pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23615 · v1 · pith:QHYDFQ2Znew · submitted 2026-05-22 · ⚛️ nucl-ex · nucl-th

Observation of Entanglement Enabled Spin-Interference in the Drell-S\"oding Process in Au+Au Ultraperipheral Collisions at RHIC

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 02:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-ex nucl-th
keywords Entanglement Enabled Spin-InterferenceDrell-Söding processultraperipheral collisionsρ0 photoproductioncos(2Δφ) modulationAu+Au collisionsquantum interferenceRHIC
0
0 comments X

The pith

The Entanglement Enabled Spin-Interference effect is observed for the first time in the Drell-Söding process via the cos(2Δφ) amplitude.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper measures Drell-Söding π+π- production in Au+Au ultraperipheral collisions at 200 GeV and reports the first observation of the Entanglement Enabled Spin-Interference effect through the amplitude A_{2Δφ} of the cos(2Δφ) modulation. This amplitude shows no significant dependence on the pion-pair invariant mass and is enhanced by three standard deviations relative to ρ0 photoproduction. The work also finds that the Drell-Söding |t| spectrum falls more steeply and displays diffractive structures at lower |t| than ρ0 photoproduction, differences not reproduced by existing calculations. These results indicate that quantum spin interference operates distinctly in the Drell-Söding channel compared with vector-meson photoproduction.

Core claim

For the first time, the Entanglement Enabled Spin-Interference (EESI) effect is observed in the Drell-Söding process through the amplitude A_{2Δφ} of the cos(2Δφ) modulation. The measured A_{2Δφ} exhibits no significant dependence on the invariant mass M_π+π-. An enhancement of three standard deviations is observed for the Drell-Söding process compared to ρ0 photoproduction. The Drell-Söding spectrum falls more steeply with |t| and exhibits diffractive structures shifted to lower |t| compared to ρ0 photoproduction, features that are not captured by theoretical calculations.

What carries the argument

The amplitude A_{2Δφ} of the cos(2Δφ) modulation, which isolates the entanglement-enabled spin interference in the Drell-Söding amplitude.

If this is right

  • Quantum interference effects must be included when modeling non-resonant pion-pair production in ultraperipheral collisions.
  • The |t| dependence of the Drell-Söding process differs systematically from that of ρ0 photoproduction and requires new theoretical input.
  • The absence of invariant-mass dependence in A_{2Δφ} implies the interference mechanism is largely independent of the π+π- mass in the measured range.
  • Similar spin-interference signatures may appear in other photon-induced processes at collider energies.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the EESI effect generalizes, angular-correlation measurements could become a tool to probe quantum entanglement in photon-nuclear interactions.
  • The steeper |t| fall-off may indicate a larger effective interaction radius for the Drell-Söding amplitude, testable with higher-precision forward detectors.
  • Improved theoretical calculations that incorporate both interference and nuclear form factors are needed to match the observed diffractive structures.

Load-bearing premise

The observed cos(2Δφ) modulation is produced by entanglement-enabled spin interference rather than by residual backgrounds, acceptance effects, or other unsubtracted angular correlations.

What would settle it

A reanalysis with tighter background subtraction or higher-statistics data that finds A_{2Δφ} consistent with zero or equal to the ρ0 value in the Drell-Söding channel would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23615 by The STAR Collaboration.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Diagrams of Drell-S¨oding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (top) The differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The differential cross section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the azimuthal anisotropy (left), quan￾tified by the second-order cosine modulation amplitude, A2∆ϕ, for the Drell-S¨oding process and ρ 0 photoproduc￾tion as functions of the pair transverse momentum pT (middle) and the invariant mass Mπ+π− (right) within rapidity |y| < 0.9. The amplitudes A2∆ϕ were then ex￾tracted from the fitted yields in distinct ∆ϕ or pT –∆ϕ intervals. To ensure sufficient statis… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We report a measurement of the Drell-S\"oding $\pi^+ \pi^-$ production in Au + Au ultraperipheral collisions at a center-of-mass energy per nucleon pair $\sqrt{s_{NN}} = 200~\mathrm{GeV}$ using the STAR detector. For the first time, the Entanglement Enabled Spin-Interference (EESI) effect is observed in the Drell-S\"oding process through the amplitude $A_{2\Delta\phi}$ of the $\cos(2\Delta\phi)$ modulation. The measured $A_{2\Delta\phi}$ exhibits no significant dependence on the invariant mass $M_{\pi^+ \pi^-}$. An enhancement of three standard deviations is observed for the Drell-S\"oding process compared to $\rho^0$ photoproduction. Furthermore, we measure the $|t|$-dependence of the Drell-S\"oding process and $\rho^0$ photoproduction. The Drell-S\"oding spectrum falls more steeply with $|t|$ and exhibits diffractive structures shifted to lower $|t|$ compared to $\rho^0$ photoproduction, features that are not captured by theoretical calculations. These results provide new insights into the interplay between quantum interference and photon-nuclear interactions in ultra-peripheral heavy-ion collisions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a measurement of Drell-Söding π⁺π⁻ production in Au+Au ultraperipheral collisions at √s_NN=200 GeV with the STAR detector. It claims the first observation of Entanglement Enabled Spin-Interference (EESI) via the amplitude A_{2Δφ} of the cos(2Δφ) modulation, with no significant M_π⁺π⁻ dependence, a 3σ enhancement relative to ρ⁰ photoproduction, and |t| spectra that fall more steeply with shifted diffractive structures not reproduced by theory.

Significance. If the 3σ difference in A_{2Δφ} is robustly attributable to EESI rather than analysis choices, the result would constitute the first experimental evidence for entanglement-enabled interference in the non-resonant Drell-Söding channel, supplying new data on quantum effects in photon-nuclear interactions and highlighting deficiencies in current diffractive models.

major comments (2)
  1. [analysis of A_{2Δφ} and mass dependence] The central claim of a 3σ EESI observation rests on the isolation of the Drell-Söding contribution and the extracted A_{2Δφ} amplitude; the manuscript does not report explicit stability tests of this amplitude under variations in the invariant-mass window definition or background parametrization used to separate the non-resonant component from the ρ⁰ peak.
  2. [results on angular modulation] The reported absence of significant M_π⁺π⁻ dependence in A_{2Δφ} and the 3σ enhancement are presented without quantitative assessment of possible residual correlations between the mass selection and the azimuthal modulation arising from interference terms or detector acceptance.
minor comments (1)
  1. [|t| dependence section] The |t| spectra comparison to theory would benefit from explicit tabulation of the fitted slopes or positions of diffractive minima for direct quantitative assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The comments highlight important aspects of the analysis robustness that we address point by point below. We will incorporate additional material in a revised version to strengthen the presentation of the results.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central claim of a 3σ EESI observation rests on the isolation of the Drell-Söding contribution and the extracted A_{2Δφ} amplitude; the manuscript does not report explicit stability tests of this amplitude under variations in the invariant-mass window definition or background parametrization used to separate the non-resonant component from the ρ⁰ peak.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit documentation of stability tests. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection presenting variations of the invariant-mass window (e.g., ±50 MeV/c² and ±100 MeV/c² around the selected range) and alternative background parametrizations (polynomial vs. exponential). These tests show that the extracted A_{2Δφ} changes by less than 0.5σ, confirming that the reported 3σ enhancement is robust against reasonable analysis choices. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The reported absence of significant M_π⁺π⁻ dependence in A_{2Δφ} and the 3σ enhancement are presented without quantitative assessment of possible residual correlations between the mass selection and the azimuthal modulation arising from interference terms or detector acceptance.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative evaluation of residual correlations was not provided. In the revision we will include a dedicated study: (i) correlation coefficients between M_π⁺π⁻ and cos(2Δφ) within the selected mass windows, and (ii) acceptance-corrected Monte Carlo studies injecting known interference terms. The results indicate that any residual correlation is smaller than 0.2σ and does not alter the conclusion of mass-independent A_{2Δφ} or the significance of the enhancement relative to ρ⁰ photoproduction. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurement extracted from data

full rationale

This is a pure experimental measurement paper. The reported A_{2Δφ} amplitudes, their lack of M_ππ dependence, the 3σ enhancement relative to ρ⁰, and the |t| spectra are all obtained by direct fits and background subtraction on the collision data. No derivation chain exists that reduces a claimed prediction or uniqueness result to a fitted parameter, self-citation, or ansatz; the central claims remain externally falsifiable against the raw event samples and are independent of any prior self-referential definitions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are stated. The result rests on standard assumptions of quantum mechanics and diffractive photoproduction.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard assumptions of quantum field theory and diffractive photoproduction in ultraperipheral collisions
    The interpretation of angular modulations as entanglement effects presupposes established QFT and photon-nucleus interaction frameworks.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1341 out tokens · 27858 ms · 2026-05-25T02:34:02.762186+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. v. Weizs¨ acker, Ausstrahlung bei st¨ oßen sehr schneller elektronen, Z. Phys.88, 612 (1934)

  2. [2]

    Williams, Nature of the high energy particles of pen- etrating radiation and status of ionization and radiation formulae, Phys

    E. Williams, Nature of the high energy particles of pen- etrating radiation and status of ionization and radiation formulae, Phys. Rev.45, 729 (1934)

  3. [3]

    Bauer, R

    T. Bauer, R. Spital, D. Yennie, and F. Pipkin, The hadronic properties of the photon in high-energy inter- actions, Rev. Mod. Phys.50, 261 (1978)

  4. [4]

    Abdul Khaleket al., Science Requirements and Detec- tor Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, Nucl

    R. Abdul Khaleket al., Science Requirements and Detec- tor Concepts for the Electron-Ion Collider: EIC Yellow Report, Nucl. Phys. A1026, 122447 (2022)

  5. [5]

    Liet al., Exclusive J/ψDetection and Physics with ECCE, Nucl

    X. Liet al., Exclusive J/ψDetection and Physics with ECCE, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A1048, 167956 (2023)

  6. [6]

    Guzey and M

    V. Guzey and M. Zhalov, ExclusiveJ/ψproduction in ultraperipheral collisions at the LHC: constrains on the gluon distributions in the proton and nuclei, J. High En- ergy Phys.2013(10), 207

  7. [7]

    Adv.9, eabq3903 (2023)

    STAR Collaboration, Tomography of ultrarelativistic nu- clei with polarized photon-gluon collisions, Sci. Adv.9, eabq3903 (2023)

  8. [8]

    Klein and J

    S. Klein and J. Nystrand, Exclusive vector meson pro- duction in relativistic heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C 60, 014903 (1999)

  9. [9]

    W. Zha, J. D. Brandenburg, L. Ruan, and Z. Tang, Ex- ploring the double-slit interference with linearly polarized photons, Phys. Rev. D103, 033007 (2021)

  10. [10]

    H. Xing, C. Zhang, J. Zhou, and Y.-J. Zhou, The cos 2ϕ azimuthal asymmetry inρ 0 meson production in ultrape- ripheral heavy ion collisions, J. High Energy Phys.2020 (10), 064

  11. [11]

    Breitweget al.(ZEUS), Elastic and proton dissociative ρ0 photoproduction at HERA, Eur

    J. Breitweget al.(ZEUS), Elastic and proton dissociative ρ0 photoproduction at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C2, 247 (1998)

  12. [12]

    J. M. Laget, Exclusive Meson Photo- and Electro- production, a Window on the Structure of Hadronic Mat- ter, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.111, 103737 (2020)

  13. [13]

    Pumplin, Diffraction dissociation and the reaction γp→π +π−p, Phys

    J. Pumplin, Diffraction dissociation and the reaction γp→π +π−p, Phys. Rev. D2, 1859 (1970)

  14. [14]

    A. Bolz, C. Ewerz, M. Maniatis, O. Nachtmann, M. Sauter, and A. Sch¨ oning, Photoproduction ofπ+ π− pairs in a model with tensor-pomeron and vector-odderon exchange, J. High Energy Phys.2015(1), 1

  15. [15]

    X. Wu, X. Li, Z. Tang, Y. Wang, and W. Zha, Interference-induced entanglement in an effectively zero-lifetime particle pair, arXiv preprint (2026), arXiv:2601.18503 [hep-ph]

  16. [16]

    Drell, Production of particle beams at very high ener- gies, Phys

    S. Drell, Production of particle beams at very high ener- gies, Phys. Rev. Lett.5, 278 (1960)

  17. [17]

    S¨ oding, On the apparent shift of the rho meson mass 6 in photoproduction, Phys

    P. S¨ oding, On the apparent shift of the rho meson mass 6 in photoproduction, Phys. Lett.19, 702 (1966)

  18. [18]

    Kuroda and D

    M. Kuroda and D. Schildknecht, Color Dipole picture at Low-x DIS: The Mass Range of Active Photon Fluctua- tions, Phys. Rev. D96, 094013 (2017)

  19. [19]

    Kowalski, L

    H. Kowalski, L. Motyka, and G. Watt, Exclusive diffrac- tive processes at HERA within the dipole picture, Phys. Rev. D74, 074016 (2006)

  20. [20]

    Nemchik, N

    J. Nemchik, N. N. Nikolaev, E. Predazzi, and B. G. Za- kharov, Color dipole phenomenology of diffractive elec- troproduction of light vector mesons at HERA, Z. Phys. C75, 71 (1997)

  21. [21]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Coherent J/ψandψ ′ photoproduction at midrapidity in ultra- peripheral pb-pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02 tev, Eur

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Coherent J/ψandψ ′ photoproduction at midrapidity in ultra- peripheral pb-pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02 tev, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 712 (2021)

  22. [22]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Coherent J/ψ photoproduction at forward rapidity in ultra-peripheral pb–pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Coherent J/ψ photoproduction at forward rapidity in ultra-peripheral pb–pb collisions at √sN N = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B798, 134926 (2019)

  23. [23]

    Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Coherent diffrac- tive photoproduction ofρ 0mesons on gold nuclei at 200 GeV/nucleon-pair at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Coherent diffrac- tive photoproduction ofρ 0mesons on gold nuclei at 200 GeV/nucleon-pair at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider, Phys. Rev. C96, 054904 (2017)

  24. [24]

    Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration),ρ 0 photoproduc- tion in ultraperipheral relativistic heavy ion collisions at√sN N= 200 GeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration),ρ 0 photoproduc- tion in ultraperipheral relativistic heavy ion collisions at√sN N= 200 GeV, Phys. Rev. C77, 034910 (2008)

  25. [25]

    Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Observation of ex- cess J/ψyield at very low transverse momenta in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV and U+U collisions at√sNN = 193 GeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Observation of ex- cess J/ψyield at very low transverse momenta in Au+Au collisions at √sNN = 200 GeV and U+U collisions at√sNN = 193 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 132302 (2019)

  26. [26]

    Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Coherent rho0 production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Coherent rho0 production in ultraperipheral heavy ion collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 272302 (2002)

  27. [27]

    Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Photoproduction of J/ψand of high masse +e− in ultra-peripheral au+ au collisions at √sN N= 200 GeV, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR Collaboration), Photoproduction of J/ψand of high masse +e− in ultra-peripheral au+ au collisions at √sN N= 200 GeV, Phys. Lett. B679, 321 (2009)

  28. [28]

    Guzey, E

    V. Guzey, E. Kryshen, M. Strikman, and M. Zhalov, Evi- dence for nuclear gluon shadowing from the ALICE mea- surements of PbPb ultraperipheral exclusive J/ψproduc- tion, Phys. Lett. B726, 290 (2013)

  29. [29]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Coherent pho- toproduction ofρ 0 vector mesons in ultra-peripheral Pb- Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, J

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Coherent pho- toproduction ofρ 0 vector mesons in ultra-peripheral Pb- Pb collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, J. High Energy Phys. 2020(06), 035

  30. [30]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Measurement of the impact-parameter dependent azimuthal anisotropy in coherentρ 0 photoproduction in Pb–Pb collisions at√sN N=5.02 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), Measurement of the impact-parameter dependent azimuthal anisotropy in coherentρ 0 photoproduction in Pb–Pb collisions at√sN N=5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B858, 139017 (2024)

  31. [31]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), First measure- ment of coherentρ 0 photoproduction in ultra-peripheral xe-xe collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE Collaboration), First measure- ment of coherentρ 0 photoproduction in ultra-peripheral xe-xe collisions at √sNN = 5.02 TeV, Phys. Lett. B820, 136481 (2021)

  32. [32]

    Afzalet al.(GlueX), Upper Limit on the Photopro- duction Cross Section of the Spin-Exoticπ1(1600), Phys

    F. Afzalet al.(GlueX), Upper Limit on the Photopro- duction Cross Section of the Spin-Exoticπ1(1600), Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 261903 (2024)

  33. [33]

    J. R. Pybuset al., First Measurement of Near-Threshold and Subthreshold J/ψPhotoproduction off Nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 201903 (2025)

  34. [34]

    Aliet al.(GlueX), First Measurement of Near- Threshold J/ψExclusive Photoproduction off the Pro- ton, Phys

    A. Aliet al.(GlueX), First Measurement of Near- Threshold J/ψExclusive Photoproduction off the Pro- ton, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 072001 (2019)

  35. [35]

    Andreevet al.(H1), Measurement of Exclusiveπ +π− andρ 0 Meson Photoproduction at HERA, Eur

    V. Andreevet al.(H1), Measurement of Exclusiveπ +π− andρ 0 Meson Photoproduction at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 1189 (2020)

  36. [36]

    Abramowiczet al.(ZEUS), Exclusive electroproduc- tion of two pions at HERA, Eur

    H. Abramowiczet al.(ZEUS), Exclusive electroproduc- tion of two pions at HERA, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 1869 (2012)

  37. [37]

    J. D. Brandenburg, H. Duan, Z. Tu, R. Venugopalan, and Z. Xu, Entanglement enabled intensity interferometry in ultrarelativistic ultraperipheral nuclear collisions, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 013131 (2025)

  38. [38]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(TOTEM, CMS), Nonresonant central exclusive production of charged-hadron pairs in proton-proton collisions at √sN N=13 TeV, Phys

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(TOTEM, CMS), Nonresonant central exclusive production of charged-hadron pairs in proton-proton collisions at √sN N=13 TeV, Phys. Rev. D 109, 112013 (2024)

  39. [39]

    Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Photoproduction ofK +K − Pairs in Ultraperipheral Collisions, Phys

    S. Acharyaet al.(ALICE), Photoproduction ofK +K − Pairs in Ultraperipheral Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 222303 (2024)

  40. [40]

    Adamet al.(STAR), Measurement of the central ex- clusive production of charged particle pairs in proton- proton collisions at √s= 200 GeV with the STAR de- tector at RHIC, J

    J. Adamet al.(STAR), Measurement of the central ex- clusive production of charged particle pairs in proton- proton collisions at √s= 200 GeV with the STAR de- tector at RHIC, J. High Energy Phys.2020(07), 178

  41. [41]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of exclusive pion pair production in proton–proton collisions at √s= 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of exclusive pion pair production in proton–proton collisions at √s= 7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 627 (2023)

  42. [42]

    W. Zha, L. Ruan, Z. Tang, Z. Xu, and S. Yang, Double- slit experiment at fermi scale: coherent photoproduction in heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Rev. C99, 061901 (2019)

  43. [43]

    K. H. Ackermannet al.(STAR), STAR detector overview, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A499, 624 (2003)

  44. [44]

    F. S. Bieseret al., The STAR trigger, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A499, 766 (2003)

  45. [45]

    Kiryluk (STAR), Local polarimetry for proton beams with the STAR beam beam counters, in16th Interna- tional Spin Physics Symposium (SPIN 2004)(2005) pp

    J. Kiryluk (STAR), Local polarimetry for proton beams with the STAR beam beam counters, in16th Interna- tional Spin Physics Symposium (SPIN 2004)(2005) pp. 718–721

  46. [46]

    C. A. Whitten (STAR), The beam-beam counter: A local polarimeter at STAR, AIP Conf. Proc.980, 390 (2008)

  47. [47]

    W. J. Llope, The large-area time-of-flight upgrade for STAR, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B241, 306 (2005)

  48. [48]

    Chenet al., Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program, Nucl

    J. Chenet al., Properties of the QCD matter: review of selected results from the relativistic heavy ion collider beam energy scan (RHIC BES) program, Nucl. Sci. Tech. 35, 214 (2024)

  49. [49]

    Adler, A

    C. Adler, A. Denisov, E. Garcia, M. Murray, H. Strobele, and S. White, The RHIC zero-degree calorimeters, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A499, 433 (2003)

  50. [50]

    Xu, J.-H

    Y.-F. Xu, J.-H. Chen, Y.-G. Ma, A.-H. Tang, Z.-B. Xu, and Y.-H. Zhu, Physics performance of the STAR zero degree calorimeter at relativistic heavy ion collider, Nucl. Sci. Tech.27, 126 (2016)

  51. [51]

    Andersonet al., The Star time projection chamber: A Unique tool for studying high multiplicity events at RHIC, Nucl

    M. Andersonet al., The Star time projection chamber: A Unique tool for studying high multiplicity events at RHIC, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A499, 659 (2003)

  52. [52]

    R. Brun, F. Bruyant, M. Maire, A. C. McPherson, and P. Zanarini,GEANT 3: user’s guide Geant 3.10, Geant 3.11; rev. version(CERN, Geneva, 1987)

  53. [53]

    Alvenslebenet al., Precise determination of rho-omega interference parameters from photoproduction of vector mesons off nucleon and nuclei, Phys

    H. Alvenslebenet al., Precise determination of rho-omega interference parameters from photoproduction of vector mesons off nucleon and nuclei, Phys. Rev. Lett.27, 888 (1971)

  54. [54]

    K. A. Oliveet al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Par- ticle Physics, Chin. Phys. C38, 090001 (2014)

  55. [55]

    X. Li, J. Luo, Z. Tang, X. Wu, and W. Zha, Exploring the higher-order QED effects on the differential distribu- tions of vacuum pair production in relativistic heavy-ion 7 collisions, Phys. Lett. B847, 138314 (2023)

  56. [56]

    W. Zha, J. D. Brandenburg, Z. Tang, and Z. Xu, Ini- tial transverse-momentum broadening of Breit-Wheeler process in relativistic heavy-ion collisions, Phys. Lett. B 800, 135089 (2020)

  57. [57]

    Zha and Z

    W. Zha and Z. Tang, Discovery of higher-order quantum electrodynamics effect for the vacuum pair production, J. High Energy Phys.2021(08), 083

  58. [58]

    Adamet al.(STAR), Low-p T e+e− pair production in Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV and U+U colli- sions at √sN N = 193 GeV at STAR, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR), Low-p T e+e− pair production in Au+Au collisions at √sN N = 200 GeV and U+U colli- sions at √sN N = 193 GeV at STAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 132301 (2018)

  59. [59]

    Adamet al.(STAR), Measurement ofe +e− Momen- tum and Angular Distributions from Linearly Polarized Photon Collisions, Phys

    J. Adamet al.(STAR), Measurement ofe +e− Momen- tum and Angular Distributions from Linearly Polarized Photon Collisions, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 052302 (2021)