REVIEW 3 cited by
Lyapunov Controlled Counterdiabatic Quantum Optimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
We introduce a quantum algorithm integrating counterdiabatic (CD) protocols with quantum Lyapunov control (QLC) to tackle combinatorial optimization problems. This approach offers versatility, allowing implementation as either a digital-analog or purely digital algorithm based on selected control strategies. By examining spin-glass Hamiltonians, we illustrate how the algorithm can explore alternative paths to enhance solution outcomes compared to conventional CD techniques. This method reduces the dependence on extensive higher-order CD terms and classical optimization techniques, rendering it more suitable for existing quantum computing platforms. The combination of digital compression via CD protocols and the adaptable nature of QLC methods positions this approach as a promising candidate for near-term quantum computing.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Tight bound for the total time in digital-analog quantum computation
DAQC synthesis of any two-body Hamiltonian can be done in analog time at most √3·T·‖hP⊘hS‖₂, and the paper asserts this bound is tight.
-
Improving Quantum Optimization to Achieve Quadratic Time Complexity
Penta-O sets QAOA parameters level by level using five energy measurements per level, cutting parameter-setting cost to O(p^2) circuit executions for depth p.
-
Classical algorithm inspired by the feedback-based algorithm for quantum optimization and local counterdiabatic driving
CACAO is a classical spin-dynamics algorithm, derived from FALQON/CD-FQA, that outperforms the quantum versions on a 2-SAT-related benchmark and handles 10,000 spins.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.