The reviewed record of science sign in
Pith

arxiv: 2606.06339 · v2 · pith:QFSCUGUA · submitted 2026-06-04 · gr-qc

tt GrayHawk tt v2: wormholes and numeric extension

Marco Calz\'a This is my paper

Reviewed by Pith T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 kernel 2026-06-28 00:06 UTCgrok-4.3pith:QFSCUGUArecord.jsonopen to challenge →

classification gr-qc
keywords GrayHawktortoise coordinateswormholesscatteringnumerical methodsblack holesgeneral relativityfield propagation
0
0 comments X

The pith

GrayHawk v2 enables numerical computation of tortoise coordinates and wormhole scattering.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents an updated version of the GrayHawk tool that supports fully numerical evaluation of the tortoise coordinate integral. This change allows analysis of metrics where analytic expressions for the integral are unavailable or impractical. The update also adds support for wormhole solutions in the scattering problem. A reader would care because these features expand the set of spacetimes that can be studied for phenomena like field propagation and Hawking radiation using the same software framework. The modular design is preserved to allow further customizations.

Core claim

GrayHawk v2 enlarges the capabilities of the tool by enabling a fully numerical computation of the tortoise coordinates integral and by extending the scattering problem to wormhole solutions, while enriching the pool of pre-loaded metrics and maintaining the modular structure of the code.

What carries the argument

The GrayHawk software tool for studying field propagation on curved manifolds, extended with numerical tortoise integral and wormhole support.

If this is right

  • The tool can now handle metrics lacking analytic tortoise coordinate expressions.
  • Scattering problems can be solved for wormhole spacetimes.
  • New pre-loaded metrics allow immediate testing of the features.
  • The modular code structure facilitates easy modifications for additional capabilities.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This numerical approach may allow detailed studies of Hawking radiation in wormhole backgrounds.
  • Comparisons of scattering properties between black holes and wormholes become feasible with the same code.
  • Further extensions to other types of curved spacetimes could be implemented due to the maintained modularity.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical integration routines and wormhole implementations are assumed to produce correct and accurate results without any reported validation against known analytic cases.

What would settle it

Running the numerical tortoise coordinate computation for the Schwarzschild metric and comparing the output to the known analytic expression would test the accuracy of the new feature.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.06339 by Marco Calz\'a.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Transmission coefficient of a field of spin-2 and mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Transmission coefficient of a field of spin-2 and mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Transmission coefficient of a field of spin-2 and mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Transmission coefficient of a field of spin-2 and mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Residuals between the gray-body factors of a wave of spin-2 and mode [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We enlarged the capabilities of the publicly available Mathematica-based tool $\tt GrayHawk$. This second version expands the spectrum of metrics that can be considered in two distinct and disjoined directions. First, it enables a fully numerical computation of the tortoise coordinates integral, allowing the user to account for many metrics for which an analytic computation was impractical. Second, it extends the scattering problem to wormhole solutions. The pool of pre-loaded metrics is enriched, enabling immediate testing of the new features, and the code's modular structure is maintained to facilitate easy modification. This implementation proves $\tt GrayHawk$ adaptability and makes it an even more powerful tool for studying black holes, wormholes, Hawking radiation, and other features involving field propagation on curved manifolds. The codes described in this work are publicly available at \href{https://github.com/marcocalza89/GrayHawk-v2}{\faGithub}.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes GrayHawk v2, an updated publicly available Mathematica package that adds two main capabilities to the original tool: a fully numerical routine for evaluating the tortoise coordinate integral (to handle metrics lacking closed-form expressions) and an extension of the scattering problem to wormhole backgrounds. The pool of pre-loaded metrics is enlarged, the modular structure is preserved, and the code is released on GitHub.

Significance. A verified, modular, open-source tool for numerical studies of wave propagation on black-hole and wormhole spacetimes would be a useful community resource. The significance is currently limited by the absence of any reported validation of the new numerical components against known analytic results.

major comments (2)
  1. [Description of the numerical tortoise integral routine] The central claim that the new numerical tortoise-coordinate routine 'enables' reliable computation for metrics without analytic forms rests on an untested implementation. No comparison is provided to the exact Schwarzschild result r* = r + 2M ln|r/2M − 1| or to any other standard analytic case, leaving open the possibility of integration, boundary-condition, or discretization errors.
  2. [Wormhole scattering extension] The extension of the scattering problem to wormhole solutions is presented without any quantitative benchmark against known wormhole scattering cross-sections or transmission/reflection coefficients. This omission is load-bearing for the assertion that the wormhole implementation works correctly.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that the implementation 'proves' adaptability; the wording should be softened to 'demonstrates' since the paper is a code description rather than a formal proof.
  2. [Abstract] The GitHub link is given with a font-awesome icon that may not render in all PDF viewers; a plain URL would be clearer.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below. Both concerns are valid given the current manuscript content, and we will revise the paper accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the new numerical tortoise-coordinate routine 'enables' reliable computation for metrics without analytic forms rests on an untested implementation. No comparison is provided to the exact Schwarzschild result r* = r + 2M ln|r/2M − 1| or to any other standard analytic case, leaving open the possibility of integration, boundary-condition, or discretization errors.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript lacks explicit validation of the numerical tortoise-coordinate routine. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection comparing the numerical output for the Schwarzschild metric against the known analytic expression r* = r + 2M ln|r/2M − 1|, including error estimates and convergence tests with respect to integration parameters. This will directly address concerns about integration, boundary-condition, and discretization accuracy. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The extension of the scattering problem to wormhole solutions is presented without any quantitative benchmark against known wormhole scattering cross-sections or transmission/reflection coefficients. This omission is load-bearing for the assertion that the wormhole implementation works correctly.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative benchmarks are required to substantiate the wormhole scattering extension. The revised manuscript will include a new figure and accompanying text showing transmission and reflection coefficients for at least one standard wormhole metric, compared against existing analytic or high-precision numerical results from the literature. This will provide the necessary verification of the implementation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: code-description paper with no derivations or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a description of software extensions to GrayHawk v2 for numerical tortoise-coordinate integration and wormhole scattering. No derivation chain, no fitted parameters, no predictions, and no self-citation load-bearing steps exist. The central claims concern code capabilities and modularity; these are not reduced to inputs by construction and require only standard validation (absent here but irrelevant to circularity).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, physical axioms, or invented entities are introduced; the work is a software engineering update.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5680 in / 923 out tokens · 19111 ms · 2026-06-28T00:06:10.307735+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hawking Emission from Black Holes Evaporating toward Wormholes and the Accuracy of the WKB Approximation

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Numerical greybody factors for photons and massless Dirac fields in Simpson-Visser and Casadio-Fabbri-Mazzacurati geometries reveal that WKB overestimates luminosities by orders of magnitude near wormhole endpoints, i...

  2. $\tt BlackHawk$ $\tt v3.0$: Hawking Radiation from Regular Black Holes

    gr-qc 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    BlackHawk v3.0 adds Hawking temperatures and greybody factors for multiple regular black hole metrics to an existing public code via numerical routines.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

138 extracted references · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    S. W. Hawking. Particle Creation by Black Holes.Commun. Math. Phys., 43:199–220, 1975. [Erratum: Commun.Math.Phys. 46, 206 (1976)]

    1975

  2. [2]

    Don N. Page. Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole. 3. Charged Leptons from a Nonrotating Hole.Phys. Rev. D, 16:2402–2411, 1977

    1977

  3. [3]

    Don N. Page. Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole. 2. Massless Particles from a Rotating Hole.Phys. Rev. D, 14:3260–3273, 1976

    1976

  4. [4]

    Don N. Page. Particle Emission Rates from a Black Hole: Massless Particles from an Uncharged, Nonrotating Hole.Phys. Rev. D, 13:198–206, 1976

    1976

  5. [5]

    W. G. Unruh. Origin of the Particles in Black Hole Evaporation.Phys. Rev. D, 15:365–369, 1977

    1977

  6. [6]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Tests of general relativity with GW150914.Phys. Rev. Lett., 116(22):221101, 2016. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129902 (2018)]

    2016

  7. [7]

    B. P. Abbott et al. Tests of General Relativity with GW170817.Phys. Rev. Lett., 123(1):011102, 2019

    2019

  8. [8]

    Abbott et al

    R. Abbott et al. Tests of General Relativity with GWTC-3.Phys. Rev. D, 112(8):084080, 2025

    2025

  9. [9]

    First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole.Astrophys. J. Lett., 875:L1, 2019

    2019

  10. [10]

    Constraints on black-hole charges with the 2017 EHT obser- vations of M87*.Phys

    Prashant Kocherlakota et al. Constraints on black-hole charges with the 2017 EHT obser- vations of M87*.Phys. Rev. D, 103(10):104047, 2021

    2017

  11. [11]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. VI. Testing the Black Hole Metric.Astrophys. J. Lett., 930(2):L17, 2022

    2022

  12. [12]

    First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    Kazunori Akiyama et al. First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way.Astrophys. J. Lett., 930(2):L12, 2022

    2022

  13. [13]

    S. A. Teukolsky. Rotating black holes - separable wave equations for gravitational and electromagnetic perturbations.Phys. Rev. Lett., 29:1114–1118, 1972

    1972

  14. [14]

    Teukolsky.Perturbations of a rotating black hole

    Saul A. Teukolsky.Perturbations of a rotating black hole. PhD thesis, Caltech, 1973

    1973

  15. [15]

    Teukolsky

    Saul A. Teukolsky. Perturbations of a rotating black hole. 1. Fundamental equations for gravitational electromagnetic and neutrino field perturbations.Astrophys. J., 185:635–647, 1973

    1973

  16. [16]

    S. A. Teukolsky and W. H. Press. Perturbations of a rotating black hole. III - Interaction of the hole with gravitational and electromagnet ic radiation.Astrophys. J., 193:443–461, 1974

    1974

  17. [17]

    GrayHawk: A public code for calculating the Gray Body Factors of massless fields around spherically symmetric Black Holes.Phys

    Marco Calzá. GrayHawk: A public code for calculating the Gray Body Factors of massless fields around spherically symmetric Black Holes.Phys. Dark Univ., 48:101900, 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    Correspondence between quasinormal modes and grey-body factors of Schwarzschild–Tangherlini black holes.PTEP, 2026:4, 2026

    Hyewon Han and Bogeun Gwak. Correspondence between quasinormal modes and grey-body factors of Schwarzschild–Tangherlini black holes.PTEP, 2026:4, 2026

    2026

  19. [19]

    The importance of being non- minimally coupled: scalar Hawking radiation from regular black holes

    Marco Calzà, Massimiliano Rinaldi, and Sunny Vagnozzi. The importance of being non- minimally coupled: scalar Hawking radiation from regular black holes. 10 2025. 20

    2025

  20. [20]

    Correspondence between quasinormal modes and greybody factors in five-dimensional black holes.Phys

    Hyewon Han and Bogeun Gwak. Correspondence between quasinormal modes and greybody factors in five-dimensional black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 113(6):064058, 2026

    2026

  21. [21]

    Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter

    Marco Calzà, Davide Pedrotti, Guan-Wen Yuan, and Sunny Vagnozzi. Primordial regular black holes as all the dark matter. III. Covariant canonical quantum gravity models.Phys. Rev. D, 112(12):124015, 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Machine learning-based analytical expressions for Gray-Body Factors and application to Primordial Black Holes.Phys

    Guan-Wen Yuan, Marco Calzà, and Davide Pedrotti. Machine learning-based analytical expressions for Gray-Body Factors and application to Primordial Black Holes.Phys. Dark Univ., 50:102078, 2025

    2025

  23. [23]

    Trinity of black hole correspondences: Shadows, quasi- normal modes, graybody factors, and cautionary remarks.Phys

    Davide Pedrotti and Marco Calzà. Trinity of black hole correspondences: Shadows, quasi- normal modes, graybody factors, and cautionary remarks.Phys. Rev. D, 111(12):124056, 2025

    2025

  24. [24]

    Perez-Gonzalez

    Alexandre Arbey, Marco Calzà, and Yuber F. Perez-Gonzalez. Gray-body factors: Method matters.Phys. Dark Univ., 48:101903, 2025

    2025

  25. [25]

    Perez- Gonzalez.BlackHawkv3.0: Hawking Radiation from Regular Black Holes

    Alexandre Arbey, Marco Calzà, Léa Malacher, Davide Pedrotti, and Yuber F. Perez- Gonzalez.BlackHawkv3.0: Hawking Radiation from Regular Black Holes. 6 2026

    2026

  26. [26]

    BlackHawk: A public code for calculating the Hawking evaporation spectra of any black hole distribution.Eur

    Alexandre Arbey and Jérémy Auffinger. BlackHawk: A public code for calculating the Hawking evaporation spectra of any black hole distribution.Eur. Phys. J. C, 79(8):693, 2019

    2019

  27. [27]

    BlackHawk: A tool for computing Black Hole evaporation.PoS, TOOLS2020:024, 2021

    Jérémy Auffinger and Alexandre Arbey. BlackHawk: A tool for computing Black Hole evaporation.PoS, TOOLS2020:024, 2021

    2021

  28. [28]

    Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Black- Hawk v2.0.Eur

    Alexandre Arbey and Jérémy Auffinger. Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Black- Hawk v2.0.Eur. Phys. J. C, 81:910, 2021

    2021

  29. [29]

    Beyond the Standard Model with BlackHawk v2.0

    Jérémy Auffinger and Alexandre Arbey. Beyond the Standard Model with BlackHawk v2.0. PoS, CompTools2021:017, 2022

    2022

  30. [30]

    M. S. Morris, K. S. Thorne, and U. Yurtsever. Wormholes, Time Machines, and the Weak Energy Condition.Phys. Rev. Lett., 61:1446–1449, 1988

    1988

  31. [31]

    Matt Visser.Lorentzian wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking. 1995

    1995

  32. [32]

    Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report

    Vitor Cardoso and Paolo Pani. Testing the nature of dark compact objects: a status report. Living Rev. Rel., 22(1):4, 2019

    2019

  33. [33]

    Echoes of Traversable Wormhole

    Rajdeep Mondal and Abhishake Sadhukhan. Echoes of Traversable Wormhole. 11 2025

    2025

  34. [34]

    Vitor Cardoso, Seth Hopper, Caio F. B. Macedo, Carlos Palenzuela, and Paolo Pani. Gravitational-wave signatures of exotic compact objects and of quantum corrections at the horizon scale.Phys. Rev. D, 94(8):084031, 2016

    2016

  35. [35]

    Cano, Frederik Goelen, Thomas Hertog, and Bert Vercnocke

    Pablo Bueno, Pablo A. Cano, Frederik Goelen, Thomas Hertog, and Bert Vercnocke. Echoes of Kerr-like wormholes.Phys. Rev. D, 97(2):024040, 2018

    2018

  36. [36]

    Echoes of novel black-bounce spacetimes.Phys

    Yi Yang, Dong Liu, Zhaoyi Xu, Yujia Xing, Shurui Wu, and Zheng-Wen Long. Echoes of novel black-bounce spacetimes.Phys. Rev. D, 104(10):104021, 2021

    2021

  37. [37]

    Echoes from asymmetric wormholes and black bounce.Eur

    Min-Yan Ou, Meng-Yun Lai, and Hyat Huang. Echoes from asymmetric wormholes and black bounce.Eur. Phys. J. C, 82(5):452, 2022

    2022

  38. [38]

    Magalhães, Andreu Masó-Ferrando, Gonzalo J

    Renan B. Magalhães, Andreu Masó-Ferrando, Gonzalo J. Olmo, and Luís C. B. Crispino. Asymmetric wormholes in Palatini f(R) gravity: Energy conditions, absorption, and quasi- bound states.Phys. Rev. D, 108(2):024063, 2023. 21

    2023

  39. [39]

    Variable-Tension Lightlike Brane as a Gravitational Source of Traversable Misner-Wheeler- Type Wormholes.Phys

    Eduardo Guendelman, Alexander Kaganovich, Emil Nissimov, and Svetlana Pacheva. Variable-Tension Lightlike Brane as a Gravitational Source of Traversable Misner-Wheeler- Type Wormholes.Phys. Lett. B, 673:288–292, 2009

    2009

  40. [40]

    Guendelman, Alexander Kaganovich, Emil Nissimov, and Svetlana Pacheva

    Eduardo I. Guendelman, Alexander Kaganovich, Emil Nissimov, and Svetlana Pacheva. Spherically Symmetric and Rotating Wormholes Produced by Lightlike Branes.Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 25:1405–1428, 2010

    2010

  41. [41]

    Asym- metric Wormholes via Electrically Charged Lightlike Branes.AIP Conf

    Eduardo Guendelman, Alexander Kaganovich, Emil Nissimov, and Svetlana Pacheva. Asym- metric Wormholes via Electrically Charged Lightlike Branes.AIP Conf. Proc., 1243(1):60– 75, 2010

    2010

  42. [42]

    E. I. Guendelman, A. Kaganovich, E. Nissimov, and S. Pacheva. Lightlike branes as natural candidates for wormhole throats.Fortsch. Phys., 57:566–572, 2009

    2009

  43. [43]

    Thin shell wormholes: Linearization stability.Phys

    Eric Poisson and Matt Visser. Thin shell wormholes: Linearization stability.Phys. Rev. D, 52:7318–7321, 1995

    1995

  44. [44]

    Traversable wormholes from surgically modified Schwarzschild space-times

    Matt Visser. Traversable wormholes from surgically modified Schwarzschild space-times. Nucl. Phys. B, 328:203–212, 1989

    1989

  45. [45]

    Stability of the thin shell from traversable Schwarzschild-like wormholes.Eur

    Luis Liempi, Fabián Orellana, and Mauricio Cataldo. Stability of the thin shell from traversable Schwarzschild-like wormholes.Eur. Phys. J. C, 84(12):1327, 2024

    2024

  46. [46]

    Thin-shell wormhole from modified Bardeen AdS black hole.Eur

    Biswajit Sarkar, Ujjal Debnath, and Anirudh Pradhan. Thin-shell wormhole from modified Bardeen AdS black hole.Eur. Phys. J. C, 86(1):84, 2026

    2026

  47. [47]

    A. Eid, A. Alkaoud, M. M. Khader, and M. A. Bakry. Stability of asymmetric Schwarzschild–Rindler–de Sitter thin shell wormhole.Sci. Rep., 14(1):12696, 2024

    2024

  48. [48]

    Optical appearance of a thin-shell wormhole with a Hayward profile.Eur

    Sen Guo, Guan-Ru Li, and En-Wei Liang. Optical appearance of a thin-shell wormhole with a Hayward profile.Eur. Phys. J. C, 83(7):663, 2023

    2023

  49. [49]

    Thin-Shell Wormholes in Einstein and Ein- stein–Gauss–Bonnet Theories of Gravity.Universe, 6(11):197, 2020

    Takafumi Kokubu and Tomohiro Harada. Thin-Shell Wormholes in Einstein and Ein- stein–Gauss–Bonnet Theories of Gravity.Universe, 6(11):197, 2020

    2020

  50. [50]

    A. Z. Petrov. The Classification of spaces defining gravitational fields.Gen. Rel. Grav., 32:1661–1663, 2000

    2000

  51. [51]

    Chandrasekhar

    S. Chandrasekhar. The teukolsky-starobinsky constant for arbitrary spin.Royal Society, 430, 1990

    1990

  52. [52]

    and G. C. Williams E. G. Kalnins, W. Miller Jr. Recent advances in the use of separation of variables methods in general relativity.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Physical and Engineering Sciences 340337-352 (1992)

    1992

  53. [53]

    E. D. Fackerell and R. G. Crossman. Spin-weighted angular spheroidal functions.J. Math. Phys, 18, 1977

    1977

  54. [54]

    K. G. Suffern. Eigenvalues of the chandrasekhar-page angular functions.J. Math. Phys, 24, 1983

    1983

  55. [55]

    A comment on the eigenvalues of spin-weighted spheroidal functions.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 6(7):1057, jul 1989

    E Seidel. A comment on the eigenvalues of spin-weighted spheroidal functions.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 6(7):1057, jul 1989

    1989

  56. [56]

    Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin- weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions.Phys

    Emanuele Berti, Vitor Cardoso, and Marc Casals. Eigenvalues and eigenfunctions of spin- weighted spheroidal harmonics in four and higher dimensions.Phys. Rev. D, 73:024013,

  57. [57]

    [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 73, 109902 (2006)]. 22

    2006

  58. [58]

    Marco Calzà, John March-Russell, and João G. Rosa. Evaporating Primordial Black Holes, the String Axiverse, and Hot Dark Radiation.Phys. Rev. Lett., 133(26):261003, 2024

    2024

  59. [59]

    Quasinormal modes-shadow correspondence for ro- tating regular black holes.Phys

    Davide Pedrotti and Sunny Vagnozzi. Quasinormal modes-shadow correspondence for ro- tating regular black holes.Phys. Rev. D, 110(8):084075, 2024

    2024

  60. [60]

    Marco Calzà and João G. Rosa. Determining the spin of light primordial black holes with Hawking radiation.JHEP, 12:090, 2022

    2022

  61. [61]

    Rosa, and Filipe Serrano

    Marco Calzà, João G. Rosa, and Filipe Serrano. Primordial black hole superradiance and evaporation in the string axiverse.JHEP, 05:140, 2024

    2024

  62. [62]

    Marco Calzà and João G. Rosa. Determining the spin of light primordial black holes with Hawking radiation. Part II. High spin regime.JHEP, 08:012, 2024

    2024

  63. [63]

    Marco Calzà and João G. Rosa. Evaporating Kerr black holes as probes of new physics. JHEP, 11:044, 2025

    2025

  64. [64]

    Topological regular black holes without a Cauchy horizon.Phys

    Marco Calzá, Massimiliano Rinaldi, and Sergio Zerbini. Topological regular black holes without a Cauchy horizon.Phys. Rev. D, 112(2):024024, 2025

    2025

  65. [65]

    Evaporation of a Kerr-black-bounce by emission of scalar particles.Phys

    Marco Calzá. Evaporation of a Kerr-black-bounce by emission of scalar particles.Phys. Rev. D, 107(4):044067, 2023

    2023

  66. [66]

    On a regular modified Schwarzschild spacetime

    Hristu Culetu. On a regular modified Schwarzschild spacetime. 5 2013

    2013

  67. [67]

    On a regular charged black hole with a nonlinear electric source.Int

    Hristu Culetu. On a regular charged black hole with a nonlinear electric source.Int. J. Theor. Phys., 54(8):2855–2863, 2015

    2015

  68. [68]

    Sushant G. Ghosh. A nonsingular rotating black hole.Eur. Phys. J. C, 75(11):532, 2015

    2015

  69. [69]

    Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores

    Alex Simpson and Matt Visser. Regular black holes with asymptotically Minkowski cores. Universe, 6(1):8, 2019

    2019

  70. [70]

    Rahul Kumar and Sushant G. Ghosh. Photon ring structure of rotating regular black holes and no-horizon spacetimes.Class. Quant. Grav., 38(8):8, 2021

    2021

  71. [71]

    Ghosh, and Sunil D

    Dharm Veer Singh, Sushant G. Ghosh, and Sunil D. Maharaj. Exact nonsingular black holes and thermodynamics.Nucl. Phys. B, 981:115854, 2022

    2022

  72. [72]

    Dymnikova

    I. Dymnikova. Vacuum nonsingular black hole.Gen. Rel. Grav., 24:235–242, 1992

    1992

  73. [73]

    Stability of a vacuum nonsingular black hole

    Irina Dymnikova and Evgeny Galaktionov. Stability of a vacuum nonsingular black hole. Class. Quant. Grav., 22:2331–2358, 2005

    2005

  74. [74]

    Black hole evaporation: A Paradigm.Class

    Abhay Ashtekar and Martin Bojowald. Black hole evaporation: A Paradigm.Class. Quant. Grav., 22:3349–3362, 2005

    2005

  75. [75]

    Bebronne and Peter G

    Michael V. Bebronne and Peter G. Tinyakov. Black hole solutions in massive gravity.JHEP, 04:100, 2009. [Erratum: JHEP 06, 018 (2011)]

    2009

  76. [76]

    Moffat, and Piero Nicolini

    Leonardo Modesto, John W. Moffat, and Piero Nicolini. Black holes in an ultraviolet com- plete quantum gravity.Phys. Lett. B, 695:397–400, 2011

    2011

  77. [77]

    Regular black holes in UV self-complete quantum gravity.Phys

    Euro Spallucci and Stefano Ansoldi. Regular black holes in UV self-complete quantum gravity.Phys. Lett. B, 701:471–474, 2011

    2011

  78. [78]

    No firewalls in quantum gravity: the role of discreteness of quantum geometry in resolving the information loss paradox.Class

    Alejandro Perez. No firewalls in quantum gravity: the role of discreteness of quantum geometry in resolving the information loss paradox.Class. Quant. Grav., 32(8):084001, 2015. 23

    2015

  79. [79]

    Nonpolynomial Lagrangian ap- proach to regular black holes.Int

    Aimeric Colléaux, Stefano Chinaglia, and Sergio Zerbini. Nonpolynomial Lagrangian ap- proach to regular black holes.Int. J. Mod. Phys. D, 27(03):1830002, 2018

    2018

  80. [80]

    Piero Nicolini, Euro Spallucci, and Michael F. Wondrak. Quantum Corrected Black Holes from String T-Duality.Phys. Lett. B, 797:134888, 2019

    2019

Showing first 80 references.