Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 42 references

A Thermodynamic Theory of Proximity Ferroelectricity

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Proximity ferroelectricity works by an internal field that equalizes the effective coercive fields of the layers in a stack, so that layers switch together or stay frozen together.

desk verdict A useful LGD framework for proximity ferroelectricity, but the quantitative match to experiments rests on fitted defect parameters and a thick-layer extrapolation. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.05219 v3 pith:QM6ZKV3Z submitted 2025-01-09 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.mes-hall

Eugene A. Eliseev , Anna N. Morozovska , Jon-Paul Maria , Long-Qing Chen , Venkatraman Gopalan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.mes-hall
keywords proximityferroelectricityLandau-Ginzburg-DevonshiretheorycoercivefieldreductiondepolarizationferroelectricmultilayersAlScN/AlNZnMgO/ZnOchargeddefectnucleation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that proximity ferroelectricity—switching a normally unswitchable polar material by stacking it against a switchable ferroelectric—has a purely electrostatic mechanism: an internal field set by the layer polarizations and their thickness ratio renormalizes each layer's double-well potential so that their effective coercive fields become equal. When this works, both layers switch together, which the authors call proximity switching; when the non-ferroelectric layer is too thick or too polar, both layers are suppressed, which they call proximity suppression. The theory is applied to AlScN/AlN and ZnMgO/ZnO bilayers, explaining how AlN and ZnO, whose intrinsic coercive fields exceed their dielectric breakdown fields, can be switched with practical fields. The paper further predicts that paraelectric and dielectric layers can be made ferroelectric by proximity, opening a large class of switchable ferroelectrics made from pristine, undoped materials.

What carries the argument

The engine is the self-consistent internal field expression Eq. (5), $$$E_z^{{(i)}}$ = -\frac{$P_z^{{(i)}}$-\bar{D}}{\varepsilon_0\$varepsilon_b^{{(i)}}$} + \frac{U}{\$varepsilon_b^{{(i)}}$\sum_k h_k/\$varepsilon_b^{{(k)}}$},$$ which combines a depolarization contribution with the splitting of the applied field, where $\bar{D}$ is the thickness-averaged displacement. Substituting this field into the Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire equations renormalizes the coefficients $\alpha_i, \beta_i, \gamma_i$ into $\alpha_i^{(R)}, \beta_i^{(R)}, \gamma_i^{(R)}$ through depolarization factors $\aleph_1$ and $\aleph_2$ defined in Eq. (7). The load-bearing identity is that, for $|\alpha_i|/\aleph_i \ll 1$, the ratios of renormalized coefficients satisfy $\alpha_1^{(R)}/\alpha_2^{(R)} \approx \beta_1^{(R)}/\beta_2^{(R)} \approx \gamma_1^{(R)}/\gamma_2^{(R)} \approx \aleph_2/\aleph_1 \approx h_1/h_2$, which makes the effective coercive fields $E_{ca}^{(i)} = E_c^{(i)}/\eta_i^{(R)}$ equal across the layers, so the stack switches collectively.

What would settle it

Grow an atomically abrupt AlN/Al$_{0.73}$Sc$_{0.27}$N bilayer with independently measurable layer polarizations and measure whether the AlN layer switches below the breakdown field; if the two layers do not show nearly equal effective coercive fields, the renormalization identity fails. A more direct test of the unique prediction is to place a high-permittivity paraelectric layer such as SrTiO$_3$ thinner than a ferroelectric layer and check whether the paraelectric layer develops a ferroelectric hysteresis loop for thickness ratio $h_2/h_1 < 1$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that proximity ferroelectricity is driven by a self-consistent internal electric field, not by chemical doping or short-range interface bonding. The depolarization field arising from the polarization mismatch between layers, combined with the splitting of the applied field, renormalizes the Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire coefficients of each layer, effectively lowering the switching barrier of the hard layer. For common material parameters the renormalized coefficients satisfy ratio identities that force the effective coercive fields of the two layers to be approximately equal, $E_{ca}^{(1)} \approx E_{ca}^{(2)}$, and the remanent polarizations to be nearly identical. Consequently, either both layers undergo simultaneous ferroelectric switching with the same coercive field and similar loops, or both remain non-switchable. Applying the theory to Al$_{0.73}$Sc$_{0.27}$N/AlN and Zn$_{0.66}$Mg$_{0.34}$O/ZnO bilayers, the authors show that the thermodynamic coercive field of the hard layer is reduced, and that including random charged defects as nucleation centers further lowers the coercive field to values below the breakdown field, matching the experimentally observed proximity switching.

Load-bearing premise

The analytical theory assumes each layer is a homogeneous single domain with natural boundary conditions and uses the simplified uniform-background-permittivity field expression of Eq. (5), and the paper itself notes this description breaks down when domain kinetics dominate, with quantitative agreement for AlScN/AlN achieved only by fitting defect parameters to the same experiment.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Multilayers pairing a switchable ferroelectric with a non-switchable polar material such as AlN or ZnO can switch below the dielectric breakdown field, effectively thawing frozen ferroelectrics without bulk doping.
  • Paraelectric and dielectric layers thinner than or comparable to the ferroelectric layer can be induced to switch ferroeletrically, with the entire stack undergoing collective polarization reversal.
  • Thick paraelectric or hard polar layers can suppress ferroelectric switching in the thinner ferroelectric layer, defining a proximity suppression regime that must be avoided in device design.
  • Random charged defects in the bulk act as nucleation centers that reduce the coercive field further, with the model reproducing the observed AlN/AlScN switching when defect parameters are fitted to experiment.
  • Because the effective coercive fields of the layers are equalized, the individual layer hysteresis loops have the same coercive field and nearly equal remanent polarizations regardless of the thickness ratio.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct testable extension is that a high-permittivity paraelectric like SrTiO$_3$ or rutile TiO$_2$ stacked on a thicker ferroelectric should show induced ferroelectric hysteresis for $h_2/h_1 < 1$; absence of such a loop would challenge the mechanism.
  • The paper's own caveat that domain kinetics dominate in thick layers suggests that the quantitative single-domain coercive fields are upper bounds, and quantitative predictions for thick experimental stacks rely on defect parameters.
  • The equal-effective-coercive-field identity, if general, implies that proximity engineering could tune coercive fields continuously by choosing thickness ratios, potentially replacing chemical doping as a doping-free design route for Si-compatible ferroelectric memories.
  • The same thermodynamic mechanism should apply to other ferroelectric/paraelectric and ferroelectric/dielectric material families beyond wurtzites, including fluorite-based stacks such as ZrO$_2$/HfZrO$_2$, where the depolarization-field coupling would collectively switch nominally non-ferroelectric layers.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops a Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire theory of multilayer stacks containing ferroelectric, paraelectric, dielectric, and non-switchable polar layers, with emphasis on bilayers. The central result is that the self-consistent internal depolarization field (Eq. 5) renormalizes the single-layer double-well potentials (Eq. 6) so that the effective coercive fields in both layers become equal, producing collective 'proximity switching' or collective 'proximity suppression' depending on layer thicknesses and LGD parameters. The authors present dimensionless phase diagrams, identify regimes for FE/PE, FE/W-FE, FE/H-FE, and FE/N-FE stacks, and apply the theory to AlScN/AlN and ZnMgO/ZnO bilayers. Charged defects are introduced in FEM calculations as nucleation centers to further reduce coercive fields to experimentally observed values.

Significance. If the central mechanism is correct, the paper offers a useful general framework for proximity ferroelectricity and makes falsifiable predictions, including induced ferroelectricity in paraelectric and dielectric layers. The analytical derivation is explicit and internally consistent within the stated single-domain approximation, and the paper is commendably candid about several limitations. The dimensionless phase diagrams and the identification of the internal-field barrier-renormalization mechanism are valuable. However, the quantitative connection to experiment is not yet independently established: the charged-defect parameters are fitted to the same experimental data they are used to explain, and the finite-element thickness dependence is extrapolated from roughly 20 nm cells to the 200-500 nm experimental layers.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 4, Figs. 4(c) and 5(b)] The quantitative agreement with experiment is not an independent validation. The single-domain bilayer coercive field in Fig. 4(c) is about 15 MV/cm, well above the breakdown field, and the experimentally observed value of about 6.5 MV/cm is obtained only after introducing charged-defect parameters (n_d, q_d, l_d) that the text states are varied 'in trying to match experiment results [13]' and later calls 'convenient fitting parameters.' Fitting the same data and then comparing with those data demonstrates consistency, not predictive validation; the paper should either validate the defect model on independent data or explicitly temper the claim that the theory quantitatively describes the experiments.
  2. [Section 4, Figs. 5(c) and 5(d)] The thickness dependence used to explain the experimental coercive fields and remanent polarization in Ref. [13] is an uncontrolled extrapolation. The text says FEM for computational cells thicker than 50-100 nm was not possible and that the curves for h2 > 20 nm are extrapolations based on the assumption that behavior depends only on the h1/h2 ratio. The experimental layers are 200-500 nm thick, so the predicted critical thickness h_cr and the comparison with the 500-nm-layer data in Ref. [13] rest on this unverified scaling assumption. A scaling argument, larger-cell computations, or an explicit sensitivity check is needed for this load-bearing comparison.
  3. [Section 4, paragraph beginning 'To summarize the section'] The paper states that the single-domain conclusion 'becomes invalid in the case when the domain kinetics is considered.' Yet the experimental switching is described and simulated as defect-nucleated domain formation and intergrowth (Fig. 6). This means the central claim that the internal-field barrier renormalization is the cause of the observed low coercive fields is not isolated: in thick multi-domain samples the measured coercivity could be dominated by defect-induced nucleation, with the renormalized-barrier mechanism contributing only marginally. The authors should quantify the relative contributions, for example by comparing defect-only simulations with simulations combining defects and the internal-field renormalization.
  4. [Appendix C and Appendix D; Tables II and III] The LGD parameter extraction involves assumptions that materially affect the quantitative coercive-field values used in the paper: identical beta and gamma are assumed for Al0.73Sc0.27N and AlN, gamma is set to zero for ZnO, and the ZnMgO parameters are fitted only near zero field. These assumptions are disclosed, but the paper does not provide a sensitivity analysis. Since the quantitative claims about threefold coercive-field reduction rely on the resulting thermodynamic coercive fields (e.g., about 26 MV/cm for AlN and 25 MV/cm for ZnO), the robustness of these magnitudes to the parameter-extraction assumptions should be examined.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] The notation 'Alx-1ScxN' appears in the abstract, title context, and several places in the text; this should be 'Al1-xScxN'.
  2. [Section 4 and Fig. 5] The composition label 'Al0.83Sc0.27N' appears in the text and figure captions, which is inconsistent with 'Al0.73Sc0.27N' used elsewhere; please check the stoichiometry labeling throughout.
  3. [Appendix A] The phrase 'back-envelope consideration' should read 'back-of-the-envelope consideration.'
  4. [Section 4] The sentence 'we choice it equal to 7 MV/cm' contains a typo and should read 'we choose it equal to 7 MV/cm.'
  5. [References] The reference list contains several duplicated entries in slightly different formats (e.g., Refs. 28/43, 29/44, 32/46, 39/49); these should be consolidated.
  6. [Eq. (5a)] The fraction for the external field contribution would be clearer with explicit parentheses: U divided by [epsilon_b^{(i)} sum_k (h_k / epsilon_b^{(k)})], rather than the current typeset form.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 6.0 of 10

The internal-field barrier-renormalization mechanism is derived from the free energy, but the quantitative agreement for defect-reduced coercive fields is obtained by fitting defect parameters to the same experimental data, so those specific values are not independent predictions.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 4 (paragraph after Fig. 5, on defect parameters and critical thickness); also Section 4 defect-parameter discussion and Section 5 summary]
    "We treat the amplitude and concentration of the defects as fitting parameters, which are the close in both layers (even though it maybe not so), and vary them to reach the bilayer critical thickness ℎ𝑐𝑟 ≥ ℎ1 and to obtain the 𝑃𝑠 values close to the values experimentally measured in Ref. [13]."

    The quantitative values presented as describing experiment — AlN coercive field reduced to 8.8 MV/cm, AlScN to 4.9 MV/cm, bilayer to 6.5 MV/cm, and the critical AlN thickness ℎ𝑐𝑟 — are produced by varying the defect charge, separation, and density until they reproduce the experimental results of Ref. [13]. The same experimental data set is therefore used both to set the adjustable inputs and to claim agreement, making the agreement forced by construction rather than a prediction. The central mechanism (internal-field renormalization via Eqs. (5)–(6)) is derived independently, but the quantitative connection to the observed low coercive fields is not an independent test of that mechanism; it is a fit.

full rationale

The paper's core mechanism is genuinely derived: the internal electric field of Eq. (5) follows from the electrostatic solution of the bilayer, and the renormalized coefficients of Eq. (6) and the equalized effective coercive fields are algebraic consequences of the free energy. These parts are not circular. The circularity is confined to the quantitative comparison in Section 4 and the summary, where the defect parameters (concentration, charge, separation, and their slight layer asymmetry) are explicitly tuned to match the experimental coercive fields and remanent polarizations of Ref. [13], after which the resulting defect-reduced coercive fields (e.g., 6.5 MV/cm for the bilayer) are presented as the theory's quantitative description of the same experiment. This is a fitted input called a prediction. The paper candidly labels these as fitting parameters, which mitigates intent but does not remove the structural circularity. Also relevant are the stated limitations: the single-domain analytical description is acknowledged to 'become invalid in the case when the domain kinetics is considered,' and the FEM curves for ℎ2 ≫ 20 nm are extrapolations because cells thicker than 50–100 nm were not computationally feasible. These limitations mean the quantitative predictions for the thick experimental layers rest on the fitted defect model and the extrapolation, not on the derived mechanism alone. The experimental reference [13] includes two co-authors of this paper (Gopalan and Maria), but that alone is not load-bearing circularity; the fitting to those same data is. Overall, a partial circularity score of 6 is appropriate: the qualitative physics is derived, while the quantitative match is partly by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities (particles, forces, or dimensions). Its free parameters are the LGD expansion coefficients fitted to bulk ferroelectric data and the charged-defect parameters fitted to the target experiments. The key axioms are the standard LGD framework, the single-domain approximation, the perfect-electrode/uniform-permittivity simplification, and several parameter-closure assumptions for the under-determined fitting systems.

free parameters (3)
  • LGD coefficients alpha, beta, gamma for Al0.73Sc0.27N and AlN = alpha = -2.644e8 and -2.164e9 m/F; beta = -3.155e9 m5/(F C2); gamma = 2.788e9 m7/(F C4)
    Determined from experimental spontaneous polarization and dielectric permittivity of the two compounds, assuming common beta and gamma for both (Appendix C, Eq. C.2). These parameters set the shape and depth of the double-well potentials used in all bilayer hysteresis calculations.
  • LGD coefficients for Zn0.66Mg0.34O, ZnO, and MgO = alpha = 2.854e8, -7.152e9, 1.659e10; beta = -3.007e9, 8.829e9, 0; gamma = 2.0e9, 0, 0 (units m/F, m5/(F C2), m7/(F C4))
    Fitted to experimental hysteresis loops of ZnMgO near zero field (Appendix D), with an assumption gamma = 0 for ZnO. The unusual positive alpha and negative beta for ZMO produce the predicted double hysteresis loops.
  • Charged-defect parameters n_d, q_d, l_d = n_d ~ 7.8e25 m^-3 in AlScN, 8.2e25 m^-3 in AlN; q_d ~ 2.3 e0; l_d ~ 1.5 nm
    Explicitly treated as fitting parameters in Section 4 to reduce the bilayer coercive field to experimentally observed values and to set the critical AlN thickness. The paper states these are 'convenient fitting parameters for modeling a charged defect'.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Landau-Ginzburg-Devonshire mean-field free energy expansion with polarization as order parameter
    The entire model is built on the LGD expansion in Eq. (1), assumed valid for the wurtzite ferroelectric layers at a fixed working temperature.
  • domain assumption Single-domain polarization, homogeneous in each layer, and natural boundary conditions dP/dz = 0 at interfaces for the analytical solutions
    Used to derive the renormalized coefficients and the equal-coercive-field result (Appendix A). The paper acknowledges this is invalid when domain kinetics is considered and introduces FEM only with explicit charge defects.
  • domain assumption Perfect electrodes with no dielectric dead layers and uniform background permittivity across all layers
    The paper assumes electrically perfect electrodes and uniform epsilon_b for the analytical field expression Eq. (5), simplifying the depolarization field to a function of average displacement.
  • domain assumption Neglect of electrostriction and elastic effects in the single-domain theory
    The authors state elastic stresses and strains have no significant impact in single-domain multilayers on elastically matched substrates, deferring the important kinetic effects to future work.
  • standard math Small-parameter approximation |alpha_i|/N_i << 1 used to truncate the coupled polynomial equations
    The derivation of Eqs. (6) and (A.8) is a perturbation expansion in |alpha_i|/N_i; the authors note the expressions become invalid when N_i tends to zero, i.e. for extremely unequal layer thicknesses.
  • ad hoc to paper Identical beta and gamma for AlScN and AlN in the parameter-solving procedure
    To close the linear system (C.2) for four unknown coefficients, the authors assume the higher-order LGD coefficients are independent of Sc content. This is a modeling assumption, not directly measured.
  • ad hoc to paper gamma = 0 for ZnO and fitting of ZnMgO only near zero field
    The system (D.4) has two equations for three unknown coefficients; the authors assume gamma = 0 for ZnO and fit ZMO using only near-zero-field points because single-domain LGD overestimates the coercive field.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Thermodynamic Theory of Proximity Ferroelectricity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/QM6ZKV3Z

@misc{pith2026250105219,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Thermodynamic Theory of Proximity Ferroelectricity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/QM6ZKV3Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.05219}
}
read the original abstract

Proximity ferroelectricity has recently been reported as a new design paradigm for inducing ferroelectricity, where a non-ferroelectric polar material becomes a ferroelectric by interfacing with a thin ferroelectric layer. Strongly polar materials, such as AlN and ZnO, which were previously unswitchable with an external field below their dielectric breakdown fields, can now be switched with practical coercive fields when they are in intimate proximity to a switchable ferroelectric. Here, we develop a general Landau-Ginzburg theory of proximity ferroelectricity in multilayers of non-ferroelectrics and ferroelectrics to analyze their switchability and coercive fields. The theory predicts regimes of both "proximity switching" where the multilayers collectively switch, as well as "proximity suppression" where they collectively do not switch. The mechanism of the proximity ferroelectricity is an internal electric field determined by the polarization of the layers and their relative thickness in a self-consistent manner that renormalizes the double-well ferroelectric potential to lower the steepness of the switching barrier. Further reduction in the coercive field emerges from charged defects in the bulk that act as nucleation centers. The application of the theory to proximity ferroelectricity in Alx-1ScxN/AlN and Zn1-xMgxO/ZnO bilayers is demonstrated. The theory further predicts that multilayers of dielectric/ferroelectric and paraelectric/ferroelectric layers can potentially result in induced ferroelectricity in the dielectric or paraelectric layers, resulting in the entire stack being switched, an exciting avenue for new discoveries. This thawing of "frozen ferroelectrics", paraelectrics and potentially dielectrics, promises a large class of new ferroelectrics with exciting prospects for previously unrealizable domain-patterned optoelectronic and memory technologies.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    C. H. Skidmore, R. J. Spurling, J. Hayden, S. M. Baksa, D. Behrendt, D. Goodling, J. L. Nordlander, A. Suceava, J. Casamento, B. Akkopru-Akgun, S. Calderon, I. Dabo, V . Gopalan, K. P. Kelley, A. M. Rappe, S. Trolier-McKinstry, E. C. Dickey & J.-P. Maria. Proximity ferroelectricity in wurtzite heterostructures, Nature, (2025), https://doi.org/10.1038/s415...

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08295-y 2025

  2. [1]

    Mikolajick, S

    T. Mikolajick, S. Slesazeck, H. Mulaosmanovic, M. H. Park, S. Fichtner, P. D. Lomenzo, M. Hoffmann, U. Schroeder. Next generation ferroelectric materials for semiconductor process integration and their applications, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 100901 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0037617

    doi:10.1063/5.0037617 2021

  3. [2]

    K.-H. Kim, I. Karpov, R. H. Olsson III, D. Jariwala. Wurtzite and fluorite ferroelectric materials for electronic memory, Nature Nanotechnology 18, 422 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-023-01361-y

    doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01361-y 2023

  4. [3]

    K. P. Kelley, A. N. Morozovska, E. A. Eliseev, Y. Liu, S. S. Fields, S. T. Jaszewski, T. Mimura, J. F. Ihlefeld, S. V. Kalinin. Ferroelectricity in Hafnia Controlled via Surface Electrochemical State. Nature Materials 22, 1144 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-023-01619-9

    doi:10.1038/s41563-023-01619-9 2023

  5. [4]

    Wolff, N., Schönweger, G., Streicher, I., Islam, M.R., Braun, N., Straňák, P ., Kirste, L., Prescher, M., Lotnyk, A., Kohlstedt, H. and Leone, S., Demonstration and STEM Analysis of Ferroelectric Switching in x=0.37 (b) Electric field (MV/cm) Polarization |𝑃| (C/m2) x=0.34 (a) Electric field (MV/cm) Polarization |𝑃| (C/m2) P>0 P<0 P>0 P<0 40 MOCVD‐Grown S...

    doi:10.1002/apxr.202300113 2024

  6. [6]

    M. H. Park, C.‐C. Chung, T. Schenk, C. Richter, K. Opsomer, C. Detavernier, C. Adelmann, J.L. Jones, T. Mikolajick, U. Schroeder. Effect of Annealing Ferroelectric HfO2 Thin Films: In Situ, High Temperature X‐Ray Diffraction. Advanced Electronic Materials 4, 1800091 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1002/aelm.201800091

    doi:10.1002/aelm.201800091 2018

  7. [7]

    J. Yang, A. V . Ievlev, A. N. Morozovska, E. Eliseev, J. D Poplawsky, D. Goodling, R. J. Spurling, J.-P. Maria, S. V . Kalinin, Y . Liu. Coexistence and interplay of two ferroelectric mechanisms in Zn1-xMgxO. Advanced Materials 36(39), 2404925 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202404925

    doi:10.1002/adma.202404925 2024

  8. [8]

    Gopalan, V

    V . Gopalan, V . Dierolf, and D. A. Scrymgeour. Defect–domain wall interactions in trigonal ferroelectrics. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 37, 449 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.matsci.37.052506.084247

    arXiv 2007

Show all 42 references
  1. [9]

    T. J. Yang, Venkatraman Gopalan, P. J. Swart, and U. Mohideen. Direct observation of pinning and bowing of a single ferroelectric domain wall. Physical Rev. Lett. 82, 4106 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.82.4106

    1999 doi

  2. [10]

    Chen, J.M

    Lu, H., Tan, Y ., McConville, J.P., Ahmadi, Z., Wang, B., Conroy, M., Moore, K., Bangert, U., Shield, J.E., L.Q. Chen, J.M. Gregg, and A. Gruverman. Electrical tunability of domain wall conductivity in LiNbO3 thin films. Advanced Materials, 31(48), 1902890 (2019), https://doi....

    2019 doi

  3. [11]

    V . R. Aravind, A.N. Morozovska, S. Bhattacharyya, D. Lee, S. Jesse, I. Grinberg, Y .L. Li, S. Choudhury, P. Wu, K. Seal, A.M. Rappe, S.V . Svechnikov, E.A. Eliseev, S.R. Phillpot, L.Q. Chen, Venkatraman Gopalan, S.V . Kalinin. Correlated polarization switching in the proximit...

    2010 doi

  4. [12]

    Gopalan, and T

    V . Gopalan, and T. E. Mitchell. In situ video observation of 180 domain switching in LiTaO3 by electro-optic imaging microscopy. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 2304 (1999), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.369542

    1999 doi

  5. [15]

    A. K. Tagantsev and G. Gerra. Interface-induced phenomena in polarization response of ferroelectric thin filmsJ. Appl. Phys. 100, 051607 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2337009 41

    2006 doi

  6. [16]

    C. H. Woo and Yue Zheng, Depolarization in modeling nano-scale ferroelectrics using the Landau free energy functional, Appl. Phys. A: Mater. Sci. Process. 91, 59 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1007/s00339-007- 4355-4

    2008 doi

  7. [17]

    Eriksson, K.; Estep, D.; Johnson, C. (2004). Applied mathematics, body and soul. Berlin; New York: Springer. ISBN 3-540-00889-6

    2004

  8. [18]

    Short-range and long-range contributions to the size effect in metal-ferroelectric-metal heterostructures

    A.K. Tagantsev, G. Gerra, and N. Setter. "Short-range and long-range contributions to the size effect in metal-ferroelectric-metal heterostructures." Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 77, 174111 (2008), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.174111

    2008 doi

  9. [19]

    C.-L. Jia, V . Nagarajan, J.-Q. He, L. Houben, T. Zhao, R. Ramesh, K. Urban & R. Waser, Unit-cell scale mapping of ferroelectricity and tetragonality in epitaxial ultrathin ferroelectric films. Nature Materials 6, 64 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat1808

    2007 doi

  10. [20]

    Eliseev, M.D

    E.A. Eliseev, M.D. Glinchuk, A.N. Morozovska, Ya. V . Yakovenko. Polar properties and hysteresis loops of thin films multilayers ferroelectric BaTiO3/paraelectric SrTiO3. Ukrainian Journal of Physics. 57, 1038-1049 (2012), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1406.7548

    2012 doi arXiv

  11. [21]

    Kretschmer and K

    R. Kretschmer and K. Binder, Surface effects on phase transition in ferroelectrics and dipolar magnets. Phys. Rev. B. 20, 1065 (1979), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.20.1065

    1979 doi

  12. [22]

    Cao and L.E

    W. Cao and L.E. Cross, Theory of tetragonal twin structures in ferroelectric perovskites with a first- order phase transition, Phys. Rev. B 44, 5 (1991); https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.5

    1991 doi

  13. [23]

    Kavle, A

    P. Kavle, A. M. Ross, J. A. Zorn, P. Behera, E. Parsonnet, X. Huang, C.‐C. Lin, L. Caretta, L.‐Q. Chen, and L. W. Martin. Exchange‐Interaction‐Like Behavior in Ferroelectric Bilayers. Advanced Materials 35, 2301934 (2023), https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202301934

    2023 doi

  14. [24]

    Y. He, D. C. Moore, Y. Wang, S. Ware, S. Ma, D. K. Pradhan, Z. Hu et al. Al0.68Sc0.32N/SiC based metal-ferroelectric-semiconductor capacitors operating up to 900oC. arXiv preprint, arXiv:2411.16652 (2024), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2411.16652

    2024 doi arXiv

  15. [25]

    G. A. Samara and P. S. Peercy. Pressure and Temperature Dependence of the Static Dielectric Constants and Raman Spectra of TiO2 (Rutile). Physical Review B 7, 1131 (1973), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.7.1131

    1973 doi

  16. [26]

    Grünebohm, P

    A. Grünebohm, P. Entel, and C. Ederer, First-principles investigation of incipient ferroelectric trends of rutile TiO2 in bulk and at the (110) surface. Phys. Rev. B 87, 054110 (2023), https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.054110

    2023 doi

  17. [27]

    Supplementary Materials to this work [URL will be added by Publisher]

  18. [31]

    Y. Gu, A. C. Meng, A. Ross, and L.-Q. Chen. A phenomenological thermodynamic energy density function for ferroelectric wurtzite Al1− xScxN single crystals, J. Appl. Phys. 135, 094102 (2024), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0190677

    2024 doi

  19. [33]

    Jesse, B.J

    S. Jesse, B.J. Rodriguez, S. Choudhury, A.P. Baddorf, I. Vrejoiu, D. Hesse, M. Alexe, E.A. Eliseev, A.N. Morozovska, J. Zhang, L.-Q. Chen, S.V . Kalinin. Direct imaging of the spatial and energy distribution of nucleation centres in ferroelectric materials. Nature Materials, 7...

    2008 doi

  20. [34]

    Maksymovych, S

    P. Maksymovych, S. Jesse, M. Huijben, R. Ramesh, A.N. Morozovska, S. Choudhury, L.-Q. Chen, A.P. Baddorf, S.V . Kalinin. Intrinsic nucleation mechanism and disorder effects in polarization switching on ferroelectric surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 017601 (2009), https://doi.or...

    2009 doi

  21. [35]

    N. Li, R. Zhu, X. Cheng, H.-J. Liu, Z. Zhang, Y .-L. Huang, Y .-H. Chu, L.-Q. Chen, Y . Ikuhara, and P. Gao. Dislocation-induced large local polarization inhomogeneity of ferroelectric materials. Scripta Materialia 194,113624 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.11.009

    2021 doi

  22. [36]

    Wolff, G

    N. Wolff, G. Schönweger, R. Md Islam, Z. Ding, C. Kübel, S. Fichtner, and L. Kienle. Interfacial polarization switching in Al0.92Sc0.08N/GaN heterostructures grown by sputter epitaxy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.09090 (2025), https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.09090

    2025 doi arXiv

  23. [37]

    Kitamura, Y

    K. Kitamura, Y . Furukawa, K. Niwa, V . Gopalan, and T. E. Mitchell. Crystal growth and low coercive field 180 domain switching characteristics of stoichiometric LiTaO3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 3073 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.122676

    1998 doi

  24. [38]

    Gopalan, T

    V . Gopalan, T. E. Mitchell, Y . Furukawa, and K. Kitamura. The role of nonstoichiometry in 180 domain switching of LiNbO3 crystals. Appl. Phys. Lett. 72, 1981 (1998), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.121491

    1998 doi

  25. [42]

    https://www.wolfram.com/mathematica, see https://notebookarchive.org/2025-01-de3c6bf

    2025

  26. [43]

    Fichtner, N

    S. Fichtner, N. Wolff, F. Lofink, L. Kienle, and B. Wagner. AlScN: A III-V semiconductor based ferroelectric, J. Appl. Phys. 125, 114103 (2019), https://doi.org//10.1063/1.5084945

    2019 doi

  27. [44]

    W. Zhu, J. Hayden, F. He, J.I. Yang, P. Tipsawat, M.D. Hossain, J.P. Maria, and S. Trolier-McKinstry. Strongly temperature dependent ferroelectric switching in AlN, Al1-xScxN, and Al1-xBxN thin films, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119, 062901 (2021), https://doi.org//10.1063/5.0057869

    2021 doi

  28. [45]

    Fichtner, N

    S. Fichtner, N. Wolff, G. Krishnamurthy, A. Petraru, S. Bohse, F. Lofink, S. C., H. Kohlstedt, L. Kienle, and B. Wagner. Identifying and overcoming the interface originating c-axis instability in highly Sc enhanced AlN for piezoelectric micro-electromechanical systems. J. of A...

    2017 doi

  29. [46]

    Watanabe, T

    N. Watanabe, T. Kimoto, and J. Suda. The temperature dependence of the refractive indices of GaN and AlN from room temperature up to 515°C. J. Appl. Phys. 104, 106101 (2008), https://doi.org//10.1063/1.3021148

    2008 doi

  30. [47]

    Dielectric functions (1 to 5 eV) of wurtzite MgxZn1−xO (x⩽ 0.29) thin films

    R. Schmidt, B. Rheinländer, M. Schubert, D. Spemann, T. Butz, J. Lenzner, E. M. Kaidashev, M. Lorenz, A. Rahm, H. C. Semmelhack, and M. Grundmann. "Dielectric functions (1 to 5 eV) of wurtzite MgxZn1−xO (x⩽ 0.29) thin films." Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 2260 (2003), https://doi.org/...

    2003 doi

  31. [48]

    Arguello, D.L

    C.A. Arguello, D.L. Rousseau, and S.D.S. Porto. First-order Raman effect in wurtzite-type crystals. Physical Review, 181, 1351 (1969), https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.181.1351

    1969 doi

  32. [49]

    Ferri, S

    K. Ferri, S. Bachu, W. Zhu, M. Imperatore, J. Hayden, N. Alem, N. Giebink, S. Trolier-McKinstry, and J.-P. Maria, Ferroelectrics everywhere: Ferroelectricity in magnesium substituted zinc oxide thin films. J. Appl. Phys. 130, 044101 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0053755

    2021 doi

  33. [50]

    Moriwake, A

    H. Moriwake, A. Konishi, T. Ogawa, K. Fujimura, C.A.J. Fisher, A. Kuwabara, T. Shimizu, S. Yasui, and M. Itoh, Ferroelectricity in wurtzite structure simple chalcogenide Applied Physics Letters 104, 242909 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4884596

    2014 doi

  34. [51]

    A. M. Hofmeister, E. Keppel and A. K. Speck. Absorption and reflection infrared spectra of MgO and other diatomic compounds. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 345, 16 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365- 8711.2003.06899.x

    2003

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.