Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Deep Learning Methods for Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Simulations of Airfoil Flows

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1810.08217 v3 pith:QHYDE75U submitted 2018-10-18 cs.LG physics.flu-dynstat.ML

classification cs.LGphysics.flu-dynstat.ML
keywords learningaccuracydeepsolutionsairfoilarchitecturemethodsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With this study we investigate the accuracy of deep learning models for the inference of Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes solutions. We focus on a modernized U-net architecture, and evaluate a large number of trained neural networks with respect to their accuracy for the calculation of pressure and velocity distributions. In particular, we illustrate how training data size and the number of weights influence the accuracy of the solutions. With our best models we arrive at a mean relative pressure and velocity error of less than 3% across a range of previously unseen airfoil shapes. In addition all source code is publicly available in order to ensure reproducibility and to provide a starting point for researchers interested in deep learning methods for physics problems. While this work focuses on RANS solutions, the neural network architecture and learning setup are very generic, and applicable to a wide range of PDE boundary value problems on Cartesian grids.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. AirCANS: CFD 2D Mesh Optimisation-based Airfoil Classification and Assessment using Neural Networks

    physics.comp-ph 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A MeshCNN-style convolutional network adapted to 2D CFD airfoil meshes classifies airfoil thickness ranges with roughly 67% stable and 83% peak accuracy, but the small self-made dataset and missing artifacts limit the result.

  2. Loop2Net: Data-Driven Generation and Optimization of Airfoil CFD Meshes from Sparse Boundary Coordinates

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Thirty-five airfoil boundary points can be mapped to a dense CFD mesh point cloud by a three-layer network trained with Chamfer and repulsion losses.

Pith tools