubly robust nonparametric regression with right-censored outcomes, adapting the strategy of the 'DR-learner' for heterogeneous treatment effects to the censored data setting. Our method generalizes censoring unbiased transformations to generate pseudo-outcomes, which serve as inputs for a second-stage nonparametric regression with sample-splitting or cross-fitting. We derive a novel representation of the conditional bias of these pseudo-outcomes; this representation is central to establishing the estimator's asymptotic properties, including rate double robustness and oracle efficiency when the second-stage regression is a linear smoother. Simulation studies demonstrate the method's favorable finite-sample performance, and we showcase its practical utility by applying it to estimate a causal effect within a regression discontinuity design with right-censored outcomes.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Loss of earning capacity in Denmark -- an actuarial perspective

    q-fin.RM 2025-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    A perspective paper arguing that Danish disability insurance requires multistate reserving models that account for reporting delays, backpay, and public benefit offsets.

Pith tools