Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 74 references

The paper claims that subleading-corrected dressing clouds of soft photons suppress all additional soft-photon emission in QED scattering at tree level, leaving amplitudes of order the soft scale, and that dressed elastic amplitudes match t

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 21:07 UTC pith:QJLFTVKT

load-bearing objection A serious worked-example paper that checks Choi-Akhoury's subleading FK dressings on three QED processes, but the headline suppression claim has a missing step in the soft-theorem derivation and is largely built into the ansatz. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2511.16419 v3 pith:QJLFTVKT submitted 2025-11-20 hep-th

Subleading soft radiation during scattering of dressed states in QED

Stavros Christodoulou , Nicolaos Toumbas This is my paper
classification hep-th
keywords soft photon emissionsubleading soft theoreminfrared divergencesdressed asymptotic statescoherent-state dressingsinclusive cross sectionsQED S-matrixtree-level bremsstrahlung
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tries to establish that the standard way of curing infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics—dressing each charged particle with a coherent cloud of very soft photons—can be upgraded so that the cloud also absorbs all radiation that would otherwise be emitted during scattering. The authors construct dressings corrected to subleading order in the soft momentum expansion and show, for three tree-level processes (electron–muon scattering, electron–photon scattering, and electron–positron annihilation into two photons), that adding a further soft photon to the final state gives an amplitude that vanishes as the infrared regulator is removed, up to corrections of order the soft scale. They also show that the same dressings make the elastic amplitudes infrared-finite and equal to the finite part of the ordinary Fock-basis amplitudes, reproducing the standard inclusive cross sections. A sympathetic reader would care because this points toward a well-defined, infrared-finite S-matrix in QED in which the soft sector is completely determined by the hard particles.

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that when the dressing functions of asymptotic charged states are extended beyond leading order to include the subleading soft factor, g^μ(k) = i e k_ν J^{μν}/(p·k), the tree-level dressed amplitude for emitting an additional soft photon below the dressing scale E_d is suppressed: after removing the infrared regulator λ→0, S̃^(α)_tree = O(Λ), a power-law correction in the soft scale rather than a finite or divergent emission amplitude. Equivalently, the dressed states contain all the soft radiation that can appear, and no 'extra' bremsstrahlung photon exists in the asymptotic Hilbert space. The paper demonstrates this cancellation ex

What carries the argument

The machinery is the pair of dressing functions assigned to each asymptotic charged state: a leading coherent-cloud function f^μ(p,k) ≈ e p^μ/(p·k) and a subleading correction g^μ(k) = i e k_ν J^{μν}/(p·k), where J^{μν} is the total angular momentum operator of the emitting particle. These are chosen so that the complete single-photon dressing factor f+g matches exactly the factorized soft photon emission amplitude (the universal soft theorem with angular-momentum action on the elastic amplitude). In the dressed radiative amplitude the three contributions—emission by the final-state cloud, by the subleading dressing, and by the hard interaction—cancel to leading power, leaving only O(Λ). The

Load-bearing premise

The cancellation assumes that the subleading dressing functions are exactly the subleading soft factors built from total angular momentum operators acting on the elastic amplitude, and that the factorized soft theorem captures the full photon emission; the paper's own footnote concedes that for electron–muon scattering only part of the orbital angular momentum contributes, so if that truncation is not justified the suppression fails.

What would settle it

Evaluate the tree-level dressed radiative amplitude for electron–muon scattering without omitting the orbital-angular-momentum pieces identified as off-shell in footnote 5; a non-vanishing O(1) soft emission as λ→0 would rule out the claimed universal suppression. Equivalently, a direct computation of the next-to-subleading O(ω_k) term in S̃^(α)_tree that remains finite as Λ→0 would falsify the paper's central result.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • No additional soft photons below the dressing scale are emitted at tree level; the asymptotic Hilbert space of the dressed formalism contains no real radiative soft photons, so the soft sector is fixed once the hard particles are specified.
  • The elastic dressed amplitudes equal the infrared-finite part of Fock-basis amplitudes, so the dressing scale E_d provides a concrete infrared cutoff for virtual soft photons.
  • The dressed-state formalism reproduces the conventional inclusive cross sections for the three computed processes.
  • The suppression mechanism is universal: it follows from the universal subleading soft theorem, so it should extend to any QED interaction and, by the same reasoning, to theories with massless mediators such as perturbative gravity.
  • The result is established only at tree level; loop corrections to the subleading soft theorem bring logarithmically divergent terms, so the dressings will need further correction to achieve infrared finiteness at one loop.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the suppression survives loop corrections, the entanglement structure of QED scattering becomes cleaner: extra soft photons would not entangle with the hard particles, so the information-theoretic description of the soft sector reduces to the cloud degrees of freedom. The paper leaves this loop question open.
  • The explicit three-process calculation suggests a practical recipe: to obtain infrared-finite amplitudes, compute the hard amplitude without soft loops and dress it, skipping any separate soft-emission factor. This could be tested by comparing against standard soft-photon generator results for these processes.
  • The same cancellation could be probed in gravity, where a subleading soft graviton theorem exists; constructing subleading dressings for graviton bremsstrahlung from matter would provide a direct analogue, which the paper identifies as a promising next step.
  • A sharper test of the core assumption would be to compute the next-to-subleading term O(ω_k) in the dressed radiative amplitude: the argument predicts it stays controlled by Λ, whereas any finite residual would indicate the subleading dressing does not fully capture the radiation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies soft photon emission in scattering of Faddeev–Kulish (FK) dressed states in QED, extending the dressing functions to subleading order in the soft momentum expansion following Choi and Akhoury. For three tree-level processes — e−μ− → e−μ−, e−γ → e−γ, and e−e+ → γγ — it claims that the elastic dressed amplitude equals the infrared-finite part of the Fock-basis amplitude, Eq. (80), and that the radiative dressed amplitude for emitting an additional soft photon below the dressing scale Ed is suppressed, Eq. (84): S~(α)_tree = O(Λ). It further argues that dressed-state cross sections reproduce Bloch–Nordsieck inclusive cross sections. The main result is the explicit demonstration that the subleading dressing functions cancel the tree-level soft radiation.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides useful explicit evidence for the Choi–Akhoury proposal that subleading FK dressings remove not only virtual infrared divergences but also real soft radiation, tying the dressed-state formalism to the Bloch–Nordsieck inclusive method. The three worked examples are clearly presented and the use of the LBK soft theorem is standard. However, the significance is tempered by the fact that the subleading dressing functions are chosen by ansatz to equal the subleading soft factor, so the cancellation is in large part built into the construction rather than derived from an independent principle.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.4 / Appendix C, Eq. (114)] The central cancellation in Eq. (84) depends on the equality S~(α,3)_tree = [fq+gq]·ε* S~(α)0. This requires neglecting gp·ε*(S0−S~(α)0) and applying the LBK soft theorem to the dressed amplitude S~(α)0. But S~(α)0 contains a momentum-dependent coherent-state overlap ⟨fq|fp⟩ and subleading dressing factors. The orbital angular momentum operators in the LBK factor should act on this overlap, generating terms not shown in Eqs. (111)–(113). Equation (80) — the asserted equivalence S~(α)0 = S0^{(α,Λ)}+O(Λ) — is stated after a schematic sum of contributions in Section 3.3, without displaying the g-dependent terms or the action of J^{μν} on the overlap. Since Eq. (84) follows only if that difference is O(Λ) as a function of hard momenta, this is a load-bearing gap.
  2. [Section 3.1, footnote 5, and Eq. (111)] For e−μ− scattering, the paper concedes that only part of the orbital angular momentum contributes to the subleading soft factor, with the omitted pieces assigned to soft emission from off-shell internal lines. No argument is given that these pieces are absent from the dressed radiative amplitude after the coherent-state exponentiation, or that gauge invariance does not require them. This undermines the specificity of the claimed O(Λ) suppression for this process and the broader statement that the emission of soft photons vanishes in any QED interaction.
  3. [Section 3.2, Eqs. (65)–(67)] The subleading dressing functions g^μ are set equal to the subleading soft factors, e.g. g^μ(k) = i e k_ν J^{μν}/(p·k). The tree-level suppression of additional radiation is therefore not an independent prediction but a consistency property of the ansatz. The paper should state this explicitly and provide an independent check, e.g. by computing the leftover terms involving S~(α)0 − S0 with the full g-dependence, so that the reader can see what would happen if the ansatz were modified.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 3.4] The text says 'see Appendix D' in the paragraph after Eq. (83), but the manuscript only contains Appendices A, B, and C. The relevant calculation is in Appendix C.
  2. [Appendix C, Eq. (109)] Equation (109) has g_q and f_q in the initial-state dressing factor; the initial-state subleading dressing should involve g_p and f_p. As written, the expression mixes initial- and final-state dressing functions.
  3. [General / Abstract] The abstract and Section 3.4 describe the result as 'completely suppressed', while Eq. (84) states S~(α)_tree = O(Λ), which is a power-law suppression in the infrared scale Λ. The qualification should appear in the abstract or the wording should be made consistent.
  4. [Section 3.3, Eq. (80)] The notation S0^{(α,Λ)} is introduced as 'the usual scattering amplitudes without virtual soft photons' but is not defined with an explicit perturbative expression. Since the subsequent argument relies on the difference between S~(α)0 and S0 being O(Λ), the precise definition and the order in e at which this holds should be stated.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The subleading-radiation suppression (Eq. 84) is built into the choice of g as the subleading soft factor, so the central prediction reduces to the dressing ansatz.

specific steps
  1. self definitional [Section 3.2, Eqs. (65)-(67); Section 3.4, Eqs. (83)-(84)]
    "gµ p (⃗k) = iekν ( e^{-ip1·kt0/p0 1} J µν p1 /(p1 ·k) + e^{-ip2·kt0/p0 2} J µν p2 /(p2 ·k) ) (65) ... S˜(α,1) tree = −f q(⃗kγ)·ϵ ∗ r(⃗kγ) S˜(α) 0, S˜(α,2) tree = −g q(⃗kγ)·ϵ ∗ r(⃗kγ) S (α) 0 +O(Λ), and S˜(α,3) tree = [fq(⃗kγ)+g q(⃗kγ)]·ϵ ∗ r(⃗kγ) S˜(α) 0 ... removing the infrared regulator λ→0, results in the emission of a soft photon being suppressed in all three processes ... S˜(α) tree = O(Λ) (84)."

    Summing the displayed components, the f_q terms cancel identically and the g_q terms leave g_q·ε*(S~0−S0). The paper then invokes its elastic equivalence S~0 = S0^{(Λ)}+O(Λ) to drop this residue. But g_q was defined in Eqs. (65)-(67) to be exactly the LBK subleading soft operator i e k_ν J^{μν}/(p·k) that already appears in the radiative amplitude. Thus the claimed suppression is not an independent dynamical prediction; it is the algebraic restatement of the ansatz that the subleading dressing is chosen to cancel the known subleading soft factor. Any different g would leave a nonvanishing residue. The independent content lies in the elastic IR-finiteness check and the Bloch-Nordsieck matching, not in Eq. (84).

full rationale

The paper is largely an explicit consistency check of the Choi-Akhoury dressed-state construction in three QED processes. The elastic result (Eq. 80) is derived by explicit cancellation of cloud and virtual-soft-photon contributions and is benchmarked against Weinberg's Bloch-Nordsieck inclusive cross sections; that part is genuinely independent and not circular. The subleading dressings are imported from [42], which is not a self-citation, and [27] (same last author) supplies standard leading FK technology rather than the load-bearing novel claim. However, the headline radiative result, S~tree = O(Λ), follows by construction: g is defined as the subleading soft factor of the LBK theorem, the radiative amplitude is decomposed so that the f and g dressing terms enter with opposite signs, and the cancellation is then essentially one line. A separate correctness worry, distinct from circularity, is that Eq. (84) requires S~0−S0 = O(Λ), whereas if S0 in Eq. (83) is the IR-divergent Fock amplitude (Eq. 22), S0→0 as λ→0 and Eq. (80) does not supply that difference; footnote 5 and the Appendix C g_q/g_p placement further weaken the derivation. These are validity concerns, not circularity, but they reinforce that Eq. (84) is not an independently established result. Overall, the central 'prediction' of suppressed subleading radiation reduces to the defining ansatz, while the IR-finiteness and inclusive-rate matching provide partial independent support. Score 6 reflects this construction-level circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 6 axioms · 0 invented entities

The calculation relies on standard soft-theorem and exponentiation results plus the Choi-Akhoury dressing ansatz. The free parameters are infrared/detector scales chosen by hand; no new particles or forces are introduced. The main auxiliary assumptions are the factorized LBK theorem, the exponentiation of virtual IR divergences, and the special e−μ treatment of orbital angular momentum.

free parameters (3)
  • E_d
    Characteristic energy scale of the soft-photon clouds; chosen by hand to be smaller than the virtual-soft scale Λ and all hard scales. The suppression claim is defined relative to this scale.
  • Λ
    IR scale below which virtual soft photons are excluded from elastic amplitudes; appears in the final amplitude via (E_d/Λ)^B and O(Λ) corrections.
  • E_T
    Detector resolution scale used in the reconstructed Bloch-Nordsieck cross section in Eq. (85); introduced by hand as an observational cutoff.
axioms (6)
  • domain assumption The LBK subleading soft photon theorem factorizes at tree level with total angular momentum operators acting on the elastic amplitude.
    Used in Section 3.1 and Appendix B to expand radiative amplitudes and to motivate the form of the g dressings; standard but nontrivial input.
  • domain assumption Virtual IR divergences in Fock-basis amplitudes exponentiate as S = (λ/Λ)^B e^{iφ} S^(Λ).
    Taken from Weinberg [3] and used in Eq. (22) to identify the infrared-finite part of elastic amplitudes.
  • domain assumption Faddeev-Kulish dressed states are eigenstates of the asymptotic Hamiltonian and yield order-by-order IR-finite elastic amplitudes.
    The foundation of the framework, taken from FK [15] and Tomaras-Toumbas [27]; the paper reviews but does not prove this.
  • ad hoc to paper The Choi-Akhoury subleading dressing ansatz g^μ(k) = i e k_ν J^{μν}/(p·k).
    The central suppression result is obtained by adopting this ansatz from [42] (Eqs. 65-67); it is not derived in this paper and is the load-bearing premise for the tree-level cancellation.
  • domain assumption For e−μ scattering, the action of total angular momentum operators on the elastic amplitude reduces to spin plus only part of the orbital term; the omitted pieces are argued to be off-shell-emission contributions.
    Stated in footnote 5; if false, the electron-muon suppression computation changes materially.
  • domain assumption Virtual soft photons with energy between E_d and Λ can be neglected by taking E_d → Λ, and O(E_d), O(Λ) corrections are negligible.
    Used throughout Section 3.3-3.4 to equate dressed elastic amplitudes with S^(α,Λ) + O(Λ) and to define the suppression regime.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-alltime-deepseek · 33142 in / 17047 out tokens · 151804 ms · 2026-08-03T21:07:18.717262+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

We study soft photon emission during scattering of Faddeev-Kulish charged states in QED, at leading order in perturbation theory. The charged asymptotic particles are accompanied by clouds of an infinite number of soft photons of energy less than a characteristic infrared scale $E_d$. When the corresponding ``dressing'' functions are suitably corrected to subleading order in the soft momentum expansion, as advocated in recent work by Choi and Akhoury, we show explicitly that the emission of additional radiative soft photons with energy less than $E_d$ is completely suppressed. Moreover, the dressing renders the elastic amplitudes infrared-finite, order by order in perturbation theory, regulating the infrared divergences due to virtual soft photons, at the energy scale $E_d$. Therefore, the characteristic energy scale of the soft photons in the clouds provides an effective infrared cutoff, allowing for the formulation of an infrared finite S-matrix.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2511.16419 by Nicolaos Toumbas, Stavros Christodoulou.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Tree-level Feynman diagrams for the elastic processes: (a) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Tree-level Feynman diagrams for the radiation-emitting process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Tree-level Feynman diagrams for the radiation-emitting process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Tree-level Feynman diagrams for the radiation-emitting process [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Representatives of the diagrams depicting the elastic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Representative diagrams of the elastic dressed [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Diagrams depicting soft emission during a generic QED process. The interaction has [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p039_7.png] view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 50 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Bloch and A

    F. Bloch and A. Nordsieck,Note on the Radiation Field of the Electron,Phys. Rev.52 (1937) 54

    1937

  2. [2]

    Yennie, S.C

    D.R. Yennie, S.C. Frautschi and H. Suura,The infrared divergence phenomena and high-energy processes,Annals Phys.13(1961) 379

    1961

  3. [3]

    Weinberg,Infrared photons and gravitons,Phys

    S. Weinberg,Infrared photons and gravitons,Phys. Rev.140(1965) B516

    1965

  4. [4]

    Gell-Mann and M.L

    M. Gell-Mann and M.L. Goldberger,Scattering of low-energy photons by particles of spin 1/2,Phys. Rev.96(1954) 1433

    1954

  5. [5]

    Low,Scattering of light of very low frequency by systems of spin 1/2,Phys

    F.E. Low,Scattering of light of very low frequency by systems of spin 1/2,Phys. Rev.96 (1954) 1428

    1954

  6. [6]

    Low,Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions, Phys

    F.E. Low,Bremsstrahlung of very low-energy quanta in elementary particle collisions, Phys. Rev.110(1958) 974

    1958

  7. [7]

    Burnett and N.M

    T.H. Burnett and N.M. Kroll,Extension of the low soft photon theorem,Phys. Rev. Lett. 20(1968) 86

    1968

  8. [8]

    Dollard,Asymptotic Convergence and the Coulomb Interaction,J

    J.D. Dollard,Asymptotic Convergence and the Coulomb Interaction,J. Math. Phys.5 (1964) 729

    1964

  9. [9]

    Chung,Infrared Divergence in Quantum Electrodynamics,Phys

    V. Chung,Infrared Divergence in Quantum Electrodynamics,Phys. Rev.140(1965) B1110

    1965

  10. [10]

    Greco and G

    M. Greco and G. Rossi,A Note on the Infrared Divergence,Nuovo Cim.50(1967) 168

    1967

  11. [11]

    Kibble,Coherent Soft-Photon States and Infrared Divergences

    T.W.B. Kibble,Coherent Soft-Photon States and Infrared Divergences. I. Classical Currents,J. Math. Phys.9(1968) 315

    1968

  12. [12]

    Kibble,Coherent soft-photon states and infrared divergences

    T.W.B. Kibble,Coherent soft-photon states and infrared divergences. IV. The scattering operator,Phys. Rev.175(1968) 1624

    1968

  13. [13]

    Kibble,Coherent soft-photon states and infrared divergences

    T.W.B. Kibble,Coherent soft-photon states and infrared divergences. iii. asymptotic states and reduction formulas,Phys. Rev.174(1968) 1882

    1968

  14. [14]

    Kibble,Coherent soft-photon states and infrared divergences

    T.W.B. Kibble,Coherent soft-photon states and infrared divergences. ii. mass-shell singularities of green ’s functions,Phys. Rev.173(1968) 1527. 44

    1968

  15. [15]

    Kulish and L.D

    P.P. Kulish and L.D. Faddeev,Asymptotic conditions and infrared divergences in quantum electrodynamics,Theor. Math. Phys.4(1970) 745

    1970

  16. [16]

    Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory

    A. Strominger, “Lectures on the Infrared Structure of Gravity and Gauge Theory.” Mar, 2017

    2017

  17. [17]

    Lysov, S

    V. Lysov, S. Pasterski and A. Strominger,Low’s Subleading Soft Theorem as a Symmetry of QED,Phys. Rev. Lett.113(2014) 111601 [1407.3814]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  18. [18]

    T. He, P. Mitra, A.P. Porfyriadis and A. Strominger,New Symmetries of Massless QED, JHEP10(2014) 112 [1407.3789]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  19. [19]

    Kapec, M

    D. Kapec, M. Pate and A. Strominger,New Symmetries of QED,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.21(2017) 1769 [1506.02906]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  20. [20]

    Campiglia and A

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha,Asymptotic symmetries of QED and Weinberg’s soft photon theorem,JHEP07(2015) 115 [1505.05346]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  21. [21]

    Kapec, M

    D. Kapec, M. Perry, A.-M. Raclariu and A. Strominger,Infrared Divergences in QED, Revisited,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 085002 [1705.04311]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  22. [22]

    Gabai and A

    B. Gabai and A. Sever,Large gauge symmetries and asymptotic states in QED,JHEP12 (2016) 095 [1607.08599]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    T. He, V. Lysov, P. Mitra and A. Strominger,BMS supertranslations and Weinberg’s soft graviton theorem,JHEP05(2015) 151 [1401.7026]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  24. [24]

    Strominger and A

    A. Strominger and A. Zhiboedov,Gravitational Memory, BMS Supertranslations and Soft Theorems,JHEP01(2016) 086 [1411.5745]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Banks,The Super BMS Algebra, Scattering and Holography,1403.3420

    T. Banks,The Super BMS Algebra, Scattering and Holography,1403.3420

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Strominger,On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,JHEP07(2014) 152 [1312.2229]

    A. Strominger,On BMS Invariance of Gravitational Scattering,JHEP07(2014) 152 [1312.2229]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  27. [27]

    Tomaras and N

    T.N. Tomaras and N. Toumbas,IR dynamics and entanglement entropy,Physical Review D101(2020)

    2020

  28. [28]

    Akhoury,Asymptotic Dynamics in Quantum Field Theory: An Infrared Viewpoint, 1103.0241

    R. Akhoury,Asymptotic Dynamics in Quantum Field Theory: An Infrared Viewpoint, 1103.0241. 45

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Bachas and J

    C. Bachas and J. Troost,Asymptotic states and gauge transformations,Phys. Lett. B385 (1996) 237 [hep-th/9510156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  30. [30]

    Carney, L

    D. Carney, L. Chaurette, D. Neuenfeld and G. Semenoff,On the need for soft dressing, JHEP09(2018) 121 [1803.02370]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Choi and R

    S. Choi and R. Akhoury,BMS Supertranslation Symmetry Implies Faddeev-Kulish Amplitudes,JHEP02(2018) 171 [1712.04551]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  32. [32]

    Mirbabayi and M

    M. Mirbabayi and M. Porrati,Dressed Hard States and Black Hole Soft Hair,Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016) 211301 [1607.03120]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    G´ omez, R

    C. G´ omez, R. Letschka and S. Zell,The Scales of the Infrared,JHEP09(2018) 115 [1807.07079]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  34. [34]

    Hirai and S

    H. Hirai and S. Sugishita,Dressed states from gauge invariance,JHEP06(2019) 023 [1901.09935]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Hirai and S

    H. Hirai and S. Sugishita,IR finite S-matrix by gauge invariant dressed states,JHEP02 (2021) 025 [2009.11716]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  36. [36]

    Furugori and S

    H. Furugori and S. Nojiri,Dressed asymptotic states and QED infrared physics,Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 125004 [2007.02518]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  37. [37]

    Hirai and S

    H. Hirai and S. Sugishita,Dress code for infrared safe scattering in QED,PTEP2023 (2023) 053B04 [2209.00608]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    Nguyen, A

    K. Nguyen, A. Rios Fukelman and C.D. White,Celestial soft dressings from generalised Wilson lines,PoSCORFU2022(2023) 289 [2304.01250]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Gomez, R

    C. Gomez, R. Letschka and S. Zell,Infrared Divergences and Quantum Coherence,Eur. Phys. J. C78(2018) 610 [1712.02355]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Irakleous, T.N

    A. Irakleous, T.N. Tomaras and N. Toumbas,Soft photon radiation and entanglement, Eur. Phys. J. C81(2021) 745 [2105.11858]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  41. [41]

    Toumbas and A

    N. Toumbas and A. Irakleous,Scattering, IR dynamics and entanglement,PoS CORFU2022(2023) 152

    2023

  42. [42]

    Choi and R

    S. Choi and R. Akhoury,Subleading soft dressings of asymptotic states in QED and perturbative quantum gravity,JHEP09(2019) 031 [1907.05438]. 46

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  43. [43]

    Z. Bern, S. Davies and J. Nohle,On Loop Corrections to Subleading Soft Behavior of Gluons and Gravitons,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 085015 [1405.1015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    He, Y.-t

    S. He, Y.-t. Huang and C. Wen,Loop Corrections to Soft Theorems in Gauge Theories and Gravity,JHEP12(2014) 115 [1405.1410]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  45. [45]

    Mao and H

    P. Mao and H. Ouyang,Note on soft theorems and memories in even dimensions,Phys. Lett. B774(2017) 715 [1707.07118]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  46. [46]

    Sahoo and A

    B. Sahoo and A. Sen,Classical and Quantum Results on Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Theorem in Four Dimensions,JHEP02(2019) 086 [1808.03288]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Laddha and A

    A. Laddha and A. Sen,Logarithmic Terms in the Soft Expansion in Four Dimensions, JHEP10(2018) 056 [1804.09193]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  48. [48]

    A.P. Saha, B. Sahoo and A. Sen,Proof of the classical soft graviton theorem inD= 4, JHEP06(2020) 153 [1912.06413]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  49. [49]

    Sahoo and A

    B. Sahoo and A. Sen,Classical and quantum results on logarithmic terms in the soft theorem in four dimensions,JHEP02(2019) 086

    2019

  50. [50]

    Sahoo,Classical Sub-subleading Soft Photon and Soft Graviton Theorems in Four Spacetime Dimensions,JHEP12(2020) 070 [2008.04376]

    B. Sahoo,Classical Sub-subleading Soft Photon and Soft Graviton Theorems in Four Spacetime Dimensions,JHEP12(2020) 070 [2008.04376]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  51. [51]

    Delisle, J

    C. Delisle, J. Wilson-Gerow and P. Stamp,Soft Theorems from Boundary Terms in the Classical Point Particle Currents,JHEP03(2021) 290 [2012.13356]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Krishna and B

    H. Krishna and B. Sahoo,Universality of loop corrected soft theorems in 4d,JHEP11 (2023) 233 [2308.16807]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Bianchi, S

    M. Bianchi, S. He, Y.-t. Huang and C. Wen,More on Soft Theorems: Trees, Loops and Strings,Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 065022 [1406.5155]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  54. [54]

    Del Duca,High-energy Bremsstrahlung Theorems for Soft Photons,Nucl

    V. Del Duca,High-energy Bremsstrahlung Theorems for Soft Photons,Nucl. Phys. B345 (1990) 369

    1990

  55. [55]

    H. Luo, P. Mastrolia and W.J. Torres Bobadilla,Subleading soft behavior of QCD amplitudes,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 065018 [1411.1669]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  56. [56]

    Z. Bern, S. Davies, P. Di Vecchia and J. Nohle,Low-Energy Behavior of Gluons and Gravitons from Gauge Invariance,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 084035 [1406.6987]. 47

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  57. [57]

    Atul Bhatkar and B

    S. Atul Bhatkar and B. Sahoo,Subleading Soft Theorem for arbitrary number of external soft photons and gravitons,JHEP01(2019) 153 [1809.01675]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  58. [58]

    Beneke, P

    M. Beneke, P. Hager and A.F. Sanfilippo,Double copy for Lagrangians at trilinear order, JHEP02(2022) 083 [2106.09054]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  59. [59]

    Beneke, P

    M. Beneke, P. Hager and R. Szafron,Gravitational soft theorem from emergent soft gauge symmetries,JHEP03(2022) 199 [2110.02969]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  60. [60]

    Travaglini et al.,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes,J

    G. Travaglini et al.,The SAGEX review on scattering amplitudes,J. Phys. A55(2022) 443001 [2203.13011]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  61. [61]

    Elvang and Y.-t

    H. Elvang and Y.-t. Huang,Scattering Amplitudes, 8, 2013

    2013

  62. [62]

    Cachazo and A

    F. Cachazo and A. Strominger,Evidence for a New Soft Graviton Theorem, 4, 2014

    2014

  63. [63]

    Chakrabarti, S.P

    S. Chakrabarti, S.P. Kashyap, B. Sahoo, A. Sen and M. Verma,Testing Subleading Multiple Soft Graviton Theorem for CHY Prescription,JHEP01(2018) 090 [1709.07883]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Tropper,Supersymmetric soft theorems,Class

    A. Tropper,Supersymmetric soft theorems,Class. Quant. Grav.42(2025) 085004 [2404.03717]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  65. [65]

    Carney, L

    D. Carney, L. Chaurette, D. Neuenfeld and G.W. Semenoff,Dressed infrared quantum information,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 025007 [1710.02531]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  66. [66]

    Carney, L

    D. Carney, L. Chaurette, D. Neuenfeld and G.W. Semenoff,Infrared quantum information,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 180502 [1706.03782]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  67. [67]

    Campiglia and A

    M. Campiglia and A. Laddha,Loop Corrected Soft Photon Theorem as a Ward Identity, JHEP10(2019) 287 [1903.09133]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  68. [68]

    Atul Bhatkar,Ward identity for loop level soft photon theorem for massless QED coupled to gravity,JHEP10(2020) 110 [1912.10229]

    S. Atul Bhatkar,Ward identity for loop level soft photon theorem for massless QED coupled to gravity,JHEP10(2020) 110 [1912.10229]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  69. [69]

    Choi and R

    S. Choi and R. Akhoury,Magnetic soft charges, dual supertranslations, and ’t Hooft line dressings,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 025001 [1912.02224]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  70. [70]

    Grignani and G.W

    G. Grignani and G.W. Semenoff,Scattering and momentum space entanglement,Phys. Lett. B772(2017) 699 [1612.08858]. 48

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  71. [71]

    Hawking, M.J

    S.W. Hawking, M.J. Perry and A. Strominger,Soft Hair on Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett. 116(2016) 231301 [1601.00921]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  72. [72]

    Strominger,Black Hole Information Revisited, (2020), DOI [1706.07143]

    A. Strominger,Black Hole Information Revisited, (2020), DOI [1706.07143]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  73. [73]

    Srednicki,Quantum field theory, Cambridge University Press (1, 2007)

    M. Srednicki,Quantum field theory, Cambridge University Press (1, 2007)

    2007

  74. [74]

    Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields

    S. Weinberg,The Quantum theory of fields. Vol. 1: Foundations, Cambridge University Press (6, 2005), 10.1017/CBO9781139644167. 49

    doi:10.1017/cbo9781139644167 2005