Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 121 references

Simulation of Lateral Impulse Induced Inertial Dilation at the Surface of a Vacuum-Exposed Granular Assembly

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-05 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single lateral impulse can durably dilate a vacuum-exposed granular surface: the shock becomes a barely-supersonic solitary wave that raises the whole channel's surface, a candidate cause of lunar cold spots.

desk verdict Plausible new mechanism for vacuum-exposed granular dilation, but the lofting story rests on a patched friction law whose equations are internally inconsistent—fix that before trusting the result. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.04074 v1 pith:QHKFGXJ3 submitted 2025-09-04 cond-mat.soft physics.space-ph

Eric Frizzell , Christine Hartzell This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.softphysics.space-ph PACS 45.70.-n96.20.-n
keywords inertialdilationgranularshocksolitarywaveSSDEMmicrogravityvacuum-exposedfreesurfaceLunarColdSpotsparticlelofting
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a single lateral impulse, without repeated shaking, can durably dilate the surface of a granular bed exposed to vacuum and low gravity. In soft-sphere discrete-element simulations, a piston-generated compressive shock decays within about 30 cm into a solitary wave that crosses the whole channel (up to 4 m) at barely supersonic speed (Mach > 1.05); wherever the wave passes, near-surface grains loft and the bed settles permanently higher. Dilation increases with initial packing fraction and with wave speed, is insensitive to channel length beyond about 2 m, requires a hard subsurface floor to sustain the wave, and is triggered by compressive (P) waves but not shear (S) waves. The authors validate their solver against known acoustic, shock, and shear-dilation behavior, and they estimate loft depths that scale toward the tens-of-centimeters band of reduced density defining lunar cold spots. The payoff, if the result holds: a one-shot, long-range mechanism for loosening regolith surfaces on airless bodies.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the solitary wave: the constant-shape, minimally dissipating compression front that a strong shock decays into, traveling at Mach 1.05–1.3 and sustained across meters of bed when riding on a hard subsurface floor. The lofting mechanism is the frictional collision at the compressive front, which turns lateral compression into upward particle velocity; a floor-reflected wave then meets the lofted grains. Two pieces carry the argument further. First, a corrected Coulomb friction model: the stock solver's tangential-force limit uses only the elastic spring force, while the authors' version (eq. A12) includes the damping force — the observed lofting depends on this patc

What would settle it

Run the same piston-impulse geometry — a granular channel in vacuum under lunar gravity, one compressive pulse — with the stock (unpatched) friction law instead of the authors' corrected Coulomb limit. If the at-rest surface height does not rise measurably behind the propagating solitary wave, or if the rise vanishes when the patch is reverted, the central claim collapses as a numerical artifact. A complementary check: in a channel much longer than 4 m, measure where the constant-compression solitary wave and its surface dilation terminate; the termination distance, not the impulse, should bou

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that one lateral impulse — a piston blow standing in for an impact-generated shock — can induce inertial bulk dilation over long distances in a vacuum-exposed granular bed under low gravity. The shock decays within ~30 cm into a solitary wave at barely supersonic speed (Mach > 1.05); with a hard subsurface floor it persists across the whole channel. At its compressive front, frictional collisions turn lateral motion into upward lofting, and the bed settles permanently higher (up to 3.8 mm in the densest case). Compression stays constant along the channel, and two counter-propagating waves pass through each other unchanged. Dilation grows with packing fraction and wave speed,

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the friction patch: the authors found that the open-source SSDEM solver LIGGGHTS release 3.8.0 cuts off the tangential (sliding) contact force using only the elastic spring force, and they replaced that cutoff with one that also includes the damping force (their eq. A12). The observed surface lofting depends on this corrected friction model; if the correction is wrong, incomplete, or sensitive to the chosen friction and damping parameters, the dila

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single lateral impulse — without repeated shaking — can permanently lower the packing density of a vacuum-exposed granular surface across the entire simulated channel (up to 4 m).
  • The effect is carried specifically by barely-supersonic compressive solitary waves (Mach > 1.05); acoustic and shear waves do not produce it, and a hard subsurface floor is required to sustain the wave over long distances.
  • Dilation magnitude is set largely by the solitary wave speed, which rises with initial packing fraction and with proximity of the surface to the hard floor; channel length beyond ~2 m does not matter.
  • Loft-depth estimates for lunar-like grains reach the tens-of-centimeters band inferred for lunar cold spots (just over 40 cm at the strongest wave strengths), making impulse-induced dilation a plausible cold-spot formation mechanism that the authors argue deserves further study.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the friction patch changes the tangential-force regime that sliding and colliding grains occupy, prior and future discrete-element studies of frictional collisional flows with this solver may deserve rechecking near the sliding threshold; the qualitative switch between compaction and dilation could reappear elsewhere.
  • The compaction-dilation crossover the authors find (below ϕ ≈ 0.55, versus 0.58 in terrestrial atmospheric tests) suggests loose beds that compact on Earth may dilate on airless low-gravity bodies; a parabolic-flight or drop-tower experiment with a vacuum-exposed granular channel could test this directly.
  • If lunar cold spots form by this mechanism, the halo's outer boundary may be set by the solitary wave's termination distance rather than by the shock's radial decay; mapping cold-spot edges onto predicted termination distances would be a testable morphological prediction.
  • The paper's loft-depth force balance (eq. 12) implies a laboratory-scale experiment: soft beads in vacuum under reduced effective gravity should loft to a predicted depth after a single piston impulse, scaling up by roughly an order of magnitude between the simulated and lunar material parameters.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper uses soft-sphere DEM simulations (LIGGGHTS) of a monodisperse, cohesive granular channel under lunar gravity and vacuum to study the response of a mechanically free surface to a laterally propagating impulse. The central claim is that a strong piston-generated shock rapidly decays into a long-lived solitary wave, and that the passage of this barely-supersonic wave (M > 1.05) causes a persistent, spatially uniform surface dilation through frictional-collision-induced particle lofting. The effect is reported to increase with packing fraction and bed height, to be insensitive to channel length, and to require a hard subsurface floor. The authors validate their model against 1D and 3D wave-speed power laws, provide controls showing that acoustic waves and shear waves do not produce long-range dilation, check random seeding variation and an extended 15 s at-rest run, and make input scripts and restart files publicly available. They also propose a force-balance estimate of lofting depth and discuss implications for Lunar Cold Spots.

Significance. If the central observation is correct, it identifies a new mechanism: a single lateral impulse can durably reduce the bulk density of a vacuum-exposed, low-gravity granular surface over distances much larger than the wave front. This would be relevant to lunar cold spots and to the response of airless-body regolith to impacts. The paper's strengths are its emergent, simulation-based claim supported by multiple controls (wave type, seed variation, length independence, long-duration at-rest check), and its unusually complete open-data/code package, which makes the results reproducible and checkable. The principal weakness is that the lofting mechanism is attributed specifically to a patched Coulomb-friction implementation, and the manuscript's equations for that patch are internally inconsistent. Until the contact-law issue is resolved, the physical status of the reported dilation remains uncertain, and the quantitative comparison to lunar cold spots also contains an internal inconsistency.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.1–2.2, Eq. (2), Appendix A (Eqs. A9–A12)] The corrected tangential force is written in Eq. (2) and Eq. A12 as Ft = -kt δ_t^{3/2} - γt vt, while Eq. A9 (the stock law being corrected) and standard Hertz–Mindlin require the elastic tangential force to be -kt δ_t with kt = 8Geq sqrt(Req δn). If the implementation follows the δ_t^{3/2} form, the tangential force magnitude is wrong in exactly the oblique collision geometry that Sec. 3.1 identifies as the lofting trigger ('the compressive front triggers particle ejection through a frictional collision with neighboring particles'). The two validation tests (1D normal-impact wave speed and one sliding-distance test) do not exercise the Coulomb-limited tangential branch during near-surface collisions. Please correct the equations or provide the exact implemented kernel, and add a targeted validation (e.g., oblique surface impact with measured tangential force and lofting threshold).
  2. [§3.6 vs Table 8 and §3.2.3] The text states that 'the greatest bulk dilation we observed in any of our tests was Δρ ∼ 0.5%', but Table 8 reports for the compact bed at vp = 10 m/s a height change Δz = 3.84 mm in a 20 cm bed. With the paper's own definition Δρ = 100 × Δz / 20 cm, this gives ≈1.9% (medium ≈1.5%). This discrepancy changes the claimed order-of-magnitude gap to the lunar cold spot value (~4%) and must be reconciled. If the 0.5% figure refers to a different definition (e.g., only the dilated surface band rather than the full bed height), that definition should be stated explicitly and applied consistently.
  3. [§3.5, Eq. (12), Fig. 32] The lunar extrapolation rests on a force-balance loft-depth model that assumes a 1° wavefront angle, a fixed vm = 0.1 m/s, δm/δ0 = 4, and a particle modulus of 500 MPa inferred by assuming the bulk-to-particle modulus ratio is the same as in the simulation. The factor-of-three agreement with the simulated 8 cm loft depth is presented despite numerous stated assumptions, and the factor-of-8.5 lunar scaling is used to conclude that 'we approximately capture the scaling between assemblies in different environments.' As written, this is stronger than the evidence supports; please label the scaling as heuristic and include a sensitivity check on θ, vm, and the assumed modulus.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 3] The 3 m channel row lists the insertion rate as '900,00'; this should be 900,000.
  2. [§2.8.3, Eq. (7)] The √(3/2) scaling factor applied to the 1D sound-speed prediction is introduced without derivation and is effectively chosen to match the simulated c0. Since the paper's measured c0 (Table 6) is used for the Mach numbers, please state explicitly that the factor is an empirical correction for the 3D packing, not a prediction from Eq. (7).
  3. [Figure 19] The caption reads 'Average δm vs R' but the abscissa appears to be radial position along the channel. Please correct the caption.
  4. [§2.6 and §3.3] The 'hard subsurface floor' is a sheet of frozen particles. Please clarify whether this acts as a rigid rough wall and how its effective stiffness/roughness compares with the free particles, since the hard-floor requirement is a headline result.
  5. [§3.2.3] The loose-bed rows in Table 8 contain negative Δz values (compaction), but the text only partially describes this. A sentence clarifying that negative Δz denotes net compaction would help.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

One fitted √(3/2) sound-speed factor is presented as a prediction, but the central dilation claim is an emergent simulation result and is not otherwise circular.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.8.3, after Eq. 7 (sound-speed prediction)]
    "Equation 7 is derived for a 'strongly compressed' (which is the case for sound waves) 1D particle chain and does not include effects from some of the physical properties in our model (friction, cohesion) so it slightly over predicted c0. Applying a scaling factor of √3/2 yields the prediction of c0 in Fig. 7 which agrees well with our numerical sound speeds."

    The √(3/2) factor is not derived; it is introduced after the fact to make the Eq. 7 estimate coincide with the numerically measured c0 values in Fig. 7. Calling the result 'the prediction of c0' presents this fitted agreement as an independent validation, when the agreement is by construction. However, this is not load-bearing for the central claim: the c0 values used to compute Mach number come from the measured acoustic-wave speeds (Sec. 2.9, Table 6), not from the scaled Eq. 7 curve, so the M > 1.05 condition and the dilation result do not depend on the fitted factor.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that a lateral impulse can induce long-range surface dilation in a vacuum-exposed granular channel—is an emergent observation from SSDEM simulations, not a derived quantity. Dilation is quantified from simulated bed-height changes (Sec. 2.8.2), and its parametric dependencies (wave type, packing fraction, channel length, bed height, floor condition) are direct simulation outputs. Therefore the central result does not reduce to its inputs by definition. The sound speed used to define 'barely supersonic' (M > 1.05) is the measured acoustic-wave speed from the same beds (Sec. 2.9, Table 6), independent of the scaled Eq. 7 curve. The only fitted-input-called-prediction step is the √(3/2) factor in Sec. 2.8.3, which is a constant chosen to make the 1D-chain formula agree with the simulated c0 and is then labeled 'the prediction of c0'; that agreement is by construction, but it is not load-bearing. The modified Coulomb friction model (Sec. 2.2, Eq. A12/A9) is a physical correction motivated by a failing unit test, not a parameter fit to the dilation target; its correctness risk belongs in a model-validity review, not a circularity verdict. The loft-depth model (Eq. 12, Sec. 3.5) uses assumed values θ = 1°, vm = 0.1 m/s, and δm/δ0 = 4, but the authors explicitly label these as assumptions ('we assume 1◦', 'we leave that as an exercise') and do not present the resulting 3 cm vs 8 cm as a precise prediction; the LCS scaling is an illustrative extrapolation. The paper also candidly states it has no method to predict final bed height or solitary-wave termination distance (Secs. 3.4, 3.5), further showing the analysis is not a closed derivation. No load-bearing self-citation was found: [115] and [116] are data/code availability, and the physics references are to external work. Overall, one minor labeled-prediction fit that is non-central; score 2.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Everything the central claim rests on that the reader did not pay for upstream: no new entities are introduced, but the quantitative result depends on several hand-picked or fitted material and analysis parameters, most notably the artificially soft and large particles, the fitted sound-speed correction, and the guessed lunar scaling parameters.

free parameters (10)
  • sound-speed scaling factor = sqrt(3/2)
    Applied to eq. 7 to match predicted c0 to simulated c0 (Sec. 2.8.3).
  • rolling viscous damping (gamma_d,r) = 2
    Tuned for single-particle settling (Sec. 2.4).
  • Young's modulus E = 5 MPa
    Chosen for timestep tractability, orders of magnitude below regolith (Sec. 2.4).
  • particle radius R = 1.25 mm
    Chosen ~10x regolith mean for tractability (Sec. 2.4).
  • lofting cutoff angle theta = 1 degree
    Assumed in eq. 12 loft-depth force balance (Sec. 3.5).
  • wavefront velocity vm in eq. 12 = 0.1 m/s
    Fixed at elastic limit instead of per-case measured vm (Sec. 3.5).
  • overlap ratio delta_m/delta_0 (Fig. 31) = 4
    Maximum observed overlap ratio used for strength (Sec. 3.5).
  • Lunar particle modulus = 500 MPa
    Assumed 100x simulated modulus using bulk-to-particle scaling (Sec. 3.6).
  • Lunar cohesion energy density = 100 kJ/m^3
    Assumed 100x simulated kc via same scaling (Sec. 3.6).
  • wave peak detection threshold = 10x initial force
    Threshold for first peak in sensor force (Sec. 2.8.3).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Hertz contact law with JKR cohesion and EPSD rolling friction captures the relevant granular physics.
    Underlies all contact forces; validated for wave speeds in 1D and 3D, not specifically for surface dilation.
  • domain assumption A 2 cm wide channel with periodic boundary conditions represents an annular sector of a radially expanding impact wave.
    Sec. 2.3; width is about 8 particle diameters, larger than the 5-diameter wall sheath.
  • domain assumption Vacuum exposure in simulation (no gas) is equivalent to the lunar surface condition for free-surface dilation.
    No gas damping is modeled; the paper argues interstitial gas suppresses dilation on Earth (Sec. 1, 3.5).
  • ad hoc to paper Eqs. 6-7 for 1D chains can be applied to the 3D bed after a sqrt(3/2) correction.
    Scaling factor is fitted; used for sound-speed validation (Sec. 2.8.3).
  • ad hoc to paper Monodisperse spheres with E=5 MPa and R=1.25 mm suffice to demonstrate the phenomenon qualitatively.
    Authors state idealized particles differ from regolith by orders of magnitude (Sec. 2.4, 3.6).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Simulation of Lateral Impulse Induced Inertial Dilation at the Surface of a Vacuum-Exposed Granular Assembly." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QHKFGXJ3

@misc{pith2026250904074,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Simulation of Lateral Impulse Induced Inertial Dilation at the Surface of a Vacuum-Exposed Granular Assembly},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QHKFGXJ3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.04074}
}
read the original abstract

We demonstrate for the first time that a lateral impulse experienced by a granular channel can induce an inertial bulk dilation over long distances across a granular medium with a mechanically free surface. The surface dilation requires zero overburden pressure (exposure to vacuum) and is precipitated by the passing of waves traveling barely above the sound speed (> Mach 1.05). We simulate this phenomenon using open source Soft Sphere Discrete Element Method (SSDEM) software. We prepare channels of monodisperse, cohesive spherical particles exposed to vacuum and modeled as Hertzian springs. We validate our model by recreating acoustic wave, strong shock, and shear dilation behavior. We then create shocks within the channel to determine the sensitivity of surface dilation to wave speed, wave type, initial packing fraction, and boundary effects. The shocks we create undergo a rapid decay in strength and appear to propagate as solitary waves that can be sustained across the channel. We find that an inertial surface dilation is induced by compressive solitary waves, is insensitive to channel length, increases with bed height, and increases substantially with initial packing fraction. A hard subsurface floor is required to maintain this wave over the entire channel. Free surface dilation induced by laterally propagating impulse loading could be implicated in the formation of Lunar Cold Spots, distal regions of low thermal inertia surrounding young craters on the Moon.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Royer, B

    J.R. Royer, B. Conyers, E.I. Corwin, P.J. Eng, and H.M. Jaeger. The role of intersti- tial gas in determining the impact response of granular beds. Europhys. Lett. , 93(2): 28008, 2011. URL https://doi.org/10.1209/ 0295-5075/93/28008

    2011

  2. [2]

    Reynolds

    O. Reynolds. L VII. On the dilatancy of media composed of rigid particles in contact. With experimental illustrations. The Lond., Edinb., and Dublin Philosoph. Mag. and J. of Sci. , 20(127):469–481, 1885. URL https: //doi.org/10.1080/14786448508627791

    doi:10.1080/14786448508627791

  3. [3]

    Tillemans and H.J

    H.-J. Tillemans and H.J. Herrmann. Simu- lating deformations of granular solids under shear. Physica A: Stat. Mech. and its Appl. , 217(3-4):261–288, 1995. URL https://doi. org/10.1016/0378-4371(95)00111-J

    work page doi:10.1016/0378-4371(95)00111-j 1995

  4. [4]

    Wensrich

    C. Wensrich. Experimental behaviour of quaking in tall silos. Powder Technol., 127 (1):87–94, 2002. URL https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0032-5910(02)00105-5

    2002

  5. [5]

    Philippe and D

    P. Philippe and D. Bideau. Compaction dynamics of a granular medium under ver- tical tapping. Europhys. Lett. , 60(5):677,

  6. [6]

    Sture, N.C

    S. Sture, N.C. Costes, S.N. Batiste, M.R. Lankton, K.A. AlShibli, B. Jeremic, R.A. Swanson, and M. Frank. Mechanics of granular materials at low effective stresses. J. of Aero. Eng. , 11(3):67– 72, 1998. URL https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)0893-1321(1998)11:3(67)

    1998

  7. [7]

    Tournat, V.Y

    V. Tournat, V.Y. Zaitsev, V.E. Nazarov, V.E. Gusev, and B. Castagn` ede. Experi- mental study of nonlinear acoustic effects in a granular medium. Acoustical Phys., 51 (5):543–553, 2005. URL https://doi.org/10. 1134/1.2042573

    2005

  8. [8]

    Van der Elst, E.E

    N.J. Van der Elst, E.E. Brodsky, P.-Y. Le Bas, and P.A. Johnson. Auto-acoustic compaction in steady shear flows: Exper- imental evidence for suppression of shear dilatancy by internal acoustic vibration. J. of Geophys. Res.: Solid Earth , 117 (B9), 2012. URL https://doi.org/10.1029/ 2011JB008897

    2012

Show all 121 references
  1. [9]

    Campbell

    C.S. Campbell. Stress-controlled elastic granular shear flows. J. of Fluid Mech. , 539:273–297, 2005. URL https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0022112005005616

    2005

  2. [10]

    K.E. Daniels. Rubble-pile near earth objects: Insights from granular physics. Asteroids: Prospective Energy and Mat. Resour., pages 271–286, 2013. URL https: //doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39244-3 11

    2013 doi

  3. [11]

    Walsh, R.-L

    K.J. Walsh, R.-L. Ballouz, E.R. Jawin, C. Avdellidou, O.S. Barnouin, C.A. Ben- nett, E.B. Bierhaus, B.J. Bos, S. Cambioni, H.C. Connolly Jr, et al. Near-zero cohesion and loose packing of Bennu’s near subsur- face revealed by spacecraft contact. Sci. Adv., 8(27):eabm6629, 2022...

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Murdoch, B

    N. Murdoch, B. Rozitis, K. Nordstrom, S.F. Green, P. Michel, T.-L. de Lophem, and W. Losert. Granular convection in microgravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 110:018307, Jan 2013. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.110.018307

    2013

  5. [13]

    Shinbrot, T

    T. Shinbrot, T. Sabuwala, T. Siu, M.V. Lazo, and P. Chakraborty. Size sorting on the rubble-pile asteroid Itokawa. Phys. Rev. Lett., 118(11):111101, 2017. URL https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.111101

    2017 doi

  6. [14]

    Wright, A.C

    E. Wright, A.C. Quillen, J. South, R.C. Nel- son, P. Sanchez, L. Martini, S.R. Schwartz, M. Nakajima, and E. Asphaug. Boul- der stranding in ejecta launched by an impact generated seismic pulse. Icarus, 337:113424, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.icarus.2019.113424

    2020

  7. [15]

    J.V. Farr. Loading rate effects on the one- dimensional compressibility of four partially Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 36 mode = title Fig. B1 W ave Visualization. Wave propagation seen through force visualization. We performed the shocking procedure on a 2 m channel fi...

    2021

  8. [16]

    Holsapple

    K.A. Holsapple. The scaling of impact processes in planetary sciences. Ann. Rev. of Earth and Planet. Sci. , 21(1):333– 373, 1993. URL https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.ea.21.050193.002001

    1993

  9. [17]

    Aoki and T

    K.M. Aoki and T. Akiyama. Simu- lation studies of pressure and density Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template mode = title 37 wave propagations in vertically vibrated beds of granules. Phys. Rev. E , 52(3): 3288, 1995. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevE.52.3288

    2021

  10. [18]

    Gusev, V

    V. Gusev, V. Aleshin, and V. Tournat. Reflection of nonlinear acoustic waves from the mechanically free surface of an uncon- solidated granular medium. Acta Acustica United w. Acustica , 94(2):215–228, 2008. URL https://doi.org/10.3813/AAA.918025

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    S´ anchez, D.J

    P. S´ anchez, D.J. Scheeres, and A.C. Quillen. Transmission of a seismic wave generated by impacts on granular asteroids. The Planet. Sci. J. , 3(10):245, 2022. URL https://doi. org/10.3847/PSJ/ac960c

    2022 doi

  12. [20]

    Tancredi, P-Y Liu, A

    G. Tancredi, P-Y Liu, A. Campo-Bagatin, F. Moreno, and B Dominguez. Lofting of low speed ejecta produced in the DART experiment and production of a dust cloud. Mon. Not. of the R. Astro. Soc. , 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3258

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    Goldshtein, M

    A. Goldshtein, M. Shapiro, and C. Gutfin- ger. Mechanics of collisional motion of gran- ular materials. Part 4. Expansion wave.J. of Fluid Mech., 327:117–138, 1996. URL https: //doi.org/10.1017/S0022112096008488

    1996 doi

  14. [23]

    Lu and M

    G. Lu and M. Fall. State-of-the-art mod- elling of soil behaviour under blast load- ing. Geotech. and Geolog. Eng. , 36:3331– 3355, 2018. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10706-018-0560-5

    2018

  15. [24]

    G.S. Collins. Numerical simulations of impact crater formation with dilatancy. J. of Geophys. Res.: Planets , 119(12):2600– 2619, 2014. URL https://doi.org/10.1002/ 2014JE004708

    2014

  16. [25]

    Gowd and F

    T.N. Gowd and F. Rummel. Effect of confining pressure on the fracture behaviour of a porous rock. In Int. J. of Rock Mech. and Mining Sci. & Geomech. Abstracts, volume 17, pages 225–229. Else- vier, 1980. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/ 0148-9062(80)91089-X

    1980

  17. [26]

    Brown and H.M

    E. Brown and H.M. Jaeger. The role of dila- tion and confining stresses in shear thicken- ing of dense suspensions. J. of Rheology, 56 (4):875–923, 2012. URL https://doi.org/10. 1122/1.4709423

    2012

  18. [28]

    Williams, J.L

    J.-P. Williams, J.L. Bandfield, D.A. Paige, T.M. Powell, B.T. Greenhagen, S. Taylor, P.O. Hayne, E.J. Speyerer, R.R. Ghent, and E.S. Costello. Lunar Cold Spots and Crater Production on the Moon. J. of Geophys. Res.: Planets, 123(9):2380–2392, 2018. URL https://doi.org/10.1029/...

    2018 doi

  19. [30]

    Nesterenko

    V.F. Nesterenko. Dynamics of heteroge- neous materials . Springer Science & Busi- ness Media, 2013. URL https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-1-4757-3524-6

    2013

  20. [31]

    Nesterenko

    V.F. Nesterenko. Propagation of non- linear compression pulses in granular media. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys.(Engl. Transl.);(United States), 24(5), 1984. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00905892

    1984 doi

  21. [32]

    Coste, E

    C. Coste, E. Falcon, and S. Fauve. Soli- tary waves in a chain of beads under Hertz contact. Phys. Rev. E , 56(5): 6104, 1997. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevE.56.6104

    1997

  22. [33]

    S. Sen, M. Manciu, and J.D. Wright. Soli- tonlike pulses in perturbed and driven Hertzian chains and their possible applica- tions in detecting buried impurities. Phys. Rev. E, 57(2):2386, 1998. URL https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevE.57.2386

    1998 doi

  23. [34]

    J. Hong, H. Kim, and J.-P. Hwang. Charac- terization of soliton damping in the granular chain under gravity. Phys. Rev. E , 61(1): 964, 2000. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevE.61.964

  24. [35]

    Shoaib and L

    M. Shoaib and L. Kari. Discrete element simulation of elastoplastic shock wave prop- agation in spherical particles. Adv. in Acoust. and Vib. , 2011, 2011. URL https: Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 38 mode = title //doi.org/10.1155/2011/123695

    2011 doi

  25. [36]

    Chakravarty and S

    S. Chakravarty and S. Sen. Possibility of useful mechanical energy from noise: the solitary wave train problem in the granu- lar chain revisited. Granular Matter, 20(3): 1–10, 2018. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10035-018-0811-4

    2018

  26. [37]

    Shukla and C

    A. Shukla and C. Damania. Experimental investigation of wave velocity and dynamic contact stresses in an assembly of disks.Exp. Mech., 27(3):268–281, 1987. URL https:// doi.org/10.1007/BF02318093

    1987 doi

  27. [38]

    Sen and R.S

    S. Sen and R.S. Sinkovits. Sound propaga- tion in impure granular columns. Phys. Rev. E, 54(6):6857, 1996. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.6857

    1996 doi

  28. [39]

    Owens and K.E

    E.T. Owens and K.E. Daniels. Sound propagation and force chains in granu- lar materials. Europhys. Lett. , 94(5): 54005, 2011. URL https://doi.org/10.1209/ 0295-5075/94/54005

    2011

  29. [40]

    Nishida, K

    M. Nishida, K. Tanaka, and T. Ishida. DEM simulation of wave propagation in two-dimensional ordered array of parti- cles. In Shock Waves , pages 815–820. Springer, 2009. URL https://doi.org/10. 1007/978-3-540-85181-3 3

    2009

  30. [42]

    Leonard, F

    A. Leonard, F. Fraternali, and C. Daraio. Directional wave propagation in a highly nonlinear square packing of spheres. Exp. Mech., 53(3):327–337, 2013. URL https: //doi.org/10.1007/s11340-011-9544-6

    2013 doi

  31. [43]

    Pal, A.P

    R.K. Pal, A.P. Awasthi, and P.H. Geubelle. Characterization of wave propagation in elastic and elasto- plastic granular chains. Phys. Rev. E, 89(1):012204, 2014. URL https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.89.012204

    2014 doi

  32. [45]

    Leonard, C

    A. Leonard, C. Chong, P.G. Kevrekidis, and C. Daraio. Traveling waves in 2D hexagonal granular crystal lattices. Granular Matter , 16(4):531–542, 2014. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10035-014-0487-3

    2014 doi

  33. [46]

    Zhang, W

    Q. Zhang, W. Li, J. Lambros, L.A. Bergman, and A.F. Vakakis. Pulse trans- mission and acoustic non-reciprocity in a granular channel with symmetry-breaking clearances. Granular Matter , 22(1):1– 16, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10035-019-0982-7

    2020

  34. [47]

    Tournat and V.E

    V. Tournat and V.E. Gusev. Acoustics of unconsolidated “model” granular media: An overview of recent results and several open problems. Acta Acustica united w. Acustica, 96(2):208–224, 2010. URL https://doi.org/ 10.3813/AAA.918271

    2010 doi

  35. [48]

    K. Tell, C. Dreißigacker, A.C. Tchapnda, P. Yu, and M. Sperl. Acoustic waves in gran- ular packings at low confinement pressure. Rev. of Sci. Instr., 91(3):033906, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5122848

    2020 doi

  36. [49]

    G´ omez, A.M

    L.R. G´ omez, A.M. Turner, M. van Hecke, and V. Vitelli. Shocks near jamming. Phys. Rev. Letters , 108(5):058001, 2012. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108. 058001

    2012 doi

  37. [50]

    Rogers and C.G

    A.J. Rogers and C.G. Don. Location of buried objects by an acoustic impulse tech- nique. Acoustics Australia, 22:5–5, 1994

    1994

  38. [51]

    Sen and M

    S. Sen and M. Manciu. Solitary wave dynamics in generalized Hertz chains: An improved solution of the equation of motion. Phys. Rev. E , 64(5):056605, 2001. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE. 64.056605

    2001 doi

  39. [52]

    Sen, T.R

    S. Sen, T.R. Krishna Mohan, D.P. Visco Jr, S. Swaminathan, A. Sokolow, E. Avalos, and M. Nakagawa. Using mechanical energy as a probe for the detection and imaging of shallow buried inclusions in dry granular beds. Int. J. of Mod. Phys. B , 19(18):2951– 2973, 2005. URL https:/...

    2005

  40. [53]

    Sen, T.R

    S. Sen, T.R. Krishna Mohan, and M. Tiwari. Impact dispersion using 2D and 3D com- posite granular packing. KONA Powder and Particle J. , page 2017014, 2017. URL https://doi.org/10.14356/kona.2017014. Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template mode = title 39

    2017 doi

  41. [54]

    Hostler and C.E

    S.R. Hostler and C.E. Brennen. Pressure wave propagation in a granular bed. Phys. Rev. E , 72(3):031303, 2005. URL https:// doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.031303

    2005 doi

  42. [55]

    Quillen, M

    A.C. Quillen, M. Neiderbach, B. Suo, J. South, E. Wright, N. Skerrett, P. S´ anchez, F.D. C´ u˜ nez, P. Miklavcic, and H. Askari. Propagation and attenuation of pulses driven by low velocity normal impacts in granular media. Icarus, 386:115139, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.101...

    2022 doi

  43. [56]

    T. Jiao, W. Chen, Y. Takato, S. Sen, and D. Huang. Revisiting nesterenko’s solitary wave in the precompressed granular align- ment held between fixed ends. Granular Matter, 25(2):17, 2023. URL https://doi. org/10.1007/s10035-023-01309-y

    2023 doi

  44. [57]

    Sutton and F.K

    G.H. Sutton and F.K. Duennebier. Elastic properties of the lunar surface from Sur- veyor spacecraft data. J. of Geophys. Res. , 75(35):7439–7444, 1970. URL https://doi. org/10.1029/JB075i035p07439

    1970 doi

  45. [58]

    Cooper, R.L

    M.R. Cooper, R.L. Kovach, and J.S. Watkins. Lunar near-surface structure. Rev. of Geophys. , 12(3):291–308, 1974. URL https://doi.org/10.1029/RG012i003p00291

    1974 doi

  46. [59]

    Mouraille, O

    O. Mouraille, O. Herbst, and S. Luding. Sound propagation in isotropically and uni- axially compressed cohesive, frictional gran- ular solids. Eng. Fracture Mech. , 76(6): 781–792, 2009. URL https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.engfracmech.2008.09.001

    2009

  47. [60]

    Botello, A

    F.R. Botello, A. Castellanos, and V. Tour- nat. Ultrasonic probing of cohesive granular media at very low consolidation. Ultrason- ics, 69:193–200, 2016. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.ultras.2015.11.011

    2016 doi

  48. [61]

    Agui and C.M

    J.H. Agui and C.M. Creager. High impact wave propagation studies in lunar granu- lar systems. In Earth and Space 2018: Eng. for Extreme Environ. , pages 99–108. American Society of Civil Engineers Reston, V A, 2018. URL https://doi.org/10.1061/ 9780784481899.011

    2018

  49. [62]

    Zeng, J.H

    X. Zeng, J.H. Agui, and M. Nakagawa. Wave velocities in granular materials under microgravity. J. of Aero. Eng. , 20(2):116– 123, 2007. URL https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)0893-1321(2007)20:2(116)

    2007

  50. [63]

    El Shourbagy, S

    S.AM. El Shourbagy, S. Okeda, and H.-G. Matuttis. Acoustic of sound propagation in granular materials in one, two, and three dimensions. J. of the Phys. Soc. of Japan, 77 (3):034606–034606, 2008. URL https://doi. org/10.1143/jpsj.77.034606

    2008 doi

  51. [64]

    Burgoyne, J.A

    H.A. Burgoyne, J.A. Newman, W.C. Jack- son, and C. Daraio. Guided impact mit- igation in 2D and 3D granular crystals. Procedia Eng., 103:52–59, 2015. URL https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.04.008

    2015 doi

  52. [65]

    Fonseka, A.P

    R.D.JI. Fonseka, A.P. Awasthi, J. Lambros, and P.H. Geubelle. Shockwaves in jammed ductile granular media. J. of Appl. Mech. , 89(5):051003, 2022. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1115/1.4053622

    2022 doi

  53. [66]

    Fonseka, P.H

    R.D.JI. Fonseka, P.H. Geubelle, and J. Lam- bros. Effect of confinement on the impact response of a granular array. Exp. Mech., 62 (5):849–862, 2022. URL https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11340-022-00819-9

    2022

  54. [67]

    Kloss, C

    C. Kloss, C. Goniva, A. Hager, S. Amberger, and S. Pirker. Models, algorithms and validation for opensource DEM and CFD– DEM. Prog. in Comp. Fluid Dyn., an Int. J., 12(2-3):140–152, 2012. URL https://doi. org/10.1504/PCFD.2012.047457

    2012 arXiv

  55. [68]

    X. Jia, C. Caroli, and B. Velicky. Ultra- sound propagation in externally stressed granular media. Phys. Rev. Lett , 82(9): 1863, 1999. URL https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.82.1863

    1999

  56. [69]

    Goddard and A.K

    J.D. Goddard and A.K. Didwania. Compu- tations of dilatancy and yield surfaces for assemblies of rigid frictional spheres. The Quart. J. of Mech. and Appl. Math. , 51(1): 15–44, 1998. URL https://doi.org/10.1093/ qjmam/51.1.15

    1998

  57. [70]

    Makse, N

    H.A. Makse, N. Gland, D.L. Johnson, and L.M. Schwartz. Why effective medium the- ory fails in granular materials. Phys. Rev. Lett., 83(24):5070, 1999. URL https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.5070

    1999 doi

  58. [71]

    Makse, N

    H.A. Makse, N. Gland, D.L. Johnson, and L. Schwartz. Granular packings: Nonlinear elasticity, sound propagation, and collec- tive relaxation dynamics. Phys. Rev. E , 70 (6):061302, 2004. URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevE.70.061302. Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 40 mo...

    2004

  59. [72]

    Cundall and O.DL

    P.A. Cundall and O.DL. Strack. A dis- crete numerical model for granular assem- blies. G´ eotechnique, 29(1):47–65, 1979. URL https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1979.29.1.47

    1979 doi

  60. [73]

    Thornton

    C. Thornton. Numerical simulations of deviatoric shear deformation of granular media. G´ eotechnique, 50(1):43–53, 2000. URL https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2000.50. 1.43

    2000 doi

  61. [74]

    Tanaka, M

    K. Tanaka, M. Nishida, T. Kunimochi, and T. Takagi. Discrete element simulation and experiment for dynamic response of two- dimensional granular matter to the impact of a spherical projectile. Powder Technol., 124(1-2):160–173, 2002. URL https://doi. org/10.1016/S0032-5910(01)00489-2

    2002 doi

  62. [76]

    Schwartz, D.C

    S.R. Schwartz, D.C. Richardson, and P. Michel. An implementation of the soft-sphere discrete element method in a high-performance parallel grav- ity tree-code. Granular Matter , 14(3):363–380, 2012. URL https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10035-012-0346-z

    2012 doi

  63. [77]

    S´ anchez and D.J

    P. S´ anchez and D.J. Scheeres. Simu- lating asteroid rubble piles with a self- gravitating soft-sphere distinct element method model. The Astrophys. J. , 727(2): 120, 2011. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0004-637X/727/2/120

    2011

  64. [78]

    Tancredi, A

    G. Tancredi, A. Maciel, L. Heredia, P. Richeri, and S. Nesmachnow. Granular physics in low-gravity environments using discrete element method. Mon. Notices of the Roy. Astronom. Soc. , 420(4):3368– 3380, 2012. URL https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2011.20259.x

    2012

  65. [79]

    S´ anchez and D.J

    P. S´ anchez and D.J. Scheeres. Disruption patterns of rotating self-gravitating aggre- gates: A survey on angle of friction and tensile strength. Icarus, 271:453–471, 2016. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icarus.2016. 01.016

    2016 doi

  66. [80]

    DeMartini, D.C

    J.V. DeMartini, D.C. Richardson, O.S. Barnouin, N.C. Schmerr, J.B. Plescia, P. Scheirich, and P. Pravec. Using a dis- crete element method to investigate seismic response and spin change of 99942 Apophis during its 2029 tidal encounter with Earth. Icarus, 328:93–103, 2019. URL...

    doi

  67. [81]

    Zhang, P

    Y. Zhang, P. Michel, D.C. Richardson, O.S. Barnouin, H.F. Agrusa, K. Tsiganis, C. Manzoni, and B.H. May. Creep stabil- ity of the DART/Hera mission target 65803 Didymos II. the role of cohesion. Icarus, 362:114433, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.icarus.2021.114433

    2021

  68. [82]

    O’Donovan, E

    J. O’Donovan, E. Ibraim, C. O’sullivan, S. Hamlin, D. Muir Wood, and G. Marketos. Micromechanics of seismic wave propaga- tion in granular materials. Granular Matter, 18(3):1–18, 2016. URL https://doi.org/10. 1007/s10035-015-0599-4

    2016

  69. [83]

    Berger and C.M

    K.J. Berger and C.M. Hrenya. Pre- dicting regolith erosion during a lunar landing: Role of continuous size dis- tribution. J. of Aero. Eng. , 30(5): 04017027, 2017. URL https://doi.org/10. 1061/(ASCE)AS.1943-5525.0000735

    2017

  70. [84]

    H. Otto, K. Kerst, C. Roloff, G. Janiga, and A. Katterfeld. CFD–DEM simulation and experimental investigation of the flow behavior of lunar regolith JSC-1A. Partic- uology, 40:34–43, 2018. URL https://doi. org/10.1016/j.partic.2017.12.003

    2018 doi

  71. [85]

    Hurley and J.E

    R.C. Hurley and J.E. Andrade. Fric- tion in inertial granular flows: competition between dilation and grain-scale dissipa- tion rates. Granular Matter , 17(3):287– 295, 2015. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10035-015-0564-2

    2015

  72. [87]

    Coste and B

    C. Coste and B. Gilles. On the validity of Hertz contact law for granular mate- rial acoustics. The Euro. Phys. J. B- Condens. Matter and Complex Sys. , 7(1): 155–168, 1999. URL https://doi.org/10. 1007/s100510050598

    1999

  73. [88]

    Ai, J.-F

    J. Ai, J.-F. Chen, J.M. Rotter, and J.Y. Ooi. Assessment of rolling resistance mod- els in discrete element simulations. Powder Technol., 206(3):269–282, 2011. URL https: Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template mode = title 41 //doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2010.09.030

    2011 doi

  74. [89]

    Johnson, K

    K.L. Johnson, K. Kendall, and A.D. Roberts. Surface energy and the contact of elastic solids. Proc. of the R. Soc. of Lond. A. Math. and Phys. Sci. , 324(1558):301– 313, 1971. URL https://doi.org/10.1098/ rspa.1971.0141

    1971

  75. [90]

    G´ omez, A.M

    L.R. G´ omez, A.M. Turner, and V. Vitelli. Uniform shock waves in disordered gran- ular matter. Phys. Rev. E , 86:041302, Oct 2012. URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevE.86.041302

    2012

  76. [91]

    Mase, R.E

    G.T. Mase, R.E. Smelser, and G.E. Mase. Continuum Mechanics for Engineers . CRC press, 2009. URL https://doi.org/10.1201/ 9780429174391

    2009

  77. [92]

    Sunday, N

    C. Sunday, N. Murdoch, S. Tardivel, S.R. Schwartz, and P. Michel. Validating N-body code CHRONO for granular DEM simula- tions in reduced-gravity environments.Mon. Notices of the Roy. Astronom. Soc. , 498(1): 1062–1079, 2020. URL https://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/staa2454

    2020

  78. [93]

    Abd-Elhady, S

    M.S. Abd-Elhady, S. Abd-Elhady, C.C.M. Rindt, and A.A. Van Steenhoven. Force propagation speed in a bed of particles due to an incident particle impact. Adv. Pow- der Technol. , 21(2):150–164, 2010. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2009.11.009

    2010 doi

  79. [95]

    Gupta, J

    P. Gupta, J. Sun, and J.Y. Ooi. DEM-CFD simulation of a dense fluidized bed: Wall boundary and particle size effects. Pow- der Technol., 293:37–47, 2016. URL https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2015.11.050

    2016 doi

  80. [96]

    Potapov and C.S

    A.V. Potapov and C.S. Campbell. Prop- agation of elastic waves in deep vertically shaken particle beds. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 77 (23):4760, 1996. URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.77.4760

    1996

  81. [97]

    Stukowski

    A. Stukowski. Visualization and analysis of atomistic simulation data with OVITO– the Open Visualization Tool. Modelling and Sim. in Mat. Sci. and Eng. , 18(1): 015012, 2009. URL https://doi.org/10. 1088/0965-0393/18/1/015012

    2009

  82. [98]

    McKay, G

    D.S. McKay, G. Heiken, A. Basu, G. Blan- ford, S. Simon, R. Reedy, M.F. Bevan, and J. Papike. The lunar regolith. In Lunar Sourcebook: a user’s guide to the Moon, edi- tor, Heiken, Grant H. and Vaniman, David T. and Bevan, M. F. , volume 7, pages 285–

  83. [99]

    Carrier III, G.R

    W.D. Carrier III, G.R. Olhoeft, and W. Mendell. Physical properties of the lunar surface. In Lunar Sourcebook: a user’s guide to the Moon, editor, Heiken, G.H. and Vaniman, D.T. and Bevan, M.F. , pages 475–594. Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, New York, 1991

    1991

  84. [100]

    Kovach and J.S

    R.L. Kovach and J.S. Watkins. The velocity structure of the lunar crust. The Moon, 7(1): 63–75, 1973. URL https://doi.org/10.1007/ BF00578808

    1973

  85. [101]

    Chau, R.H.C

    K.T. Chau, R.H.C. Wong, and J.J. Wu. Coefficient of restitution and rotational motions of rockfall impacts. Int. J. of Rock Mech. and Mining Sci. , 39(1):69– 77, 2002. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/ S1365-1609(02)00016-3

    2002

  86. [102]

    Zhang, D.C

    Y. Zhang, D.C. Richardson, O.S. Barnouin, P. Michel, S.R. Schwartz, and R.-L. Bal- louz. Rotational failure of rubble-pile bodies: Influences of shear and cohesive strengths. The Astrophys. J. , 857(1): 15, 2018. URL https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4357/aab5b2

    2018

  87. [103]

    J. Wang, M. Zhang, L. Feng, H. Yang, Y. Wu, and G. Yue. The behaviors of particle-wall collision for non-spherical par- ticles: Experimental investigation. Powder Technol., 363:187–194, 2020. URL https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.12.041

    2020 doi

  88. [104]

    Holmes, R

    M.A.J. Holmes, R. Brown, P.A.L. Wauters, N.P. Lavery, and S.G.R. Brown. Bending and twisting friction models in soft-sphere discrete element simulations for static and dynamic problems. Appl. Math. Modelling , 40(5-6):3655–3670, 2016. URL https://doi. org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.10.026

    2016 doi

  89. [105]

    Gouache, C

    T.P. Gouache, C. Brunskill, G.P. Scott, Y. Gao, P. Coste, and Y. Gourinat. Regolith simulant preparation methods for hardware testing. Planet. and Space Sci. , 58(14-15): Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template 42 mode = title 1977–1984, 2010. URL https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.pss.20...

    2021

  90. [106]

    Zhang and H.A

    H.P. Zhang and H.A. Makse. Jam- ming transition in emulsions and gran- ular materials. Phys. Rev. E , 72(1): 011301, 2005. URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevE.72.011301

    2005

  91. [107]

    J. Wang, M. Lei, H. Yang, K. Xu, S. Xu, P. Zhao, and Y. Song. Effects of coeffi- cient of friction and coefficient of restitution on static packing characteristics of polydis- perse spherical pebble bed. Particuology, 57: 1–9, 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j. partic.2020.12.013

    2021 doi

  92. [108]

    Knight, C.G

    J.B. Knight, C.G. Fandrich, C.N. Lau, H.M. Jaeger, and S.R. Nagel. Density relaxation in a vibrated granular material. Phys. Rev. E, 51(5):3957, 1995. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevE.51.3957

    1995 doi

  93. [109]

    Mykulyak

    S.V. Mykulyak. Features of nonlinear wave propagation in a layer of a granu- lar medium. Phys. Mesomech. , 17(2):157– 162, 2014. URL https://doi.org/10.1134/ S1029959914020088

    2014

  94. [110]

    Lee and J

    J.-S. Lee and J. C. Santamarina. Ben- der elements: Performance and signal interpretation. J. of Geotech. and Geoen- viron. Eng. , 131(9):1063–1070, 2005. URL https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE) 1090-0241(2005)131:9(1063)

    2005 doi

  95. [111]

    Mouraille, W.A

    O. Mouraille, W.A. Mulder, and S. Luding. Sound wave acceleration in granular materi- als. J. of Stat. Mech.: Theory and Exp., 2006 (07):P07023, 2006. URL https://doi.org/10. 1088/1742-5468/2006/07/P07023

    2006

  96. [112]

    W. Li, E.N. Hahn, X. Yao, T.C. Germann, B. Feng, and X. Zhang. On the grain size dependence of shock responses in nanocrys- talline sic ceramics at high strain rates. Acta Materialia, 200:632–651, 2020. URL https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.09.044

    2020 doi

  97. [113]

    Ning and T.M

    Z. Ning and T.M. Evans. Discrete element method study of shear wave propagation in granular soil. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechan- ics and Geotechnical Engineering, France, Paris, pages 1031–1034, 2013

    2013

  98. [114]

    Shojaaee, J.-N

    Z. Shojaaee, J.-N. Roux, F. Chevoir, and D.E. Wolf. Shear flow of dense granu- lar materials near smooth walls. I. Shear localization and constitutive laws in the boundary region. Phys. Rev. E , 86(1): 011301, 2012. URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevE.86.011301

    2012

  99. [115]

    Frizzell

    E.S. Frizzell. Shock induced dilation, vali- dation code, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10. 5281/zenodo.7608511

    2023

  100. [116]

    Frizzell

    E.S. Frizzell. Shock induced dilation, restart files and single run output code, 2023. URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7608668

    2023 doi

  101. [117]

    Zhang, D.C

    Y. Zhang, D.C. Richardson, O.S. Barnouin, C. Maurel, P. Michel, S.R. Schwartz, R.- L. Ballouz, L.AM. Benner, S.P. Naidu, and J. Li. Creep stability of the proposed AIDA mission target 65803 Didymos: I. Discrete cohesionless granular physics model. Icarus, 294:98–123, 2017. URL...

    2017

  102. [118]

    Subramaniyan and C.T

    A.K. Subramaniyan and C.T. Sun. Contin- uum interpretation of virial stress in molecu- lar simulations. Int. J. of Solids and Struct. , 45(14-15):4340–4346, 2008. URL https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.03.016

    2008 doi

  103. [119]

    van den Wildenberg, R

    S. van den Wildenberg, R. van Loo, and M. van Hecke. Shock waves in weakly com- pressed granular media. Phys. Rev. Letters, 111(21):218003, 2013. URL https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.218003

    2013 doi

  104. [120]

    J.D. Goddard. Nonlinear elasticity and pressure-dependent wave speeds in granu- lar media. Proc. of the R. Soc. of Lond. S. A: Math. and Phys. Sci. , 430(1878):105– 131, 1990. URL https://doi.org/10.1098/ rspa.1990.0083

    1990

  105. [121]

    Li and R.M

    L. Li and R.M. Holt. Particle scale reservoir mechanics. Oil & Gas Sci. and Technol. , 57 (5):525–538, 2002. URL https://doi.org/10. 2516/ogst:2002035

    2002

  106. [122]

    Somfai, J.-N

    E. Somfai, J.-N. Roux, J.H. Snoeijer, M. Van Hecke, and W. Van Saarloos. Elastic wave propagation in confined gran- ular systems. Phys. Rev. E , 72(2): 021301, 2005. URL https://doi.org/10. 1103/PhysRevE.72.021301

    2005

  107. [123]

    Fa, M.-H

    W.Z. Fa, M.-H. Zhu, T.T. Liu, and J.B. Plescia. Regolith stratigraphy at the chang’E-3 landing site as seen by lunar pen- etrating radar. Geophys. Res. Lett. , 42 (23):10–179, 2015. URL https://doi.org/10. 1002/2015GL066537

    2015

  108. [124]

    Mohan, K.K

    L.S. Mohan, K.K. Rao, and P.R. Nott. A frictional Cosserat model for the slow Springer Nature 2021 LATEX template mode = title 43 shearing of granular materials. J. of Fluid Mechanics, 457:377–409, 2002. URL https: //doi.org/10.1017/S0022112002007796

    2021 doi

  109. [125]

    Fleischmann, R

    J. Fleischmann, R. Serban, D. Negrut, and P. Jayakumar. On the importance of dis- placement history in soft-body contact mod- els. J. of Comput. and Nonlin. Dyn. , 11 (4), 2016. URL https://doi.org/10.1115/1. 4031197

    2016 doi

  110. [126]

    Mohamed and M

    A. Mohamed and M. Gutierrez. Comprehen- sive study of the effects of rolling resistance on the stress–strain and strain localization behavior of granular materials. Granular Matter, 12(5):527–541, 2010. URL https: //doi.org/10.1007/s10035-010-0211-x

    2010 doi

  111. [127]

    Jiang, Z

    M. Jiang, Z. Shen, and J. Wang. A novel three-dimensional contact model for gran- ulates incorporating rolling and twisting resistances. Comput. and Geotechnics , 65: 147–163, 2015. URL https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.011

    2015

  112. [356]

    Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge, New York, 1991

    1991

  113. [2002]

    URL https://doi.org/10.1209/epl/ i2002-00362-7

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 5, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.