REVIEW 1 cited by
The vicissitudes of "cannonballs": a response to criticisms by A.M. Hillas and a brief review of our claims
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
A.M. Hillas, in a review of the origins of cosmic rays, has recently criticized the "cannonball" (CB) model of cosmic rays and gamma-ray bursts. We respond to this critique and take the occasion to discuss the crucial question of particle acceleration in the CB model and in the generally accepted models. We also summarize our claims concerning the CB model.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
A revamped understanding of Cosmic Rays and Gamma-Ray Bursts
The paper claims new GRB and cosmic-ray data validate the Cannonball Model, with knees and positrons explained by relativistic supernova ejecta, though several 'predictions' rely on fitted parameters.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.