Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Machine learning in resting-state fMRI analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1812.11477 v1 pith:QJYFC5OQ submitted 2018-12-30 cs.LG cs.CVq-bio.QMstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVq-bio.QMstat.ML
keywords learningmachiners-fmriapplicationsresting-stateanalysisfmrimethods
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Machine learning techniques have gained prominence for the analysis of resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (rs-fMRI) data. Here, we present an overview of various unsupervised and supervised machine learning applications to rs-fMRI. We present a methodical taxonomy of machine learning methods in resting-state fMRI. We identify three major divisions of unsupervised learning methods with regard to their applications to rs-fMRI, based on whether they discover principal modes of variation across space, time or population. Next, we survey the algorithms and rs-fMRI feature representations that have driven the success of supervised subject-level predictions. The goal is to provide a high-level overview of the burgeoning field of rs-fMRI from the perspective of machine learning applications.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Detecting abnormalities in resting-state dynamics: An unsupervised learning approach

    cs.LG 2019-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Unsupervised autoencoder and next-frame prediction models trained on healthy rs-fMRI can distinguish autism patients from healthy controls with AUC around 0.70.

Pith tools