Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AI Fairness via Domain Adaptation

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2104.01109 v1 pith:QKUAHWGF submitted 2021-03-15 cs.CV cs.LG

classification cs.CVcs.LG
keywords fairnessmethoddomaintrainingadaptationdiagnosticsincludinguses
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

While deep learning (DL) approaches are reaching human-level performance for many tasks, including for diagnostics AI, the focus is now on challenges possibly affecting DL deployment, including AI privacy, domain generalization, and fairness. This last challenge is addressed in this study. Here we look at a novel method for ensuring AI fairness with respect to protected or sensitive factors. This method uses domain adaptation via training set enhancement to tackle bias-causing training data imbalance. More specifically, it uses generative models that allow the generation of more synthetic training samples for underrepresented populations. This paper applies this method to the use case of detection of age related macular degeneration (AMD). Our experiments show that starting with an originally biased AMD diagnostics model the method has the ability to improve fairness.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Practitioner Insights on Fairness Requirements in the AI Development Life Cycle: An Interview Study

    cs.SE 2025-12 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Practitioners recognize AI fairness but apply it unevenly, rarely document it formally, and frequently deprioritize it against accuracy, deadlines, and features.

  2. Mitigating Algorithmic Bias in Multiclass CNN Classifications Using Causal Modeling

    cs.LG 2025-01 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Adjusting CNN emotion-class probabilities by subtracting fitted gender coefficients, one class at a time, reduced male/female true-positive-rate gaps on a FairFace/DeepFace test set without lowering accuracy.

Pith tools