Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 69 references

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.

T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.3

Unidirectional chiral interaction in a cascaded cavity prolongs excited-state lifetime and increases two-magnon bundle purity and number.

2026-07-03 12:55 UTC pith:QGODBYS3

load-bearing objection The paper proposes a chiral unidirectional coupling in a cascaded cavity to prolong excited-state lifetime and thereby improve two-magnon bundle purity and number. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2607.01635 v1 pith:QGODBYS3 submitted 2026-07-02 quant-ph

Chiral interaction enhanced magnon bundle emission

Zhicai Chen , Deyi Kong , Chengdeng Gou , Xiangming Hu , Fei Wang This is my paper
classification quant-ph
keywords chiral interactionmagnon bundle emissioncascaded cavityunidirectional couplingtwo-magnon bundlesexcited-state lifetimequantum information processing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a scheme that places a qubit and a magnon inside a cascaded-cavity arrangement to produce a unidirectional chiral interaction. This interaction extends the lifetime of the target excited state and thereby reduces re-excitation of the magnon. The longer lifetime raises both the average purity and the total number of two-magnon bundles that are emitted. The result supplies directional control while raising the quality of the emitted multi-magnon state.

Core claim

By implementing a chiral interaction scheme in a cascaded-cavity configuration with a qubit and a magnon, the unidirectional coupling prolongs the lifetime of the target excited state. This prolongation suppresses magnon re-excitation, thereby increasing both the average purity and the number of two-magnon bundles emitted.

What carries the argument

The cascaded-cavity setup that enforces unidirectional chiral interaction between the qubit and the magnon.

Load-bearing premise

The cascaded-cavity setup can be realized experimentally so that the interaction stays strictly unidirectional without adding significant extra decoherence or loss.

What would settle it

Compare the measured lifetime of the target excited state and the purity of emitted two-magnon bundles in the cascaded-cavity geometry versus an otherwise identical bidirectional geometry.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • The unidirectional interaction supplies directional control over magnon emission.
  • Both the purity and the yield of two-magnon bundles rise relative to the bidirectional case.
  • The same lifetime-prolongation mechanism can be applied to higher-order magnon bundles.
  • The improved multi-magnon source becomes more suitable for quantum information tasks that require clean entangled states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The scheme could be tested in existing magnon-qubit hybrid devices that already use cavity chains.
  • If the lifetime extension holds, similar unidirectional couplings might suppress unwanted back-action in other hybrid quantum systems.
  • Engineering the cavity cascade length or coupling strengths offers a route to optimize bundle size without adding new loss channels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes placing a qubit and a magnon in a cascaded-cavity setup to realize a chiral (unidirectional) interaction that enhances magnon bundle emission. The central claim is that this unidirectional coupling prolongs the lifetime of the target excited state, suppresses magnon re-excitation, and thereby increases both the average purity and the number of two-magnon bundles, offering directional control together with improved source quality for quantum information applications.

Significance. If the lifetime-prolongation mechanism is correctly derived from the cascaded master equation and produces the reported improvements in purity and bundle number, the result would supply a concrete route to higher-quality multi-magnon sources. The approach exploits an established cascaded-system technique, so the novelty lies in its application to magnon bundles rather than in the interaction form itself.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the stated lifetime prolongation and consequent suppression of re-excitation are presented as direct consequences of the unidirectional interaction, yet no Hamiltonian, master equation, or numerical protocol is supplied in the visible text; without these elements it is impossible to verify whether the reported gains are independent of the model definition or arise by construction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the review and the opportunity to clarify the presentation of our results. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the stated lifetime prolongation and consequent suppression of re-excitation are presented as direct consequences of the unidirectional interaction, yet no Hamiltonian, master equation, or numerical protocol is supplied in the visible text; without these elements it is impossible to verify whether the reported gains are independent of the model definition or arise by construction.

    Authors: The abstract is intended as a concise summary. The full Hamiltonian of the qubit-magnon system (including the cascaded-cavity terms) appears in Section II, Eq. (1). The cascaded master equation that encodes the unidirectional interaction is derived immediately thereafter as Eq. (4), with the unidirectional term explicitly isolated. The numerical protocol for extracting the excited-state lifetime, purity, and two-magnon bundle statistics (via quantum regression and Monte-Carlo wave-function trajectories) is given in Section III. The prolongation of the target-state lifetime follows directly from the absence of the back-action term in the cascaded dissipator; this is shown both analytically (by adiabatic elimination) and numerically (Figs. 2 and 3). The reported improvements are therefore model-derived rather than imposed by construction. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper models a cascaded-cavity system with unidirectional (chiral) coupling via a master-equation treatment. The reported prolongation of target-state lifetime and resulting improvement in two-magnon bundle metrics follow directly from the unidirectional term in the Liouvillian; no parameter is fitted to the target observables and then re-labeled as a prediction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem that forces the result, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The abstract and claim description contain no reduction of the central finding to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be extracted from the text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5612 in / 1063 out tokens · 43213 ms · 2026-07-03T12:55:33.798578+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

In this paper, we suggest a chiral interaction scheme to enhance magnon bundle emission by placing a qubit and a magnon into a cascaded-cavity setup, respectively. It is found that the unidirectional interaction prolongs the lifetime of the target excited state, thereby suppressing the magnon re-excitation and promoting both the average purity and number of two-magnon bundles. Consequently, the chiral interaction not only offers directional control but also improves the quality of the multi-magnon source, which may find potential applications in quantum information processing.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.01635 by Chengdeng Gou, Deyi Kong, Fei Wang, Xiangming Hu, Zhicai Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) The system schematic involves cascading the out [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Time-averaged population of states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Time evolution of populations of states [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: (a) Equal-time second-order correlation functions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: (a)-(c) and (d)-(f) Quantum trajectories of two-mag [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: The correlation function (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Addition- ally, σij = |i⟩⟨j| (for i, j = 1 , 2) are the projection oper- ators when i = j and the spin-flip operators when i ̸= j

    and m (m†) are the annihilation (creation) operators for the cavity fields and magnon mode, respectively. Addition- ally, σij = |i⟩⟨j| (for i, j = 1 , 2) are the projection oper- ators when i = j and the spin-flip operators when i ̸= j. The Hamiltonians Haq and Ham read /s48 /s48 /s46 /s53 /s49 /s49 /s48 /s50 /s48 /s51 /s48 /s52 /s48 /s53 /s48 /s48 /s48 /s4...

    work page

  2. [2]

    In the first place, as shown in Figs

    By comparing the dynamical evolution of the chiral interaction with the achiral case, there are sev- eral advantages as follows. In the first place, as shown in Figs. 5(c) and 5(f), the excitation probability P2− is substantially enhanced from 0.04 to 0.06, indicating that the chiral interaction facilitates the preparation of the high Fock state. Secondly,...

    work page

  3. [3]

    It is clear that the average purity of bundles rises from 86.8% for symmetric coupling to 91.1% for chiral coupling and the average number is increased from 10.75 to 12.82. To clearly demonstrate the influence of chiral interac- tion on the average number and purity of magnon bun- dles, we plot the average number ¯N2 and purity ¯Π 2 versus atomic dissipati...

    work page

  4. [4]

    As shown in Fig

    The pu- rity of bundle emission is defined as Π N = ¯NN / ∑¯Nj, where ¯Nj represents the statistical average number of j- magnon emissions. As shown in Fig. 6(a), the purity of magnon bundles is always enhanced in the asymmetric case. Notably, when the atomic decay rate γq is low, the increase in purity is much greater than in the case where the larger val...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Lodahl, S

    P. Lodahl, S. Mahmoodian, S. Stobbe, A. Rauschenbeu- tel, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, H. Pichler, and P. Zoller, Chiral quantum optics, Nature 541, 473–480 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Sayrin, C

    C. Sayrin, C. Junge, R. Mitsch, B. Albrecht, D. O’Shea, P. Schneeweiss, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Nanophotonic optical isolator controlled by the internal state of cold atoms, Phys. Rev. X 5, 041036 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    Dong, K.-Y

    M.-X. Dong, K.-Y. Xia, W.-H. Zhang, Y.-C. Yu, Y.-H. Ye, E.-Z. Li, L. Zeng, D.-S. Ding, B.-S. Shi, G.-C. Guo, et al., All-optical reversible single-photon isolation at room temperature, Sci. Adv. 7, eabe8924 (2021)

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Scheucher, A

    M. Scheucher, A. Hilico, E. Will, J. Volz, and A. Rauschenbeutel, Quantum optical circulator controlled by a single chirally coupled atom, Science 354, 1577– 1580 (2016)

    work page 2016

  9. [9]

    K. Xia, F. Nori, and M. Xiao, Cavity-free optical isola- tors and circulators using a chiral cross-Kerr nonlinearit y, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 203602 (2018)

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    S¨ ollner, S

    I. S¨ ollner, S. Mahmoodian, S. L. Hansen, L. Midolo, A. Javadi, G. Kirˇ sansk˙ e, T. Pregnolato, H. El-Ella, E. H. Lee, J. D. Song, et al., Deterministic photon–emitter cou- pling in chiral photonic circuits, Nat. Nanotechnol. 10, 775–778 (2015)

    work page 2015

  11. [11]

    D. G. Su´ arez-Forero, M. Jalali Mehrabad, C. Vega, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, and M. Hafezi, Chiral quantum optics: recent developments and future directions, PRX Quan- tum 6, 020101 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    Yan and H

    G.-A. Yan and H. Lu, Realization of tunable highly- efficient quantum routing in chiral waveguides, Front. Phys. 10, 880117 (2022)

    work page 2022

  13. [13]

    N. E. Palaiodimopoulos, S. Ohler, M. Fleischhauer, and D. Petrosyan, Chiral quantum router with Rydberg atoms, Phys. Rev. A 109, 032622 (2024)

    work page 2024

  14. [14]

    Liu, L.-L

    S.-Y. Liu, L.-L. Jiang, H. Zhu, J.-Q. Liao, and J.-F. 8 Huang, Nonreciprocal routing induced by chirality in an atom-dimer waveguide-QED system, Phys. Rev. A 112, 053711 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Huang, S ¸

    R. Huang, S ¸. K. ¨Ozdemir, J.-Q. Liao, F. Minganti, L.-M. Kuang, F. Nori, and H. Jing, Exceptional photon block- ade: Engineering photon blockade with chiral exceptional points, Laser Photon. Rev. 16, 2100430 (2022)

    work page 2022

  16. [16]

    Z.-G. Lu, Y. Wu, and X.-Y. L¨ u, Chiral interaction in- duced near-perfect photon blockade, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 013602 (2025)

    work page 2025

  17. [17]

    T.-L. Chen, A. Salij, K. A. Parrish, J. K. Rasch, F. Zinna, P. J. Brown, G. Pescitelli, F. Urraci, L. A. Aron- ica, A. Dhavamani, et al. , A 2D chiral microcavity based on apparent circular dichroism, Nat. Commun. 15, 3072 (2024)

    work page 2024

  18. [18]

    Y. Wang, H. Zheng, Z. Tang, R. Wang, X. Luo, Y. Shen, X. Yang, K.-K. Liu, S. Wang, S. Deng, et al. , Spin- polarization-induced chiral polariton lasing at room tem- perature, ACS Photonics 10, 1936–1943 (2023)

    work page 1936

  19. [19]

    Guddala, Y

    S. Guddala, Y. Kawaguchi, F. Komissarenko, S. Kir- iushechkina, A. Vakulenko, K. Chen, A. Al` u, V. M. Menon, and A. B. Khanikaev, All-optical nonreciprocity due to valley polarization pumping in transition metal dichalcogenides, Nat. Commun. 12, 3746 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [20]

    Llewellyn, Y

    D. Llewellyn, Y. Ding, I. I. Faruque, S. Paesani, D. Bacco, R. Santagati, Y.-J. Qian, Y. Li, Y.-F. Xiao, M. Huber, et al. , Chip-to-chip quantum teleportation and multi-photon entanglement in silicon, Nat. Phys. 16, 148–153 (2020)

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    Meyer-Scott, N

    E. Meyer-Scott, N. Prasannan, I. Dhand, C. Eigner, V. Quiring, S. Barkhofen, B. Brecht, M. B. Plenio, and C. Silberhorn, Scalable generation of multiphoton entangled states by active feed-forward and multiplexing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 150501 (2022)

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Bin, Q.-Y

    Q. Bin, Q.-Y. Qiu, Y. Wu, and X.-Y. L¨ u, Entangled Photon-Magnon Bundle Emission, Laser Photon. Rev. 18, 2300977 (2024)

    work page 2024

  23. [23]

    Q. Bin, H. Jing, Y. Wu, F. Nori, and X.-Y. L¨ u, Non- reciprocal bundle emissions of quantum entangled pairs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 043601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [24]

    J. P. Dowling, Quantum optical metrology–the low- down on high-N00N states, Contemp. Phys. 49, 125–143 (2008)

    work page 2008

  25. [25]

    J. Joo, W. J. Munro, and T. P. Spiller, Quantum metrol- ogy with entangled coherent states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 083601 (2011)

    work page 2011

  26. [26]

    Qin, Y.-H

    J. Qin, Y.-H. Deng, H.-S. Zhong, L.-C. Peng, H. Su, Y.- H. Luo, J.-M. Xu, D. Wu, S.-Q. Gong, H.-L. Liu, et al. , Unconditional and robust quantum metrological advan- tage beyond N00N states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 070801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  27. [27]

    N. G. Horton, K. Wang, D. Kobat, C. G. Clark, F. W. Wise, C. B. Schaffer, and C. Xu, In vivo three-photon mi- croscopy of subcortical structures within an intact mouse brain, Nat. Photonics. 7, 205–209 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    S. Li, R. Chang, L. Zhao, R. Xing, J. C. M. van Hest, and X. Yan, Two-photon nanoprobes based on bioorganic nanoarchitectonics with a photo-oxidation en- hanced emission mechanism, Nat. Commun. 14, 5227 (2023)

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    C. S. Mu˜ noz, E. Del Valle, A. G. Tudela, K. M¨ uller, S. Lichtmannecker, M. Kaniber, C. Tejedor, J. J. Finley, and F. P. Laussy, Emitters of N-photon bundles, Nat. Photonics 8, 550–555 (2014)

    work page 2014

  30. [30]

    Chang, A

    Y. Chang, A. Gonz´ alez-Tudela, C. S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, C. Navarrete-Benlloch, and T. Shi, Deterministic down- converter and continuous photon-pair source within the bad-cavity limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 203602 (2016)

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    C. Gou, X. Hu, and F. Wang, Antibunched two-mode two-photon bundles via atomic coherence, Phys. Rev. A 106, 063718 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    C. Gou, J. Xu, F. Wang, and X. Hu, Antibunched N - photon bundles from dark states assisted by ac Stark shift, New J. Phys. 26, 073046 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Bin, X.-Y

    Q. Bin, X.-Y. L¨ u, F. P. Laussy, F. Nori, and Y. Wu, N -phonon bundle emission via the Stokes process, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 053601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    F. Xing, Z. Liao, and X.-H. Wang, Deterministic gener- ation of arbitrary n-photon states in a waveguide-QED system, Phys. Rev. A 109, 013718 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [35]

    Zou, J.-Q

    F. Zou, J.-Q. Liao, and Y. Li, Dynamical emission of phonon pairs in optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. A 105, 053507 (2022)

    work page 2022

  36. [36]

    H. Y. Yuan, J. Xie, and R. A. Duine, Magnon bundle in a strongly dissipative magnet, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 064070 (2023)

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    C. Zhao, W. Li, B. Xiong, J.-X. Peng, L. Zhou, and W.- J. Gong, Heralded generation of entangled states based on N-bundle emission in a waveguide magnonics system, Phys. Rev. A 112, 013723 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    C. Gou, X. Hu, J. Xu, and F. Wang, Hybrid magnon-photon bundle emission from a ferromagnetic- superconducting system, Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 023052 (2024)

    work page 2024

  39. [39]

    Z. Wang, W. Shi, D. Kong, H. Zhan, and F. Wang, Photon–magnon bundle emission via enhanced photon– magnon–atom tripartite interaction, Opt. Lett. 50, 5386– 5389 (2025)

    work page 2025

  40. [40]

    Z. Chen, C. Gou, X. Hu, D. Kong, and F. Wang, En- hanced bundle emission of squeezed photons using para- metric amplification, Phys. Rev. A 112, 063703 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [41]

    Xiong, Q

    B. Xiong, Q. Bin, S.-L. Chao, J.-B. Liu, and X.-Y. L¨ u, Two-photon decay enhanced even photon bundle emis- sion, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 013238 (2025)

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Q. Bin, Y. Wu, and X.-Y. L¨ u, Parity-symmetry-protected multiphoton bundle emission, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 073602 (2021)

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Strongly coupled magnons and cavity microwave photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 156401 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Hybridizing ferromagnetic magnons and microwave photons in the quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 083603 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Bourhill, N

    J. Bourhill, N. Kostylev, M. Goryachev, D. L. Creedon, and M. E. Tobar, Ultrahigh cooperativity interactions between magnons and resonant photons in a YIG sphere, Phys. Rev. B 93, 144420 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [46]

    Kostylev, M

    N. Kostylev, M. Goryachev, and M. E. Tobar, Super- strong coupling of a microwave cavity to yttrium iron garnet magnons, Appl. Phys. Lett. 108, 062402 (2016)

    work page 2016

  47. [47]

    H. Y. Yuan, Y. Cao, A. Kamra, R. A. Duine, and P. Yan, Quantum magnonics: When magnon spintronics meets quantum information science, Phys. Rep. 965, 1 (2022)

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Huebl, C

    H. Huebl, C. W. Zollitsch, J. Lotze, F. Hocke, M. Greifen - stein, A. Marx, R. Gross, and S. T. B. Goennenwein, High cooperativity in coupled microwave resonator ferri- magnetic insulator hybrids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127003 (2013)

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Osada, R

    A. Osada, R. Hisatomi, A. Noguchi, Y. Tabuchi, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, M. Sadgrove, R. Yalla, M. Nomura, and Y. Nakamura, Cavity optomagnonics with spin-orbit coupled photons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 223601 (2016)

    work page 2016

  50. [50]

    Zhang, N

    X. Zhang, N. Zhu, C.-L. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Opto- magnonic whispering gallery microresonators, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 123605 (2016)

    work page 2016

  51. [51]

    Zhang, C.-L

    X. Zhang, C.-L. Zou, L. Jiang, and H. X. Tang, Cavity magnomechanics, Sci. Adv. 2, e1501286 (2016). 9

    work page 2016

  52. [52]

    Tabuchi, S

    Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi, T. Ishikawa, R. Ya- mazaki, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Coherent coupling between a ferromagnetic magnon and a superconducting qubit, Science 349, 405 (2015)

    work page 2015

  53. [55]

    H. J. Kimble, The quantum internet, Nature 453, 1023 (2008)

    work page 2008

  54. [56]

    C. Dong, Y. Wang, and H. Wang, Optomechanical in- terfaces for hybrid quantum networks, Natl. Sci. Rev. 2, 510 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [57]

    Li, Y.-P

    J. Li, Y.-P. Wang, W.-J. Wu, S.-Y. Zhu, and J. Q. You, Quantum network with magnonic and mechanical nodes, PRX Quantum 2, 040344 (2021)

    work page 2021

  56. [58]

    Z.-X. Lu, X. Zuo, Z.-Y. Fan, and J. Li, Optomagnonic continuous-variable quantum teleportation enhanced by non-Gaussian distillation, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043148 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [59]

    C. W. Gardiner, Driving a quantum system with the output field from another driven quantum system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2269 (1993)

    work page 1993

  58. [60]

    H. J. Carmichael, Quantum trajectory theory for cas- caded open systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 2273 (1993)

    work page 1993

  59. [61]

    Tan and J

    H. Tan and J. Li, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen entanglemen t and asymmetric steering between distant macroscopic mechanical and magnonic systems, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013192 (2021)

    work page 2021

  60. [62]

    Combes, J

    J. Combes, J. Kerckhoff, and M. Sarovar, The SLH framework for modeling quantum input-output networks, Adv. Phys.: X 2, 784–888 (2017)

    work page 2017

  61. [63]

    Stannigel, P

    K. Stannigel, P. Rabl, and P. Zoller, Driven-dissipati ve preparation of entangled states in cascaded quantum- optical networks, New J. Phys. 14, 063014 (2012)

    work page 2012

  62. [64]

    D. I. Schuster, A. Wallraff, A. Blais, L. Frunzio, R. S. Huang, J. Majer, S. Kumar, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf, Strong coupling of a single photon to a super- conducting qubit using circuit quantum electrodynamics, Nature 431, 162–167 (2004)

    work page 2004

  63. [65]

    Hofheinz, H

    M. Hofheinz, H. Wang, M. Ansmann, R. C. Bialczak, E. Lucero, M. Neeley, A. D. O’Connell, D. Sank, J. Wenner, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Synthesizing arbitrary quantum states in a superconducting resonator, Nature 459, 546–549 (2009)

    work page 2009

  64. [66]

    B. G. Christensen, D. L. Campbell, A. Bilmes, et al., Anomalous charge noise in superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. B 100, 140503(R) (2019)

    work page 2019

  65. [67]

    A. P. M. Place, L. V. H. Rodgers, P. Mundada, et al., New material platform for superconducting transmon qubits with coherence times exceeding 0.3 milliseconds, Nat. Commun. 12, 1779 (2021)

    work page 2021

  66. [68]

    Hioki, H

    T. Hioki, H. Shimizu, T. Makiuchi, and E. Saitoh, State tomography for magnetization dynamics, Phys. Rev. B 104, L100419 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [69]

    Xu, X.-K

    D. Xu, X.-K. Gu, H.-K. Li, Y.-C. Weng, Y.-P. Wang, J. Li, H. Wang, S.-Y. Zhu, and J. Q. You, Quantum control of a single magnon in a macroscopic spin system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 193603 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [70]

    Lachance-Quirion, Y

    D. Lachance-Quirion, Y. Tabuchi, S. Ishino, A. Noguchi , T. Ishikawa, R. Yamazaki, and Y. Nakamura, Resolving quanta of collective spin excitations in a millimeter-size d ferromagnet, Sci. Adv. 3, e1603150 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [71]

    Lachance-Quirion, S

    D. Lachance-Quirion, S. P. Wolski, Y. Tabuchi, S. Kono, K. Usami, and Y. Nakamura, Entanglement-based single- shot detection of a single magnon with a superconducting qubit, Science 367, 425 (2020)

    work page 2020