REVIEW 2 cited by
AI Fairness via Domain Adaptation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
While deep learning (DL) approaches are reaching human-level performance for many tasks, including for diagnostics AI, the focus is now on challenges possibly affecting DL deployment, including AI privacy, domain generalization, and fairness. This last challenge is addressed in this study. Here we look at a novel method for ensuring AI fairness with respect to protected or sensitive factors. This method uses domain adaptation via training set enhancement to tackle bias-causing training data imbalance. More specifically, it uses generative models that allow the generation of more synthetic training samples for underrepresented populations. This paper applies this method to the use case of detection of age related macular degeneration (AMD). Our experiments show that starting with an originally biased AMD diagnostics model the method has the ability to improve fairness.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Practitioner Insights on Fairness Requirements in the AI Development Life Cycle: An Interview Study
Practitioners recognize AI fairness but apply it unevenly, rarely document it formally, and frequently deprioritize it against accuracy, deadlines, and features.
-
Mitigating Algorithmic Bias in Multiclass CNN Classifications Using Causal Modeling
Adjusting CNN emotion-class probabilities by subtracting fitted gender coefficients, one class at a time, reduced male/female true-positive-rate gaps on a FairFace/DeepFace test set without lowering accuracy.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.